How to get 800 upvotes on Reddit: Offer an evo-psych explanation of why vaginas are icky, preferably including the phrase “wet hole.” Here, watch a master at work:
Well, that proves it. It’s SCIENCE!
How to get 800 upvotes on Reddit: Offer an evo-psych explanation of why vaginas are icky, preferably including the phrase “wet hole.” Here, watch a master at work:
Well, that proves it. It’s SCIENCE!
Nameless: What is this I don’t… You’re mixing up your personal preference for no pubic hair with a universal preference. For some strange reason, I see quite a few MRAs doing this (Meller springs to mind). I like tall, skinny Brits with dark hair, but I don’t tell people who don’t think David Tennant or Benedict Cumberbatch are hot that they’re stupid. Or that a preference for tall Brits is somehow universal to all who like men.
But seriously, David Tennant!!!!!
Yeah, Hamlet could dither for the Olympics and probably make the All-Scandinavia Drama Queen show, but that’s some damn good speechifiying there.
“Or that a preference for tall Brits is somehow universal to all who like men.”
It’s not? But that’s something that I like, and it feels instinctive, so obviously it must be something all women like. I also like pomegrantes – you mean to tell me that not everyone does? I will need to see extensive proof, and even then, I will remain skeptical.
If you’re prescribing porntastic standards for genital grooming, MsN, then you can go first — but you should be particularly attentive to removing anal hair: that is particularly offensive on men (as far as I’m concerned). Hot wax or a razor, go at it. (Carefully!)
But you can’t expect everyone else to accept you exactly as you choose to be.
Acceptance, schmacceptance.
And not the tack I would take if I were a socially-awkward aspie.
I too think tall Brits are where it’s at. Benedict Cumberbatch could be reading The Little Red Hen and I would watch it and think it was awesome.
Oh, wait, I already did.
BTW much as I’m not that keen on Dr Who, Tennant outside of that context is a wonderful thing. I still remember the first thing I saw him in, and that was about 15 years ago.
(It also had Ken Stott. That series was awesome, though sadly short. Check it out – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takin'_Over_the_Asylum .)
Hmmm…….What I’m talking about is that I have read and heard self-professed feminists openly condemn men who prefer women who remove their pubic hair simply because pubic hair is “natural” on women(and men who prefer this are pedos). They also try to make women who do so feel guilty by telling said women that they are caving in to the “beauty standards of the patriarchy”.
I don’t think anyone has the right to “acceptance” (by which you seem to mean approval/attraction) at all.
I also think that the insulting of people who don’t adhere to the preferences of a person/group is wrong. So the tone of indignation in your post is, from my POV more than a tad two-faced and hypocritical.
You guys! You’re making me want to take a trip home. I’m thinking of the Scott Capurro line “ah, England – skinny pale boys!”.
Monsieur sans Nom is a total fake. I’ll bet he is not even an aspie at all. He just wanted to give KathleenB a hard time earlier.
As Bee pointed out, the feminist movement (defined how, exactly?) is not really “in cahoots” with naturists. So what if it was, though? You’ve made it pretty clear that you don’t like feminists, and we don’t like you either, so there’s unlikely to be any fucking going on. Why do you care about the pubic topiary of women you’re never going to sleep with anyway?
You really need to learn the concept “mind your own business”.
What women are you talking about? And yeah, what I said about genital depiliation most certainly Is my opinion and I own that. God forbid anyone criticize feminism!
I am squeeing and flailing on the inside! (outside hurts too much right now, effing Michigan winters…)
If it was an actual criticism it might be more relevant. As is it’s pretty much just “why don’t all the ladies make their ladybits look pretty for me? I has a sad.”. Which no one here is particuarly interested in.
Thanks for the hot pug-on-pug action, ersatzmoon. No wonder I like pugs so much! Vulvalicious!
Who wants to be Noname doesn’t shave his bits?
*bet
Dearksidecat: Or his legs, armpits, chest, back, etc. even though he no doubt wants his wimminz hair free…..typical double standard.
What’s wrong with that? I’m sure plenty of women have double standards when it comes to how they want their menz to look.
Don’t derail. I want to focus on your pubes, Frenchy.
Do you have ugly pubic hair, Frenchy? Do your genitals look not-nice? If so, what’s the reasoning behind this?
No Noms: it’s a cultural double standard. Women are expected to remove “excess body hair,” and men aren’t.
So you assume your individual preference is just that, as opposed to being culturally programmed — but yeah, would you shave if a woman asked for it because “men just look so much sexier without all that icky hair”?
Nothing in itself wrong with that unless you assume that cultural demands of women not extended to men are inherently sexist, and that you are quite possibly a hypocrite.
I have no stake in the fight since my partner and I are both women.
Augh, what has been seen cannot be unseen! /me runs off in search of brain bleach
I prefer lack of body hair (legs and armpits, anyway), including on myself. I used to shave my legs before I switched to electric razors (I always cut my face up something fierce with disposable razors).
I do miss the feeling of smooth legs. My damn leg hair is so itchy!
Other people can be into whatever they feel like. Whatever floats your boat and all that jazz.