Apparently, or so I’ve learned from the manosphere, every single thing that women do is designed to torment men. Yesterday, we learned that women with jobs are leeching off of men just as much as women without jobs.
Further proof of female perfidy can be found in a recent post on the popular manosphere blog In Mala Fide with the provocative title Provocative Female Attire is an Assault Against Men. Guest poster Giovanni Dannato lays it out for anyone who needs convincing:
When a woman walks down a crowded sidewalk in revealing clothing, she is forcing herself on every man nearby.
The woman fully understands the powerful biological drives of men. She knows they cannot ignore her, not even if they want to.
Amazingly, the fact that a woman might show some cleavage does not automatically mean that she wants to have sex with every single man who sees her.
She has chosen to advertise herself to everyone passing by, but she is looking only for a few men. The wealthiest, the most famous, the most powerful men she can attract. …
There’s an old elementary school custom…when you bring something tasty to class, it’s understood that you should put it away unless you intend to share it with others. …
Likewise, a woman who puts her goodies blatantly on display is making false advertisements. Nobody supposes or expects that she could share herself with her entire audience—not even if she wanted to.
That’s right. Women are like gum. Or that pizza Spicoli had delivered to him in class in Fast Times at Ridgemont High that the mean Mr. Hand forced him to share with everyone. And if you gum-pizza-ladies are not willing to share yourself with every horny man (and, presumably, lesbian) who happens to notice you in your slut uniform, you are committing a terrible infraction.
Oh, sure, wearing a totally cute outfit is not specifically against the law, but, as Dannato reminds us,
looking for refuge in explicit written law is inherently disingenuous. …
[W]omen exposing themselves without intent to reciprocate the attention they attract is impolite and inconsiderate – an act of aggression in which they use the power of their sex as a weapon.
So how can men defend themselves against such evil feminine perfidy? By yelling “hey, whore! How much?” or “can I squeeze those titties?” or “Can you give me directions to Pussy Avenue?” Because street harassment – sorry, catcalling – is
a defense mechanism used by lower status men against women flaunting themselves publicly – for the benefit of millionaires only.
What else are men supposed to do?
[M]en are effectively strapped down, gagged, and muzzled while females can flaunt and taunt with impunity. For many men this pretty much sums up every single day of an entire lifetime at school and at work.
And women won’t even admit that when they put on a cute outfit and leave the house that they’re doing it to torment men.
Western Women don’t just abuse their incredible sexual power, they pathologically lie about their inability to understand the effects and implications of their actions. In fact, they seem to derive a sort of sociopathic pleasure from being able to sow unpleasantness and discord without consequence – all while playing innocent. They express their contempt and hatred for men even as they troll the populace for providers. Their enormous power comes without responsibility and they love it that way.
And now these evil women have come up with an even-more-dastardly-than-usual way to torment men “[i]n the most vengeful, derisive, and mocking way they know how.” Yep, you guessed it: The SlutWalks. Large groups of women tormenting men with sexy clothes in unison!
Apparently overwhelmed by contemplation of the sheer feminine evil of the SlutWalks, Giovanni ends his post abruptly at this point.
I admit I don’t have the patience to wade through the comments. If any of you do, please post any of your findings below.
EDITED TO ADD: Ironically, Ferdinand Bardamu (the guy behind In Mala Fide) aids and abets the evil sexy-woman assault on men with his own retro porn site Retrotic. NSFW, of course. And if Dannato’s post is to believed, not safe for straight men generally.
NOTE: This post contains sarcasm.
What about those of us who wear business suits 24/7 (okay I am exaggerating slightly, I stopped wearing them on weekends unless I have business to attend to)?
Are we dressing slutty?
No, then you’re just flaunting to da poor downtrodden menz that you’ve stolen their jobs too.
“Male musicians and recording artists were not constrained by feminist :”political correctness” then the way they have been since about 1972 or so.”
You’ve obviously never heard of these eejits.
http://www.harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=297
Holy crap, NWO is the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal! It ALL MAKES SENSE NOW!!!
I find the notion that modern male musicians are constrained by feminism totally hilarious, in a slightly sad sort of way. “Okay, Eminem, let’s do another song about murdering women – but this time, murder them in a FEMINIST way!” Right.
DKM, if you understood that you lived a very specific sort of kink lifestyle (rather than being some moral crusader from the olden days) and treated your life accordingly, I think you’d be a happier man. If you want to live out your extended historical fantasies with your dolls, that’s fine– there are other men who do similar things out there, typically with RealDolls– but please realize this doesn’t make you a morally superior human being who knows the Real Truth about feminism.
Actually, now that I’m thinking about this… DKM, are your bizarre screeds on the internet part of your kink? Are they part of the immersion necessary for you to fully enjoy your world? If so, you should stop doing that; it’s not nice to engage people in your sexual activities without their consent. It makes you a sort of “flasher”. If you want to write about your kinky life with your dolls you should make a sex blog or you should hang out on a love doll forum or something. Not here.
And anyway! Music in ye olden days was all about swooning teh wimminz. Now it’s all “smack ma bitch up, yo!”
PFKAE–November29, 2011 @2:07pm
Slutty? No! Pseudomasculine, unisex, anti-male and giving you modern women the sex-appeal and loveliness of an oil slick in a deserted junkyard? Yes, definitely!!
Business suits belong on businessMEN! Any questions.
The post by Glass right below yours–@2:10pm, is much closer to the point! It does reflect unwanted, uninvited, and useless government-mandated female presence in a largely male business environment, academia, or civil service! Occupations and postitions that could have, and should have, been held by MALE breadwinners!
Adding! Exclamation points! Makes it! TRUE!!
Joanna–to the extent that you are right about old-fashioned music, as contrasted with modern feminist (or pro-feminist) hypersexual s**t,, THAT was to its credit!
Meller: So your response to being proved utterly wrong in a factual statement is… to reply that you’re still right despite being proved wrong? That’s one ell of an ego you’ve got going there.
Yes.
1) What the hell drugs are you taking?
2) Why the fuck can’t you use proper punctuation? (see what I did there? Question sentences end with a question mark! It should be right next to the shift key on the lower right of your keyboard.)
3) No, seriously, I want to know what combination of drugs produces the kind of utter crap you dribble endlessly from your keyboard.
Tatjna: Also, multiple exclamation points makes it look like you’re trying to imitate Captain Kirk in text. That’s pretty cool (tho Picard and Sisko were a zillion time awesomer than Kirk).
Curse you, Joanna. I was trying to forget that those particular eejits existed. I love men in eyeliner, but not enough to tolerate them sounding like that.
Davie-
Can I call you Davie?
Tough shit I’m calling you Davie
I’m a white hetero male just like I’m assuming you are.
Guess what dude, it doesn’t mean shit. It doesn’t make us special. It doesn’t mean we are superior in any fashion to any other person. You can’t present any factual data or evidence to support your earnest belief that men have some innate superiority to anyone else.
You pine for the “good ol’ days” when bullshit gender politics and fucked up socialization supposedly put men at the head of the mythical “normal” family unit. You do this because you’re a pathetic failure and you wish you could go back in time where you believe your penis and your skin color would give you the power and control over other people you so desperately crave.
All you MRA types are cut from the same pathetic, whiny tapestry of weakness, zero social skills, and a pathological desire to feel powerful.
You’re a sad little creature and I would feel sorry for you if you didn’t bear such hatred toward others.
Joanna–to the extent that you are right about old-fashioned music, as contrasted with modern feminist (or pro-feminist) hypersexual s**t,, THAT was to its credit!
DKM, I’m a classical musician. My area of specialization is early vocal music. I’ve studied the history of Western music in some depth, and I can personally assure you that what people were mostly singing about in the 1500s covered the following topics:
– God is awesome!
– Sex is awesome!
– Also oral sex! And threesomes!
– Orgasms are ESPECIALLY awesome!
– Hey, sexy person, wanna have sex? Because it’s awesome!
– I’m not having sex right now and I’m sad about it!
– Being in love is awesome! Especially if you get sex!
– It’s springtime! That’s awesome! You know what happens in the springtime? SEX!
– No one will have sex with me! Time to get drunk! Booze is awesome!
– Look! Sexy young people having sex! That’s awesome.
Unless you are going to argue that feminists have time machines and personally went back a few hundred years before the origins of the feminist movement to tell composers of the time to write a vast number of songs about how much they like boinking, I’m pretty much going to have to call bullshit on the “old-fashioned music” claim. I get that you appear to believe history began and ended in some porcelain-based version of Victorian England and/or the Lawrence Welk show, but, well…it didn’t.
“Business suits belong on businessMEN! Any questions.”
Men can wear eyeliner! Women can wear pants! WTF is wrong with having the choice???
NWO’s prediction that none of the regulars here were still with their first boyfriends hasn’t been falsified once, but four times at least so far. It’s a pattern that evidentiary data that does not fit NWO’s theory is rejected or ignored, rather than the theory being bunkum.
Similarly, NWO asked Holly whether she had given her virginity to her first lover (fetishising virginity is another weird idea perpetuated in society) but the question could just as well have been asked of anyone, except that NWO would have to accept more data undermining his ideas. Such as, a significant number of us did not consent to our first sexual encounters.
Earlier in this thread I pointed out NWO’s failures in biology, and elsewhere noted his innate cruelty suggested by the idea of locking a woman and a dog in a trunk for an hour to see who would be the more grateful to be let out.
Hence, I asked NWO, “are you a sociopath?” Why won’t he answer?
I just had a giant threesome with both these comments ’cause I loved them so much. It was tricky, because I was already pretty tired out from my fling with Glass’ witty T-shirts (sorry your closet is now empty, Glass, but I showed those T-shirts a damn good time) but still totally hawt. And now DKM’s comments are like the after-sex cigarette (ie. cancerous and stinky.)
That awkward moment when you rewatch Bambi as an adult and figure out what “twitterpated” is all about. 😀
Before any of our dudebros start whining, it’s not the obscenity of the lyrics I object to, it’s the horrible candy-sweet vocals and the shitty techno-lite that offends my ears.
@Pollywog: What’s interesting about all that is that the perception that in the past, songs were a lot less vulgar is at least partly manufactured. In “The Conspiracy of Good Taste” there are a few examples given of this phenomena, for instance a upper class researcher who wrote a book compiling English folk songs basically rewrote songs for his book so that they would be less bawdy/vulgar.
Most of what DKM think of how the past was so much less vulgar than now is based on active historical revisionism by conservative folks.
And the award for the Best Metaphor goes to….
Bagelsan!
Both men and women can wear business suits AND eyeliner at the same time! In fact, I highly recommend that they do. Especially the guys, if they’re sexy.