Apparently, or so I’ve learned from the manosphere, every single thing that women do is designed to torment men. Yesterday, we learned that women with jobs are leeching off of men just as much as women without jobs.
Further proof of female perfidy can be found in a recent post on the popular manosphere blog In Mala Fide with the provocative title Provocative Female Attire is an Assault Against Men. Guest poster Giovanni Dannato lays it out for anyone who needs convincing:
When a woman walks down a crowded sidewalk in revealing clothing, she is forcing herself on every man nearby.
The woman fully understands the powerful biological drives of men. She knows they cannot ignore her, not even if they want to.
Amazingly, the fact that a woman might show some cleavage does not automatically mean that she wants to have sex with every single man who sees her.
She has chosen to advertise herself to everyone passing by, but she is looking only for a few men. The wealthiest, the most famous, the most powerful men she can attract. …
There’s an old elementary school custom…when you bring something tasty to class, it’s understood that you should put it away unless you intend to share it with others. …
Likewise, a woman who puts her goodies blatantly on display is making false advertisements. Nobody supposes or expects that she could share herself with her entire audience—not even if she wanted to.
That’s right. Women are like gum. Or that pizza Spicoli had delivered to him in class in Fast Times at Ridgemont High that the mean Mr. Hand forced him to share with everyone. And if you gum-pizza-ladies are not willing to share yourself with every horny man (and, presumably, lesbian) who happens to notice you in your slut uniform, you are committing a terrible infraction.
Oh, sure, wearing a totally cute outfit is not specifically against the law, but, as Dannato reminds us,
looking for refuge in explicit written law is inherently disingenuous. …
[W]omen exposing themselves without intent to reciprocate the attention they attract is impolite and inconsiderate – an act of aggression in which they use the power of their sex as a weapon.
So how can men defend themselves against such evil feminine perfidy? By yelling “hey, whore! How much?” or “can I squeeze those titties?” or “Can you give me directions to Pussy Avenue?” Because street harassment – sorry, catcalling – is
a defense mechanism used by lower status men against women flaunting themselves publicly – for the benefit of millionaires only.
What else are men supposed to do?
[M]en are effectively strapped down, gagged, and muzzled while females can flaunt and taunt with impunity. For many men this pretty much sums up every single day of an entire lifetime at school and at work.
And women won’t even admit that when they put on a cute outfit and leave the house that they’re doing it to torment men.
Western Women don’t just abuse their incredible sexual power, they pathologically lie about their inability to understand the effects and implications of their actions. In fact, they seem to derive a sort of sociopathic pleasure from being able to sow unpleasantness and discord without consequence – all while playing innocent. They express their contempt and hatred for men even as they troll the populace for providers. Their enormous power comes without responsibility and they love it that way.
And now these evil women have come up with an even-more-dastardly-than-usual way to torment men “[i]n the most vengeful, derisive, and mocking way they know how.” Yep, you guessed it: The SlutWalks. Large groups of women tormenting men with sexy clothes in unison!
Apparently overwhelmed by contemplation of the sheer feminine evil of the SlutWalks, Giovanni ends his post abruptly at this point.
I admit I don’t have the patience to wade through the comments. If any of you do, please post any of your findings below.
EDITED TO ADD: Ironically, Ferdinand Bardamu (the guy behind In Mala Fide) aids and abets the evil sexy-woman assault on men with his own retro porn site Retrotic. NSFW, of course. And if Dannato’s post is to believed, not safe for straight men generally.
NOTE: This post contains sarcasm.
Mr. Futrelle, fair enough, I was trying to make a point that as there are different ideaologies in Feminism, there are different ideologies in the manosphere….
http://www.inmalafide.com/blog/2011/10/05/lick-that-kitty-you-misogynistic-douchebag/
one of my favorite authors 😉
(except I like the OG version on his blog better than the inmalafide one.)
Okay, NWO, photo time!
This is me: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v92/wolfychan/d0noj.jpg
Am I dressed “animalistically”? (This is so silly. Animals don’t wear clothes.)
Do you feel men seeing me in this manner of dress will be unable to control themselves? Do you feel I’m teasing and taunting men with this presentation? Do you think I deserve to be raped for dangling my tasty temptingness before men in this way?
NWOslave seems to be having theme days lately. Yesterday it was , “Why are you so mean to me, guys?!” and today it’s “women are animals”.
I can’t wait for his upcoming blue period.
And to the guys who want the old way back, are you crazy?
I love the non-contractual sex whoo hoo Lol
I wonder what NWO makes of National Geographic?
random6x7, he probably considers it porn.
I dunno Holly. Those shorts are rather above the knee if you ask me.
“There’s an old elementary school custom…when you bring something tasty to class, it’s understood that you should put it away unless you intend to share it with others. …”
I wanted to link to Brian Griffin (?) saying “Did you bring enough breasts for the rest of the class?” here, but I couldn’t find it on YouTube (and the results of the search were… odd).
Probably just as well, half my posts are just linking to videos. I’m the Wreck-Gar of Manbooz!
Seriously, though, there’s a reason why that custom is associated with elementary school. Adults are expected to be mature enough to deal with not getting everything they want without throwing a temper tantrum over it.
Also, even if you bought into that weird idea about ‘men are only attracted to bodies, women are only attracted to actions’, wouldn’t the male equivalent of dressing sexy be acting cool? Not raping someone, FFS. They’d have to organize CoolWalks where they walk around being all confident and charming and dressing snappily and playing in bands.
“They’d have to organize CoolWalks where they walk around being all confident and charming and dressing snappily and playing in bands.”
Lol!
Let’s be honest folk’s, there really is no intelligence here. Everything is mockery and hatred in the old boobsphere. It’s what you’re all about. Isn’t it? Oh that’s right. I forgot the lip service equality speech. Your little social experiment is about to crash all around you. No biggie, nothing I wanna save anyway. The real fun is about to begin.
Joanna – They’re at the knee! I am a Proper Lady!
…I’m also extremely short. On an average-sized man they’d be above the knee. I guess that makes him sluttier and more animalistic than me.
Gosh Holly, I can see your forearms, and your knees! And if the picture had extended further downward, I might have been able to see your ankles – and everyone* knows that they are extremely sinful to be left uncovered.
* In the 19th century, perhaps.
NWO, thanks for finally waking up to the fact that the purpose of this site is to mock misogyny. You may go now.
NWO: Where the hell do you get this bullshit? Even if every single woman in the world acted like a dog in heat (WHICH WE DON’T), that doesn’t give you (or any man) license to skip the asking permission part of sex. YOU have to take responsibility FOR YOUR OWN BEHAVIOR. Even if a woman is walking naked down the street, YOU need to keep your fucking pants zipped. And it’s the same if there’s a man walking down the street naked, I have to keep MY pants on. See, everybody has to take responsibility for controlling our sex drives.
Hey… if women are interested in money and a provider and that’s our sexual desires, why aren’t there more female thieves? You’d think that if:
A) Rape is the natural result of frustrated male sexuality
and
B) Men are attracted to bodies while women are attracted to $MONEY$,
Then women with frustrated sexuality would steal large amounts of cash all the time. And, I don’t know, masturbate with it or something. Buy themselves shoes and handbags. If women really are all turned on by money and desperate for status symbols, why aren’t women all enormous petty thieves?
(Pre-emptively: No, claiming that dating/marriage/divorce is “like theft” does not count. Yes, I’m sure you can find a news story of a woman stealing something. But it’s definitely not the female epidemic this worldview would predict.)
Yea, Stoner….the different ideologies of the manosphere are which aspects of a woman’s life are appropriate/more useful for men to control.
At the end of the day, MRAs/PUAs/MGTOWs have one uniting belief: that women are subhuman and only men have have the final say on how they should live their lives.
All of them and their “varying ideologies” can go fuck themselves.
You know, I would probably be a miserable person too if I decided everyone walks by and turns me on is doing it on purpose just to taunt me.
If I’m understanding this correctly, women are just doing this to frustrate straight guys, right? So when I see a woman and find her attractive, that’s just a side-effect and I don’t get to be all righteously indignant?
Imagine if a woman was walking down the street naked. Not “like naked,” not with exposed arms or whateverthefuck, seriously buck ass naked. How would you react?
You might be very surprised.
You might be worried about her, particularly if it was cold out or if she seemed confused.
You might be offended, if she was hangin’ it out in front of people who really didn’t want to see that.
You might be curious about why she was doing it.
You might be, if this wasn’t the first time you saw such a thing, completely indifferent and more concerned with getting to the bank before closing or remembering to buy dog food.
You might like yourself a look, sure, if the situation seemed under control and she was your type. Maybe even a dopey grin if she wasn’t looking your way.
But I’m having a hell of a time getting to where it makes any sense to sexually assault her. Just because she’s naked? At the absolute extreme of “slutty appearance,” it still makes no sense in my head.
@KathleenB
” YOU have to take responsibility FOR YOUR OWN BEHAVIOR.”
Indeed you do. if a woman devolves down to animalistic state when she dresses and acts sexually to attract the attention of all men. And a man devolves down to an animalstic state when he takes what sexually attracts him. What is the ration of men-vs-women who have devolved down to an animalistic state?
Responsibilty is for everyone.
NWO, am I “dressing sexually”?
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v92/wolfychan/d0noj.jpg
NWO, what’s your explanation for the fact that most people tend to choose mates in their own socioeconomic class? If women went after money, and men went after looks, that shouldn’t be the case.
Quackers,
Fair enough….
I’ve felt, as a male “unfairly judged” many times when reading things by Feminist authors….
“…if a woman devolves down to animalistic state when she dresses and acts sexually to attract the attention of all men.”
Except we don’t. When we dress up, it’s either for ourselves, or for someone in particular, OR we aren’t dressed up fancy, but it just happens to be attractive to someone’s tastes. Since you are the one making the assumption that we do it to attract every man, the burden of proof is on you. It’s not for us to have to defend existing while being attractive to some.
Right, so now I’m just waiting with bated breath for NWO’s predicted Manboobz Apocalypse Fun Times.
*drums fingers impatiently*
How about now?
I’ve taken figure drawing classes before. That includes naked male and female models. Surprisingly, no one has sexually assaulted any of them simply for being naked. In fact, most people are just interested in getting a good drawing done.
Amazing how people have the ability to control themselves! you’d think we have something crazy like free will and common decency to not rape!