He may be a raving misogynist asshole who seems to spend most of his free time scanning through PlentyOfFish profiles for women he can insult. But I’ll give Zero Tolerance Man props for one thing: his blog, NO MARRIAGES.COM, is very easy to read.
Not because he’s a brilliant writer with the clarity and grace of a latter-day Orwell. Because he uses such huge fonts, offering those with tired eyes a haven of sorts from the tiny text you find on most websites. The only real trouble is that, reading his posts, I can’t help but imagine him shouting them out at the top of his lungs.
I thought I’d give you some of the highlights — that is, lowlights — from recent posts, in a normal sized font.
I would compare most American women to septic tanks or dumpsters. The ego of the typical American woman is out of control, especially with the on-line dating sites. they get a few emails from pathetic desperate guys and right away, they are a princess waiting for their dream man.
The bathroom isn’t good enough to pump out that titter milk for these American bitches? After all, if I’m at work and I feel like busting a nut, I have to go into the shitter, close the stall door and pump away. But now, that isn’t good enough for a woman and her little womb turd!!! …
American women are essentially worthless except as a fuck and dump, so why are we bothering with this shit? Leave the little bastard at home or if the bitch just has to drain her tit, let her squeeze it out into the shitter.
Besides, it’s just another body fluid like the piss, blood, and yeast infections that drain from her overused overpriced PUSSgina right into the shit pot. I’m sick of giving these “ladies” deferential treatment.
MISERABLE AMERICAN BITCHES!!!!!
I am sorry, but unless a woman is here to service my needs, she has no more value than shit in the sewer. … We should treat American women like the crap they are and work on lowering their self-esteem.
You wouldn’t buy a dented can at the supermarket! Why would you choose a single mother? Single mothers are for losers. …
Think about it! …
Her pussy is stretched out from shitting out the kids or she has a big UGLY scar across her belly. Also included at no additional charge are stretch marks and varicose veins for your entertainment pleasure. …
Some of these bitches have 120,000 miles on their odometer by the time their husband (s) or the guys they fucked have put them in the recycle bin where they belong!
You can see these bitches walking down the street with their noses stuck up in the air with their snooty, snotty grins as if to say “look at me, I am wonderful and if you are a man, you are a pig”. I wasted years of my life and lots of money trying to please these monsters.
Only a MADMAN would marry one of these creatures.
Oh there’s more, much more. Including a poem. But I’m saving that for a future post.
random6x7–October20,2011@1;48PM
She wasn’t at her place in nature at all! The entire quote passage is just P. being a smartass!
I am the first to recognise that Gor has its points, but, as I have said frequently here and elsewhere, a dominant male conquers his woman with love, gentleness, and pleasure, not brutality! Abuse rarely if ever attains the desired effect even with domestic animals or livestock, still less with human females. A man wants to see women expressing pleasure, joy, and ecstacy in his arms–or in his bed–NOT agony or terror! He values her love, not her hatred! He want QUALITY, not equality, in a relationship that emphasises the differences between the sexes, not the similarities or uniformity!
CassandraSays and KathleenB
No worse than you feminists inflicting yourselves on the general public–with the aid of Television, cable, movies, books, magazines, schools and colleges, and mass-circulation newspapers–for over 40 horrid years! We critics of feminism–who are just as critical of it as YOU are opposed to the idea of women retaining a few of the adorable qualities of bunnies, kittens,or even traditional women, have a few tiny sites on the internet, with at most a few thousand circulation/week, and its unendurable to youall!!
Waht is wrong with that picture?
“As things stand, his points basically stand, Modern women STINK! What are you going to do about it?”
I’m happy with how things are, and so are the men who love me, so why should I do anything? The fact that you’re not happy really isn’t my problem. In fact, watching you flail around in discomfort at having to deal with the modern world is quite entertaining.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sAF8gMN9c0
I don’t know what world you live on, but on Earth, not even bunnies and kitties act like you seem to think they do.
Oh Meller. The troll that makes fun of himself.
Keep talking, Meller. Make yourself look even more stupid. You know … if that’s possible.
Mass media doesn’t get to be mass media unless there’s an audience, Meller. I realise that basic economics is probably a bit too complicated for you, so I’ll simplify – if people didn’t want to watch the kind of stuff you’re complaining about, no one would bother producing it, because media companies like to make money.
So apparently most people just love the kind of media you hate. The Gor books, on the other hand, have an audience that’s very dedicated but rather small. You are the niche market.
He’s getting so frothy his spelling and exclamation points are out of control!
Damn, Meller, do you know any other punctuation?
Is one of the adorable qualities of kittens and bunnies their furriness? Because I hate shaving.
When she was in elementary school, my sister brought her “class bunny” home for the Christmas vacation, to care for him while the school was closed. It was really cute. This animal had very simple needs. Whenever he wasn’t pooping on the dining table, he was violently humping my sister’s Little Mermaid blanket, so that by the end of the bunny’s 10-day stay with us, the thing was in tatters.
Ever have a rabbit pee on the couch? Awful. Worse than cat pee, even.
DKM wants women to be bunnies and opposes abuse, not because it’s wrong, but because it’s ineffective.
…Well.
Is there any point in mentioning the inherent idiocy of MRA guys latching onto S&M themes? For that situation to really play out for two consenting parties, both people have to respect boundaries and tedious responsible stuff like that.
I mean legitimate parts of the culture. You know, where the scene is about everyone enjoying themselves, regardless of sex/gender/etc in clearly agreed upon rules and codes of conduct?
Meller, why is it that you assume that men want all the same things as you out of a relationship?
Meller: Waht is wrong with that picture? That you don’t want women to have rights.
Feminists want everyone to have rights.
As I said before: If someone wants to be in a D/S relationship, feminism doesn’t care.
If someone wants to be a housewife, feminism doesn’t care.
If someone wants to be unmarried and work for herself, feminism doesn’t care.
If a man want’s to be the stay at home partner, feminism doesn’t care.
If she want’s to have a part time job, and spend time keeping house, feminism doesn’t care.
You, on the other hand do care. If she won’t let you “conquer” her, she is a shrike, a man-hater, an evil corruption of her nature.
You say that anything other than the world of Mellerland is an abomination, and must be destroyed; even if that means killing women.
That’s what wrong with your picture.
Shora: Meller, why is it that you assume that men want all the same things as you out of a relationship?
Because if men (real men, not men who have been feminised) didn’t all want what he wants they he’s either not a “real man”, or he is an outlier.
Either of those makes his fantasies less believable. It’s not that there aren’t women out there who don’t like the same sort of things, but as Amphitrite said, that would require respecting women as people, and that doesn’t seem to be possible for Meller.
They are fluffy, an sweet, and dote on the way their Lord and Master cuts his cigars, or they are venom-laden shrikes who hate men.
His world is filled with women meant to be slaves (and he will treat them lovingly, but that’s not a given; they are slaves and if they need a taste of the lash [because they have done something to ask for it, or merely which justifies it] that is the master’s privilege). If they aren’t slaves they are “Panther Women” who invert the natural order and enslave men.
A meeting as equals, he can’t fathom.
Pecunium, you’re awesome.
Ahem. Not flogging a zombie horse, but:
http://www.forensicpsychiatry.ca/paraphilia/sadism.htm
Check out the “Demography” section. Loved this one especially:
“Paradoxically, while sexual sadism is more common in men, there appears to be a predominance of female domatrixes found in sadomasochistic pornography (Weinberg, 1984, 1987).”
Catch that? Lots of men involved in it fantasize about women being in charge. So Meller is even misrepresenting the majority of those that share his kink? That’s pretty epic fail.
Meller:
Did that mail order bride ever show up at the abandoned feedlot where you reside?
(that was you, warn’t it?). What’s the going price for “the women that love us” these days?
“Abuse rarely if ever attains the desired effect even with domestic animals or livestock, still less with human females.”
Didn’t work all those times you tried, eh? Pisser!
Anyway,
Peace and Freedom!
Feminism is a Honey Badger?
Sign me up!
You guys have no appreciation for great poetry. Zero Tolerance Man inspired my muse to become a non-american Usonian woman!
Apparently the strike tag didn’t work in that last comment.Curse you, strike tag!
I’m tickled that he thinks we’d be upset at his promise not to marry us.
Meller: When did I ever say that a woman can’t be cute or cuddly if that’s what turns her crank? Nowhere. I DO NOT GIVE A RAT’S ASS what other people do in the bedroom so long as everyone is enjoying themselves – or outside the bedroom. You do not have room in your cosmology for women who don’t fit the narrow roles you’ve established, and you constantly say that those of us who don’t conform (to YOUR idea of an ideal woman) are provoking men and it’s just a matter of time before men rise up. You are full of shit, Meller, and unwilling to admit that you are not the center and originator of the universe and it’s rules.
Going by my experience as a domme, non-submissive behavior from women does make a lot of men rise up, just not in quite the way that Meller has in mind.
dkm they actually make a thing for the sort of companionship youre talking about its called a golden retriever
Feminists want everybody to have rights.
Nice, if anyone could believe it. Feminism wants everyone, EXCEPT heterosexual men, especially White men, to have rights. Anything that anyone else wants to do, from baby-killing (abortion) to spousal murder–if the victim(?) can convince the court that she was being “abused”–from employment opportunities (quotas, affirmative action, compensatory hiring, etc.) at the (white) man’s expense to gay and lesbian “parenting”, everyone has rights, except the people who form the foundation of this (and any other society)! Men are atavistic, patriarchy is obsolete and oppressive, marriage is slavery (never mind that it is WOMEN, not men who usually want to ‘tie the knot’ only to pursue divorce (70% of divorces are initiated by wives) and any kind of support for or recognition of the woman as wife,mother, and homemaker is denounced as “oppression”, because the beneficiary is a man!
Doesn’t sound like ‘equality” to me! In fact, it sounds a lot like a giant “are men really necessary” or even ‘ woman needs a man like fish needs a bicycle” form of social order, I believe that apropos of Animal Farm, men and women are ‘equal’ but women are “more equal” than the men! No thank you!
Talk of “equality” always precedes dispossession of, and ultimate enslavement of almost everybody. Look at what happened (for only the most obvious examples) to France after 1789, Russia after 1917, China after 1949, and what seems to have been happening to America in a big way since c.1964, although it has not yet run its course. the Paris Commune of 1870 and the Reconstruction nightmare inflicted on the former Confederacy were also motivated by a drive for “equality” to a large extent.
Do feminists have a chance to succeed by themselves? Probably not! But, as I pointed out in other posts elsewhere, they act as a convenient conduit by criminal elites who actually dominate governments, multinational corporations, significant media outlets and the top leadership of major legal, diplomatic and financial centers, who are exploiting their dominance in those power centers to advance a new World Orider where feminists may play roughly the same role as trade unions did for workers in the XX century–a mechanism of co-optation by a fake ‘left” to control workers on one hand, and give a few privileged ones the illusion of a favored seat at the table, on the other.
Simply substitute women (perhaps gays, blacks, or other so-called aggrieved group) for “workers” and “trade unions” to get an idea of the rights availble to people under the NWO shaping up. It is NOT a pretty picture! The only group (the much denigrated and disenfranchised White men) who even have a partial history of freedom would have been effectively neutralized, if not eradicated! The so-called “equality” that would prevail among the ‘protected’ groups, on the other hand, would leave them with little more than bare survival on a level probably indistingushable from that which prevailed among masses around 1500.
THIS is what the so-called equality of feminism offers ALL of us in the slightly longer term.
If that is what “feminism” offers, maybe the antithesis of feminism is a better idea.
Forgive me if I look for something better!