Categories
disgusting women evil women marriage strike men who should not ever be with women ever MGTOW MGTOW paradox misogyny oppressed men sex vaginas

“Remember that pussy is a biochemical WMD; wherever it is used, there is mass chaos and destruction.”

Spock tries to warn the Captain about the evil vagina.

The daffy, excitable Man Going His Own Way who calls himself MarkyMark may be my favorite manosphere blogger of all. Not only does he bring the lulz himself – who can forget the time he wrote a completely unironic point by point rebuttal of an Onion article? – but he also helps to bring attention to the equally stupefying work of others.

In his latest post, he directs our attention to some observations made by fellow MGTOWer Spock’s Disciple on the Happy Bachelors forum on the subject of pussy and its discontents. “This is good stuff, stuff my boys need to read,” Mark writes. “[Spock’s Disciple], like his hero, applied cold hearted logic when analzying pussy. The Force is STRONG with that one!”

Yes, he actually wrote that. I don’t think it’s a joke. I think he honestly does not know that there is a difference between Star Trek and Star Wars. How that is possible, I do not know.

Anyway, on to the eminently rational Spock’s Disciple, reflecting on the irrational power of the ladybits:

Remember that pussy is a biochemical WMD; wherever it is used, there is mass chaos and destruction.  How many wars and conflicts have been fought at the urging and behest of women? More than any honest man would admit to and would be proud of.

Young men are apparently helpless in the face of the punany:

The need for pussy is a very real and built in addiction for men.  We are hardwired by nature for sex and procreation. … [T]he sight and sound of pussy blinds younger men and allows them to be controlled by women though their hormones.

The, uh, SOUND of pussy? If I had to pick just two (or three, or four) sensory experiences relating to the vagina that would be generally considered appealing to heterosexual males, I’m not sure “sound” would make the cut.

But eventually even the horniest dudes start to get less horny – and thus less hypnotized by the power of the pussy. The only trouble is that by the time they lose interest in sex most of them are married, and they’re now stuck with the woman whose vagina formerly had them in thrall. It’s a grave injustice.

[W]hen most men pass the age of 30-35, they begin to awaken from this biochemical “dream” and what do they awaken beside? What do married men look forward to the next 30-50 years of their lives? Sleeping with a living corpse, which continues to torture and destroy them day by day? Looking forward to the time when the woman undergoes the process of metamorphosis, into a completely insane mummy (menopause and post menopause)?

This seems a tad alarmist. I mean, if your wife turns into a monster zombie-mummy – as all women apparently do after they hit their mid-thirties – you could always get separate bedrooms.

But Obi-Wan’s Spock’s Disciple has a more radical solution: don’t get into bed with the ladies in the first place!

Pussy is indeed way overrated and if younger men could get a shot of “anti-testosterone” for a few weeks, they could see through the eyes of men who are 40+; without the haze of hormones, you cannot believe how much farther you can see! It’s the difference between seeing the horizon through LA style smog and seeing the horizon from a high mountain in the Rockies.

Pussy is a man’s Achilles heel; once that man realizes this and takes the appropriate steps, he’ll never lose his peace of mind again.  To these skeptical young men I say, there is an infinitely vast arena where you can have anything you desire, and can succeed at anything you wish to try for; all you have to do is see women for what they truly are, and become a master of the beast within; once you do that women’s true face will be visible to you, and you’ll never again partake of that foul potion.

It is possible to tame that beast, and indeed it is a certainty that you will learn much from the process of taming it; all it takes is patience and time. Look at your fellow men, your brothers in arms, and look at their almost invisible chains, and wonder at why you would desire such an existence for yourself?

And, hey, if all else fails, MarkyMark adds some advice of his own: pay a visit to Pamela Handerson before going out on the town with one of those vagina-people.

[T]here is one thing that the younger men can do until their sex drives die down permanently: masturbate before going out with a woman.  … To put it another way, since the little head had been, shall we say, quieted down, the bigger head could work properly; the bigger head will then allow you to see a woman for who she REALLY is. 

If you’re a fan of Spock, and looking for appropriate masturbatory material, might I suggest this?

776 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
BlackBloc
BlackBloc
13 years ago

Implying MGTOW have this invisible army of men who aren’t dating and follow their ideology, rather than being a tiny minority.

ithiliana
13 years ago

Can’t speak for all women, but I don’t ask men out…..because I don’t want to date men. Gave ’em up in ’82 and haven’t missed them.

Again, with the generalizations.

And it’s not as if women don’t ask women out on dates, and the more formal elements i remember from decades ago don’t seem to apply among my college students (they hang out in groups and then couples seem to well occur!).

juliejezebel
13 years ago

I’ve asked nearly all of my past lovers/partners out first. I have no issue with asking men out. I don’t understand how anyone could not be comfortable with taking a small risk to get a big reward. Sure you can get turned down. I have been, but I’ve also had wonderful experiences (some quite long term) from asking men out. Is it really that rare in men’s experience that they don’t get asked out? And if they do, do they assume the women are slutty? Cause they can’t have that both ways.

ithiliana
13 years ago

@Blackbloc: “the lurkers support them in email”!!!11!!!

BlackBloc
BlackBloc
13 years ago

Need better trolls. The ones we have are already all used up and boring.

KathleenB
KathleenB
13 years ago

The eater chose the food type, chose the restaurant, and also chose the menu item so what are the chances that the meal is not tasty?

Dude, different people have different tastes. I love a local pizza joint, they make the best soft, thin crust pizza I’ve ever had. I would wake up in the middle of the night when I lived in Denver, upset because the nearest Scrib’s pizza was halfway across the country. But not everyone love Scrib’s. The use full-fat mozarella cheese, so the pizza is greasy – that’s a deal killer for a lot of people. The crust is thin, but not crispy, a deal killer for others. So the fact that I love this particular type of pizza is not a guarantee that everyone else will love it.

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
13 years ago

“@Joanna

The proof is that you won’t put your money where your mouth is. On your next several first dates why don’t you offer to skip the date and go right to sex and then report back the accept/reject results. We’ll be waiting.

Oh and by the way. Don’t all of a sudden get super picky. You gotta keep it real.”

Why should she? Given that she’s presumably going on dates with the intent of finding someone to date rather than in an attempt to prove you wrong, why should she follow your instructions? She’s not your performing monkey, kiddo. You’re going to have to dial down the imperious attitude if you want anyone here to engage with you.

Also, you’re making some odd assumptions about women and sex. I don’t generally have sex on the first date for all kinds of reasons both practical and emotional, but on a purely physical level I’ve already decided whether or not I’m attracted to someone before I go on a date with them. If someone asks me out and I don’t think I might eventually want to fuck them, I say no. The process during which I decide whether or not I actually will have sex with someone has nothing to do with attraction or lust or the lack thereof – it doesn’t take multiple dates to figure out if someone is hot – it has to do with protecting my own personal safety and figuring out whether or not if I do have sex with the guy he’s going to be a jerk about it. Because unfortunately men not being jerks to women because the women decided to fuck them is far from guaranteed.

Side note – this is why although I don’t fuck men who I’ve just met, I sometimes do with women.

KathleenB
KathleenB
13 years ago

BlackBloc: Agreed. We really need to attract a better class of troll. Even Meller and NWO are getting old. Surely there are wingnuts out there we haven’t mocked into flouncing!

DYE
DYE
13 years ago

Bionic,

That’s not how a woman gets a slutty reputation. Very few men think women who ask them out on a date are sluts. So that characterization is a case of convenient projection. I think the real truth is that there are a lot of women for whom slut shaming is a convenient excuse, because one, they are afraid of rejection and would rather prefer “initiation” be the man’s job. And two, that there’s also a certain power in being the chosen rather than the chooser. And I get all that.

I also think the idea that it’s OK to wait and do the right thing, until culture changes enough for one to feel comfortable is absurd. Slutwalks aren’t the way to get more women to do their fair share. Making women more confident isn’t the way to to get to women do their fair share either. Having confident women understand that the right thing to do is splitting the responsibility/excitement/fear/burden/whatever of arranging that 1st date, will actually get women to do their fair share.

ozymandias42
13 years ago

DYE, I’ve never actually been asked out. I have had more than twenty non-platonic partners. Do the fucking math.

Feminists are far more likely to ask their partners out than non-feminists. Stop whining at us and go whine at Cosmo already.

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
13 years ago

“A woman for whom stigma really matters will not be having sex on the 1st date… with anybody…ever. But for those women who don’t adhere to such conventions the affect is way overstated and an excuse. Females just aren’t nearly as horny, indiscriminate, nor sexually consistent as males… and there’s nothing wrong with that.”

Why do women need an “excuse” for not wanting to have sex with someone? You are seriously fucked up if you think that they do.

Also I’m laughing at the idea that “indiscriminate” is a good thing. I know some very promiscuous men, but I wouldn’t call most of them “indiscriminate” in their choice of partners. Being truly indiscriminate is usually a sign of desparation and feeling like you lack options – men who have a wide variety of potential sexual partners to choose from are often just as discriminating as women. Just without the side order of having to take the possibility of being raped or not having an orgasm into consideration before every sexual encounter.

(Not that men can’t be raped, by the way, but in my experience very few of them consider the possibility when thinking about hooking up with a woman.)

About UnHeroicMan’s comment…dude, if you think that you and your little friends represent a broad societal trend you’re delusional. Observe our friend DYE above – does he look to you like he plans on going his own way any time soon? Most men want to be in relationships with women, even the ones who’re kind of sexist and inclined to feel pissy towards us. Very few human being have the monastic inclinations that would be required to Go Your Own Way permanently. Now if you were willing to accept gay men into your ranks then the number of men who were happy to swear off dating women would certainly be much larger, but since most of you guys are homophobic and most gay men don’t hate women you’re doomed to be a tiny group of pissed off dudes sulking in your little forums. Which by the way I’m glad that you’re doing, since if you stick to it you’re saving the women who might otherwise have had to deal with you a lot of hassle.

Back to DYE again!

“All it means is that men know what and who they want so unless all your dates have been blind…literally and figuratively, the guy who is sitting across from you he has already made up his mind he WILL fuck you. ”

You’re aware that this makes you sound like a potential rapist, right? He WILL fuck the woman he’s on a date with, regardless of how she feels about it? Congratulations – you’ve just demonstrated exactly why so many women are cagey about sex while they’re still getting to know a man. They’re trying to weed out men who think like you.

ithiliana
13 years ago

http://www.k-state.edu/actr/2010/12/20/gender-and-personality-differences-in-date-initiation-preferences-eric-shumaker/default.htm

From past research:

Although men still tend to initiate dates more than women, date initiation by women is still fairly common. In a study of college-aged female date initiators by Mongeau, Hale, Johnson, and Hillis (1993) it was found that 90% of men had been asked out on a date by a woman and a shocking 83% of those for a first date. Most men reported accepting these dates initiated by women. The men also reported the woman’s assertiveness as a positive thing. In Mongeau & Carey’s (1996) follow-up study, they found what sort of personality characteristics men perceive in women who initiate dates. They most frequently saw woman-initiators as liberal, open, active, and extroverted. An odd finding, however, was that those men saw the initiating women as less physically attractive than their non-initiating counterparts. Additionally, men had higher sexual expectations on female-initiated dates; however it was found that these dates actually had less intimacy and sexual activity. The authors hypothesized that this unrealistic inflation of sexual expectancy was because the women-initiators were perceived as more open, liberal, and extroverted.

Granted, college student population, but a bit more info about what whiny Mr. “you are not doing your fair share” dude has shared.

This study:

Discussion

The findings of this experiment supported all three predicted hypotheses. Hypothesis one that suggested that when a man has an interest in a female with whom he would like to date, he would prefer if she used direct or indirect means of asking him which supports Muehlenhard and McFall’s (1981) previous findings. Novel to this study was hypothesis two, predicting that when a woman would like to ask a prospective male on a date, she would prefer to utilize indirect means of asking or simply wait for him to take action. Hypothesis two predicted that females would not like to be direct in their approaches, which the data supported. Perhaps from sex-role socialization, as discussed by Deborah Tannen, women have a nature to take a secondary or background role when it comes to dating and rely on men to do the approaching and other relationship related tasks. Also, we could infer from Predicted Outcome Value Theory that women may see that by subtly hinting interest to a potential male dating partner, or waiting for him to take action, results in the most possible positive gain for her.

Finally, the third hypothesis subject to examination in this study looked at the personality factor of extroversion and how this trait affected participants dating initiation preferences. It was found that extroverted participants preferred to use more direct approaches of asking for dates more often than introverts. Eysenck’s (1981) theory of extroversion suggests that extroverts are very often under-aroused and seek the stimulation that social situations bring. In addition, the quality of extroversion was described Costa and McCrae (1992) as being assertive, outgoing, and excitement seeking. Introverts were described by Buss and Plomin (1984) as those people that withdraw from and initiate less social situations. Thus, we can deduct from previous research and these findings that extroverts will want to reduce their uncertainty more and will likely be more inclined to see assertive social behavior (such as asking someone directly on a date) as potentially more positive and rewarding than introverts might.

As with any research, there are several limitations pertaining to this study that must be addressed. First, there was a small sample size consisting only of undergraduate students. It may be hard to generalize the results to other populations. Secondly, responses were based on “hypothetical scenarios”. How one might initiate a date in real-life scenarios may be different. Other major limitations of this study include the validity of the survey instruments and the statistics used for data analysis. The survey participants completed consisted of only “Yes” or “No” options for each of the three dating initiation preference options given (Direct, Indirect, or Wait). A better statistical analysis and interpretation could have been preformed if participants only selected one approach that they prefer to use and of which they would prefer a prospective partner use when asking them. The survey also could have been set up so that participants ranked each possible initiation option on a Likert scale, making the dependent variable continuous and easier to analyze statistically. Additionally, the survey could have included more or different extroversion and introversion questions to better determine exactly which personality type the participant fell into. Since a 50% median split had to be used to divide the two personality types because of low introversion personality-type numbers, the data represented more “moderately extroverted” individuals versus “moderately introverted” individuals. Finally, the survey instrument could have better defined exactly what a direct, indirect, or waiting approach meant, including more specific examples of each.

The implications of these research findings are vast. Previous research by Muehlenhard

and McFall (1981) and Muehlenhard and Miller (1988) only focused on male’s dating initiation preferences by females. This prior research was conducted in order to aid females that were struggling to get or initiate dates with men. This research expanded upon those findings and found significant effects regarding how women actually prefer to initiate dates and whether extroverts or introverts prefer direct means of dating initiation. Several groups of people in the real world can benefit from these research findings. Counselors, therapists, and dating coaches can use this data in giving their clients struggling to approach others in their lives for a date or relationship. The general population reading this can benefit from the findings as well. Readers may want to conduct an extroversion test themselves to see where their personality lies to determine how they should interact and approach those of both the same and opposite personality types. Those that are more introverted in nature or lack social skills may benefit from these research findings to help them gauge how to interact with others in their lives both romantically and socially.

Future research could also address several other aspects of this subject. Sex and personality differences have the potential to be examined in further depth. Are the differences in men and women’s preferences due to sex-role socialization or actual biological differences? Researchers could also examine the nonverbal communication aspects of a date request. Finally, future research should address howimportant dating initiation approaches actually are to individuals. Could future research showthat once two people are happily on a date, the importance of who initiated the date becomes null?

What are they teaching trolls these days! Basic Google is not hard.

cynickal
cynickal
13 years ago

What are they teaching trolls these days! Basic Google is not hard.

Yes, but then they have to actually read the links to see if it supports what they say it’s supporting.
And by that time it’s all, “TL;DR! Hey look! These stats just fell out of my ass! I should stick my whole head in there and see where they’re coming from!”

DYE
DYE
13 years ago

“Why do women need an “excuse” for not wanting to have sex with someone? You are seriously fucked up if you think that they do.”

Why do women need an “excuse” for not wanting to do anything they want to do? Well they don’t, but they do FEEL the need to make excuses all the time.

“You’re aware that this makes you sound like a potential rapist, right? He WILL fuck the woman he’s on a date with, regardless of how she feels about it?”

LMAO. You are aware that this makes you sound like you can’t read right? So I only wrote tons of comments (amidst lots of denial from others) about how dating is screening for women and you conclude that I’m saying that how she feels is irrelevant? Ok then.

FelixBC
FelixBC
13 years ago

Wait, I’ve just understood the math. No MRA has ever been asked out by a woman, therefore no woman has ever asked a man out. Thanks Heroic Man, now I understand!

thebionicmommy
thebionicmommy
13 years ago

DYE, there are still some men who do consider it “too forward” for women to ask men out. They want women to act demure and play hard to get. They equate confidence with being sexually free spirited. That’s why so many women buy the book The Rules, and then treat dating like some kind of game. Once again, though, the women that read The Rules and Cosmo for dating advice aren’t usually feminists. As a feminist, I want women to feel free to ask men or women out without fear of slut shaming.

Holly Pervocracy
13 years ago

Two reasons a woman might not ask you out:

1. She’s believes that asking someone out is a purely male responsibility

2. She doesn’t want to go out with you.

Don’t get too worked up about #1 before you’ve ruled out #2, is all I’m saying.

Alyssa Sweet
13 years ago

i will admit that men are more likely to be the one to ask someone out i guess, but i don’t know why these guys think that it’s still that set in stone or has anything to do with feminism. seems likes an awful awful convenient way to blame someone else for your lack of courage or initiative. Also yes women spend their lives obsessing about their looks which will never ever be good enough because it’s SO MUCH FUN! You can’t blame someone else for NOT asking you out, geez, thankfully we now live in a time where it’s not that big of a deal. It’s not like every girl is just dying to ask you out and is just dreaming of you doing it without giving you any signs or anything.

Alyssa Sweet
13 years ago

i just want to scream “what is your point?!?!” you think more women should ask out men. fabulous. you can say that. it’s not a conspiracy against men though!!

Alyssa Sweet
13 years ago

wo reasons a woman might not ask you out:

1. She’s believes that asking someone out is a purely male responsibility

2. She doesn’t want to go out with you.

Don’t get too worked up about #1 before you’ve ruled out #2, is all I’m saying.

YUP!!!!! Also i’m gonna assume with these guys they wouldn’t be satisfied with women asking them out that they didn’t want go out with.

Joanna
13 years ago

See, now I can never go on a date without thinking “This guy only wants to fuck me.” Thanks for that DYE.

red_locker
13 years ago

Yeah, seriously, DYE needs to speak for himself.

Pecunium
13 years ago

Hershele Ostropoler: The UCMJ has the age of consent at 16:

Art. 120– Rape and Carnal Knowledge

Guide Note: As part of the FY 2006 Military Authorization Act, Congress amended Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), effective for offenses occurring on and after October 1, 2007. Article 120 was formerly known as “Rape and carnal knowledge,” but is now entitled “Rape, sexual assault, and other sexual misconduct.”

The new Article 120 creates 36 offenses. These 36 offenses replace those offenses under the former Article 120 and others that used to be MCM offenses under Article 134 (the “General” Article).

The new Article 120 replaces the following Article 134 offenses:

* Indecent assault
* Indecent acts or liberties with a child
* Indecent exposure
* Indecent acts with another

The UCMJ change also amends two Article 134 offenses:

(1) Indecent language communicated to another – other than when communicated in the presence of a child – remains punishable under Article 134. If the language was communicated in the presence of a child, then it is an Article 120 offense.

(2) Pandering (having someone commit an act of prostitution) is still an offense under Article 134, but if the pandering is “compelled,” it becomes an Article 120 offense.

The change also adds a new Article 120a, “Stalking.”

ELEMENTS OF THE OFFENSE

Rape

By using force: That the accused caused another person, who is of any age, to engage in a sexual act by using force against that other person.

By causing grievous bodily harm: That the accused caused another person, who is of any age, to engage in a sexual act by causing grievous bodily harm to any person.

By using threats or placing in fear: That the accused caused another person, who is of any age, to engage in a sexual act by threatening or placing that other person in fear that any person will be subjected to death, grievous bodily harm, or kidnapping.

By rendering another unconscious: That the accused caused another person, who is of any age, to engage in a sexual act by rendering that other person unconscious.

By administration of drug, intoxicant, or other similar substance:

(i) That the accused caused another person, who is of any age, to engage in a sexual act by administering to that other person a drug, intoxicant, or other similar substance;

(ii) That the accused administered the drug, intoxicant or other similar substance by force or threat of force or without the knowledge or permission of that other person; and

(iii) That, as a result, that other person’s ability to appraise or control conduct was substantially impaired. …

Rape of a child not yet 12

(i) That the accused engaged in a sexual act with a child; and

(ii) That at the time of the sexual act the child had not attained the age of twelve years.

Rape of a child who has attained the age of 12 years but has not attained the age of 16 years

By using force:

(i) That the accused engaged in a sexual act with a child;

(ii) That at the time of the sexual act the child had attained the age of 12 years but had not attained the age of 16 years; and

(iii) That the accused did so by using force against that child.

By causing grievous bodily harm:

(i) That the accused engaged in a sexual act with a child;

(ii) That at the time of the sexual act the child had attained the age of 12 years but had not attained the age of 16 years; and[emphasis added]

(iii) That the accused did so by causing grievous bodily harm to any person.

By using threats or placing in fear:

(i) That the accused engaged in a sexual act with a child;

(ii) That at the time of the sexual act the child had attained the age of 12 years but had not attained the age of 16 years; and

(iii) That the accused did so by threatening or placing that child in fear that any person will be subjected to death, grievous bodily harm, or kidnapping.

By rendering that child unconscious:

(i) That the accused engaged in a sexual act with a child;

(ii) That at the time of the sexual act the child had attained the age of 12 years but had not attained the age of 16 years; and

(iii) That the accused did so by rendering that child unconscious….

ndecent liberties with a child

(a) That the accused committed a certain act or communication;

(b) That the act or communication was indecent;

(c) That the accused committed the act or communication in the physical presence of a certain child;

(d) That the child was under 16 years of age; and

(e) That the accused committed the act or communication with the intent to:

(i) arouse, appeal to, or gratify the sexual desires of any person; or

(ii) abuse, humiliate, or degrade any person.

So no, the age of consent isn’t 12, and persons aged 12 are accorded extra protection to those under 12; which seems to be a recognition of the fact that pre/younger teens are especially vulnerable.

Pecunium
13 years ago

Ray Percival: How you answer the question is one thing, but the subject matter is another. I did information extraction. The answers I collected were not anecdotal in structure, but any of them could have been relayed as an anecdote, had I differently worded my interrogatories.

Studies of oral histories are mining of anecdote to get broader social patterns.

Pecunium
13 years ago

Blackbloc: The low rate of first-date sex for heterosexual women has more to do with the men in the equation than the women.

As was borne out in the survey of male/female college students responses to, “wanna fuck” propositions. When the people were asked and why they said no, the asnwer was, “I didn’t think they’d be good in bed. Women who thought the prospective partner was likely to be good in bed, the numbers were about the same for males as for females.

1 12 13 14 15 16 32