Given that we live in a feminazi gynocracy, with evil feminasties controlling all that we see and hear, it’s amazing that something like this ever found its way into print. This is from Maxim, in 2003. I found it here. Click on it to see it full size.
In the interest of accuracy, I would like to note that the woman pictured below might not be an actual feminist, as her armpit hair appears to be fake.
NOTE: This post contains
No, it wouldn’t. That’s not a real thing.
Hey Captain Bathrobe, why don’t you go back the YYYYY-M-C-A? 🙂
I’m not saying adult women should come-on to pubescent boys or anything of the kind, but a boy seeing a scantily-clad woman is not going to scar him for life.
That. Simply. Doesn’t. Happen.
Guys, give up. NWO long ago stopped paying attention to the conversation and is now, for some reason, posting his comments in realtime as he yanks it to Van Halen’s “Hot for Teacher” video.
“but a boy seeing a scantily-clad woman is not going to scar him for life.”
Unless he has serious issues =o
“Guys, give up. NWO long ago stopped paying attention to the conversation and is now, for some reason, posting his comments in realtime as he yanks it to Van Halen’s “Hot for Teacher” video.”
LOL
@katz
“You realize NWO is just going to tell you that there really IS a chip.”
There already is one! The digital angel.
http://www.raven1.net/mcf/news/digital-angel-awarded-uspatent-raisequestions.htm
Presently, they use them in the military and medical patients. You’ve all seen the adverts of the lost child or the child cutting classes. That’s a chip on a braclet.
However, if marketed correctly they could be a big hit, particularly if they have multi-functions like accessing computers, phones and such. The lost child or the abducted child by the bad man theme is always popular. Better yet, don’t be the last boy on the block to get your digital warrior. Or the digital unicorn for girls, your friend forever. The apps are endless!!!
“Guys, give up. NWO long ago stopped paying attention to the conversation and is now, for some reason, posting his comments in realtime as he yanks it to Van Halen’s “Hot for Teacher” video.”
Did I break him? =O
The flouncy skirt is kind of cute, just not with that top. I’d pair it with a scoop neck tee in a bright color. The second outfit is kind of any woman, USA – standard. I don’t like the lingerie, it’s shapeless and sort of blah.
This has been How to Dress with Cassandra. Notice the lack of profanity and claims about the motivations of the person being discussed.
ok, Ozy, I don’t know why the fuck you would feel bad about yourself. You have a popular blog and boyfriends or girlfriends or whatever and all that stuff. Not that I feel bad about myself, because I don’t, I have a high IQ, but whatever.
@Bostonian
Did you use “yank” in a shaming fashion? Tsk, tsk.
When a guy wanks it’s because he can’t get any.
When a girl wanks it’s because a man can’t please her.
Eh… aren’t there micro chips for pets already? O.o
And here I thought he’d passed out with his dick in his hand and a Steven Seagal movie on.
But lo, it yet lives :/
Can they create robogirls?
Haha, you can’t make this shit up.
Glad to see NWO is a reader of the Mind Control Forum:
http://www.raven1.net/mcf/index.htm
Popping in to say I don’t find Sean Foreman attractive either. He has that douche-y, dudebro look to him.
I’m not apologetic about who I do or don’t find attractive. Arrogant assholes with easily hurt egos like MRAL are not my problem, especially when they are usually hypocrites and openly talk about how they find fat or old women gross. Many men have no problem openly discussing which women they do or don’t find attractive, though usually they aren’t as rude about it like MRAs/PUAs are. But they are still open about it none the less. I’m the same, except I don’t talk about it to make others feel bad.
Jackson Rathbone is cute, mainly his eyes. Although I think Twilight is a piece of shit. I’m with most of the women here and don’t really find uber-masculine buff/athletic men hot either. Never have. Even before the whole meterosexual thing kicked in.
My bad, that was Shaenon who originally shamed me, Bostonian was simply the first to climb aboard the badwagon.
NWOslave’s belief that heterosexual males are in any way hurt by seeing scantily-clad women is for me, a heterosexual male who enjoys seeing scantily-clad women, very confusing.
@Holly Pervocracy
I’ve never read it but I’ll check it out.
Is that Sean person supposed to be good looking? Ugh. Proof # a million that tastes in looks are subjective.
Though maybe what turned me off is the Vans Warped Tour banner, which automatically triggered the sound of a thousand mediocre pop punk bands at once in my brain.
sorry that should say “I don’t talk about it in a way that makes others feel bad”
You’ve never read it… but you just linked a page from it…
*brain explodes*
Actually it doesn’t surprise me this much, it wouldn’t be the first time.
Is it just me or is NWO more… unique… than usual today?
@Spearhafoc
Being a feminist man is proof positive of your confusion.
I don’t like the colour maroon. Therefore I am a stuck up feminist bitch =)