NOTE: The title of this post is sarcastic. If you found this post through a Google search because you’re actually looking for tips on how to exploit desperate young women, you’re a piece of shit, and this post is not for you. Go away, and go fuck yourself.
Fellas! Want sex, but don’t have the money to shell out on prostitutes? Hate the time and effort it takes to talk a non-professional sex-having women into having sex with you? A recent post by Advocatus Diaboli on the always delightful In Mala Fide offered an elegant solution for horny but frugal men. In a post titled Pooning on a Tight Budget, AD explained the technique that has worked for him:
Getting poor, but good-looking, young girls (18-23) to have sex with [you] in return for some timely financial help.
Turns out that women who are poor and desperate can be exploited for your own sexy purposes!
Of course, it’s not always quite as easy as it might seem.
I should be upfront that getting amateur women to have sex for money can be tricky as most of them believe that they are not whores. Moreover, poor young women often have “boyfriends” and white knight orbiters. So I created a set of filters and rules to screen out the most problematic types.
According to AD, all you have to do is to:
Avoid all girls who have obvious and serious drug and mental health issues or have lived on the street for over 6 weeks at a stretch.
Happily for you, that still leaves lots of girls ripe for the picking! AD suggests you focus your attention on:
Freshly homeless young girls, especially those who hangout in mixed groups.
The safest ones are those who are into pot, drumming, dreadlocks et cetera. You can find them in many larger cities in the spring and summer. While I would never trust them with any significant amount of money, many are reasonably decent human beings.
You might not think you’d have much in common to talk about with these women – what with them being “reasonably decent human beings” and you being a “completely reprehensible pile of shit” – but you’d be surprised.
Strike up a conversation with them, engage them and see where it leads. But you must make it plainly obvious that you are interested in them sexually, but that all favors require reciprocation. Once you get to know them, a decent round of drinks, snacks, money for pot, a small necessary item of clothing, decent dinner with booze will almost guarantee you a good lay (or at least a couple of BJs).
And if you crunch the numbers you’ll see it’s really quite a frugal solution.
Your initial financial hit for hanging out with them is very small, and once they are sleeping with you.. it will often work to about $30-60 (cash equivalent or cash) per session. You may also get freebies..
But girls don’t necessarily have to be literally homeless to be desperate enough to sleep with you for money. Nope! You may also find great cost-savings from targeting:
Girls who are not homeless, but are just hanging on.
How do you find these lovely ladies? Keep an eye out for women working really shitty jobs that don’t pay shit! You’ll find them conveniently located
in smaller retail stores or businesses that pay minimum wage with no tips. Build a rapport and be fairly upfront about your interest, but do not come across as desperate. Go to her workplace and talk to her when you are in that area, but do not stalk her.
Yep, it turns out that even desperate women can be creeped out. So play it cool! Stalking’s for fools!
There’s another possible hurdle: other dudes.
Such women often have “boyfriends,” however, they are often just as poor or poorer than her. You can get pussy as long as you are firm about the need for reciprocation. This category of girls might be more willing to give BJs than having ‘real sex.’ But do you really care?
Just remember to keep to your budget!
Restrict your help to less than $200 at any one time AND only after she has put out a couple of times.
And then there’s AD’s favorite category of desperate women:
Girls who are poor, but not homeless and have no “boyfriends” + have moved to the city within the last eight weeks.
You have hit the jackpot!
Just don’t get carried away. Remember: you’re in charge, and she should know it!
Remember these girls can become de facto GFs, but do not restrict yourself to one. While you do not have to rub it in their faces, they should know that you are always looking around for a better deal. But treat them a bit better than type 1 and 2, they do give more per dollar spent on them.
Your accountant will be so, so proud of you!
Just remember:
They will play by your rules as long as they are not too dehumanizing, and they are often cheaper than professional whores.
Now that’s a motto to live by!
Amazingly, not all of the readers of In Mala Fide appreciated AD’s little treatise.
Simon invoked the c-word, before tossing in some racism:
Mate you are one deadset sad cunt. It’s no surprise to know you’re Indian.
Cathater broke out the other c-word:
Pretty damn creepy. You sound like you have no soul. Actually, you might be the first member of a new species: the perfectly rational, purely selfish utility-maximizing agent (Homo Economicus) that Austrian economists and Randroids have always droned on and on about.
Yes, I was as surprised as you are to read an actually reasonable critique of the post on In Mala Fide.
Don’t worry, though, the rest of the comments mostly lived up to the foul standards of the blog.
Ryu worried about the old slippery slope. If you start by suggesting that PUAs target homeless women, the next thing you know they’ll advocate sex with children! And then down the slippery slope you’ll slide:
This is the direction that PU takes one in. I’m surprised that there haven’t been any PUAs who say that during a dry spell we should go to gay bars and pick up men. Just to keep your dick wet, you know.
Savrola returned to the theme of race:
There’s a problem WNs have yet to deal with. Well off second-generation foreigners like AD taking advantage of your impoverished women of older native stock, after they’ve taken your jobs.
Can’t keep ‘em here, can’t send ‘em back.
What to do?
Blog proprietor Ferdinand Bardamu waded in to take a shot at all the “white knights” sticking up for the gals.
ROFLMAO at all these white knights. …
If you want to blame someone, blame the morally debased white women who would rather blow a stranger for $200 then work honestly (pull yourself up by your bootstraps, slob! nobody owes you anything!).
We’re living in Soviet Amerika (and Soviet Kanada). All of your daughters are whores or will become whores, soon as the price tag gets high enough.
Meanwhile, Stoner With a Boner, who sometimes graces the comments section here with his always trenchant wisdom, took a stand on behalf of the real victims here: dudes paying their own hard-earned money to icky ladies for sex.
Personally, I find the idea of clocking more hours at a job I hate just to hand $200 to a prostitute who would probably leave me dying in the street rather than help degrading.
Men, the forgotten victims once again.
This post contains:
Oh, honey, We’re all better than you. Low bar and all.
Nobody like Thomas Hobbes(except for me and a few outliers of course :-P). Nietzsche on teh other hand, is the darling philosophe of countless hipsters and pretentious pseduo-intellectuals the world over. I’m sure some MRA made reference to him somewhere….
Yeah, agreeing with Hellkell on that one. We also probably all have a better understanding of logical fallacies.
@katz
“Yeah, agreeing with Hellkell on that one. We also probably all have a better understanding of logical fallacies.”
Is that because you’re feminists, women, have intuition, or all three?
holy fucking lol. if you aren’t actually a teenager then you seriously need to rethink the way you express yourself.
*patpat* Go back to your inventions, NWO, this discussion is clearly way over your head.
@Tatjna
And by what measuring stick have you used proving your superior intellect? Would that be because you’re a feminist, woman, have intuition, or all three?
it’s brandon. do you not read brandon’s posts? dude is awful on so many levels. seriously, owlslave, like can we at least agree on the fact that brandon totally sucks?
@NWO You don’t get it do you? You’re the only one who thinks anyone’s applying your misguided yardstick to measuring intellect or ability to argue. The rest of us use demonstrated ability in real discussion as a measure and don’t assume that someone’s gender or political leanings have any bearing – but hey, you’ve never been very good at that, have you?
Your schtick seems to be thinking that if you repeat something often enough it’ll become true, and then getting all pissy when nobody buys it. Hence, this discussion is over your head and you just proved it by repeating your blatant and fallacious attempt at undermining the discussion yet again. Run along now.
@NWO
“And by what measuring stick have you used proving your superior intellect? Would that be because you’re a feminist, woman, have intuition, or all three?”
It has a lot to do with having critical thinking skills, the ability to reason, and the capacity for abstract thought; things you’ve clearly proven you lack, judging by your track record here.
(*braces self for the impending crazy*)
Whoops, Tatjna beat me to it.
@Tatjna
My comment was in reply to Katz. Your name was never mentioned. Does your “demonstrated ability in real discussion” include replying to a comment not made to you? You weren’t even invited into the discussion. What makes you believe you opinion is so valuable for it’s intellect? You’re a little girl child of limited intelligence, common sense and have no common decency. Your entire existance revolves around insults and hatred.
You said you’re intelligent? Well since you said so, it’s gospel. Het everyone, Tatjna, a woman has declared her superior intelligence. She’s smarter than me, only because the words fell from her univited yap. She’ll be backed up fully by fellow ideology believers.
Sorry, I was unaware that one needed an invitation.
Can I have a look at yours, just so I know what one looks like?
@Pyena
“(*braces self for the impending crazy*)”
And full proof of being totally backed up by fellow ideology believers who also know only hatred and insults.
Are these the qualification for womens intelligence? Hatred and insults?
NWO, if Yao Ming showed up here, and someone said, “Hi, Yao Ming! We are all shorter than you,” would this statement be based on (a) everyone here being women, (b) everyone here being feminists, (c) everyone here having “intuition,” or (d) Yao Ming being a very tall guy?
If you can figure out the answer to this question, see if you can figure out why your question was stupid!
@Polliwog
And that is your analogy?
If I go over to where this article was posted, and they all say hiring street waifs for sex is a fatanstic idea, and they also say Yao Ming is tall, they’re right on both accounts?
lol, Amnesia, that’s true. Female volunteers probably just want to steal sperm from the male volunteers and trap them into marriage. It’s misandry!
/sarcasm
If I go over to where this article was posted, and they all say hiring street waifs for sex is a fatanstic idea, and they also say Yao Ming is tall, they’re right on both accounts?
Can you please explain how on earth you got from “saying you are better than someone because they are a shitty person is comparable to saying you are shorter than someone because they are a tall person” to “if you say you’re shorter than a tall person, everything else you say is equally true”? Because that’s…a hell of a strange leap, even for you.
@NWO Hahaha and that would be you getting pissy when nobody buys it.
Never mind that you totally missed the point and I wasn’t even referring to myself but to your complete lack of demonstrated ability when compared with that of the others in this discussion (including the non-women and many of the non-feminists). Yes, Nameless Dude, much as I disagree with much of what he says, has far better debate skills than you. Mind you, so does my dog.
You do realise that the only reason anyone pays attention to you at all is the same reason we would pay attention to a toddler that’s about to wipe its snotty nose on your work clothes, right?
@Polliwog
How about if I go over to radfem and they all say kill all men. Or keep 10% around to do the manual labor and a sperm donors. They also say Yao Ming is tall.
Are they intelligent as well? Everywhere I go everyone says they’re intelligent. How about if I keep my own opinion as to who is intelligent and who isn’t.
Just because any of you say something doesn’t make it so. Even is all of you say something, it still doesn’t make it so. This is not the genius think-tank you believe.
I know I have been certified as better than you Brandon. I have documentation and everything.
*is smug*
@NWO,
Are these the qualification for womens intelligence? Hatred and insults?
Please see the Blackadder quote regarding “irony” further upthread.
@Tatjna
“You do realise that the only reason anyone pays attention to you at all is the same reason we would pay attention to a toddler that’s about to wipe its snotty nose on your work clothes, right?”
Over and over again from everyone here. Hatred and insults. That is how you guage intelligence.
————
Here I’ll try.
You stupid fucking slut, you sit around in a bobble-head echo chamber masturbating to the greatness of womanhood.
Am I intelligent now as well?
NWO, why DON’T you go over to radfem? Give them your best material and tell us how it went for ya.
What, are you pissy because i dared to state that I, a mere woman, thinks we’re all (not you) better than B_don?
Tough nuts, babydoll.
The second you demonstrate sound debating skills NWO, they’ll be acknowledged. It’s been spelled out to you often enough what sound debate looks like. While you continue to do nothing but fling unsubstantiated shit in a feeble attempt to insult people into believing you*, all you’re doing is reinforcing everyone’s low opinion of you.
But your tantrums are kind of amusing.
* Yes, we did all see through your oh-so-unsubtle attempt to get us to say “Oh yes we think we’re intelligent purely because we’re women and by the way evo psych is true because we have intuition” so you could go “HA! Fooled you into agreeing with me!”