So some MRAs are rallying around Herman Cain – not in spite of the sexual harassment allegations against him, but because of them.
On The Spearhead, W. R. Price notes that Cain has gotten a flood of new donations since the scandal broke. His conclusion:
The support for the conservative candidate suggests that the decades-old trend of male helplessness in the face of female accusations may be coming to an end.
Other Spearheaders are a bit more blunt:
It is refreshing to see a man (politician or otherwise) in the spotlight stand up and defend himself against a P.C. hatchet-job such as “sexual harrassment” when so many before him did the whiney-baby kiss-up “I was wrong” pandering while bowing before the golden hoochie.
Meanwhile, white and nerdy on Omega Virgin Revolt (yes, that’s a real blog) has actually put his money where his mouth is, sending along a donation to Cain.
I usually don’t bother with voting. Everyone running for most offices is either a liberal feminist or a conservative feminist. To me that is no difference. However, if Herman Cain is still in the running by the time my state’s primary happens (and if he is the Republican nominee) I will vote for him.
Herman Cain is now dealing with at least three women who are claiming that he sexually harassed them. Public figures who were accused of sexual harassment in the past didn’t take on their accusers directly, but Herman Cain did. He pointed out how what is happening to him is a false accusation. As a result of this Cain has received hundreds of thousands of dollars in donations in the last few days. One of those donations was my donation.
This may not seem like much, but this small act as made Cain more anti-feminist than all of the other candidates for president.
Notice that in white and nerdy’s version of the controversy, Cain has “pointed out” that he’s being falsely accused. Actually, what Cain has done is to deny that he harassed anyone. At this point, we don’t actually know enough to judge definitively whether the allegations are true — though the fact that the National Restaurant Association paid out tens of thousands of dollars to settle the cases makes me a bit skeptical of Cain’s denials. But apparently, in W&N’s brain, there’s not even a chance he’s guilty of anything other than standing up to the dirty feminazis.
One of the commenters on Omega Virgin Revolt is even more enthusiastic about Cain than the blogger himself. Jack writes:
If Cain becomes president, we might actually see an end to the incessant pandering to women by the mindless political class. It’s about time that a politician stood up and declared that women have responsibilities in life and are not entitled to a free ride. Cain might actually do that.
Over on Reddit, meanwhile, OffensiveBrute doesn’t defend Cain so much as he defends not giving a shit about sexual harassment:
I say even if Cain is guilty, who the hell cares? Sexual harassment is illegal, but not immoral. well not the kind that Cain is accused of anyway.
Skooma714 offers a similar take:
He didn’t even touch them. They probably hear shit like that on the DC Metro everyday.
They probably are over it. They want to get some paper and attention.
And, yes, both of these comments garnered some upvotes.
Of course, not every MRA out there is rallying around Cain. On Reddit, there are plenty of MRAs who are suspending judgment on the allegations, or who dislike Cain because he’s, you know, a right wing asshole. Over on The Spearhead, the only ones who seem to have an issue with Cain are those who, well, let’s just say that they probably also think burning crosses make great lawn decorations:
Black men are notorious for their sexual escapades, their testosterone being greater than that of White Men – as is their level of rape accusation. He may be innocent but he may just as well be guilty of a real indescretion.
I am happy to report that this comment got a lot of downvotes there; not every Spearheader is a raving Stormfronter. Of course, it says something about the general political and social backwardness of the site that those Spearheaders who are defending Cain from the crudest Klan-tastic racist attacks are doing so basically because they think he’s a credit to his race:
If the Blacks in America were like Herman Cain, this country would be measurably better for it and most of us would be hating on someone else.
But don’t worry: On The Spearhead they can still all agree on one central point – that women are evil, lying whores. As Keyster put it, in one of the most-highly upvoted comments in the thread:
What this indicates is that people are fed up with political correctness and the feminist/sexual grievance industry. …
In the new Femocracy you can’t date them, you can’t marry them and you can’t even work among them, without risking untold trouble for life. Is it any wonder men are distancing themselves from women, if not abandoning them altogether? How’s a man to know whether she has a “false accusation bomb” strapped to her waist or not? If you’re a man among women stay alert, you’re outside the Green Zone.
Will MRAs end up rallying around Cain in the way they rallied around Julian Assange and Dominique Strauss-Kahn? Or will something – his political views, his race? – prevent them from jumping on the Cain train? I guess we’ll just have to see.
@Holly: And Jill from Feministe constantly talks about “random white dudes”. Being someone that doesn’t give a rats ass about skin color, MRA’s and feminists come off as racist. So MRA’s love “white dudes” and lots of feminist bloggers (Jill just being one of them) hate “white dudes”. To me that is equally racist.
If that’s what you think, Brandon, then I guess that’s what it is.
Only not, but you’re not really into the whole nuance thing.
@hellkell: Oh…there is “nuance” while being racist? All this time I thought it was “If I dislike a person/group solely based on their skin color”…that makes a person racist.
Yeah, this ‘you stupid women don’t know how to run your stupid social movement, let me tell you aaaaaaaaaalllllllllllllll about it’ act is getting really, really annoying.
Being someone that doesn’t give a rats ass about skin color
lol, of course you subscribe to this brand of tedium.
you want to be colorblind? go live in a country without serious racial tension.
you live in america? sorry dude, you dont get to haughtily proclaim that youre above caring about race. youre not special, you have to deal with the same society as everyone else.
@KathleenB: I never said you are stupid.
@hellkell: Oh…there is “nuance” while being racist? All this time I thought it was “If I dislike a person/group solely based on their skin color”…that makes a person racist.
shockingly, racism, like most things, is in fact more complex than this inane schoolboy dichotomy
@Sharculese: I had this funny notion that in order to end racism…you don’t view everything through a “race lens”.
Yeah, because pretending race doesn’t exist is a perfect way to resolve racial issues and tension.
It’s too complex to explain to you, cupcake. You’d just selectively read and miss the goddamn point anyway.
@Hellkell: oh…you are giving me cute little nicknames…that’s so sweet pooky.
Oh, Brandon thinks he’s colorblind, while pretending that i’ts feminism with unique racial issues. That’s actually really adorable.
@Sharculese: I had this funny notion that in order to end racism…you don’t view everything through a “race lens”.
it would be funny if it werent for the fact that you live your life by these sorts of platitudes. you think you can end racism without thinking about race? pardon me if this violates your lily-white bubble, but oy vey!
Brandon, if you don’t like feminism, why the hell are you reading Feministe? Do you roll up in there with your wisdom?
I don’t get it. I don’t read MRA sites because all they do is piss me off. Except MarkyMark; that dude is so throwed, he’s cookin’ on another planet.
@Hellkell: Because I like to see how bat shit crazy feminists get.
Of course you do.
Bored now.
@hellkell: Bordom is a sign that you can’t entertain yourself.
no cliche is too stale for the brandometer!
What’s “bordom?”
Seriously, he’s like the boring uncle at Thanksgiving who can only speak in platitudes.
Brandon: You really don’t have to say it. Your disdain for female intelligence comes across in every single phrase that departs your keyboard.
So Jill sometimes talks dismissively about white guys. And MRAs are happily in bed with actual, non-metaphorical, swastika-waving Neo-Nazis.
If the conclusion you draw from this is “gosh, sounds like they’re both about equally racist,” you’re either incredibly intellectually dishonest or you’re incredibly stupid.
Could be both I guess.
Seriously dude. Nazis. Come on.
Hellkell: I’m having evil!Willow flashbacks now, thanks.
KathleenB: I was channeling her.
Holly, you know the answer is “both.” He’s proven it over and over.
Brandon thinks Feministe is a collection of batshit insanity? Is he actually trying to find radical feminists, or did he just type “feminist blog” into Google and check the first few results?