You might assume that those Occupy Wall Street protests (and their various offshoots) you’ve seen so much little of on the news lately are all about, you know, Wall Street, and the economy, and the fact that the very people who got our economy into the mess it’s in are somehow all still richer (a lot richer) than you or me. But apparently that’s not it at all. Nope! Apparently it’s all about hating on the menz.
How so? Let us turn to the good fellows at The Spearhead for guidance. In a recent post titled Occupy Wall Street Is Just Another Vehicle For Misandry, the blogger known only as Pro Male/Anti-Feminist Tech (PMAFT for short) argues that the movement is overrun by dastardly “single mothers and other women demonstrating high levels of entitlement.” His proof: one lady he found posting her story on the We Are the 99 Percent blog who noted that she had “no job, 3 kids and cannot see a med … let the dudes pay my bills.”
You might assume that by “the dudes” the lady in question is referring to extremely rich dudes – you know, the 1 percent that the “we are the 99 percent” movement is focusing its attention on. But apparently PMAFT knows better than we do, declaring that
she is demanding men subsidize her, not rich men or billionaires (which would be questionable enough) but men in general.
Oh, but she’s not the only entitled princess on display on the 99 Percent blog. Here are two other women — chosen from hundreds of examples from the blog — that to PMAFT seem to epitomize the evils of female entitlement and man-hatred:
Imagine, women actually having the chutzpah to want medical insurance for young children! Blatant misandry at its worst!
The commenters whooped it up in typical Spearhead fashion. “Single mums want to fuck with John and expect Harry to support her and her kids,” complained Nico. “New-age gov-mediated cuckoldry.”
To the redoubtable Uncle Elmer, these women’s pleas were
symptomatic of the feminized educational system and media. Without a manly Patriarchy to call BS on a lot of these entitlement notions, we have several generations of women now sailing into the hard rock of reality. … nobody cares.
Finndistan, meanwhile, wrote a screed nearly as long as the OP, laying out his case against shoe-wearing single mothers. A condensed version:
So, single mom? Should’ve kept your legs closed… should’ve chosen a better man….
I am not in America, but my single friends who get laid by one of your friends once every blue moon are already paying for you and your friends shoes and bastards by the insane amount of taxes imposed on them with threat of imprisonment.
If these guys are the 1%; that makes you, the 99%, parasites….
You, found a dipsh%t welfare boy, made a baby, and we, the 1% as defined by you, who actually want to work and create something useful, not bastards, are getting screwed by the real 1% who steal from us to give to you, so you can buy shoes and create bastards.
As a man … more than one third of my earning … go[es] to feed your shoes and your bastards …
Single mom with shoes and bastards, bought and being payed for by my money.
Occupy Wallstreet just shows that the western man is the pinata of the western world. And then he dies.
This comment got 63 upvotes from the locals, but no shoes or bastards.
AfOR, not quite as longwinded, noted that he found the women’s pictures “hilarious,” adding:
Suck it down bitches.
If you blow me PROPERLY I’ll buy you a 99 cent burger.
This got 58 upvotes from the totally non-hateful readers of The Totally Non-Hateful Spearhead.
EDITED TO ADD:
Speaking of hateful, here’s a comment I somehow missed, from evilwhitemaleempire. Readers of the comments here will recognize him as a dickish dude who posts dickish comments here from time to time. But in this comment he really lets his misogynist flag fly. (TRIGGER WARNING FOR VIOLENT MISOGYNY) Referring to one of the women cited as “entitled” by PMAFT, who had noted that she has “no money to hire a lawyer so I can divorce my abusive husband,” evilshitemaleempire offered this advice:
Heh. If she’s telling the absolute truth about her life on that paper (questionable) then she needs to go back to that abusive husband and start doing some serious dick sucking.
And if he wants anal sex she’d better give it to ‘em.
At last count this comment had 16 upvotes and one downvote. Stay classy, Spearhead.
No, A lot of far-rightists are isolationists, because they hate the US government.
Also, one of several American racist responses to World War 2 is to regret that it happened.
I’ve tried a few times to give you folks a bit of education on the workings of your State/Corporate/MSM/Military complex but you seem to be oblivious to the obvious. You probably think Obama is running the show, or that he answers to the people or some such nonsense. I’ll try one more time, here’s a link to the money masters. It’s quite long so you’ll need a bit of time if you want to be educated. If a 2 minute clip is the limit of your attention span, you’ll learn nothing.
Think of all the laws that’ve been passed over the years governing insurance, finance, stocks and such that your Government said would improve overall wealth, reguardless of being dems or reps. Has the gap between the rich and the poor shrunk or has it widened? We know the poor are the majority, the middle class is gasping and the ultra-wealthy have acquired more of your wealth. Those laws that were enacted that have caused this to happen aren’t failed policies. They worked exactly as they were designed.
The big thing these days is a “limit” or a “cap” on earnings for finances. I don’t know the numbers off hand, but for illustration purposes I’ll say of the very wealthy, 10k people earn an average of 10 million a year, which equals 100 billion a year total. We’ll say they pay 25% in taxes for a total of 25 billion in taxes. If Big Daddy passes a limit law saying there is now a cap of 1 million on these people, there will now be 22.5 billion less in taxes from these people, and 67.5 billion less in disposable income from these people.
So if this limit is pushed thru those people will be putting 40 or 50 billion dollars less into the economy, which translates into less goods being purchased and less jobs. Many of them may have stuck out on their own, branching off into various fields. That won’t be happening. Big Daddy, to make up the 22.5 billion shortfall will simply borrow more and pass off repayment, at interest, to you.
Since only 10 billion is now made by these 10k people, where’s that other 90 billion? Did it just go away? Of course not. That 90 billion is now in the hands of the owners, the bankers. The gap between the rich and the poor has widened ever further. Haliburton, Dow, Johnson & Johnson, Seimens, AIG, The Lehman Bros, The Federal Reserve, The World Bank, The IMF, every major pharmaceutical, chemical, oil company, and all major banking and insurance institution are owned by the same few hundred families. Are we going to tax the bankers so they can give the money back to themselves? It’s laughable.
Obama and his 434 cohorts who you believe are running the show, are below these few hundred families. These people are powerful, they don’t care about you or anyone but themselves. They bankrupt nations, starve continents, fund insurgents, finance crime, start wars and fund both sides. They profit from your suffering and death. Do you think they, or the State cares about women’s welfare, education and employment? They tell Big Daddy to offer women special entitlements and then tells Big Daddy to borrow money from them at interest and bill us all.
The Federal Reserve must be destroyed. How many of your presidents warned us? If you won’t listen to me, at least listen to them.
I’m not surprised. I have to say the least surprising was the pro-slavery site; but we knew that Meller was all for slavery, whips, chains and all.
NWO: Where do the reptilians fit into all of this? And is the world hollow inside? How many people do Satanists sacrifice every year? (You sound almost exactly like Icke, thus the questions, those are all his hobby horses.)
While I was browsing the SPLC, I read this article and now I understand NWO a lot better:
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/ideology/sovereign-citizens-movement
I don’t see anything on there about the government declaring that no one can earn more than $1 million and the rest goes to the Je… bankers, but that just goes to show NWO is a creative sort.
You gotta hand it to Meller–only he can look at an article about a survey of female victims of domestic violence and then complain that it makes women out to be victims.
I mean, I would try to give credit to NWOslavey or Antsy for doing that kind of thing but they have to up their game.
Felix Frankfurter, Justice of the Supreme Court (1939-1962), said: “The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes.” In a letter to an associate dated November 21, 1933, President Franklin Roosevelt wrote, “The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.”
Georgetown professor Dr. Carroll Quigley (Bill Clinton’s mentor while at Georgetown) wrote about the goals of the investment bankers who control central banks: “… nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole… controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.”
President Andrew Jackson, who believed that it threatened the nation. He wrote: “The bold effort the present bank had made to control the government, the distress it had wantonly produced…are but premonitions of the fate that awaits the American people should they be deluded into a perpetuation of this institution or the establishment of another like it.”
Thomas Jefferson wrote: “The Central Bank is an institution of the most deadly hostility existing against the principles and form of our Constitution…if the American people allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”
Congressman Louis McFadden, House Committee on Banking and Currency Chairman (1920-31), stated: “When the Federal Reserve Act was passed, the people of these United States did not perceive that a world banking system was being set up here. A super-state controlled by international bankers and industrialists…acting together to enslave the world…Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers but the truth is–the Fed has usurped the government.”
MEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 Oh wait, I thought you said a show of hands of who is not surprised at all. My bad!
*reads Holly’s link to the sovereign citizens article*
*looks at the bottom of the Manboobz sidebar*
Y’know, guys…maybe they have a point.
Maybe the case for the “holocaust” is not as airtight as some of you imagine if people from every possible non-establishment shade of politics and economics, from anarchist capitalism, to White racial nationalism, to Constitutional (or Confederate) conservatism, to certain shades of the so-called Christian right (identity Christianity and Church of the Creator) to–perhaps the smallest and least influential–old style European fascist and ‘national socialists’ have as a common denominator–questioning the establishment version of the “holocaust’–especially when the same people lie about everything else anyhow, from the lone-nut explanations of the Kennedy and King assasinations, to the origins of the Great Depression, the FDR complicity in the Pearl Harbor attack, the origins of the Bank of England in 1694, the Federal Reserve in 1913, the ‘ratification’ of the XIVth and XVI Amendments to the Constitution, or what was left of it,the coverup of the other holocausts of the years 1915-1961, from Armenia to Tibet, from the Ukraine to Crimean tarters (including chechens) during and after WWII, the infamous project Keelhaul, involving the Anglo-American turning over some two to three million escapees from Soviet hell back to Stalin, there to face certain death…
Hey comrades, maybe my favorite websites have some skepticism of YOUR holocaust, but how about your denials of mine? As long as we are talking about holocausts-plural–why not go to R.J. Rummel encyclopedic “Death By Government” and calculate how many deaths were inflicted by those who were fighting for democracy, the four freedoms, and “bluebirds over the white cliffs of Dover” and compare them to the number of deaths inflicted by the hated nazis–and Japanese, while your about it. Guess who was by far the most lethal?
Am I a holocaust denier? No, I think that there was a deliberate plan to resettle the jews of Europe organized by the Waansee conference in the summer of 1942, that escalated to deliberate mass murder undertasken by the Nazis, that could be covered under the label of ‘genocide”. Do I think that was the entire story, or that the Nazis were somehow unique in their evil, I do not! Nothing that was done to the Jews (or other victims of the Nazis) during those terrible years, didn’t have clear counterparts, among both the West and the USSR, against the Germans.e.g. Hitler had his “final solution” and his Waansee conference, FDR had his Morganthau Plan…No I am not going into detail here, but suffice it to say that it was just as brutal, in both intention and possible implementation, as anything Hitler or Himmler ever imagined. Ditto about Soviet actions toward Germans in Eastern Europe-most of whom had familes there for centuries, and some even fought for the Red Army in defending the USSR–of whom an estimated FIFTEEN MILLION–more than twice the number of Jews murdered by Nazis final solution during WWII– perished from 1943-1948! Given the realities of this, you can understand why some of my sources and histories are not quite as self-righteous about the “holocaust” as some of you so-called anti-racists are. There’s more than the “truth’ to the holocaust! there is the whole truth and nothing but the truth! If youall still feel “offended”, better pull in your horns! There is a lot youall have left out.
I wondered why the government always insisted I have to hold a red light in my left hand and a green light in my right hand whenever I go out at night.
Although it’s the way I have to carry that white light that really feels like an intrusion on my rights..
Hello
manbooberssailors!The Council on Foreign Relations was incorporated as the American branch in New York on July 29, 1921. Founding members included Colonel House, and “…such potentates of international banking as J.P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Otto Kahn, and Jacob Schiff…the same clique which had engineered the establishment of the Federal Reserve System,”
During the FDR years, the Council on Foreign Relations captured the political life of the U.S. Besides Treasury Secretary Morgenthau, other CFR members included Secretary of State Edward Stettinus, War Secretary Henry Stimson, and Assistant Secretary of State Sumner Welles.
Since 1934 almost every United States Secretary of State has been a CFR member; and ALL Secretaries of War or Defense, from Henry L. Stimson through Richard Cheney.
Since that time nearly ALL presidential candidates have been CFR members. President Truman, who was not a member, was advised by a group of “wise men,” all six of whom were CFR members, according to Gary Allen. In 1952 and 1956, CFR Adlai Stevenson challenged CFR Eisenhower.
CFR candidates for president include George McGovern, Walter Mondale, Edmund Muskie, John Anderson, and Lloyd Bentsen. In 1976 we had Jimmy Carter, who is a member of the Trilateral Commission, created by David Rockefeller and CFR member Zbigniew Brzezinski with the goal of economic linkage between Japan, Europe, and the United States, and: “…managing the world economy…a smooth and peaceful evolution of the global system.” We have also had (though his name strangely disappears from the membership list in 1979) CFR director (1977-79) George Bush, and last but not least, CFR member Bill Clinton.
The American delegation to the San Francisco meeting that drafted the charter of the United Nations in 1949 included CFR members Nelson Rockefeller, John Foster Dulles, John McCloy, and CFR members who were communist agents–Harry Dexter White, Owen Lattimore, and the Secretary-General of the conference, Alger Hiss. In all, the Council sent forty-seven of its members in the United States delegation, effectively controlling the outcome.
What must be remembered is that this is not some lunatic- fringe group…these are members of one of the most powerful private organizations in the world: the people who determine and control American economic, social, political, and military policy. Members’ influence and control extends to “leaders in academia, public service, business, and the media,” according to the CFR 1993 “Annual Report.”
———————————-
The CFR, a private organization seems to have a lot of power. Are ya sure you know what’s going on? Just pretend facts are fiction and fiction is fact, I guess? Wanna bet the economy tanks for real?
Don’t wear out your CTRL-V keys on our behalf, Slavey.
NWOSlave-October 13,2011@9:44pm; @10:12pm
Thank you for your informative and interesting video about “the money masters” As indicated by their responses to my posts, covering some of the same material, focused upon feminism rather than monetary finance, you unfortunately face a hostile, deaf and uncomprehending audience. What do you expect from people who get their “economics” and their “history” from ‘publik skoolz’ and the New York Times? However, at least one person is going to look at your video appreciatively!
“A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step!” Chinese proverb
PEACE AND FREEDOM!!
David K. Meller
Here is the CFRs official site
http://www.cfr.org/
Here is a membership list
http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com/CFRMembers.html
Oddly enough, they’re in charge of your media, education, banks, corporations. Well pretty much everything.
Gotta go. Have fun with your wall street protests.
So NWO is against Occupy Wall Street because he hates the bankers who control the economy?
Wow, the logic in that is stunning.
I’m sure NWO thinks the bankers are behind Occupy Wall Street. Because, um, because…
…Jews.
NWOSlave: I could pull up a list of all the important people who are members of the Catholic Church and use that as evidence of the terrible Papist plot to enslave Amerika. Or point to all the important leaders in our communities that have been members of the Boy Scouts of America and conclude that the BSA has an agenda and controls the US government. What’s your point?
The CFR is basically a think tank. Members get brochures and shit and get exposition to certain thinkers who do research on policies, they’re not being issued a new hive mind on subscription. Being a member of your local church is a more binding ideological agreement than that, and most people don’t consider that sinister in and of itself.
So say you’re right, NWOslave. How does repealing age of consent laws fix the problem?
Also, I can’t help noticing that women are listed in significantly lower numbers on that membership list than men. If the worldwide economic collapse was caused by a mostly-male semi-secret organization, why are you bitching about the wimminz?
I can see the reasoning behind claims that pharmaceutical companies have cures they’re not selling because they can make more money off of repeatedly selling treatments over selling a cure once, but what possible reason could they have for not making money off of selling the male equivalent of the Pill?
Also:
So does Big Pharma also have hidden away somewhere a highly safe version of the Pill, and are selling a poisonous version to women just for the fun of it? Or is there something inherent in human biology that makes is so birth control pills for women can’t be highly safe?
The women are probably super-extra-secretly controlling it all with their magic vaginas, as they are wont to do.
I’d like to repeat this post so you can get a look at who and what the CFR controls.
Here is the CFRs official site
http://www.cfr.org/
Here is a membership list
http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com/CFRMembers.html
Oddly enough, they’re in charge of your media, education, banks, corporations. Well, pretty much everything.
Oh, and, Holly, if you’ll browse the list of CFR members most of them aren’t Jews. However, I’d like to know why you’re such a racist? Racism is not only saying racist remarks, but also denying a person of a particular race is above blame for any crime or oppression they commit.
If a person is white, black, asian, spanish, christian, moslem, jewish, italian, russian, norwegian, polish, mongolian and each of them commits the same crime, whether it’s murder, or stock manipulation that causes poverty, are any of them exempt from blame of that criminal activety?
Funny how you did exactly that. But then again, what can one expect from a feminist whose standard of blame consists of the racist, sexist remark, “white, male privilege.”
‘It’s not the fault of white, black, asian, spanish, christian, moslem, jewish, italian, russian, norwegian, polish, mongolians. It’s feminists’.
I have to wonder nwoslave if it’s really not your fault. Seriously you may be ground zero.
I think you might be the cause of all of North America’s ill’s. I have a serious grief with you little dude, I’ve lost money in the past few years and i believe it is your fault.
Would it be ok with you if I did a simple search and got your personal information then sued you for my stock loses? If I believe it’s your fault ,shouldn’t I have that right?
You keep blaming others for your own choices, it might come back and bite you. Best case senerio you’d learn empathy for others.