Here’s the bravely anonymous alpha blogger behind “Danger & Play ~ An online magazine for alpha males” explaining “Why You Should Cheat on Your Girlfriend.” I’ve bolded my favorite bit:
Haters will tell you to, “Man up! Break up with your girlfriend if you’re not happy.” They are missing the point. You want to have your cake, and to eat it too. Steady, reliable pussy and the occasional strange is the best of all worlds.
Cheating is a lot of fun, and it’s something I highly recommend. It’s way more exhilarating than bungee jumping, and few things feel as good as banging your girlfriend on the same day you banged some strange.
Cheating keeps your game tight. The best way to regulate your girlfriend is knowing you can bang chicks as hot or hotter than your girl. Well, when you cheat, this isn’t hypothetical. It’s reality.
Somehow I’m guessing there’s a lot more “hypothetical” than “reality” going on in this guy’s posts.
You don’t want an exclusive relationship? Fine. There’s no law saying you have to be in one. You can date casually and non-exclusively. You can have an open or polyamorous relationship. There are a lot of people out there in relationships, yet happily fucking other people outside of them. They’re just above board with it.
But that’s not what’s going on with our PUA friend here. With his talk about “regulat[ing]” girlfriends, he seems more interested in fucking over his girlfriend (assuming such a creature really exists) than he is in fucking strangers (sorry, “stranges”).
That’s not “Game.” That’s just being a dick.
But, hey, Nietzsche! He’s BEYOND GOOD AND EVIL! Or, as he puts it in a comment, “Shame and guilt are beta.”
You know, if you have to go around telling everyone what an Nietzschean ubermensch you are, you’re probably aren’t much of a Nietzschean ubermensch.
Cya losers.
xD
That was his curtest sign off? XD What happened to the “I’LL GET YOU NEXT TIME GADGET” things we usually get from him? xD
C’mon NWO, you aren’t done telling me how much you hate me yet XD
So it’s a-okay to screw someone who’s too drunk to be able to recite the alphabet, as long as she’s not outright unconscious? Got it.
NWO, ladies and gentleman, providing us a perfect example of his “morality, integrity, and honor.”
@Eurosabra
Sorry your pity-party didn’t find a willing host, because what I said was that people weren’t giant snobs, and that’s what I meant. As in if you are average, you can easily find other average people who are interested. If you are below average, you can still find people in the lower-average range who might be interested. Both ways, men and women… everyone can find someone. Unless you’re a creep, a jerk, or a self-pitying crybaby.
Late to the party, but I think Ami is awesome with awesome sauce, plus awesome cake and a scoop of awesome ice cream for desert. In short, she’s awesome!
NWO and Brandon, neck in neck in today’s Manboobz Most Sociopathic Troll competition. Watch out, MRAL, you’re falling behind!
Both ways, men and women… everyone can find someone. Unless you’re a creep, a jerk, or a self-pitying crybaby.
or Ami apparently XD
I’m just trying to figure out how Brandon can be so deeply concerned about the possibility of a false rape accusation being leveled against him and not be in possession of a bunch of illegal sex tapes.
Seriously, he’s spent quite a few posts not only justifying this practice but explaining how he would get away with it. And the posts prior to those were all about just how necessary this sort of thing is because false rape accusations could come out of nowhere.
@Brandon:
… *sigh* Let’s get some extreme into this conversation. Do you believe it is ok to murder someone on the grounds that you believe they may murder you in the future? Obviously, life in prison is far better than being dead, right?
@Nobinayamu: Because I found out about danger and play’s post about it today. I never actually thought of it prior to reading it and thought it was an interesting take on the matter.
And, NWO, as always, we console ourselves with the fact that we get to keep being us, and you, sadly, must go on being you. Still, tomorrow is another day.
@Kirby: That’s a bad analogy. For one, I could record hundreds of times without anyone knowing about it. Murders don’t really go unnoticed.
@Brandon will you be doing it from now on then? o:
There’s the famous OK Cupid survey that found that women rated 80% of online men “average or below.” Men were more forgiving. So, there are people who are alone without being dysfunctional, and they are mainly men.
It’s not pity. It’s simply a market in which women are always in more demand than comparable men.
I notice you never answered my question, Brandon. If a woman was to videotape you because she was afraid you might rape her and wanted evidence for later if she needed it, would you be OK with that?
Eh, Brandon thinks too small! What he should really do, if he wanted to be really safe, is always have sex while covered entirely in a latex body suit, wipe down his partner and the entire room with bleach afterwards, burn off his own fingerprints, conk his partner over the head to induce amnesia, feign his own death, change his name and go into hiding in Mongolia. Better safe than sorry, amiright?
@Ami: Probably not. I trust Ashley and I am not really having casual flings right now.
Like imagine a woman is afraid of rape (which remember is a lot more common than false rape allegations), and so she sets up a camera and records every single incidence of sex that happens in her home. Is that totally cool as long as she promises not to show the footage to anyone?
Better safe than sorry, amiright?
Ami is always right. :3
I vote this!
@Brandon:
It’s not a bad analogy because I’m not operating under the premise that “it is only immoral if I get caught.” I’m trying to get at your paranoia as justification for an immoral act, not how well you can hide from the law.
“I trust Ashley and I am not really having casual flings right now.”
Now I’m curious. What on earth could she have done to make you trust her when you have this level of paranoia?
Brandon | October 18, 2011 at 12:01 am
@Ami: Probably not. I trust Ashley and I am not really having casual flings right now.
But if you two break up, you’ll be video taping any encounters you have with women from then on out now that you have this knowledge? :]
@ Baglesan – Or he could try not behaving in ways that might make women feel like he’d raped them.
…Nah, that’s way too hard. Elaborate password-protected videotaping schemes are much simpler.
You know, Brandon, my best guy friend in the world has a little talk he gives to young men (cousins, nephews, kids from his neighborhood, etc.) that’s all about navigating the at times tricky world of youth, intoxicants, forays into casual sex, consent, etc. I don’t necessarily agree with his approach, but the message is awesome and resonates with his target audience.
And he has never recommended that men secretly videotape their sexual encounters, without getting permission. I mean, yes of course, he’s not an asshole and that helps. But your elaborate fantasies of how easy it would be (because apparently law enforcement doesn’t have anyone who knows how to work a ‘puter) set aside — you’ve really spent his many posts on this because you think that was an “interesting take”?
Really?