Oh, ladies, must you complain so much? I mean, who cares if every time you say something on the internet some random dude threatens to rape you? White and Nerdy, the dude behind the Omega Virgin Revolt blog, doesn’t care, and he wants you to know it:
#mencallmethings is just another example of how women (in first world countries) don’t have any actual problems. Between the government and manginas doing everything for women, no woman has any true problems. Any “problem” a woman has is because of one of these reasons:
1. A desire for the equivalent of fried ice. IOW she wants something that is physically impossible.
2. Failed attempts at defrauding, stealing from, or otherwise attempting to enslave men.
That’s it. When a woman has to go through 1% of what a typical non-alpha man has to go through then maybe she can talk about having actual problems. Until that happens women should keep their mouths shut.
Exactly. We need to stop talking about men raping women to focus on the much more important issue of women not having sex with White and Nerdy.
But I am wondering about one thing. Is it possible that the women in question were asking for fried rice instead of fried ice? Because fried rice is totally a thing, and if you call up the proper restaurant someone will literally bring it to your door.
Now I’m hungry.
NOTE: This post may contain 
….
@HellKell: Time will tell what MRA’s actually do. They could fizzle out or get stronger every year. Who knows.
@Katz: Families would be in a stronger position if fathers knew they were raising their own children. I also would remove any seeds of doubt men might have and couldn’t re-neg further down the road.
WHAT IF SHE SECRETLY FUCKED HIS TWIN BROTHER? WHAT IF THE TEST DIDN’T EXAMINE ENOUGH GENETIC LOCI AND THE BAJILLION TO ONE CHANCE OF A PERFECT ACCIDENTAL MATCH HAPPENED?? WHAT IF ALL WOMEN ARE SECRETLY ALIENS WHO STEAL MEN’S SPERM TO FEED THEIR OWN DIABOLICAL LIFE FORCES???
…Okay, well, that last one’s obviously true.
@Zhinxy: Why? Most liberals demanded massive government spending to pay for ALL healthcare.
I’m a libertarian, so this does not apply to me. So I ask you, why is this the government’s business.
Brandon wrote, “What odd paranoia’s? The fact that at a bare minimum, thousands of men are paying money for children they 1) didn’t help create or 2) legally sign paperwork declaring them the legal guardian.”
I still need a frakking citation for this, Brandon. We at least had the statistic giving a 1 in 6 chance of a woman being raped during her lifetime. As far as I can tell you’re pulling ALL of this out of your ass.
(Also, is it just me or is Brandon acting like Bagelsan is actually being serious?) 😛
Holy shit, the identical twins. What will we DO, BRANDON, WHAT WILL WE DO?
@Bagelsan: I would support that measure. Mothers should be given their children and not someone else’s child. So if an “exit test” was instituted, I would support that.
But I don’t want to lose sight of the bigger picture; as always, the only thing Brandon cares about is that he doesn’t have to spend a cent on anything that isn’t Brandon. 😀
Molly, are you implying that my invisible Canadian baby (in Montana?) and the impending lawsuit/kidney removal/imprisonment of Brandon is maybe not entirely 100% serious? 😀
Here you go Molly: http://bit.ly/tf4cEl
An “exit test.” Jesus wept.
@Hellkell: Citation needed 😉
Zhinxy ain’t one.
But dude, I am actually cool with government funded paternity tests. I said as much earlier. That’s actually not the same thing as mandating one for all children.
also, you still haven’t established that fathers are frequently defrauded. Remember that being wrong isn’t fraud. Fraud requires falsehood; deliberate falsehood. Being inaccurate is insufficient. That’s why most numbers that MRAs claim mean *FRAUD* aren’t actually evidence for their claims; they’re only evidence of women being wrong.
Cute, Brandon, but that’s not how it works. We’re not making the claims–you are–hence we are not your google bitches.
Here ya go Brandon:
http://www.childsupportanalysis.co.uk/analysis_and_opinion/choices_and_behaviours/aabb.htm
@Rutee: She is signing a document claiming a man is the father. It’s called due diligence and she should exercise it prior to her signing that document.
A man should also exercise the same due diligence prior to signing that document and get a paternity test.
An excerpt:
“The AABB (American Association of Blood Banks [1]) annually publishes consolidated statistics from many accredited paternity testing services. These may reveal, for example, that 28% of paternity tests were “negative”, and the man tested is not the biological father of the child. (28% is a typical figure).
This does not mean that 28% of men in the population are not the biological fathers of the children they believe are theirs. It does not even mean this in sub-populations “at risk”, such as broken families. And it certainly does not mean that there is a 28% rate of paternity fraud [2] in any given population or sub-population! In fact, it means very little other than what it says – these are simply the statistics for a given set of paternity tests, saying little about the rate of misattributed paternity [3] for the sub-population who have been tested.”
“A man should also exercise the same due diligence prior to signing that document and get a paternity test.”
Okay, then he can do that! He can just go do that and no need for some stupid State baby poking problem! Let’s go have lunch!
@bagelsan: WTF was that? Some second rate “think tank” that is obviously biased…and actually ceased operating July of 2007.
Do you actually have a reliable source?
“Do you actually have a reliable source?”
Funny, I was asking you the same thing, Brandon…
Dude, it’s just a simple explanation of how paternity test stats don’t address the actual rates of paternity fraud in any way. It’s faster than me typing out the exact same explanation. :p
Really, a working knowledge of stats should tell you everything that link does, they just put it fairly succinctly.
@Zhinxy: Why? Most liberals demanded massive government spending to pay for ALL healthcare.
Oh, I forgot to add, does this include you? Or do you think we should have private healthcare but mandate paternity testing, cause it’s so vitally f’n important? Why would I be completely unsurprised at the latter…
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2011/09/18/six-in-10-who-take-dna-tests-in-wales-turn-out-not-to-be-fathers-91466-29442359/
And that is just on a portion of the men. I wonder what the number would be if you broadened it out to every child.
I bet the percentage would be even higher.
And they only take the dna tests because there is some doubt in the first place.
You really believe that over sixty percent of women are lying about who their children’s fathers are??
No. I think women are more promiscuous now than in previous decades and when they get pregnant, even they don’t know who the father is.