Courtesy of MGTOWforums.com, here’s a little collection of some of the evil dastardly tricks that women pull on the poor oppressed men of the world. Obviously, most sensible guys know that “housework” is a scam; so-called “housewives” spend most of their time on the couch eating bon bons and watching The View.
But did you know about Arson Night? Or the Cheerleader Ring Drop? Read on, and become enlightened Knowledge is power! STAY SAFE, GUYS!
If a man give his woman 100 dollars a week for food shopping, she will spend say 60 on food and keep the rest. When he enquires why there’s no food in the house come Friday he will get bitched at for not trusting her. And made to feel guilty for accusing her, even though she has deceived him.
They like to lay in bed, and pretend to be sick or sad (which means you won’t be coming in there) and text all their boyfriends.
When they say they are going out with the girls, they could be out doing Anything. This ranges from doing hard drugs to stripping to boinking strangers to sitting alone on a curb to arson. You can never be sure.
How about when they try their version of the Jedi mind trick on you. You know the thing they brag about in private. Trying to make something that’s her idea, seem like it’s *your* idea so that you’ll do it. And then pat you on the back to boost your ego like a trained dog when in reality you did what they for *them* all along.
Sooo many guys fall for this. Suddenly they’re buying crap they don’t need or moving the inlaws in because the woman made it seem like *he* wanted it. Classic.
Short Hair: The Beginning of the End
Women spend so much time on their appearance… why?
That’s right, to catch a sucker into paying the bills. Once the contract is signed, and the babies are popped out, she has you by the balls and doesn’t need to pretend anymore. Next she’ll wear more “comfortable clothes” and cut her hair short. It’s the beginning of the end.
And, yes, The Cheerleader Ring Drop:
In 11th grade high school, I was in the wrestling team. One day, during a water break, this cheerleader next to me started getting panicky and asked me if i could help her find her ring. She “dropped” it and did this just as an opener, i suppose. I ended up ‘being’ with her and it quickly diminished; she was bunk. Another cheerleader came up to me while i was with her and told me “what are you doing her?, you’re way too good for her!”
Luckily, the fella calling himself Tha Big Daddy C-Master, who started the thread, has a simple solution to all this. Well, two simple solutions:
You can always turn the other way, or just use a woman. Human toilets and all.
I couldn’t have said it worse myself!
Also, to peruse at your leisure:
http://www.redbookmag.com/
http://www.goodhousekeeping.com/
One of my favourite songs is “Songbird”, written by Christine McVie about a man. But I don’t even know why we’re bothering to list songs, if NWO has honestly never noticed a love song written by a woman about a man in his entire life. Seems like a lost cause.
Todays NY post under entertainment
http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/want_his_texts_cjd4dOFW1bbjUwgmFjswMJ
Don’t go out of your way to seek attention from him — especially by doing things you think he wants or expects from you. (Though it sounds like he’s not that type of guy, which is great.)
What type of guy is that? Is she default good?
———————
In the meantime, continue holding out for a guy who earns your attention — both physically and emotionally.
That’s right, he has to earn her attention.
———————-
Huffington post
Womens opinion on everything. What hurts them. How men fail them.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/women/
I’m absolutely certain NWO does not believe in nontoxic women.
I’m uncertain if he even believes in nontoxic men.
That was from a column chiding girls not to be “sluts!” I thought that was the most important thing ever!
Anyway, how worthless am I? (Don’t answer that.) I think everyone, male or female, deserves to be respected in their relationships. At a bare minimum everyone deserves to have a partner who acknowledges they exist.
NWO, those of us who seek out relationships have to earn the attention and affection of the people we’re with and/or want to be with. Gender has nothing to do with it.
Do tell? What has this close reading of history entailed where you’ve concluded working mothers probably have more face-time with their kids than traditional housewives did for most of history. What history book have you gotten this from?
First item on a Google search for “amount of time parents spend with children”:
http://www.prb.org/Articles/2007/DoParentsSpendEnoughTimeWithTheirChildren.aspx
Time diaries indicate that married fathers spent an average 6.5 hours a week caring for their children in 2000, a 153 percent increase since 1965. Married mothers spent 12.9 hours, a 21 percent increase. Single mothers spent 11.8 hours, a 57 percent increase.
@ozymandias42
None of these are MSM news outlets. Ya know, the stuff blasted out over the internet, newspapers, TV and all sources of info every day. I’m far likelier to be “informed” by an article originating from Ms Mag on an MSM outlet than I ever will be from good houskeeping.
Find me an article in an MSM outlet where women give or do something for men, sans sex. How women can help men with domestic chores, Love them more, Care for them more, Support them more. Be more loyal.
What you’re saying is, the only thing modern day women have to offer is sex, and that comes with a pricetag.
NWO only consults pulledoutofmyass.com*, no other citations are accepted by him.
*Only things pulled out of his particular ass, actually.
Good Housekeeping has a circulation of 4.3 million.
Ms. Magazine has a circulation of 110,000.
In short, Ms. Magazine’s circulation is ~2.5% of Good Housekeeping’s.
NWO, just because you don’t read Good Housekeeping doesn’t mean that no one reads it. Lots of women read Good Housekeeping. I’ll bet you’ve never read Essence magazine or noticed on a news stand but it has articles every month about being more supportive of the man in your life, more understanding. Every month in some mainstream outlet there are pieces about women who are educated and successful and the importance of making sure that the men in their lives feel appreciated.
So, let’s be clear, anything that comes from a source you don’t read doesn’t count?
@Shaenon
Nice article. Of course it’s been reviewed emperically of course? Oh that’s right, nothing is these days. It’s an opinion piece. And how does the opinion piece end? Mothers feeling rushed, doing more, working more, caring more, loving more, supporting more.
Dad’s busy gettin tanked watchin football. Go make me a sammich while you’re in the kitchen, hehe. He’s just a by-line in the never ending story of women’s eternal goodness.
Oh NWO. You can play “that example doesn’t count!” til the end of times and I don’t really care at all.
That’s not because you’re a man though.
You mean no one here can find me an MSM outlet with this?
How women can help men with domestic chores, Love them more, Care for them more, Support them more. Be more loyal.
Cause I can sure find a zillion articles in the MSM the other way around. And another zillion where women writers talk about men as if they’re the shit from dogshit eating parasites.
Do ya think all that hatred is good for a society?
JTK, honey, we discussed this in the last thread. It’s fine if you want to go your own way, we don’t mind, it’s all good, please feel free to leave any time now. But why are you so desperate to convince others to take the same path? And why keep posting here, of all places? Is there some sort of validation that you need from us? Because all you’re actually going to get is “cool, whatever, see ya”.
Holly, as I noted upthread, NWO only considers pulledoutofmyass.com a proper source.
Once again, I have to wonder how someone with milkslave’s intellect manages to boot up his computer box without some assistance. Seriously, milkslave, it’s like you were born under a rock and assume that the sun doesn’t exist and everyone’s always covered in worms. Rest assured, some of the very best love songs ever were indeed written by women for men.
No. That’s what you’re saying. No one here has said that. And, again, just because you have to pay for sex doesn’t mean all -or even most men- pay for sex. That’s on you. If it bothers you, stop doing it.
Although I think it’s hilarious, but typically hypocritical, for you to be pooh-poohing the importance of a satisfactory sex life within a relationship. That is the focus of magazines like Cosmo. And you are always whining about men not getting enough sex from: 1) women who arouse them and/or 2) their wives and girlfriends.
You’re furious that women can refuse sex to men who buy them drinks and furious about women having sex with their boyfriends.
Do let me know when you can find 1 article from any MSM news outlet which has anything close to resembling, how women can help men with domestic chores, Love them more, Care for them more, Support them more. Be more loyal.
Gotta go. Like I said, hatred infused into a society at all levels can’t be healthy.
Oh, please give us links to a zillion MSM articles that tell men how to help women with domestic chores. Please.
I think it’s time for you to provide citations.
With the stipulation that:
1. Manhatingwhorebitches.com is not a reliable source
and
2. Talking about men as if they’re adults with obligations to the other people in their lives is not “as if they’re the shit from dogshit eating parasites.” Kind o the opposite actually.
*googles for pulledoutofmyass.com and fails to locate it*
Those are some interesting results though.
Her voice on the hook will just destroy you:
And, a tremendous singer songwriter:
Probably, technically, Killing Me Softly doesn’t count…
But it’s so awesome. If you’ve never listened to Flack’s album First Take, do a search on it. Her version of “Ballad of a Sad Young Man” is so beautiful.
Instead of NAWALT (“Not All Women are Like That”) as the default basis of opinion, why not assume the reverse, and that the rather dismaying, if not horrible, stories read above by unfortunate men by the modern women who snagged them, why not make an equally plausible assumption?
Why not assume that these stories are the norm, and for every one that we read about, there are dozens of other such feminists torturing and exploiting men because of simple greed, viciousness, and misandry?
Correct me if I;m wrong, but weren’t all of the songs cited about women loving men best sellers BEFORE feminism dominated—and polluted–our society (and its entertainment) by the mid to late ’70s? Just an innocent question.