Courtesy of MGTOWforums.com, here’s a little collection of some of the evil dastardly tricks that women pull on the poor oppressed men of the world. Obviously, most sensible guys know that “housework” is a scam; so-called “housewives” spend most of their time on the couch eating bon bons and watching The View.
But did you know about Arson Night? Or the Cheerleader Ring Drop? Read on, and become enlightened Knowledge is power! STAY SAFE, GUYS!
If a man give his woman 100 dollars a week for food shopping, she will spend say 60 on food and keep the rest. When he enquires why there’s no food in the house come Friday he will get bitched at for not trusting her. And made to feel guilty for accusing her, even though she has deceived him.
They like to lay in bed, and pretend to be sick or sad (which means you won’t be coming in there) and text all their boyfriends.
When they say they are going out with the girls, they could be out doing Anything. This ranges from doing hard drugs to stripping to boinking strangers to sitting alone on a curb to arson. You can never be sure.
How about when they try their version of the Jedi mind trick on you. You know the thing they brag about in private. Trying to make something that’s her idea, seem like it’s *your* idea so that you’ll do it. And then pat you on the back to boost your ego like a trained dog when in reality you did what they for *them* all along.
Sooo many guys fall for this. Suddenly they’re buying crap they don’t need or moving the inlaws in because the woman made it seem like *he* wanted it. Classic.
Short Hair: The Beginning of the End
Women spend so much time on their appearance… why?
That’s right, to catch a sucker into paying the bills. Once the contract is signed, and the babies are popped out, she has you by the balls and doesn’t need to pretend anymore. Next she’ll wear more “comfortable clothes” and cut her hair short. It’s the beginning of the end.
And, yes, The Cheerleader Ring Drop:
In 11th grade high school, I was in the wrestling team. One day, during a water break, this cheerleader next to me started getting panicky and asked me if i could help her find her ring. She “dropped” it and did this just as an opener, i suppose. I ended up ‘being’ with her and it quickly diminished; she was bunk. Another cheerleader came up to me while i was with her and told me “what are you doing her?, you’re way too good for her!”
Luckily, the fella calling himself Tha Big Daddy C-Master, who started the thread, has a simple solution to all this. Well, two simple solutions:
You can always turn the other way, or just use a woman. Human toilets and all.
I couldn’t have said it worse myself!
@Amused
Here’s a quote from you, from the article.
“Upon a close reading of history, the idea that being cared for and educated by “paid strangers” is bad appears to be quite recent, and today’s working mothers probably have more face-time with their kids than traditional housewives did for most of history.”
That’s right everyone, Amused has closely analysed history. Well thank the goddess for that! But have you closely read it in the form of all history being rewritten as womens oppression?
Do tell? What has this close reading of history entailed where you’ve concluded working mothers probably have more face-time with their kids than traditional housewives did for most of history. What history book have you gotten this from?
——————–
What you should have said, after closely reviewing history was. The promotion of the family as the stabilizing factor for any society should be of paramount importance.
But you didn’t. You promote the destruction of the family. Good for you.
Doesn’t NWO define manhood by presence of penis? So why are men bothering to wear strap-ons, and furthermore doesn’t that just make them extra male, rather than feminized? Are the strap-ons themselves wearing frilly dresses? What does it all mean?
NWO, I’d like a full list of all people you don’t think should be beaten.
At some point it’s just not shocking anymore. “NWO thinks a randomly horrible thing? Must be Monday.”
http://www.theonion.com/articles/marilyn-manson-now-going-doortodoor-trying-to-shoc,459/
@Bostonian
” He also calls 11 year old kids sluts!”
What do you call an 11 year old that dresses and acts like a slut?
@NWOslave
A kid playing dress-up.
That’s totally possible, but since NWO refuses to define what slutty clothing is and has not yet described a single article of clothing that wouldn’t be slutty, it’s also very possible that we would call that kid “a kid dressed for school.”
@Holly Pervocracy
Go to the article that Amused links to. Which also links to
Moms Resent Dads for Not Doing Enough at Home
and
Working Moms Multitask More Than Dads — and Like It Less
Is this something good?
Is this something boys/men should have to see everyday?
Is this something that should be promoted non-stop in our schools, government, MSM?
Do ya think this is love?
What do you think women will get in return for this non-stop media onslaught?
Here’s another one:
What do you call an eleven year old boy in a speedo?
I’ll answer it myself: A boy on the swim team.
@Amnesia
“A kid playing dress-up.”
In public? This is your excuse?
NWO, you call the eleven-year-old a CHILD.
You know what? Men SHOULD be able to wear frilly dresses and strapons if they want to! There is nothing wrong with that! Men should be able to do whatever they want, as long as it doesn’t hurt other people! Just like women!
Actually, he finally specified that girls should be dressed like Mennonites.
“Also, I’ve been to daycare. It’s not a communist assembly line. There are blocks.”
Reason XtyYandZth why I love Ozy.
I’d also like to point out that we’ve seen the silly rant about putting playboy pictures on your wall and why must the wimmenz dictate my decorations? here on manboobz before.
Unlike you, kumys boy, I don’t have a one-track mind.
Mostly, I got this from reading various memoirs and letters written by people who lived a very, very long time ago. What have YOU read on the subject, NWOSlave?
A family that’s founded on the idea that society is evil and should be opposed and avoided does not have a stabilizing effect on society. Clearly.
Also: you are no one to dictate values to me, what with your dreams of beating women to saying they are happy in their family lives.
Should people see it? Well, uh, is it true? If it’s true, then we should be aware of it. If it isn’t, then we shouldn’t, because it is bad to say untrue things.
Pants and a T shirt are not inappropriate for any child. People in general do not dress like Mennonites anymore.
I agree with whoever told him to move to Saudi Arabia.
NWO, you claim that you don’t drink so I’m not sure why you think you know so much about the bar scene but let me explain something to you. Not all women are sex workers. I, for example, am not a sex worker. So, when a man offers to buy me a drink I don’t presume that he literally expects his $5 – $15 (depending on the drink) to be a payment for sex. If a man offers to buy a woman a drink (and, really, I don’t think men should do this) and genuinely expects her to have sex with him in direct exchange for the cost of the beverage then he should be upfront about that. That way, she can politely refuse his offer if she’s not a sex worker or, if she is -and she’s not opposed to offering the man in question a service- explain that what her rates and policies are.
Personally, I’ve turned down more offers for drinks than I’ve accepted but that’s entirely beside the point. We all know how you feel about women who think they’re too good to accept a man’s offer of a drink. That said, I’ve never had a man say “Hey, I’d like to buy you the next martini and I assume that should be sufficient payment for a blow-job in my car.”
Have you?
@Amused
“Also: you are no one to dictate values to me, what with your dreams of beating women to saying they are happy in their family lives.”
Yet you demand the right to dictate values to all men?
My dreams of beating women into saying they are happy in their family lives?
How’s that ghetto lookin for ya? The feminist dream of fatherless families in daycare. I thought you cared about women of color?
NWO, today I am wearing tight-ish purple pants, a baggy black Edward Scissorhands shirt, and a vintage black leather jacket. Except for my feet, hands, neck, and head, all of my body is covered, but you can make out that I have legs and a round ass, although the shirt is too loose to reveal that I have breasts.
Am I dressing like a slut? Am I taunting men by flaunting my sexuality? Am I asking to be raped?
KSA abayas are too form-fitting and therefore slutty. Also, I’ve read that women in Jeddah prance around in knee-length kaftans worn over lose pants, wantonly assaulting men with the sight of their nearly naked bodies. I think rural Afghanistan would be more appropriate. Of course there, some women dye their burkas light blue and cinnabar, and that’s whorish.
“No. You’re making the mistake of tarring the whole of the MRM with the same brush”
I’m not sure the guy whose first post on this website contained veiled threats of starting a rape campaign is the best person to say, “We’re not all so bad.”
NWO, again, are there people you don’t want to see beaten and/or raped?
All I’ve got is “maybe yourself.” Maybe. Obviously all women, but also all men who are in any way feminine or have had any positive interactions with women, or simply failed to beat as many women as they possibly could have.
Any exceptions there?
After we’ve established that you want everyone on Earth beaten, you can no longer shock us by providing us with specifics. “Uh, and… Drew Carey! I think Drew Carey should be beaten! Um, are you shocked yet? Okay… the guy who hosts the Puppy Bowl! How about now?”
I clearly don’t demand such a right — after all, I’m not the one calling for people to be beaten in the streets for their opinions. YOU are doing that.
Nah-uh. You didn’t say you want to beat women into saying they are happy. You said that all women who participated in the survey should be dragged out and beaten in the streets. That would include women who said they are happy balancing work with motherhood.
Wtf does any of this have to do with women of color or fatherless families?
I refuse to accept your assertion that an 11-year old girl in capri pants and/or green shoes is in anyway dressing or acting like a “slut” however you may define that term. I consider capri pants to be completely age appropriate clothing for an elementary-to-middle school aged girl. The style has been around for decades; my 63 year old mother wore pedal-pushers in the 50s.
I refuse to argue within the frame of your fucked up-ness. The fact that you find the sight of bare calves on a barely pubescent girl sexually stimulating does not objectively prove that capri-pants are “slutty” clothes.
I would like to know why in “preserving the family” any consideration of making the family a place where women can thrive is somehow wrong.
Today I’m wearing a tight-ish dark purple Darkwing Duck t-shirt and white, blue, and purple striped pajama pants because I’m on Christmas break and I’m not going to put on jeans unless I’m going somewhere. I’m not wearing socks, but the pants do over up my oh-so-slutty ankles. My arms, however, are almost completely exposed below the shoulder. Oh well. Maybe my freckled skin and ginger complexion will scare off the men folk.