Apparently, or so I’ve learned from the manosphere, every single thing that women do is designed to torment men. Yesterday, we learned that women with jobs are leeching off of men just as much as women without jobs.
Further proof of female perfidy can be found in a recent post on the popular manosphere blog In Mala Fide with the provocative title Provocative Female Attire is an Assault Against Men. Guest poster Giovanni Dannato lays it out for anyone who needs convincing:
When a woman walks down a crowded sidewalk in revealing clothing, she is forcing herself on every man nearby.
The woman fully understands the powerful biological drives of men. She knows they cannot ignore her, not even if they want to.
Amazingly, the fact that a woman might show some cleavage does not automatically mean that she wants to have sex with every single man who sees her.
She has chosen to advertise herself to everyone passing by, but she is looking only for a few men. The wealthiest, the most famous, the most powerful men she can attract. …
There’s an old elementary school custom…when you bring something tasty to class, it’s understood that you should put it away unless you intend to share it with others. …
Likewise, a woman who puts her goodies blatantly on display is making false advertisements. Nobody supposes or expects that she could share herself with her entire audience—not even if she wanted to.
That’s right. Women are like gum. Or that pizza Spicoli had delivered to him in class in Fast Times at Ridgemont High that the mean Mr. Hand forced him to share with everyone. And if you gum-pizza-ladies are not willing to share yourself with every horny man (and, presumably, lesbian) who happens to notice you in your slut uniform, you are committing a terrible infraction.
Oh, sure, wearing a totally cute outfit is not specifically against the law, but, as Dannato reminds us,
looking for refuge in explicit written law is inherently disingenuous. …
[W]omen exposing themselves without intent to reciprocate the attention they attract is impolite and inconsiderate – an act of aggression in which they use the power of their sex as a weapon.
So how can men defend themselves against such evil feminine perfidy? By yelling “hey, whore! How much?” or “can I squeeze those titties?” or “Can you give me directions to Pussy Avenue?” Because street harassment – sorry, catcalling – is
a defense mechanism used by lower status men against women flaunting themselves publicly – for the benefit of millionaires only.
What else are men supposed to do?
[M]en are effectively strapped down, gagged, and muzzled while females can flaunt and taunt with impunity. For many men this pretty much sums up every single day of an entire lifetime at school and at work.
And women won’t even admit that when they put on a cute outfit and leave the house that they’re doing it to torment men.
Western Women don’t just abuse their incredible sexual power, they pathologically lie about their inability to understand the effects and implications of their actions. In fact, they seem to derive a sort of sociopathic pleasure from being able to sow unpleasantness and discord without consequence – all while playing innocent. They express their contempt and hatred for men even as they troll the populace for providers. Their enormous power comes without responsibility and they love it that way.
And now these evil women have come up with an even-more-dastardly-than-usual way to torment men “[i]n the most vengeful, derisive, and mocking way they know how.” Yep, you guessed it: The SlutWalks. Large groups of women tormenting men with sexy clothes in unison!
Apparently overwhelmed by contemplation of the sheer feminine evil of the SlutWalks, Giovanni ends his post abruptly at this point.
I admit I don’t have the patience to wade through the comments. If any of you do, please post any of your findings below.
EDITED TO ADD: Ironically, Ferdinand Bardamu (the guy behind In Mala Fide) aids and abets the evil sexy-woman assault on men with his own retro porn site Retrotic. NSFW, of course. And if Dannato’s post is to believed, not safe for straight men generally.
NOTE: This post contains sarcasm.
“If a female of any species, can’t excite the male of that species to mate, her genes die. Biology 101.”
So then why do peacocks (male) have the huge, beautiful feathers while peahens (female) are duller by comparison?
HEY NWO WHAT DO SLUTS DRESS LIKE
Ah! random6x7 beat me to it!
Quackers,
I go to different places to get different opinions and not be in an echo chamber….
as far as AVfM, I don’t particularly think Paul Elam would give a damn if I got prostate cancer as he does seem more interested in belittling Feminists than doing things good for actual men-here’s where I might agree with many here….
I have seen many things I’d consider misandrist by Hugo Schyzer-he is a clever writer, so it is difficult to catch. Perhaps here is where I might be at odds with some here….
As far as my personal opinion of the most “reasonable” place to discuss “gender politic,” that would be Feminist Critics. I imagine many here would have a far different view…
Great minds, Pyena!
I guess Slavey and Dannato are taking the MRAL position that if they are aroused when they see a woman, it is something she is doing to them, and indeed, by being arousing at them and not having sex with them, she is doing something hostile to them.
@Quackers
“what about all those men who go shirtless in the summer? are they signifying their readiness to mate too?”
We went thru that part of biology already. Men is actions/wealth/talent/power. Try to keep up. If women were stimulated by that there’d be a ton of playgirl style mags at the news-stands, but there isn’t. Are there any at all? But run the excuse the corporation doesn’t want to make money off of porn mags for women. Yeah, that’s it. Or maybe they just can’t figure out what turns women on, even with all the women in porn. It just eludes them, all those billions of elusive dollars.
@ random6x7
Indeed! XD
Come to think of it, aren’t the males of most species of birds the pretty, colourful ones?
Hi MRAL
NWO seems to be using the Stephen Colbert “I said it, then I said it again. That’s two pieces of evidence, right there,” method of biology.
I mean, how could he say a thing if it weren’t true? That’s just not good sense.
“..and all women dress and act sexually virtually all the time.”
All the time, eh? Every moment of every hour of every day?
I guess my choice to be celebrate at the moment and not seeking a relationship despite having a few offers and having sexual urges every fucking day makes me some sort of superhuman.
Pretty much. The females have to blend in if they’re going to sit on eggs for months at a time. The male crabs are the ones stuck with the huge claws, too, and male bower birds make the awesome sex huts.
@ NWO
“Biology” is not “shit you just made up”. I’m not even a biology major and I know more about it than you!
Because the colorful plummage of male birds means that they are…unnatural? Ah, appeal to nature fallacy at its finest. Seriously, NWO, go take biology 101. The sexual habits of animals are incredibly variable. Your understanding of basic animal behaviors is lower than that of my not even five year old niece. Shit, the one who is not even two knows more about it than you. Go back to kindergarten and start again.
*celibate
So to NWO wearing cargo pants and one of my old tee shirts is sexual? Wait. I wear cargo pants and my tee shirts!
I’m very very very confused now. Does NWO want to date me? Or do my shirts magically become sexual when a woman wears them?
“..and all women dress and act sexually virtually all the time.”
Wait. Cargo pants and my tee shirts are sexual now? But *I* wear my tee shirts and cargo pants?
Does NWO want to date me? I’m so very confused.
Gah. Sorry. Browser glitch.
I don’t know if it’s been mentioned before, but does anyone else think NWO is a stunning example of the Dunning-Kruger effect?
@random6x7
Wouldn’t it be kinda hard for a female in the animal world to mate with a male of the same species if he had a mushy dick?
I’ll be sure ta put this in the book-o-larnin. Feminist research suggests, nature got it wrong. Males in the animal kingdom act sexually and patiently waits for female to rear into their erection. This is all good stuff.
Keep up the fine denial, I’m outta here.
I thought you were going, NWO?
Off to plot the inevitable downfall of Manboobz or some such.
Maybe he thinks we’ll all just die out because we’re not actually flaunting ourselves at him and we need to do this for our genes to survive or something. Then we’ll be sorry!
@NWO
Ah yes, the good ol’ “women don’t care what men look like” screed. Tell that to the guy I’m currently crushing on. I know nothing about him except for that I see him at his workplace often (and it ain’t a high status job either) it’s purely a physical attraction. How dare he exist looking all sexy and not dating me!!!
Also you may not see many Playgirl magazines on the news-stands, but you also haven’t seen the plethora of tumblr accounts dedicated to male actors and the fandoms they are a part of. Post after post of these guys with women commenting about how gorgeous they are. You really don’t have a clue NWO. And you still didn’t answer my question about why men can control themselves around a beach or a pool.
“If a female of any species, can’t excite the male of that species to mate, her genes die. Biology 101.”
Does the Big Book O’ Learnin have a section on Biology yet?
“If a female of any species, can’t excite the male of that species to mate, her genes die. Biology 101.”
Assuming a normal complement of chromosomes in her egg, a female can only pass on half of her genes to any one child. However, a woman need not reproduce herself to increase her biological fitness: kin selection can ensure a woman passes on her genes by promoting the children of her siblings – siblings share a mix of genes from their parents. You fail Biology 101.
okay, okay, since the conversation is drifting into one of my fav topics, pr0n….
this I’ll ask–since allot of Hustler type porno has plenty of buffed out guys with throbbing cocks–does that mean that the supposedly straight men proudly, even if covertly fapping (that’s the trendy term I’ve learned for masturbating in the manosphere) to said porn are secretly harboring bisexual desires?