Here’s the bravely anonymous alpha blogger behind “Danger & Play ~ An online magazine for alpha males” explaining “Why You Should Cheat on Your Girlfriend.” I’ve bolded my favorite bit:
Haters will tell you to, “Man up! Break up with your girlfriend if you’re not happy.” They are missing the point. You want to have your cake, and to eat it too. Steady, reliable pussy and the occasional strange is the best of all worlds.
Cheating is a lot of fun, and it’s something I highly recommend. It’s way more exhilarating than bungee jumping, and few things feel as good as banging your girlfriend on the same day you banged some strange.
Cheating keeps your game tight. The best way to regulate your girlfriend is knowing you can bang chicks as hot or hotter than your girl. Well, when you cheat, this isn’t hypothetical. It’s reality.
Somehow I’m guessing there’s a lot more “hypothetical” than “reality” going on in this guy’s posts.
You don’t want an exclusive relationship? Fine. There’s no law saying you have to be in one. You can date casually and non-exclusively. You can have an open or polyamorous relationship. There are a lot of people out there in relationships, yet happily fucking other people outside of them. They’re just above board with it.
But that’s not what’s going on with our PUA friend here. With his talk about “regulat[ing]” girlfriends, he seems more interested in fucking over his girlfriend (assuming such a creature really exists) than he is in fucking strangers (sorry, “stranges”).
That’s not “Game.” That’s just being a dick.
But, hey, Nietzsche! He’s BEYOND GOOD AND EVIL! Or, as he puts it in a comment, “Shame and guilt are beta.”
You know, if you have to go around telling everyone what an Nietzschean ubermensch you are, you’re probably aren’t much of a Nietzschean ubermensch.
@Amused: You see it as sexual exploitation, I see it as sexual protection.
How about not videotaping people without their consent, then? Cutting that out of your daily routine has got to save you some time and energy.
I love the, consistent, logic fail (who was the last one going on about how false accusations of murder were impossible without a body).
1: A body exists.
2: Someone is accused.
2a: That person did it, or didn’t.
Corollary to 2a: Since a large number of murders have no witnesses; and the victim is dead, the odds of a false accusation are higher than that for rape. A mendacious accusation of rape requires malice. A false accusation of murder only requires circumstance.
You don’t get to protect yourself by infringing upon the rights of others. It’s kind of a basic tenet of society.
One of these things is not like the others…oh, wait, sex involves an intervening actor. Drunk people have a right to not be assaulted, and that includes sexaul assault. If you beat someone, rape someone, run someone over with your car, etc. it is not defense that they are drunk. “Sex” without consent is rape. A person who is intoxicated is not competant to fully give consent. Therefore, having “sex” with them is rape. You are not allowed to rape people who are drunk. Boo fucking who for you.
@Brandon, you seriously can’t figure out how someone would be falsely accused of murder? Think it over and get back to us on that one.
Also, you are not just walking past someone when you have sex with them and tape it, you are actively engaging with them and doing stuff to them, you have a duty to treat people decently. And, just because we have sociopathic assholes like you, we put some of those duties into law to give an extra incentive for sociopathic assholes to behave properly.
On that note, would ppl please not conflate aspergers with sociopathy. Aspies just have trouble communicating and figuring out what others want and need. Sociopaths know their actions are unfair and harmful and don’t care. Brandon falls in the latter group, not the former. Most aspies have a very strong sense of justice and do not want to see people harmed. Unlike Brandon, who doesn’t give a fuck about anyone but himself (or perhaps his parents, leaving open the question of whether he is a sociopath or just an antisocial narcissist).
DSC, I don’t think anyone conflated the two.
Except as long as they don’t hurt anyone, there’s no reason to demonize sociopaths either.
Heehee, it’s fun huh kirbywarp? I wonder how many hits his blog got in the last 2 days.
Joanna! Moar rewrites!
I have screen caps of the changes, but sadly I don’t think it will matter. This guy’s blog is so empty that I’ve filled up the “latest comments” list. Who would I be proving anything to? Ah well…
His edits are getting rather intricate… Apparently now I’m the guy from elevatorgate…
…. Did you just respond to a comment made after yours? Did the system screw up, or do you have an amazing gift for precognition?
No, no. I think it’s just a rewrite of an older comment I made. lol Aw he’s so mad. Poor guy. =D
Wow…. I’ve seen some pathetic stuff, but wow…. the absolute incongurity of it… in some ways it reminds me of the manboobz_ dude at reddit, but it lacks the style and substance.
He’s not mad. He’s ALPHA! And ALPHA does what ALPHA wants!
It’s like he’s taken photographs of us and drawn on fake mustaches, or drawn big penises and written “I are doofus” on the top. Poor guy.
Ha ha! Score! The most recent comments… ALL KIRBY! Hail to the Warp!
LMAO kirbywarp. I’m really, really tempted to introduce all my friend’s to his blog just so they can have their comments edited to. He’d have quite the workout.
.:Darksidecat
I think the drunk sex = rape equation is highly problematic. I don’t know if you intend it that way, and while i wholeheartedly agree that having sex with someone so drunk they can’t enthusiastically consent, because they are more passed out than concious, can’t see straight anymore, are clearly desoriented and things like that,is straight-out rape, i don’t like the implications of “never have sex with a drunk person, because this always amounts to rape”. To me, it implies that this takes away my self agency. I decided to drink. I knew beforehand that this might change my behaviour, that i may do things i wouldn’t do otherwise. But if i do them enthusiastically and out of my free will, even if my judgement is impaired at that moment, it stems from that earlier decision to get intoxicated. Taking away my responsibility for that makes me feel very uncomfortable, because, well… that’s like being treated like a child. Like my decisions are not taken seriously. That in the end, when it comes to sex, my self agency again doesn’t matter, even if it’s in a way intended to protect me. Especially if this is only aimed at women.
But there’s a world of difference between “does stupid things happily, that she/he might regret later” and “can’t do anything anymore on their own, especially not giving enthusiastical consent.”. Nobody should make them out for the same, be it in one way or the other.
So, greetings from Germany, i hope i didn’t misspell too many things. Also, i don’t want to accuse you of any of these views.
That would also give him more blog hits… Eh. Could be fun to watch the fallout. (evil Kirby mode… ACTIVATE!
)
Eneya: That was many moons ago, during a thread where the subject of dirty talk vs. disrespectful talk came up. Brandon was defending calling someone a… whore maybe?…with the fact that it got Ashley hot in bed.
I believe that on another occasion he told us he’d read his comments to Ashley, and she responded by giggling, bouncing on his bed, and begging him to spank her. She’s a keeper, that one.
Did anybody else catch the part where he described himself as approvingly as “cold and calculating”? Awwww. I remember when I was sixteen.
The thing is, I think Brandon’s way old enough to know better. That’s the scary part.
Well… making fun of someone for liking something in the sack is like making fun of someone for their music taste… just cos you don’t like, doesn’t mean they shouldn’t…unless it’s evil of course >.>
I still want to know if he (Brandon) thinks other people have the right to secretly record him having sex. Several people have asked this (or similar things) already. He’s yet respond, if memory serves. I wonder why.
@darksidecat:
Buying something also involves an intervening actor.
How can you even compare that. Sex is something most people do voluntarily in their lives contrary to being beaten or run over by a car.
I don’t know how consent is defined and there are surely big differences between legislations.
But common sense tells us that if a drunk person gives me $ 50 that’s not the same as if I would steal $ 50 from a passed out person.
Why shouldn’t “having sex” be so different?
And so at least it should be a defense because I’m sick that sober people have to give much thought about how intoxicated exactly someone is before they can assume consent.
Oh, thanks for your sympathy, but I assure you, I don’t have absolutely any desire to have sex with drunk women, disgusting as they are.
But I am glad that I am at least still allowed to just leave them where they are.
DUDE THERE IS A KIRBY CARTOON WHY HAVEN’T I WATCHED THE KIRBY CARTOON ALSO THIS ONE IS WHERE MY AVATAR IS FROM I THINK!
That is what alcohol does to you! But he did everything right and how did it end?
Alcohol = Evil
Simon, she’s an abuser, full stop.