Categories
evil women life before feminism MGTOW misogyny pedophiles oh sorry ephebophiles sexy robot ladies

Johnny Appleseed: A Man Going His Own Way?

How do you like them apples?

So yesterday I quoted some random Spearheader who described women (well, white women in particular) as “complete parasitical whores roaming the landscape spreading VD like Johnny Appleseed and fucking men over.”

One reader wondered if Mr. Appleseed really went about spreading VD. So I did a little research, and it turns out that it is exceedingly unlikely that Mr. Appleseed – who actually was a real person — spread anything other than the magic of apples. And his Swedenborgian beliefs.

Why? Because Mr. Appleseed – real name John Chapman – was what these days we might call a Man Going His Own Way. Seems he didn’t have much truck with the ladies, according to one contemporary account quoted in his Wikipedia entry:

On one occasion Miss PRICE’s mother asked Johnny if he would not be a happier man, if he were settled in a home of his own, and had a family to love him. He opened his eyes very wide–they were remarkably keen, penetrating grey eyes, almost black–and replied that all women were not what they professed to be; that some of them were deceivers; and a man might not marry the amiable woman that he thought he was getting, after all.

So what led poor Mr. Appleseed to these dire thoughts about women? Apparently the underage girl he hoped to some day get with was more into dudes who weren’t him:

Now we had always heard that Johnny had loved once upon a time, and that his lady love had proven false to him. Then he said one time he saw a poor, friendless little girl, who had no one to care for her, and sent her to school, and meant to bring her up to suit himself, and when she was old enough he intended to marry her. He clothed her and watched over her; but when she was fifteen years old, he called to see her once unexpectedly, and found her sitting beside a young man, with her hand in his, listening to his silly twaddle.

That ungrateful little strumpet!

I peeped over at Johnny while he was telling this, and, young as I was, I saw his eyes grow dark as violets, and the pupils enlarge, and his voice rise up in denunciation, while his nostrils dilated and his thin lips worked with emotion. How angry he grew! He thought the girl was basely ungrateful. After that time she was no protegé of his.

But Appleseed, despite giving up on women in the real world, held out hope for the afterlife – explaining to others that he expected to have two spirit wives all his own after he died. Which I guess is the 19th century equivalent of the MGTOWers today who fantasize about the sexy robot ladies who will eventually, it is hoped, make actual human females – with their troubling “thoughts” and “needs” and “desires” of their own – obsolete.

Mr. Appleseed’s quest to remain alone was probably also helped by the fact that – if the illustration I found on Wikipedia is any indication – he looked a bit like Dale Gribble from King of the Hill. Only much, much sloppier, with long hair. Oh, and instead of wearing a baseball cap, he wore “a tin utensil which answered both as a cap and a mush pot.”

So, yeah, a creepy weirdo who hates women — definitely an MGTOWer all the way.

Oh, except that he actually did something with his life — you know, helping spread apple trees to a big portion of the midwest — instead of spending all his time going on about how all women are whores.

1K Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
kysokisaen
13 years ago

Speaking of participants and lurkers, where the hell did the troll who started all this go? He did all that fussing and when we finally deliver up what he wanted in a way the rest of us could get into, he disappears. I think that’s reason enough to ban his petulant ass next time he tries to derail a thread with Holocaust denial. Or any version of the Let’s All Look At Me Troll Show.

BlackBloc
BlackBloc
13 years ago

>>Stalin still gets a free pass in certain vaguely respectable quarters, whereas Hitler-worship is rightly confined to the lunatic fringe

That might be something that’s culture/country specific? Here in Quebec I’ve met countless Maoists, one Castrist, never a Stalinist. I’ve heard there’s a decent Trotskyist following in the UK (the SWP?). And that’s it.

Hitler has some fans (we butt heads every so often), though Le Pen has a better cachet and some of our homegrown fascists who have ties to the Quebec independance movements are more beloved. IMO Hitler gets most of the hatred because while Stalin/Trotsky and co. are supposed to be internationalists (thus loony communists from everywhere may love them), fascism is country-specific (which means that every country that’s not Germany will be ambivalent about him).

BlackBloc
BlackBloc
13 years ago

I meant fascists from every country that’s not Germany… non-fascists tend to not be ambivalent about Hitler.

kysokisaen
13 years ago

Yeah, I had forgotten about Georgian-Russian issues because my sympathies – and therefore my reading – tends towards Ukraine and a few other places. It’s hard to keep track of everything when you’re looking at the big picture, but at the same time focusing on any one area over another means you miss some important things. I think that’s why I like Russian, Slavic and Soviet history so much – it’s such a clusterfuck.

Any recommendations on reading? Nothing too scholarly – The Gulag Archipelago is about as serious as I want to read. I am not a professional historian. The topics I am most currently interested in are the Soviet space program and the Americans and other Westerners who went to participate in the Great Experiment in the 30s and never came back.

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
13 years ago

Actually the more I think about it the more interesting it is to me that I’ve never met a Stalinist. I’ve met just about every other flavor of communist, but in more than 20 years of being actively interested in communism, not a single Stalinist. So I’m very curious about where these respectable circles in which Stalinism is supposedly OK are.

Raoul
Raoul
13 years ago

@Wetherby “The British comedian Alexei Sayle said that he had to become a Maoist in his teens because his parents were Stalinists and you were supposed to move to the left of them.”

That’s as may be, but the best Sayle quote is what he told some heckler in a club: “I’d rather be up where I am shouting spite than down where you are spouting shite!”

Men's Rights Activist Lieutenant
Men's Rights Activist Lieutenant
13 years ago

Lol, so are you telling me that Asians and Africans care as much about white genocides as massacres that took place closer to home? (Protip: they don’t)

PC brigade=owned.

clairedammit
clairedammit
13 years ago

ARE WE READY CLOCKS?

David K. Meller
David K. Meller
13 years ago

1)Fatman, I don’t want feminists to be unhappy, there is just no point that I can see in their involbement with robotics or gender-positive AI. Feminuts already have everything they need or want as far as relationships with tame, well-programmed, docile and (in many ways antimale) renegade males! “Husbandbots” would not give a feminist anything that she doesn’t already have.

I am Pro-male, not anti-female. I am anti-feminist to the degree that feminists are anti-feminine!

Real women would be happier co-operating with, and pleasing the man of their choice, rather than the endless and pointless aggression, competition, and rivialry so often promoted by and from that mob of “unsexed” women. Real men can’t be happy in theri state of undeclared war with us,, so, if these dreadful modern women can’t offer us anything any better, we will have to build it ourselves, even if it takes centuries! I don’t know what these miserable unsexed feminoids will do once this takes place, but frankly, I don’t give a DAMN! I am interested in general human happiness. like you, and in the happiness of real women– women who are soft, tranquil, adorable, playful, sensitive, cute, and charming–NOT pseudomasculiine, NOT butch, NOT pushy and aggressive, and NOT “equal”!

2) zhinxi, I thought that I did reply about gold. I reolied that gold, by both limiting the amount of money (and credit) in circulation, and by forbidding the action of State counterfeiting, acted very strongly as a force for peace, disarmament, and open commerce, and very strongly AGAINST war! The only way a modern State could be funded with a functioning 100% gold standard (NOT a “mixed” standard such as XIX th century America where banks were not punished for fraud and counterfeiting when they treated the assets of creditors and depositors as their own (fraudulently) and issued “banknotes” as money, which were subsequently redeemed below par, since there was NO GOLD to redeem them when there was the inevitable “bank run”. cf. our hero’s books
a) the Case for a 100% Gold Dollar.
b)What has the Government Done to our Money?
c)Mystery of Banking.
d)Wall St. and American Foreign Policy—a dead on refutation of the myth that elites favor “hard money” or the discipline of a Gold Standard in any form!

There’s (lots) more, but that will do for starters!

As far as it goes, I abhor all eminent domain laws, articles of incorporation, and Federal and State land use regulation–and regulators! I welcome any and all efforts, by “hippies” –or anyone else– to engage in their homesteading and locallyor community-based, productive, sustainable and profitable agriculture, handicrafts, alternative medicine, barter (including silver and gold), independent arts and theater, etc. Of course, I detest and abhor any government or corporate subsidies ,bailouts, and loan guarantees for such “countercultural” enterprises as well! If you are any sort of anarchist, I should think you would feel the same way!

NWOSlave–Don’t let their calling you a “racist” get you down! “Racist” is one of these made up words that many egalitarians, including feminists, use to dismiss their opponents and critics when they have no real arguments or facts on their own. Every one of the critics of manboobz has been called a “racist, a “nazi” or a “bigot” by its feminist hive at one time or another!

They know that you’re correct in what you say, and they have no real arguments to counter it!

A free society allows complete freedom of association, and therefore it is really no business of feminists–or anybody else–whom you choose to favor with your time, labor, attention, or justly acquired property! You may associate with everybody, with some and not others, or with nobody. You are no more a so-called racist than is anybody else! If Ihad a nickel for everytime some of the feminoids here called me a racist, I would probably be well on my way to being a millionaire. Means nothing!

David K. Meller
David K. Meller
13 years ago

Weatherby–5 November 2011 @5:45am

Thank you, thank you, thank you!

VoiP
VoiP
13 years ago

Lol, so are you telling me that Asians and Africans care as much about white genocides as massacres that took place closer to home? (Protip: they don’t)

PC brigade=owned.

Feel like proving that?

Molly Ren
13 years ago

Hey, Meller! I’ve been needing to ask you this for The Book: you keep saying feminists and women aren’t the same thing. But then were do feminists come from? Do they spring spontaneously from the ground? Are they what happens when a porcupine mates with a cactus? Tell all!

David K. Meller
David K. Meller
13 years ago

Zhinxi

Lighten up!! I watch–and reply to–other blogs and websites than manboobz.com–LOTS of them! I favor ones whom I tend to agree with replies sooner than ones like this, where firstly, everything that I say is apt to be misunderstood, even when I am trying to be friendly or agreeable, and secondly, I don’t agree with you people all that often anyhow. There is nothing cowardly about this, just common sense! I ‘ll also flat out tell you that most of the other websites and blogs–which you people opined were “right wing moonbattery”–whom I enjoy are MUCH more intelligent than manboobz–or related feminist websites, and hence more enjoyable reading!

I replied to your opinion about gold vs. paper a few days ago, but you seem to have missed it. I just added another reply, but now I am going to another–and friendlier site–not because I am “cowardly”, but because I have better things to do, and it is far likelier there that I will be understood when I write there in plain English than here! Of course having most of you manboobzers going to pieces when I reply to some of the more outrageous drivel about me, Stormfront, Ron Paul, “anarchism–in its many variants–feminism, and just about everything else save the weather, having Futrelle put my posts under “moderation”, isn’t the friendiest thing in the world to me anyhow, although he has the RIGHT to moderate anybody he pleases!

I’ll reply in my own time. I am, for example, going to be reluctant to reply to Johnson and Long’s piece on libertarianism and feminism that you introduced me to, because I do HATE feminism, and the evidence that it and libertarianism, which I have great regard for, may well have common points and perhaps even origins requires some more thought on my part! I don’t want to be attacking my own side! Sometimes I get overly excitable when I get involved in something and I write carelessly. I want there to be more libertarians in the world, and if Long, et al. can reach out effectively, I certainly don’t want to write something that works at cross purposes with that! You too, I think, want libertarianism to be more popular on manboobz and similar blogs, and you wouldn’t wan’t me to inadvertantly write something damaging to its prospects of leftist acceptance!

Rutee Katreya
13 years ago

Or any version of the Let’s All Look At Me Troll Show.

The only trolls who can do anything different spew even more vile garbage and end up banned.

Lol, so are you telling me that Asians and Africans care as much about white genocides as massacres that took place closer to home? (Protip: they don’t)

It’s so adorable hwen you’re both arrogant and stupid. Oh, wait, no, not adorable, that other thing, tedious. In as few words as possible, non-whites are expected to know about major genocides of white people, and there is very little reciprocity on the matter.

BlackBloc
BlackBloc
13 years ago

Meller, care to admit Benjamin Tucker was a Socialist and self-identified as such yet?

You right-wing Libertarians can start getting your own heroes and stop revising history to claim ours. Thank you.

Men's Rights Activist Lieutenant
Men's Rights Activist Lieutenant
13 years ago

Rutee- in Western countries, maybe. If you went to China, do you think those people would be offended (or at least, put off) if you dismissed major tragedies in their culture while simultaneously knowing very little about white genocides (protip: they would).

Men's Rights Activist Lieutenant
Men's Rights Activist Lieutenant
13 years ago

Basically, the only thing whites are disproportionately guilty of is having the most collective power of all the races.

NWOslave
NWOslave
13 years ago

Hey racist/sexists, what’s up? Doin some fine hatin today? Just thought I’d stop in and give ya a heads up on what women in the world are up to these days. Here’s a link to a bunch of feminists who’ve really got their act together.

http://radicalhub.wordpress.com/2011/10/04/radical-feminism-in-the-21st-century/

Oh this is some fine stuff. Wasn’t there some hubub a while back about how all modern feminists are just peachy-keen, humanitarians these days. The article was bad enough but the comments almost make the gang seem tame by comparison, (almost). You guys just couch your rhetoric with with flowery niceties. Anyhoo, have a look, it makes even the worst MRA comment ever dug up by Dave read like fluffy bunny roasts marshmellows.

One of the prevailing thoughts is keeping men away from any child, (fatherhood). Well, whatever amount of men, (if any), women decide to let live anyways. Speaking of fatherhood being a crime, have ya seen the UK law that’s about to be passed? I’d say if it’ll pass, but really now.

Here’s an article about it, as I’ve already linked to previously. Ya know, citation needed.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2056869/Family-law-Fathers-grandparents-denied-right-children-divorce.html

And here’s the entire mundane law, so ya know I ain’t joshin ya.

http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/publications/policy/moj/family-justice-review-final-report.pdf

Too strange how fathers will become, for lack of a better word, illegal. Kinda like a slave one could say. Oh they use words like, “Family Justice,” and go on about child care, in the best interest and such. But basically, it’s exactly like those fine feminists in the first link I gave advocate for. And the Norgrove Report, which is what the soon to be law is called, has flow charts. I know ya love them. And it says recommended by, well, the people writing it. And there’s graphs also. And it even somehow comes up with statistics to back up the nightmare known as father.

It seems like your fondest dreams will come true. More feminism.

OSHIII
OSHIII
13 years ago

Oh noes! The girl he was trying to groom for sex talked to another young man!

katz
13 years ago

Also, whether or not other people are ignorant doesn’t justify you being intentionally ignorant.

And if Africans are less concerned about European genocides from last century it may be because they’re more concerned about their own genocides that are happening right now.

Philippa
Philippa
13 years ago

DKM, you just don’t understand the very basics do you?

Why should an intelligent, educated, hardworking, capable woman be forced to behave like a cute, cuddly, compliant, brainless idiot in order to ‘please her man’. What man who cared about his wife’s physical and mental well-being would want her to? Why should any person have to become less than who they are in order to please someone else?

If you don’t like strong, capable, intelligent women, then for heaven’s sake don’t make one miserable by marrying one. There are plenty of men who are looking for exactly that kind of person.

I don’t want to be like something out of the Stepford Wives and my husband sure as hell wouldn’t want to be married to one.

zhinxy
zhinxy
13 years ago

2) zhinxi, I thought that I did reply about gold. I reolied that gold, by both limiting the amount of money (and credit) in circulation, and by forbidding the action of State counterfeiting, acted very strongly as a force for peace, disarmament, and open commerce, and very strongly AGAINST war!

That wasn’t my point. My point was the humanitarian and imperialistic issues involved in gold mining. You keep giving me these impassioned responses to things I didn’t say. Sometimes to things that are the opposite of what I said.

zhinxy
zhinxy
13 years ago

P.S. What on earth would qualify as outrageous drivel about Stormfront?

zhinxy
zhinxy
13 years ago

Here’s links to your comment and mine, so you don’t have to go looking in the archives.

You gave me a response about gold vs. fiat state money, and how it may limit expansion in wartime, but that wasn’t my point. My point was the imperialism, slavery, and exploitation involved in gold mining. Even if it were the best “state money” (which isn’t saying much – I think we need to focus on alternative currencies, but no matter…) the issues of it’s production, and how it breaks and bloodies the backs of our fellow human beings are still a major libertarian ethical issue, that shouldn’t be swept under the rug.

In fact, the very tendency to limit a gold-backed state’s warmongering has a tendency to DRIVE the search for more!

Your comment:

http://manboobz.com/2011/10/11/dr-pepper-ten-a-diet-soda-going-its-own-way/comment-page-4/#comment-76663

My responses:

http://manboobz.com/2011/10/11/dr-pepper-ten-a-diet-soda-going-its-own-way/comment-page-4/#comment-76754

http://manboobz.com/2011/10/11/dr-pepper-ten-a-diet-soda-going-its-own-way/comment-page-4/#comment-76763

ReturnOfTheComeback
ReturnOfTheComeback
13 years ago

Actually, raising a would-be spouse is an trope that’s really older than history (we were doing even when were still monkeys)

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/WifeHusbandry

1 10 11 12 13 14 40