Apparently, or so I’ve learned from the manosphere, every single thing that women do is designed to torment men. Yesterday, we learned that women with jobs are leeching off of men just as much as women without jobs.
Further proof of female perfidy can be found in a recent post on the popular manosphere blog In Mala Fide with the provocative title Provocative Female Attire is an Assault Against Men. Guest poster Giovanni Dannato lays it out for anyone who needs convincing:
When a woman walks down a crowded sidewalk in revealing clothing, she is forcing herself on every man nearby.
The woman fully understands the powerful biological drives of men. She knows they cannot ignore her, not even if they want to.
Amazingly, the fact that a woman might show some cleavage does not automatically mean that she wants to have sex with every single man who sees her.
She has chosen to advertise herself to everyone passing by, but she is looking only for a few men. The wealthiest, the most famous, the most powerful men she can attract. …
There’s an old elementary school custom…when you bring something tasty to class, it’s understood that you should put it away unless you intend to share it with others. …
Likewise, a woman who puts her goodies blatantly on display is making false advertisements. Nobody supposes or expects that she could share herself with her entire audience—not even if she wanted to.
That’s right. Women are like gum. Or that pizza Spicoli had delivered to him in class in Fast Times at Ridgemont High that the mean Mr. Hand forced him to share with everyone. And if you gum-pizza-ladies are not willing to share yourself with every horny man (and, presumably, lesbian) who happens to notice you in your slut uniform, you are committing a terrible infraction.
Oh, sure, wearing a totally cute outfit is not specifically against the law, but, as Dannato reminds us,
looking for refuge in explicit written law is inherently disingenuous. …
[W]omen exposing themselves without intent to reciprocate the attention they attract is impolite and inconsiderate – an act of aggression in which they use the power of their sex as a weapon.
So how can men defend themselves against such evil feminine perfidy? By yelling “hey, whore! How much?” or “can I squeeze those titties?” or “Can you give me directions to Pussy Avenue?” Because street harassment – sorry, catcalling – is
a defense mechanism used by lower status men against women flaunting themselves publicly – for the benefit of millionaires only.
What else are men supposed to do?
[M]en are effectively strapped down, gagged, and muzzled while females can flaunt and taunt with impunity. For many men this pretty much sums up every single day of an entire lifetime at school and at work.
And women won’t even admit that when they put on a cute outfit and leave the house that they’re doing it to torment men.
Western Women don’t just abuse their incredible sexual power, they pathologically lie about their inability to understand the effects and implications of their actions. In fact, they seem to derive a sort of sociopathic pleasure from being able to sow unpleasantness and discord without consequence – all while playing innocent. They express their contempt and hatred for men even as they troll the populace for providers. Their enormous power comes without responsibility and they love it that way.
And now these evil women have come up with an even-more-dastardly-than-usual way to torment men “[i]n the most vengeful, derisive, and mocking way they know how.” Yep, you guessed it: The SlutWalks. Large groups of women tormenting men with sexy clothes in unison!
Apparently overwhelmed by contemplation of the sheer feminine evil of the SlutWalks, Giovanni ends his post abruptly at this point.
I admit I don’t have the patience to wade through the comments. If any of you do, please post any of your findings below.
EDITED TO ADD: Ironically, Ferdinand Bardamu (the guy behind In Mala Fide) aids and abets the evil sexy-woman assault on men with his own retro porn site Retrotic. NSFW, of course. And if Dannato’s post is to believed, not safe for straight men generally.
NOTE: This post contains sarcasm.
NWO, you still need to tell women what to wear. Clearly, that will solve all sorts of problems and bring an end to the feminazi gestapo. The longer women are allowed to wear what they wat, the longer you suffer. So why aren’t you in a hurry to make a decision?
It’s pretty funny that NWO is into evo-psych, when last we discussed it, he didn’t believe in evolution.
Evolution is not true but evo psych is because SCIENCE
or something
I’ve now lost track of who posted that Hot Chelle Rae video in which thread, but I can’t help noticing that those guys are rather fine. Even though I get the sense that this is what we’re going to laugh at in 20 years.
I’m posting this as an observation as someone whose read many different things in the manosphere (and even gotten stuff posted at Inmalafide.)
If you see “contradictions,” that’s because there are, there are “white power” guys vs mixed race guys vs others etc. There are PUA’s like Roissy/Heartiste and Roosh V who make fun of MRA’s like Paul Elam. Then Mr. Elam insults PUA’s, even Fidelbogen and Alek Novy will often post against PUA’s and “Gamers.” So it’s all kind of funny in a way….
It would be kind of like Hugo Schwyzer making fun of Roger Jensen, then Clarisse Thorn saying that they are both prudes, then Twisty Faster and Amanda Marcotte saying that none of the others even get “it” and the real problems are such and such….
Well, he did say we should dress like Mennonites, but he failed to specify whether he meant these Mennonites: http://www.travelandtransitions.com/stories_photos/images/Aug3-Clonmel/mennonite-choir.jpg or these Mennonites: http://www.kciiradio.com/2010/08/iowa-mennonite-students-travel-thousands-of-miles-for-government-sanctioned-cultural-exchange-2/
I’m so confused.
The “women aren’t attracted to male bodies” argument is way more fun to disprove than the “women don’t really get harassed” one.
Still waiting for that definition of “slutty” clothing. Owly’s “Dress like a menonite” in the other thread didn’t really help matters.
Yes, the diversity of opinion in the MRM is stunning, what with some of them being racist misogynists and some of them being less racist misogynists.
…”mixed race guys?” Really?
Holly, read this….
http://www.inmalafide.com/blog/2011/11/05/the-real-significance-of-occupywallstreet/
Dude, why would we go read some random In Mala Fide post?
Because it’s racist!
I guess we know stonerwithaboner isn’t one of them “mixed race guys.”
katz, suit yourself….
I go everywhere, from Pandagon to AVfM, Quite Riot Girl, Feminist Critics, hell I’ve even read about prison rape at Stormfront and those losers would love to throw me in an oven while pretending the Holocaust never happened…..
Well that was super racist! I’m sure glad you shared that, stonerwithaboner, for… reasons.
…
I guess I missed those decades.
Holly, read the comments section 😉
Stoner, I think we already mocked that article.
oh, and I don’t expect a “cookie” if you read my comments, I expect I’ll be called an asshole, but since I hope I am dealing with intelligent people, that they can make a distinction that i am a different sort of asshole…..
Oh hey, good for you, Stoner.
It’s pretty funny there are guys there trying to define themselves as “unmixed whites.” Like they had their own personal Garden of Eden in Sweden or they descended from only blond apes.
I don’t know why you’re aiming so low, stoner, an asshole is an asshole regardless of difference.
everyone is an asshole to some degree or another for different reasons I guess…..
I know Amanda M. is a favorite villain of the MRM, but these two are not really in the same category of feminist at all.
@Joanna
“And they say women can’t control their hormones. Really dudes, get a hold of yourselves!”
Women can’t control themselves in the least. From the time they hit puberty thru their entire lives, they dress and act like an animal in heat with the express intention of sexually exciting all men within eyeshot.
Are there young boys around entering puberty who have no understanding of what’s happening? They don’t care. If they did they’d show the slightest bit of restaint and understanding. Worse, they encourage young girls to imitate their behavior as well.
Do they know their actions of teasing and denial is cruel and degrading? Of course. They enjoy taunting men with sex and then calling men animals as they themselves behave like the cruelest of animals.
They enjoy acting like animals while demanding men behave. They seem to be in their glory when they can excite as many men as possible, but woe to any man who dares touch the sacred chalice he’s been taunted and teased with.
Their animalistic actions of teasing, taunting and denial over and over again brings a perverse pleasure. Young boys, socially awkward men, lonely men; It’s like a game of how many sexually frustrated men you can leave in your wake.
With their animalistic behavior they’ll cause every type of sexual dysfunction possible. All the while screaming behave while laughing at the sexual dysfunction they’ve caused. By the boatload they’ll become the majority coucilors and therapists of every kind to council men on their poor behavior; A final insult.
These same women will scold a child for teasing a dog while she commits and encourages all women to commit the vilest act of taunting and degradation. Truely, modern day women treat a dumb beast with far more love, tenderness and compassion they afford to any man.
Does anyone else hear the Eddie Murphy “Ice Cream Man” bit in their heads when NWO goes off on how women taunt men by being dressed?
“I got some ice cream, and you can’t afford it…”
Seriously, NWO how many women do you know? In real life, personally. Not on the internet.