Here’s the bravely anonymous alpha blogger behind “Danger & Play ~ An online magazine for alpha males” explaining “Why You Should Cheat on Your Girlfriend.” I’ve bolded my favorite bit:
Haters will tell you to, “Man up! Break up with your girlfriend if you’re not happy.” They are missing the point. You want to have your cake, and to eat it too. Steady, reliable pussy and the occasional strange is the best of all worlds.
Cheating is a lot of fun, and it’s something I highly recommend. It’s way more exhilarating than bungee jumping, and few things feel as good as banging your girlfriend on the same day you banged some strange.
Cheating keeps your game tight. The best way to regulate your girlfriend is knowing you can bang chicks as hot or hotter than your girl. Well, when you cheat, this isn’t hypothetical. It’s reality.
Somehow I’m guessing there’s a lot more “hypothetical” than “reality” going on in this guy’s posts.
You don’t want an exclusive relationship? Fine. There’s no law saying you have to be in one. You can date casually and non-exclusively. You can have an open or polyamorous relationship. There are a lot of people out there in relationships, yet happily fucking other people outside of them. They’re just above board with it.
But that’s not what’s going on with our PUA friend here. With his talk about “regulat[ing]” girlfriends, he seems more interested in fucking over his girlfriend (assuming such a creature really exists) than he is in fucking strangers (sorry, “stranges”).
That’s not “Game.” That’s just being a dick.
But, hey, Nietzsche! He’s BEYOND GOOD AND EVIL! Or, as he puts it in a comment, “Shame and guilt are beta.”
You know, if you have to go around telling everyone what an Nietzschean ubermensch you are, you’re probably aren’t much of a Nietzschean ubermensch.
Late to the party, but what the everloving fuck?
Brandon gives me the heebie-jeebies. I really, really hope that Ashley is inflatable (and that that’s why Brandon trusts her and doesn’t need to secretly videotape her).
Brandon, please just don’t interact with people anymore if you have to violate their rights just to feel safe. I know, you don’t give a shit about others, but there is a lot in it for you as well!
For example, the probability of being falsely accused is pretty much zero and there is no need to consider other people’s autonomy or feelings! Doesn’t that sound awesome?
On a positive note: Ami is indeed awesome 😀 U jelly, NWO?
Well, whatever reasons Brand have in mind… they are still wrong because he does something without the consens of someone else and that is violation of privacy.
I find it creepy that he somehow he think he justifies that here in the thread.
I am still unconvinced that this is the best case scenario if all he cared about was to be sure that nobody can accuse him of rape falsley… what about these women who read this thread and have slept with him? They will have completely justified reasons to sue him?
+11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
I know, right? Priorities. They got them all wrong.
How very DARE you be rude to someone who thinks there is nothing wrong with violating their partners’ autonomy?
@Kollege:
1) I don’t really care if I give you the heebie-jeebies. I am not responsible for your feelings.
2) Ashley is not inflatable and I find it hysterical that everyone here thinks she is.
3) The stats about FRA’s are all over the place. Some as low as 2% while others as high as 60%. So to say it probably will not happen is you trying to appease me with your wishful thinking
So… you violate people on something you actually have no proof it’s an actual issue in such a numbers that it would even remotely justify violating people’s lives and privacy?
Nice…
While you’re all absolutely correct about the moral and ethical reasons that Brandon’s “secret videotape” idea is wrong, I just can’t get over the “commit a crime to avoid being accused of a crime” thing. In NYS, videotaping someone without their knowledge when they have a reasonable expectation of privacy (i.e. – when they’re out walking the street, no. When they’re in the bedroom fucking, yes.) is a Class D felony. A felony that you’re confessing to by turning in those tapes. That’s a 1-2.5 year sentence. Doesn’t seem like the best strategy to me.
@Seraph: I would rather incriminate myself and serve 1-2 years if I avoided spending 8-10 years instead.
Brandon has stated before in this thread that he thinks honest consent is possible. He just thinks the majority of women are incapable of it.
Brandon, where do you get your idea that rape is prosecuted in such high numbers that this could be even remotely justified?
I mean… I am now reading statistics and they are a fac cry from the picture you are presenting us. So.. care to elaborate?
There’s a way to serve zero years in prison, but only manginas can do it.
It involves only having sex with people you trust, and if you don’t trust any women, you don’t have sex with any women!
What’s happened to the men that you’ve know who were falsely accused of rape Brandon? I mean, if 60% is a remotely credible statistic (And 60% of what, precisely? Accusations or men who’ve been accused?) then you must know more than one.
And again, while you defend the “hypothetical” practice of illegally videotaping sexual encounters without consent, you continue to justify this on a by what you believe to be the considerable likelihood that you will be accused, falsely of rape. Yet you claim that you have never done this and that, prior to now, despite your casual sexual flings, and the fact that you regularly engage(d) in sex with women you don’t trust you’ve never done anything to verify a woman’s consent in a fashion that might be admissible as evidence in a court of law.
I find that strange.
Brandon, I have an assignment for you.
Tell Ashley, with whatever spin or priming or prepping you want, that you think it is ok to videotape women you have sex with without their consent, to protect yourself from false rape charges.
If you cannot do this, then you know exactly why it is so wrong to do so. If you are right about how likely women are to accuse men of rape, then it should be easy to justify.
So how about it?
The tapes won’t get you off the rape charges. Even if they were admissible, they would only incriminate you further. And that’s only if the accusation ever happens, which is way less likely then you being convicted of a crime you would actually be guilty if went you ahead with this stupid, monstrous, immoral and entire ass-backwards plan.
I think Brandon is confused about stats (surprising, no?). He seems to think that it’s 2-60% of *all men who have sex* who are falsely accused of rape. So, every time Brandon has sex, with perhaps the exception of the pneumatic Ashley, he stands an up-to 60% (because of course he believes the MRA version) chance of being accused of rape.
Kirby, I know you’ve been gone for a minute but please know that when Brandon tells Ashley about these discussions her response is usually some sort of giggle and complete agreement with whatever Brandon thinks. Also, she gets turned on.
FYI.
Really? He said that? Links, because I have obviously missed that?
Eneya: That was many moons ago, during a thread where the subject of dirty talk vs. disrespectful talk came up. Brandon was defending calling someone a… whore maybe?…with the fact that it got Ashley hot in bed.
Brandon, I don’t trust you to not get my consent, turn off the camcorder, and then rape me (do acts I did not consent to, or do things in a way that injures me, or refuse to stop when I’m in pain), so would it be cool with you if my burly friend stands in the closet while we have sex?
Of course, here I’m doing you the courtesy of asking. Would it be cool with you if my burly friend is SECRETLY in the closet while we have sex?
They weren’t. The final straw that forced their hands was being prevented from butchering Indians, which they were pretty happy to do in general. A significant minority were theocrats. They thought, as an aggregate, that freedom didn’t apply to the poor, to PoC, to women. This worship of them needs to go away.
Yes, easily
Or… would you mind if I cary a microphone/camera hidden somewhere in my clothes/lingerie/jewlery just in case as well?
I mean, fuck, if I’m a juror at a rape trial, and the defense offers a video that the accuser didn’t consent to being in as evidence she freely consented, I’m voting to convict.
No, I’m mentioning it in relation to you *taking the video without consent*. You’re an idiot; as I said, this is doable, you just have to be willing to have less sex because a non zero number of people who would want to sleep with you won’t let you take video of you. But you can be ethically secure, *actually use hte tape in court* (Protip: Illegally obtained evidence can’t be used in a court of law), and have sex.
You do realize that the illegal videotape isn’t admissable evidence, right? To the extent you actually have to worry about an accusation of rape that isn’t true (You don’t), this isn’t actually a cure.
@Nobinayamu and Holly:
Whelp, I’m out of ideas then. How do you explain empathy and morality to someone who simultaneously thinks that one person liking something means it’s ok to do it to everyone, and is fine with breaking the law as long as it mitigates a small chance of false accusation?
Back to the op, I think someone else mentioned that PUAs view women as masturbation aides. That’s… pretty much correct according to this guy. Also, women are cake.
The comment section is fun too.
Oh block quote, why you treat me so?