Gay men, when will you learn that feminists are fickle friends? Christian J. – the blogger behind What Men Are Saying About Women and the inventor of the MRA two-dot ellipses – offers gay men a trenchant warning about the evils of these seemingly friendly “allies.”
Fascinating how gay men are of the opinion that they are seen as humans where feminists are concerned. I am not quite certain how many more times we have to demonstrate that feminists loathe gays, with a passion, the male type ofcourse, not the lesbobo version..
Yes, obviously the lesbobos — much like lesbos, but with twice as much bo — have no problem with male hating. But gay men need to open their eyes to what is really going on.
Feminists have jumped aboard the Gay Rights Movement in order to spread their own male hating message. A message that the Gay Community appears to ignore. When feminists call for the removal of all men, the Gay man is definitely not exempted, I cannot understand how they can be in denial of that fact, that certainty..
Also, that whole “gay marriage” thing you guys are always on about is really kind of pointless, since the evil ladies have already ruined marriage for everyone:
Feminists are only concerned about destroying marriage and families and the Gay community can help there as well by demanding that marriage should be renounced as null and void.
Of course, the lesbobos love feminism, and vice versa. Or at least they profess to:
Feminism and feminists only support lesbianism as most of the radical feminists are lesbians and they possess sufficient toxicity and male hate in order to spread their anti male loathing. They attached themselves to any movement they think they will have some advantage or benefit to spreading their elitist, sexist message..
But gay men?
Ignore these warning at your own peril. Feminists will dump you faster than typhoid when they have achieved their own outcomes. It’s that simple..
FIGHT THE TWIN EVILS OF LESBOBOS AND FEMINISMISM!
TWO DOTS GOOD, THREE DOTS BAD!
IGNORE THESE WARNING AT YOUR OWN PERIL!
@Noadi
Hey now, some of us straight guys like lesbian porn made by lesbians. Stop oppressing me with your minor(mostly true) generalization you big meanie. 😛
Arks:
>> I look at these [slash] stories (…)
>> I think there’s a definite cock quota that porn has to reach
I also read the occasional slash, and I do need a bit of cock in my porn. I’m bisexual. What’s your excuse?
Based on what I’ve been watching recently, I have a repressed desire to quit my job and aimlessly wander the Arctic wastes in pursuit of my dream of becoming a dentist.
Also, Transformers 2 with Rifftrax has certainly lain bare my secret fetish for running through fields of exploding CGI while three men make fun of me.
I can’t believe that we’ve gotten this far into a discussion of men viewing girl-on-girl porn without anyone bringing up “Lesbian Spank Inferno.”
(Please let the embedding work please let the embedding work please let the embedding work…)
Come on now, “Lesbian Spank Inferno” was erotica, not porn (he did explain the plot after all). I love Coupling so much.
Not even going to touch the delusional bit above about feminists wanting to remove all men (clearly as a feminist I only pretend to love my male friends and family members, including my brand new nephew, born this morning!).
Gay Hobbes?
http://worldofwonder.net/2011/03/01/Calvin_Hobbes_today/
except that fetishizing lesbians is a million dollar industry of porn, using real women.
No money is made from slash fanfic, which is based on fictional characters, many of which are drawn or animated. Do you see the difference here?
Should I bother pointing out again that many of them are also animated and drawn? and no one is making money off of their fetishization?
Come see me when real straight men start doing gay porn for a largely female audience, then we’ll talk.
Oh wow! Congratulations to the parents and to your whole family 🙂
There’s that, and there’s also the fact that most feminists think that the abuse heaped on gay people, particularly gay men and men perceived to be gay, is largely rooted in misogyny.
I thought the same thing, kirby. It’s impressive he has the gall to call feminists anti-gay, when he just stated that gay marriage makes straight marriage pretty much worthless.
Same here. It’s not like only straight women read/write/draw slash. There are plenty of queer guys and gals involved, too.
Also seconding everything Quackers said. There are definitely some problematic slashers (just a few days ago, I actually encountered a yaoi fangirl on DA who had some pretty homophobic views – guess non-straight guys are okay as long as they get her off and don’t demand any of these pesky rights that straight people enjoy), but there is a really big difference between fanfic/fanart and actual live action porn. It’s…kinda worrying that this isn’t obvious.
Then there is the whole issue of (mostly straight) guys trying to control women’s sexuality by shaming them for liking guy-on-guy stuff.
Aaaaand another pet peeve of mine:
Yeah, but they aren’t usually canonically straight, either.
If the creator didn’t state that they are an absolute 0 on the Kinsey scale, NO EXCEPTIONS EVER, there is plenty of room for interpretation (pssst, bi- and pansexuality exists!).
Ya know, for many queer people, it’s kind of nice to have interesting and complex characters to relate to, instead of only having the choice of one walking stereotype over another.
Admittedly, it’s getting better, but still, I really hate the “straight until stated otherwise” mindset.
I also don’t like it if a male character who was canonically in love with a female character is depicted as exclusively gay, for that matter, but luckily I didn’t encounter such cases very often.
i only slash major events from american history. nobody does dean acheson/bobby kennedy quite like i do.
@zhinxy: I only did philosophy for a year to get some credits, I’ll admit. So as far as points of reference go, I had to pick between either Hobbes, or the Crown Prince of Manginas himself, Rousseau. Of course I went with who I relate to more.
@zhinxy: I only did philosophy for a year to get some credits, I’ll admit. So as far as points of reference go, I had to pick between either Hobbes, or the Crown Prince of Manginas himself, Rousseau. Of course I went with who I relate to more.
cant. stop. laughing.
noted feminist jean jacques rosseu. fucking lol.
@ Sharculese – I once encountered real person slash involving an NHL player and Hitler. That still wins the all time WTF award for me, even more than the Pokeman porn I saw on Weeping Cock.
I too don’t remember the part where Hobbes was right. About virtually anything.
@zhinxy: I only did philosophy for a year to get some credits, I’ll admit. So as far as points of reference go, I had to pick between either Hobbes, or the Crown Prince of Manginas himself, Rousseau. Of course I went with who I relate to more.”
Oh dear lord. Well, at least you admit it. That actually is something.
Well, it might improve your opinion of Rousseau if you remember that women were supposed to be kept ignorant, domestic, and Mellerishly giggly, and if you knew that in real life, he totally abandoned his actual, living children and their mother without a penny of support. Well, he later hired her as a maid, after she’d been forced to give them all up to foundling hospitals. I guess he wasn’t all that bad. Social contracts a social contract, but sometimes a social contract don’t mean shit cause bitches man, amirite? Seriously. You might like the guy more than you think!
No, Rousseau was a mangina. Self-loathing, self-chastising, afraid of the power women could have over his life, the common features of all feminist “men.” If he was forced to live today in our post-feminism world then he’d probably spend his time white-knighting on places like this. He just had the fortune of living in a pre-gynocratic world.
I can’t imagine anyone saying Ark’s last post without bursting out laughing by the last sentence.
i got called hobbesian once. it was by my LIBERTARIAN FRIEND’s generally less libertarian girlfriend, because i said i didn’t trust most ordinary people in crisis situations to use guns responsibly. i was never sure what to make of that.
Oh, you’re a Hobbesian all right. :p Bet you’d look askance at my nuclear bazooka car, too. does it matter why I want it? I don’t think so.
( If you’re interested, I would say it all turns on whether or not it’s a function of ordinary people not having the preparation to deal with crisis situations while armed, in which case I actually agree and you’re not a Hobbesian, or if it turns on whether people just suck and shouldn’t be armed because they suck and Hobbes mom didn’t love him unless he behaved, in which case you are, and also hate freedom. Why do you hate freedom? )
And PS yes, those ARE your only two options. I learned from Arks. Oh yes, I did.
And because I learned from Arks I’m going to assign a philosopher to be right. Let’s use … I dunno, Kant?
in case you were worried, it is actually the first one
forgot to add: lol