NOTE: The title of this post is sarcastic. If you found this post through a Google search because you’re actually looking for tips on how to exploit desperate young women, you’re a piece of shit, and this post is not for you. Go away, and go fuck yourself.
Fellas! Want sex, but don’t have the money to shell out on prostitutes? Hate the time and effort it takes to talk a non-professional sex-having women into having sex with you? A recent post by Advocatus Diaboli on the always delightful In Mala Fide offered an elegant solution for horny but frugal men. In a post titled Pooning on a Tight Budget, AD explained the technique that has worked for him:
Getting poor, but good-looking, young girls (18-23) to have sex with [you] in return for some timely financial help.
Turns out that women who are poor and desperate can be exploited for your own sexy purposes!
Of course, it’s not always quite as easy as it might seem.
I should be upfront that getting amateur women to have sex for money can be tricky as most of them believe that they are not whores. Moreover, poor young women often have “boyfriends” and white knight orbiters. So I created a set of filters and rules to screen out the most problematic types.
According to AD, all you have to do is to:
Avoid all girls who have obvious and serious drug and mental health issues or have lived on the street for over 6 weeks at a stretch.
Happily for you, that still leaves lots of girls ripe for the picking! AD suggests you focus your attention on:
Freshly homeless young girls, especially those who hangout in mixed groups.
The safest ones are those who are into pot, drumming, dreadlocks et cetera. You can find them in many larger cities in the spring and summer. While I would never trust them with any significant amount of money, many are reasonably decent human beings.
You might not think you’d have much in common to talk about with these women – what with them being “reasonably decent human beings” and you being a “completely reprehensible pile of shit” – but you’d be surprised.
Strike up a conversation with them, engage them and see where it leads. But you must make it plainly obvious that you are interested in them sexually, but that all favors require reciprocation. Once you get to know them, a decent round of drinks, snacks, money for pot, a small necessary item of clothing, decent dinner with booze will almost guarantee you a good lay (or at least a couple of BJs).
And if you crunch the numbers you’ll see it’s really quite a frugal solution.
Your initial financial hit for hanging out with them is very small, and once they are sleeping with you.. it will often work to about $30-60 (cash equivalent or cash) per session. You may also get freebies..
But girls don’t necessarily have to be literally homeless to be desperate enough to sleep with you for money. Nope! You may also find great cost-savings from targeting:
Girls who are not homeless, but are just hanging on.
How do you find these lovely ladies? Keep an eye out for women working really shitty jobs that don’t pay shit! You’ll find them conveniently located
in smaller retail stores or businesses that pay minimum wage with no tips. Build a rapport and be fairly upfront about your interest, but do not come across as desperate. Go to her workplace and talk to her when you are in that area, but do not stalk her.
Yep, it turns out that even desperate women can be creeped out. So play it cool! Stalking’s for fools!
There’s another possible hurdle: other dudes.
Such women often have “boyfriends,” however, they are often just as poor or poorer than her. You can get pussy as long as you are firm about the need for reciprocation. This category of girls might be more willing to give BJs than having ‘real sex.’ But do you really care?
Just remember to keep to your budget!
Restrict your help to less than $200 at any one time AND only after she has put out a couple of times.
And then there’s AD’s favorite category of desperate women:
Girls who are poor, but not homeless and have no “boyfriends” + have moved to the city within the last eight weeks.
You have hit the jackpot!
Just don’t get carried away. Remember: you’re in charge, and she should know it!
Remember these girls can become de facto GFs, but do not restrict yourself to one. While you do not have to rub it in their faces, they should know that you are always looking around for a better deal. But treat them a bit better than type 1 and 2, they do give more per dollar spent on them.
Your accountant will be so, so proud of you!
Just remember:
They will play by your rules as long as they are not too dehumanizing, and they are often cheaper than professional whores.
Now that’s a motto to live by!
Amazingly, not all of the readers of In Mala Fide appreciated AD’s little treatise.
Simon invoked the c-word, before tossing in some racism:
Mate you are one deadset sad cunt. It’s no surprise to know you’re Indian.
Cathater broke out the other c-word:
Pretty damn creepy. You sound like you have no soul. Actually, you might be the first member of a new species: the perfectly rational, purely selfish utility-maximizing agent (Homo Economicus) that Austrian economists and Randroids have always droned on and on about.
Yes, I was as surprised as you are to read an actually reasonable critique of the post on In Mala Fide.
Don’t worry, though, the rest of the comments mostly lived up to the foul standards of the blog.
Ryu worried about the old slippery slope. If you start by suggesting that PUAs target homeless women, the next thing you know they’ll advocate sex with children! And then down the slippery slope you’ll slide:
This is the direction that PU takes one in. I’m surprised that there haven’t been any PUAs who say that during a dry spell we should go to gay bars and pick up men. Just to keep your dick wet, you know.
Savrola returned to the theme of race:
There’s a problem WNs have yet to deal with. Well off second-generation foreigners like AD taking advantage of your impoverished women of older native stock, after they’ve taken your jobs.
Can’t keep ‘em here, can’t send ‘em back.
What to do?
Blog proprietor Ferdinand Bardamu waded in to take a shot at all the “white knights” sticking up for the gals.
ROFLMAO at all these white knights. …
If you want to blame someone, blame the morally debased white women who would rather blow a stranger for $200 then work honestly (pull yourself up by your bootstraps, slob! nobody owes you anything!).
We’re living in Soviet Amerika (and Soviet Kanada). All of your daughters are whores or will become whores, soon as the price tag gets high enough.
Meanwhile, Stoner With a Boner, who sometimes graces the comments section here with his always trenchant wisdom, took a stand on behalf of the real victims here: dudes paying their own hard-earned money to icky ladies for sex.
Personally, I find the idea of clocking more hours at a job I hate just to hand $200 to a prostitute who would probably leave me dying in the street rather than help degrading.
Men, the forgotten victims once again.
This post contains:
It’s funny that NWO’s new shtick is along the lines of: “HOW DARE YOU SPEAK TO ME OUT OF TURN, PEON! I was having a perfectly civil conversation until YOU barged in uninvited!”
It’s as if he’s never been in one of these internet blog discussion thingies before.
I fail to see how this is much different from stuff you normally say on this site.
@hellkell
You belong to a hate movement. How “good” can you be?
@Tatjna
There were no sublte attempts at anything. You prattle on as if you’re wise and intelligent. You revel in ridiculing and hating men. And you’re so horrified at any mans mere disagreement it sends you into a rage. Zip up your pants princess your privilege is showing.
NWO, if you can’t even use basic logic while talking about whether you’re intelligent… yeah.
We think you’re stupid because you act stupid and say stupid things. And I’m not even talking about “you hate women, and that’s stupid,” although it certainly is. You also can’t puzzle out complex logic problems like “tall people are tall.”
Now don’t quote me if I’m wrong here but don’t these mra dudes bitch and moan that women hold the cards in procreation, namely it’s the women who get to decide if a man gets access to spread his genes (among a big long list of things the mra dudes complain women are advantaged). But let me ask you this. If women really were in control over reproduction don’t you think you would see more men being forced to give up their fertilizing sperm and pay child support to the woman who wants nothing to do with the man? If women were really in all that amount of control, I guarantee you my friend that you would see some women exercising this sort of control every chance they can get. Plenty of women would love a child but not have to put up with the man. And number 2. IT IS THE MAN who controls reproduction because of this: women can’t have a baby without a man’s sperm fertilizer. If the man says NO, guess what? The woman can’t have a baby. Far as I see it, the mra dudes got it all wrong. Reality is THEY control reproduction when it’s the woman who is the one wanting to procreate.
Now this got me thinking about mra dudes ranting and raving against a woman’s right to do what she wants with her body, ie., get an abortion. If you want to force a woman to not abort her baby, it’s the same kind of intrusion as forcing a man to give sperm against his will and pay child support. I’d like to ask the mra dudes how they would feel if government impeded their control into his life and passed statutes that mandated he make a baby and pay child support. Far as I’m concerned, outlawing abortion is the same kind of absurdity , just in reverse.
This is not the genius think-tank you believe.
Again, I would refer you to the above-mentioned quote regarding “irony.”
Well, NWO knows hatred and insults better than anyone else, seeing as how that’s all he uses.
Does that make him a) a woman, b) a feminist, c) intuitive, or d) an asshole?
To be honest, NWO, I wish it was possible to lucidly talk about philosophy of knowledge with you, because you have such a… unique theory of epistemology.
I wish we could get you off the subject of “GRRR WOMEN” long enough to share our ideas on what it means to learn a thing, how you judge the validity of a new piece of knowledge into your worldview, and how you employ existing and new knowledge in debate. I bet you’d be fascinating.
No NWO, I revel in ridiculing YOU. I quite like men as a rule (yes even ones that disagree with me), but your statements are , well.. ridiculous. And the more we ridicule you for it, the more ridiculous your statements become. it’s like a singularity of ridiculousness!
PS You are right, there were no *subtle* attempts at anything. Nope. Not subtle at all.
@Holly Pervocracy
“NWO, if you can’t even use basic logic while talking about whether you’re intelligent… yeah.”
“We think you’re stupid because you act stupid and say stupid things. And I’m not even talking about “you hate women, and that’s stupid,” although it certainly is. You also can’t puzzle out complex logic problems like “tall people are tall.”
You’ve never seen me in real life. How con you possibly know how I act? Nice try with the woman hatred crap. You belong to a hate movement that’s a century old. You just can’t admit that women have flaw inherent to women.
I worked out the complex puzzle. Why when I threw it back didn’t it work? Perhaps the analogy had no relevance.
Oooh, ooh! And after I talked epistemology with NWO, we’d share our respective philosophies of good and evil!
Only awesome could come from that theoretical discussion he will never have because he prefers to grunt “yeah, I know what evil is, evil is the Title IX supersoldiers with orders to hold secret puppet trials for any man caught feeling attraction to women!”
We know how you type. And how you type is hilarious and by now you should know why.
If you’re trying to prove that you’re not stupid, and you’re trying to prove that in the medium of a written discussion, you should probably take the effort to proofread your posts.
@Holly Pervocracy
You belong to a hate movement. The smartest thing I can do is hate everything about feminism.
@Holly Pervocracy
Ridiclue and hatred, is that all you can provide as proof of your intelligence?
The smartest thing you can do is hate something and whine about it on the Internet instead of making efforts to help the people you feel are oppressed?
Goddamn, you are stupid. Enjoy wasting your life.
If a man don’t want to pay child support he is stupid not to get it snipped or just a fool for having sex despite the risk of potentially fertilizing the egg. Sometimes men can be such tools. Reality is most real men……..(excluding the trolls who have no lives other than cry and moan about their bad luck with women and how women are evil yet they are totally consumed by women, obsessed with women, controlled by women, ruled by women. As much as they cry sore grapes at not having the world revolve around them and the whining and bitching that they have to share the spotlight with women and endure some real competition in education and corporate ladders, I think deep down they are scared to share the control, scared of competition and they are hungry for a woman to tell them it’s going to be alright and to love them. They are crying loud and hard and they want to be held and cuddled by a woman.) ……..out in the real world have a good time with women. It’s a dang shame these mra dudes are incapable of finding happiness like the rest of us men. Too bad these mra dudes can’t find peace like the rest of us men. Too bad they let women control their peace of minds day in and day out.
No, the smartest thing you could do would be to understand lucidly which parts of feminism are hateful and why, and to attack those parts in reasonable proportion to their hatefulness.
@Holly Pervocracy
Do you have the right of property, freedom, life and vote?
Everything else is either privilege which is hate, and hate itself.
What do I have that you don’t?
Oh shit, I have to prove my intelligence?
I’m so smart, I know we weren’t talking about this originally!
I’m so smart, I remember when someone is less than 24 hours after claiming I deserved to be sexually exploited!
I’m so smart, I even remember when that same person was calling for women to be beaten in the street as a result of their exercising free speech in a way you didn’t approve of!
I’m so smart I don’t think the above were smart things for you to say and then try to pretend you didn’t say.
A personality disorder.
@Lauralot,
I’m reminded of that old George Carlin routine: “asshole, jack-off, or scumbag?”
@NWOslave
I’ll bite. What flaws are ‘inherent to women’?
I don’t see “right to beat people who disagree with you” under there. Is that an extra right or does it fall under “freedom”?
Because if it falls under “freedom” then people have the right to beat you instead and I’m pretty sure you don’t want that one so badly.