Courtesy of MGTOWforums.com, here’s a little collection of some of the evil dastardly tricks that women pull on the poor oppressed men of the world. Obviously, most sensible guys know that “housework” is a scam; so-called “housewives” spend most of their time on the couch eating bon bons and watching The View.
But did you know about Arson Night? Or the Cheerleader Ring Drop? Read on, and become enlightened Knowledge is power! STAY SAFE, GUYS!
If a man give his woman 100 dollars a week for food shopping, she will spend say 60 on food and keep the rest. When he enquires why there’s no food in the house come Friday he will get bitched at for not trusting her. And made to feel guilty for accusing her, even though she has deceived him.
They like to lay in bed, and pretend to be sick or sad (which means you won’t be coming in there) and text all their boyfriends.
When they say they are going out with the girls, they could be out doing Anything. This ranges from doing hard drugs to stripping to boinking strangers to sitting alone on a curb to arson. You can never be sure.
How about when they try their version of the Jedi mind trick on you. You know the thing they brag about in private. Trying to make something that’s her idea, seem like it’s *your* idea so that you’ll do it. And then pat you on the back to boost your ego like a trained dog when in reality you did what they for *them* all along.
Sooo many guys fall for this. Suddenly they’re buying crap they don’t need or moving the inlaws in because the woman made it seem like *he* wanted it. Classic.
Short Hair: The Beginning of the End
Women spend so much time on their appearance… why?
That’s right, to catch a sucker into paying the bills. Once the contract is signed, and the babies are popped out, she has you by the balls and doesn’t need to pretend anymore. Next she’ll wear more “comfortable clothes” and cut her hair short. It’s the beginning of the end.
And, yes, The Cheerleader Ring Drop:
In 11th grade high school, I was in the wrestling team. One day, during a water break, this cheerleader next to me started getting panicky and asked me if i could help her find her ring. She “dropped” it and did this just as an opener, i suppose. I ended up ‘being’ with her and it quickly diminished; she was bunk. Another cheerleader came up to me while i was with her and told me “what are you doing her?, you’re way too good for her!”
Luckily, the fella calling himself Tha Big Daddy C-Master, who started the thread, has a simple solution to all this. Well, two simple solutions:
You can always turn the other way, or just use a woman. Human toilets and all.
I couldn’t have said it worse myself!
Not all women of color are single mothers, nor are all the women of color who are single mothers poor and living in the ghetto. And many of the poor, single mothers who are living in impoverished cannot and do not send their children to day care because they can’t afford it.
Fathers can drop kids off at daycare too or opt to change off with the mother and care for the kids while she’s at work then no daycare at all. That would take some doing to fit schedules but could be done.
@Nobinayamu
Just because I don’t drink doesn’t mean I don’t go to bars. You’ve turned down drinks from men who don’t meet your approval. Well aren’t you moral? Women by the score sit in bars with no money expecting freebies. Hell, we’ve got articles in major MSM newspapers with women bragging about getting thousands a month in freebies.
There’s been many a time where we’re sitting there at a bar eating and a woman comes sauntering over in a skimpy outfit and says, “what are you drinking?” As in, “buy me a drink” as she just reaches over and grabs a chicken tender and “pleasantly” joins in the conversation as if she’s welcome. Or aren’t women like that?
NWO goes to bars… in his head. I have literally never seen anyone of any gender do what he describes as a common occurrence, especially among strangers.
@Xtra
“Fathers can drop kids off at daycare too or opt to change off with the mother and care for the kids while she’s at work then no daycare at all. That would take some doing to fit schedules but could be done.”
Is that what men can do? I’m told if a woman does that she’s oppressed as a mere “helpmeet” to a man. So what you want is all men to be a lowly “helpmeet” to all woman?
I’m rockin’ the long white bathrobe look today, but I’m not sure it’s slutty since no man can see me. In fact, I’m not sure I even exist if no man can see me. If a woman is sitting on her couch drinking vanilla rooibos, and no man is around to determine how slutty her outfit is, is she really there?
Thanks Bostonian, somehow I missed that. So I guess what I would call an 11 year old girl “dressed like a slut” is “a kid who doesn’t happen to be from a mennonite family.”
“Instead of promoting feminizing men into your frilly dress strap-on debauchery, you should be dragging everyone of these women out into the street and beating the ever loving crap out of them.”
Cute. Answer Holly’s question–who DON’T you want to see beaten?
“Do ya call that love?”
What you know about love could do the hustle on the head of a pin.
NWO, why aren’t you using my citation when you’re clearing pulling your posts out of your ass? Is it because I put it in MLA style? I can do APA if you prefer.
@Bostonian
“I have literally never seen anyone of any gender do what he describes as a common occurrence, especially among strangers.”
Does you experience encompass the world? You’ve never seen it happen so it never happens? What else doesn’t happen?
Does yours?
No, NWO, there are women like that. That’s not what women are like. And, you know what, I don’t care.
It isn’t my responsibility as a woman or as a feminist to police the behavior of women I don’t know. If, in the scenario you presented, a woman makes an explicit or implicit request for a drink then you should tell her “no.” Tell her that taking food of someone’s plate is rude and that she should go sit somewhere else.
NWO’s going a bit overboard with the “women are evil” thing today.
@Xtra
“I would like to know why in “preserving the family” any consideration of making the family a place where women can thrive is somehow wrong.”
Can men thrive as well? Does it matter if men thrive? Are happy? Healthy? Content?
Let’s all make sure women thrive. What can men do so women thrive? Be more supportive? Loving? Caring? More domestic duties? Listen? Be attentive? More giving? Kinder? Gentler? Stronger? More emotional?
Just saying NWO lies through his teeth as usual.
Joanna: I know, right? I’m wondering if he’s envisioning that whole “beating women in the streets” thing like the Holocaust: first there is a massive beating, gang rapes and eleven-year-olds with severed heads and shit, then Owly gets to say it didn’t happen?
What particularly gals me about the ‘traditional family values’ types like NWO is that their conception of family (one man, one woman, and children) is a recent, modern aberration that is less than two centuries old. It is the result of the uprooting necessary in an industrial capitalist society, where men had to be mobile to be able to look for work in far away cities (or even other countries) rather than stick around with their kin for generations and generations. Families used to be multigenerational (3+ generations under one roof) and children were raised more or less collectively by multiple aunts and uncles (and grandparents) rather than only by their mother and father. Capitalism made it necessary to create a more mobile familial unit, just like capitalism made it necessary for women to enter the workforce because one wage was often not enough anymore to feed one’s children.
A few generations past, people would have complained that children couldn’t be properly raised by ONLY one mother and one father.
NWO, do you still stand by your belief that women should be enslaved?
I dunno, treat us as friends and partners?
Sure that works.
Enough domestic duties that they are comparable between the partners.
Given that you are starting from the position of promoting child-rape and summary executions of women, I’d say all of those apply.
Quite the contrary: be less emotional, because you are clearly losing it. Like all MRA’s and misogynists, you are an emotional wreck.
NWO:
Yes, jackass, they can, and most relationships are set up so that both thrive. Sorry you’ve never experienced it.
For a libertarian, NWO is remarkably bad at the concept of “freedom.”
When I first discovered MGTOW, I understand the logic behind it, but I always had to reassure myself that this path was the right one. Society will resist your urge to break free, people will argue with you if you bring up issues that we discuss here. At first, I needed constant reassurance that I wasn’t losing my mind, and as time passed it was more evident that things were even worse than I thought they were.
Then… one day it just “clicked”. I realized that MGTOW was a legitimate response to the world, and my thoughts about just about every topic are processed through the mindset of the movement. It happens AUTOMATICALLY, it is my new consciousness. Whenever I hear a guy talking about getting married, I just cringe cuz I know his life is done. RIP former friend. When I hear them talk about having kids, I know their freedom will be gone. When I hear a guy complain about a particular women, I feel like telling him to cut her ass off right away because it always gets WORSE, not better, but I know they won’t listen. Years of experience and observation have basically rewired my brain to know that most of the basic staples of our society are facades….. I automatically avoid those things that people tell me I should do and should care about, and I do what is right for me.
It’s probably the main reason why I don’t need to go on a forum like this anymore; its like I graduated from MGTOW academy. I’ve learned most of what I need to know and I just come around to say hello. For those of you here on manboobz that are just learning about the emerging mgtow movement, it is simply men deciding they can live their lives without a woman to be happy. That they can be singel men and be fulfilled. For years, society has told men they need to be married or in a relationship with a woman to be happy. That they need womens approval. That they cannot live without sex . I mean listen to all the love songs throughout history composed by men it always has to do with a woman. Feminists have won the war of the sexes, you got what you want. Men are finally sating “we lost” and bailing out on women and going at it either alone or seeking other men for nurturing.You won feminists-you won the battle. Men are opting out of the war and the playing field.We lost but in losing we are finally MGTOW.
NWO always lies. Given his obvious disconnect from reality -men are never teachers or therapists, there are no charities for men, twelve year old girls go to the mall in bikinis, etc.- I used to consider the possibility that he wasn’t deliberately lying so much as unable to process objective truth.
But the more he writes the more it becomes clear that he is both a delusional, hate-filled bigot and an unrepentant liar. The two aren’t mutually exclusive.
So, how about it NWO? In your extensive, non-drinking, bar experiences, have you ever observed a man explaining to a woman -after offering to buy her a drink- that he expects sex in direct trade for the price of her cocktail?
And if women and little girls dress like the Amish, what will we do about the men who are sexually attracted to the garb of the Amish? When some guy hits on me by telling me that he thinks my glasses are sexy (when I’m wearing glasses; I go back and forth) should I have just stumbled out of the house blind? Or worn my contacts? What about when I’m wearing my contacts and a guy tells me that my smile is sexy? Should I stop caring for my teeth?
You’ve asserted that the sole purpose and expression of a woman’s sexuality is little more than her ability to arouse a man and, therefore, reproduce. Then, after months of posters asking you to provide a definitive example of how women and little girls should dress to keep men from being aroused you finally say that we should “…dress like mennonites.” You do realize that mennonites have sex and reproduce, right?
I’m not a hottie or whatever so I’m probably an Invisible Woman by MRA standards, but…
If I went to a bar by myself and sat around not buying anything, I’m pretty sure the bouncer would want to know what the hell was my deal and was I a customer here or should I be on my way now. I’m pretty sure this would happen generally before men started setting upon me with free* drinks.
*Free in the sense of “in exchange for a full night of sex,” which is the crappiest free ever. If I were a sex worker I could get at least $100 and you think I’m contractually obliged to put out for a $6 cocktail?
@Nobinayamu
“No, NWO, there are women like that. That’s not what women are like. And, you know what, I don’t care.”
If there are women like that hten women are like that. You don’t care. The only honest statement of the day. Men should never care as well.
————-
“It isn’t my responsibility as a woman or as a feminist to police the behavior of women I don’t know.”
Yet you demand the authority to police the behavior of men, as well as having all men police the behavior of men.
———–
Look at every comment here. It’s all what women want. How women can be happier. Every article linked to is a woman’s opinion of how men fail women. How men can help women. How men can support, love, honor, listen to and meet the need’s of all women.
I have yet to see any MSM article of what women can “give” to men or can “do” for men, other than wearing dresses and having strap-on sex while weeping like a child, which is not a pressing problem.
———–
Find me a 10 MSM article on what women can do to support, love and honor men in the last 3 months.
Okay, which of our regulars is “JTK”?
“I really have evolved past needing to tell women I’m leaving them and now I devote my life to contemplating rock gardens and composing symphonies, but I came here just this once to let you know?”
riiiiiight.