Did Tom Matlack of the Good Men Project – not to be confused with Ben Matlock, fictional defense lawyer beloved by the elderly – swallow one of those mysterious “red pills” I keep hearing about on Men’s Rights blogs? Whatever he swallowed, it’s apparently causing him to hallucinate.
How else to explain his recent post on the GMP site titled “Being a Dude Is a Good Thing.” Now, as a dude who spends a good deal of time every day being a dude, I’ve got nothing against anyone being a dude, provided that’s what they want to be. It’s just that the piece itself is full of some rather strange generalizations that don’t actually seem to be, you know, true, at least not in what’s commonly known as “the real world.”
Rather than try to rebut his argument, because he doesn’t seem to have much of one, let’s just look at some of his loopier pronouncements:
Why do men get blamed for everything?
Uh, because they don’t? Sure, men get blamed for things, but guess what? Women get blamed for things all the time, too, from witchcraft, to divorce, to getting themselves raped, battered or killed. They’ve been blamed for earthquakes, for “inciting” male lust, for killing chivalry and “killing off real men,” for “taking roles intended by God only for men.” Heck, some inventive sorts have even figured out how to blame women for men who are assholes. And this guy has decided that “Black Women are to blame for the disrespect Black Men show towards Black Women.” For endless additional examples, scroll back through the posts and comments here, visit any of the blogs on my “boob roll,” or simply continue living on planet earth.
Back to Matlack, whose generalizations get more surreal by the sentence:
In the locker room, in the bathroom, on the walk out of the board room, in my conversations with men of all kinds, that’s what I hear more than anything. The resignation that to be a man is to be unacceptable at some level to the woman in your life.
Really? Who on earth are you hanging out with? And what women are they hanging out with? Are men other than Tom Matlack and his possibly apocryphal conversational partners actually having conversations like this on a regular basis? If the “woman in your life” basically hates men, what is she doing with you, and what are you doing with her?
One close friend jokes, “When speaking to my wife I always make sure to look at the ground in deference. And I make sure not to make any sudden movements.”
Um, what?
I’ve watched him. He loves his wife.
He’s a very competent human being. But with her he’s decided the only way to survive is to submit. The female view is the right view. The male view just gets you into trouble.
You see what I meant before about the hallucinations, right?
But Matlack suggests there is hope for the poor demure, never-before-heard-from men of the world. Apparently they are starting to open their mouths at last.
It seems that the blame game in the mainstream, whether through the minimization of male life in pop culture or on television or through the continued obsession with men behaving badly, has finally struck a chord with the average guy.
Let’s just pause a moment to reflect on this whole “minimization of male life in pop culture or on television.” Mr. Matlack, do you actually watch movies or television, or visit libraries or anything like that? Most movies revolve around men as the main characters, with women in many cases serving as little more than a love interest or simply as scenery. Have you ever heard of the Bechdel test? Read up on it, run the test on some of your favorite films, and then get back to us on the “minimization of male life in pop culture.”
Now back to Matlack’s manifesto:
We are no longer willing to be blamed for being men. We are no longer willing to avert our gazes and stay silent about our feelings. We are raising our voices and telling our stories in our own male vocabulary.
Yeah, because men have been so utterly silent about their feelings, their opinons, and pretty much everything, up until now.
To women, I assume the response is, “well, it’s about time.” But just remember when we talk it’s not going to sound like a women in a man’s body. It’s gonna be all dude. And you are just going to have to deal with that.
Ladies, prepare yourselves for a lot more Dudesplaining in the near future. Dudes will be ignored no longer! Dudes!!! DUUUUUDESSS!!!!!!
EDITED TO ADD: Matlack’s gotten some responses on Twitter to his dudely roar; he’s posted a bunch of them here. Guest appearances by Amanda Marcotte and (seriously) Roseanne Barr.
I wonder if over at the GMP they ever discuss how to get nail-polish out of a mans dressy if it accidentally gets spilt?
You can’t. I know because I got it on my pants last night.
Now answer my question.
MRA Lieutenant, it’s a horrid societal stereotype that women are supposed to be the more emotional gender, while men are supposed to be tough, bottling up their emotions inside of themselves, never shedding a tear — and it’s complete and utter bullshit when you consider individual people since no one is a stereotype, yet just a few posts above yours NWOslave chose to cruelly mock and denigrate anything on the “castrated eunichs pagoda” (sic) that was not traditionally masculine. Individual (heterosexual) relationships are not going to illustrate Matlack’s point unless both parties are gender stereotypes, since acculturation pushes roles on both men and women that simply don’t fit for a wide range of people.
NWOslave, you should stop being a misandrist and shaming men.
I have two girls. I have learned that nail polish plus cloth is always forever.
@Quackers
Blah, blah, blah. Do you have like a rape fetish or what?
You’re supposed to be mocking the rampant misogyny over at the GMP. Ya know how dare they say men are blamed for everything? Your response to everything is “rape culture,” check and mate.
Well maybe, but I think a lot of people, if not most, do roughly conform to gender stereotypes. Due to a combination of biological/cultural factors or whatever. And I don’t think there’s anything wrong with talking in those terms.
@Xanthe – Well, if those types of relationships exist in sitcoms, they’ve *gotta* embody the typical hetero relationship dynamic, amirite? I mean, Ross and Rachel wouldn’t lie to me, would they? Or Monika and Chandler? Or Ray and, uh… his wife? Or…….. tv people?
MRAL, if any one person in a relationship is dominating the emotional climate, the relationship probably needs work, because that can get unhealthy. I wouldn’t say women dominate so much as it’s more socially acceptable for women to be more open with their feelings (also easier for those feelings to be dismissed, but that’s another class). But y’know, there’s this movement that’s trying to make it better for everyone. Oh, shit, what is the name of it? I forget…
@Xanthe
“NWOslave, you should stop being a misandrist and shaming men.”
Oh nooooooo! The NWO is a misandrist routine. Do explain it to me? I so love that one!
Hugo can be interesting, but he has a religious, guilt-based approach to a lot of things that occasionally sets my teeth on edge. Also I feel like a lot of his ideas are reactive in terms of being based on stuff he did in the past that he’s ashamed of.
NWO, why the fuck do you care?
Seriously. Lots of people make lifestyle choices that I find unappealing or even repulsive, ranging from “watching football games” to “getting drunk” to “following the exploits of the Kardashians.” You know what I do? I just IGNORE it. Because beer-guzzling football-watching Kardashian fans neither pick my pocket nor break my bone, nor are they in general offensively stupid or lacking in empathy. Therefore, we can get along in peace and tolerance.
hellkell: All sorts! My school has a gaming night every Friday and Saturday. It’s totally fun.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evander_Berry_Wall
If this doesn’t describe you then you are not a dude.
Cassandra, agreed. I feel that I’d like him in person. He’s a good writer, but I sense something big underlying all of it.
@Xanthe
“Individual (heterosexual) relationships are not going to illustrate Matlack’s point unless both parties are gender stereotypes, since acculturation pushes roles on both men and women that simply don’t fit for a wide range of people.”
That is just sooo deep. And it makes you appear quite intelligent. I could just listen to that kind of thing all night.
NWO, kindly put a cork in your hateful bullshit.
Ozy, that does sound like fun.
Hahaha of course NWO wont answer my question. How surprising.
Okay, I guess I hear you. I wasn’t a huge fan of the article but I basically still think that it was a conscious effort by Matlack to provide an direct alternative to Hugo, who posted a pretty controversial article that seemed to really annoy him.
NWOslave, decent people can make a distinction between the ideas that people hold (which may be wrong, hurtful or illogical ideas, and mock those ideas) and the person who holds them. This site (and the posters who comment here) mocks ideas that are worthy of being mocked. You on the other hand have been busy up-thread mocking men because they don’t fit your view of masculinity, and using derisive terms like “castrated eunichs” (sic), “emasculated” “(men?)”. Doesn’t that make you a misandrist bigot?
“Well, it’s finals week.”
@MRAL
Good luck! Don’t forget to get up and stretch every so often, though. Finals make it all too easy to glue oneself to a chair for two weeks.
@ozymandias42
A tad touchy tonight are we? Just picture all men wearing flowery spring dressy’s and openly weeping to an episode of the view. The image’ll take you to a happy place.
Actually I wonder if that’s why Hugo bugs MRAL so much. There’s a definite undertone of “I feel so ashamed and guilty” to a lot of what Hugo writes, especially about sex, and I can see how to a guy who has some self-loathing issues and discomfort around the issue of sex that could come across as “and you should be ashamed too!”.
Like I said, he has some interesting stuff to say, and he’s definitely smart, but there’s a pious, hectorting, judgey sort of tone to a lot of his writing that really can be offputting. I feel like in real life I might find him to be kind of a downer.
@Xanthe
” This site (and the posters who comment here) mocks ideas that are worthy of being mocked.”
You mock, what in your ideology driven opinion dictates you mock. Just because “you” say something is mock-worthy, doesn’t make it so. The hubris is astounding. You are right by default. The arrogance boggles the mind.
I made a kool quote geode!
Oh well, you can still read what I wrote.