You might assume that those Occupy Wall Street protests (and their various offshoots) you’ve seen so much little of on the news lately are all about, you know, Wall Street, and the economy, and the fact that the very people who got our economy into the mess it’s in are somehow all still richer (a lot richer) than you or me. But apparently that’s not it at all. Nope! Apparently it’s all about hating on the menz.
How so? Let us turn to the good fellows at The Spearhead for guidance. In a recent post titled Occupy Wall Street Is Just Another Vehicle For Misandry, the blogger known only as Pro Male/Anti-Feminist Tech (PMAFT for short) argues that the movement is overrun by dastardly “single mothers and other women demonstrating high levels of entitlement.” His proof: one lady he found posting her story on the We Are the 99 Percent blog who noted that she had “no job, 3 kids and cannot see a med … let the dudes pay my bills.”
You might assume that by “the dudes” the lady in question is referring to extremely rich dudes – you know, the 1 percent that the “we are the 99 percent” movement is focusing its attention on. But apparently PMAFT knows better than we do, declaring that
she is demanding men subsidize her, not rich men or billionaires (which would be questionable enough) but men in general.
Oh, but she’s not the only entitled princess on display on the 99 Percent blog. Here are two other women — chosen from hundreds of examples from the blog — that to PMAFT seem to epitomize the evils of female entitlement and man-hatred:
Imagine, women actually having the chutzpah to want medical insurance for young children! Blatant misandry at its worst!
The commenters whooped it up in typical Spearhead fashion. “Single mums want to fuck with John and expect Harry to support her and her kids,” complained Nico. “New-age gov-mediated cuckoldry.”
To the redoubtable Uncle Elmer, these women’s pleas were
symptomatic of the feminized educational system and media. Without a manly Patriarchy to call BS on a lot of these entitlement notions, we have several generations of women now sailing into the hard rock of reality. … nobody cares.
Finndistan, meanwhile, wrote a screed nearly as long as the OP, laying out his case against shoe-wearing single mothers. A condensed version:
So, single mom? Should’ve kept your legs closed… should’ve chosen a better man….
I am not in America, but my single friends who get laid by one of your friends once every blue moon are already paying for you and your friends shoes and bastards by the insane amount of taxes imposed on them with threat of imprisonment.
If these guys are the 1%; that makes you, the 99%, parasites….
You, found a dipsh%t welfare boy, made a baby, and we, the 1% as defined by you, who actually want to work and create something useful, not bastards, are getting screwed by the real 1% who steal from us to give to you, so you can buy shoes and create bastards.
As a man … more than one third of my earning … go[es] to feed your shoes and your bastards …
Single mom with shoes and bastards, bought and being payed for by my money.
Occupy Wallstreet just shows that the western man is the pinata of the western world. And then he dies.
This comment got 63 upvotes from the locals, but no shoes or bastards.
AfOR, not quite as longwinded, noted that he found the women’s pictures “hilarious,” adding:
Suck it down bitches.
If you blow me PROPERLY I’ll buy you a 99 cent burger.
This got 58 upvotes from the totally non-hateful readers of The Totally Non-Hateful Spearhead.
EDITED TO ADD:
Speaking of hateful, here’s a comment I somehow missed, from evilwhitemaleempire. Readers of the comments here will recognize him as a dickish dude who posts dickish comments here from time to time. But in this comment he really lets his misogynist flag fly. (TRIGGER WARNING FOR VIOLENT MISOGYNY) Referring to one of the women cited as “entitled” by PMAFT, who had noted that she has “no money to hire a lawyer so I can divorce my abusive husband,” evilshitemaleempire offered this advice:
Heh. If she’s telling the absolute truth about her life on that paper (questionable) then she needs to go back to that abusive husband and start doing some serious dick sucking.
And if he wants anal sex she’d better give it to ‘em.
At last count this comment had 16 upvotes and one downvote. Stay classy, Spearhead.
Meller: Grow up.
Youall BELIEVE that gender differences are negligable if not nonexistant, the sexes are identical and interchangeable, and that no differences in outcome will occur if women are substituted for men
No, we haven’t said that. What we have said is they are not so different as you make them out to be (trust me when I say I can tell a female body from a male).
We don’t believe in the gender essentialism you believe in. Are there trends of difference between the sexes, taken as a whole? Yes.
Does that mean each person is going to be destined to be something specific because of their gender? No. That’s not the way biology works, nor are the differences you think exist biological. They are cultural.
As such they are constructs, and as such they are so far from immutable as to be jokes when presented as essential facts of nature.
You say the women who stand out in their fields are mutant freaks. I say they are people, like any other. I have science, and history, and the evidence of my eyes to support this.
You have nothing but rants which would embarrass Foamy the Squirrel to support your theses.
You have to resort to threats, enforced illiteracy (or a severely limited set of allowed books), restrictions of rights, enforced dependence, and the threat of violence and murder to get what you want.
All I have to do is treat women as my equals. Those who want to be soft and fluffy submissives, can do so. Those who want to be engineers, can do so. Those who want to be soldiers, can do so. Those who want to be sexually active, can do so. Those who want to be abstinent can do so.
In short, I value freedom, and figure that by working toward equality I can maximise the number of people who are free.
You value slavery,and call it peace.
I feel really confused about this cock carussel thing. I get that having a lot of penis in my vagina somehow loosens it up, despite that it is a muscle and all. I just fail to see why it would make a difference if it’s a lot of different penisses or just one penis that get’s in there a whole lot of times. Does that last thing make me a used up slut too? And if not, how the hell does that penis pussy loosening work?
Well you see, okay if it’s a lot of different penises that makes a difference because… yeah, I got nothin. I guess it’s just another one of those MRA mysteries.
awwww italics fail
An even bigger mystery, why does the vagina not stay baby sized after a woman gives birth? If several penises(peni?) stretch it out, shouldn’t a baby…..
Xtra, I think a lot of them think that. There’s this whole weird concept of the vagina as a cheap elastic waistband (wear it too many times and it’ll never fit right again) among people who either haven’t had first-hand experience with a vagina or weren’t paying attention.
(I’ve also heard a number of people say that tightness isn’t necessarily correlated with male pleasure anyway, but having no bio-penis myself I can’t really speak to that.)
Maybe it is just some sort of homophobia? Like the immature believe that when you drink from the same bottle, you’re having an indirect kiss, and that’s gross, so having sex with a women who had a lot of sex with different men is like having an indirect gay orgy?
And what’s wrong with gay orgies?
ahem, I’ve been reading lots of slash…
…and you people (feminists and those who agree with them) wouldn’t have to enforce “equality” on everyone through gender (and race/religion/sex-orientation) based favoritism and judicial intervention, you wouldn’t need to brainwash everyone through the movies, schools and colleges, newspapers and periodicals, and the entire apparatus of propaganda available to the criminal elites of modern society!
Efforts to enforce “equality” would not disorganize society, would not provoke resentment, and would not disenfranchise and dispossess the most capable, efficient, and reliable participants–white men! Indeed, you would not be doing anything, if “equality”, gender based or otherwise, were ‘natural’ that would be any different than what would happen anyway!
Instead, what do we have? We have cities hit by storms, which used to cause severe damage that could be recovered from in a few weeks; 2-3 months at most,instead hopelessly disorganized after several years. cf. New Orleans after hurricane Katrina. Does anyone imagine that K was the very first storm to afflict New Orleans, LA (a city and a state,which, even in better days,was a national joke of corruption, graft and inefficiency? George W. was certainly not the first idiot to infest the White House when disaster struck a part of his kingdom, so his Presidency was responsible for some of what went wrong, but not everything!
A tiny, little hurricane (Irene) made landfall in New York, with top winds approx 80 mph. The usual ferocity of a hurricane is at least 40% more–with tidal surge to match–and yet there were neighborhoods in outer boroughs which were without power for more than a week! What would have happened in the New York Womynz Republic if a REAL hurricane had pulverized the city?
The 2003 regional power failure. The same thing, with power and water not restored for many days when it should have–and would have, if the support and technical services were properly MANNED–be restored in 2-3days at most!
It is worth noting that recovery from mishaps and disasters was much cheaper, more reliable, and complete in times two or three generations ago, when technology was much less developed. That makes the contrast between then and now even more startling.
I won’t even go into the demoralizing effect of the enforced dispossession and enemployment of (white) men on the larger society. manboobz.com recently posted an account of a horrifying crime (a mass murder commited in Seal Beach CA) with cries of enthusiastic support by other men whose personal situations with family courts, divorce, and paternal alienation were similar enough to resonate among other men from coast to coast!
As with the Anders Brevik atrocity in Norway some months ago, highlighting alienation of Norway’s men from a feminist, woman dominated government who did nothing about Islamic immigration, do you really want “equality” if it forces the majority of men–who would normally be the most law-abiding, peaceable, and productive people–into supporting, and eventually engaging in, maniacal and paranoic sociopathy? Didn’t we see enough of this in both Europe and America after WWI?
I go slowly, if I were you! very, VERY slowly, with lots of backtracking where men were most grievously injured!
By all means, let men be men, and women be women! Don’t bias the results with large-scale brainwashing and herding women in areas which men can do well, have been there for decades or generations, and women don’t belong, these fields are none of their business, and which most of them aren’t psychologically (or perhaps even biologically) equipped to handle anyhow, except for a tiny minority, <5%, with inonospheric level IQs, who are probably mutants anyhow!
Are you smoking crack, DKM? How the hell does feminism affect WEATHER? And I will do whatever the fuck I want to, whether it be cursing, or looking through a microscope at things, or repairing my computer – you can fuck right off with your BIOLOGY IS DESTINY bullshit.
Also, my baking turned out horribly today, and I has a sad. Did FEMINISM ruin it?
DKM
*unemployment*
Please, we know already that you are an idiotic anti-semite with racist and misogynistic slavery/genocide dreams, but spellcheck is not that hard to use. Even by a disgusting creature such as yourself.
Also KB, it wouldn’t be crack (thats for the BLACKS!)
DKM would have to stick to the more stereotypically “white” drug of crystal meth for this level of brain rot. Which he has to have if he’s on weather conspiracies now. A whole new door of stupid/crazy has just opened.
An excellent point! i revise the question: DKM, what the hell drug(s) are you on?
I assure everybody that I am drug free! I never said that feminism affects weather. I merely cited the strong possibilities that feminist law and employment policy EFFECTS ability to cope with disaster, whether caused by weather, large-scale electrical power failure, or anything else (outbreak of disease, riots and civil breakdown of law and order, etc.).
Get yourselves in order. What I wrote may be controversial enough without embellishing it with YOUR hallucinations.
Mr. Kobold, I leave weather “conspiracies” to lefty loonies like you with your so-called ‘global warming’ and ‘human-caused climate change’ fraud! I certainly don’t need weather to successfully refute feminism–or any other symptom of equality run amok!
Blaming feminism for the weather, Meller? C’mon, I know you’re an aura vibing, tinfoil hat wearing, Nazi, racist, DV rationalizing, wannabe Legree, but you can do better than WEATHER.
You believe in auras but not global warming? WHAT THE FUCK, MAN.
DKM: Feminism made the response to Katrina slower? Seriously, you have lost touch with common reality. That’s… christ, that’s a load of bullshit.
Paternal alienation. Dekraai had what, 54% shared custody? And was he fighting to reduce the access his ex-wife had, when he had more then she did to begin with. This is your example “paternal alienation”? You sicken me.
Apparently all the menz capable of fixing things will not do so unless they have a good woman slave to go home to. So women’s choices are be a house servant fuck toy or the wrath of the menz deprived of their right to a woman slave for their fixerings of stuffs. I think I’ll take my chances with the hurricane.
So, just to be clear about this, David K. Meller does not believe that men can live in a world where they have to play on an equal playing field as women, without “supporting, and eventually engaging in, maniacal and paranoic sociopathy.” (Why does he hate men so much??????)
Of course, he also believes that feminism causes hurricanes.
And that I am a mutant. Carry on, David K. Meller! This is fun.
It wasn’t Dekraai’s equal paternal custody that they were cheering. It was THEIR OWN problems with divorce, family court, paternal custody, and alienation, and mandatory child-support troubles. Dekraai’ action, despicable as it was, was just the lightning rod! The courts, the spouses, and the lawyers supplied the actual lightning!
And there is a hugh amount of current, powered by growing and irresistable amperage, that is being built up by a divorce and custody system that horribly exploits men, orphans children, doesn’t do all that much for 95% of divorced women, and massively enriches lawyers, psychologists, ‘marriage counselors, and child-service bureaucracies! This enthusiam for Dekraai would materialize with almost anyone who was at odds with the above, along with the cathartic violence and mayhem!
Time to put ‘no-fault’ divorce out to pasture, isn’t it?
Oh DKM. I gotta hand it to you–most people who think like you don’t come right out and say they think they’re superior to other people because they’re white and male.
DKM, what do you know about recovering from a disaster? It takes a heck of a lot longer than a few weeks to recover from a devastating storm. I live in Joplin, my home was hit by a tornado in May, and believe me it’s going to take a very long time to get things back to normal. Thousands of people need home repairs or to rebuild from scratch after clearing their lots. Hundreds of businesses, a hospital, and many of the schools are now destroyed.
I think my city, state, and federal government have all done a wonderful job in recovery efforts. Only three months after the tornado, Joplin schools started on time, despite losing 10 building, including the high school! Several businesses that were flattened are already rebuilt! For the past few months, hundreds of special trucks and crews have worked around the clock to pick up tornado debris and haul it away to landfills. I can barely get to my own home because the roads are always blocked while city crews work on clean up. The National Guard did an excellent job finding people and getting them out of rubble. FEMA has set up a trailer park for uninsured people that lost their homes. If you know so much about disaster recovery, please let those of us in Joplin know what should be done differently!
DKM, I wholeheartedly agree with you! Feminism is pretty helpful at getting lots of things done!
(But I suspect you meant “affects”…)