Like a lot of people, when I’m looking for insights on the current economic mess, I turn first to random dudes posting on The Spearhead. Here’s some guy called Poiuyt explaining how ladies and the men who don’t hate them are the source of all our troubles:
Because this god damned genderist society has become so amoral, so degenerate and so bankrupted on account of its genderist pervervions and femaleist subversions, it is going to be exceedingly difficult to grow itself out of the mess it finds itself in. The proverbial golden geese and their precious eggs in male produktivity have been either been killed, eaten, over-exploited, over worked, abused, dis-incentivised, harrased and are now increasingly extinct.
Well, I can’t argue with that, though the whole goose metaphor isn’t working 100% for me, given that I’m pretty sure it’s not the man goose that lays the eggs, but the lady goose. But that’s nitpicking. Poiuyt is on a roll:
You simply cannot get any further male inspired ekonomic growth out of hugely indebted and morally bankrupted societies as ours following genderist statism today, … … because the primary sources of growth potential in male inspired productivity and male entrepreneurship has been cannibalised to the bone. Cannibalised to the point where there is nothing left to base any further ekonomic growth on, consequent of the vicious sexist state ideology of womanism at all costs.
49 upvotes for this bit of wisdom.
She…she wasn’t wondering. She was explaining. Did you read the post?
Also: do you know what a grant is? Because I think not.
Holy reverse psycology batman! You must be joking. Try that little speech on someone else. Why not go the entire nine yards and say, “see how the patriarchy hurts men too!”
NWO, you know the old myth about the Inuit having 300 words for snow?
Because it is so key to your lifestyle, you have just as many ways to say “la la la I’m not listening.”
Delta wrote, “People are getting useless gender studies majors and liberal arts degrees faster than McDonald’s and Starbucks can hire them.”
Delta hasn’t been all that original so far, but “liberal arts majors ruined the economy” is my new favorite crackpot theory as to what caused the recession. Forget the banks and lack of regulatory laws!
Out of curiosity, NWO, would you assume that a man telling you he’d been raped was a liar, and tell him you weren’t going to fall for his evil ploy to ruin a woman’s life?
(Acceptable answers: “Yes, I’m consistently horrible” and “No, I’m only a misogynist.” Unacceptable answer: “That’s what feminists do!”)
[This comment got eaten by the Internet Tube Elves earlier today, but by constantly going to new levels of both obtuseness and assholery, NWOwlyslave has inspired me to try to get it through one more time just for the satisfaction. I’m not even sure if this is in the right thread anymore.]
NWOwlyslave accuses people of ignoring his citations when he apparently has no idea how to interpret them. To wit:
Right, except “in the context of” does not mean “but it’s still because of, so na-ne-na-ne-boo-boo,” “larger societal oppression” is not the same as “straight men’s oppression,” and the reference to “Resources that describe same-sex domestic violence” is clearly not a citation attempting to prove your drastic misrepresentation of the paragraph. The point of the paragraph is that other people’s attitudes towards homosexual couples affects how domestic violence in those relationships is seen and the resources available to those people may differ from those available to people in heterosexual abusive relationships.
It would be difficult to create such a drastic misinterpretation of these words unless you were deliberately trying.
Hmm. Are NWOslave and Toysoldier secretly the same person? The (capacity for) Force(d misinterpretation) is strong with these two, and I’ve definitely never seem them both in a room at the same time!
Protip: saving a document on your computer is not the same thing as reading it, let alone comprehending it.
[Every day in every way, NWOslave astounds with his failure to comprehend what he reads. Hey Owly, you never told me if you lieks my poem for you or not.]
Honesly, NWO’s consistant hated toward women make me wonder how anyone would let him near female bovines…
They must oppress him so, what with their needing to be milked and fed and cleaned up after. Waving their slutty, slutty utters all over the place, forcing men to cater to their every whim.
Tragic, I say.
If the real-estate market is driven by women wanting Barbie Dream Houses, why the hell can’t I find a house with an elevator in it?
Because men invented elevators.
Don’t you remember the Skepchick thread?
NWO, what wealth? You’re a failed inventor/milk machine tech who works 28 hour days. Not exactly a get-rich-quick scheme.
@Holly Pervocracy
“Out of curiosity, NWO, would you assume that a man telling you he’d been raped was a liar, and tell him you weren’t going to fall for his evil ploy to ruin a woman’s life?”
“(Acceptable answers: “Yes, I’m consistently horrible” and “No, I’m only a misogynist.” Unacceptable answer: “That’s what feminists do!”)”
Decisions, decisions. Why don’t you tell me? My choices, since you’ve deemed yourself correct and innocent, are; consistently horrible, or only a misogynist. Why these are the same choices the various non-monolithic brands of feminism offers now.
But, since I’m on a roll, I’m gonna have to say the LGBT, and whatever other letters have been added to the great rainbow coalition is your problem since they have the unconditional support of feminism. So if a man is raped, it’ll be by the GB portion of your blessed coalition.
I know, I know. According to feminism it’s always straight men raping other men. The fly in that ointment of thought is, being a straight man myself, and hanging out with straight men. We would be vomiting, dry heaving, coughing, hacking and wheezing if we tried to commit such a crime. Even feminists have to admit, this seizure-like state wouldn’t be very condusive to getting a woody. At best, a straight man could only make an extremely feeble try at attempted rape of another man. So you’d have to be G or B or have tendencies toward G to commit the rape of a man/boy.
Of course, since the numbers of male on male rape both in and out of prison are kept a well guarded secret, we don’t know how high that number really is. So if it were to come out that there are as many men raped as women, and gays make up at most 2% of the population. We’d know that gay men on average are 50 times more likely to rape than straight men. We wouldn’t want that type of info getting out, only straight men are bad. Feminism has decreed that to be truth.
———————
@cynickal
“Because men invented elevators.
Don’t you remember the Skepchick thread?”
I remember it well. We had feminists deeming any man talking to a woman creepy and skeevy at her discretion. It ranged from evevators to outside doughnut shops. And if it’s dark, forget about it. You came dangerously close to breaking the law.
———————-
Oh and Dave, if I’m off topic, keep in mind I’m either responding to a question or commenting on a comment. Which means my comment is off topic because their comment or question is off topic.
Ummm… the person who’s getting attention gets to decide their boundaries. The person giving the attention should, if a decent human being or trying to pretend to be one, abide by the boundaries of others. It’s not misandrist to tell a man that you don’t like the way he’s talking to you or looking at you or touching you or whatever. If a man asked a woman not to violate his boundaries, he would be lauded for showing the bitches who’s boss. And (assuming he was polite and no-violent) I think most feminists would respond with a resounding ‘meh.’
@hellkell
“NWO, what wealth? You’re a failed inventor/milk machine tech who works 28 hour days. Not exactly a get-rich-quick scheme.”
Even though failed inventor/milk machine tech isn’t quite it. You are right in one sense. What little wealth I have is being stripped away. Does it bring joy to your heart that even some bottom feeding failure like myself has his meager possessions stripped? That’ll teach me!
Who the fuck is taking your stuff away, NWO? Are feminists sneaking into your house at night and taking you shit to redistribute to the more deserving? Give me a fucking break.
@KathleenB
“Ummm… the person who’s getting attention gets to decide their boundaries.”
But how can any person know what another persons “boundaries” are unless they appproach them. The only way to know a persons boundaries is to approach them. Yet depending on the individual woman/feminist and where she was approached, any womans individual feelings may describe the mans behavior as creepy. The only way to never cross a womans boundaries is to never approach.
“Even though failed inventor/milk machine tech isn’t quite it. You are right in one sense. What little wealth I have is being stripped away. Does it bring joy to your heart that even some bottom feeding failure like myself has his meager possessions stripped? That’ll teach me!”
It’s not feminists stripping your wealth, nor are they to blame for you being a bottom feeding failure. That’s on you and you alone.
You know, I meet a lot of guys through work who are strangers to me, and the vast majority of them have managed to walk up and start talking to me without crossing my boundaries. There have also been many men who have managed to approach me in a specifically interested in dating way while I’m out and about without crossing my boundaries.
It’s almost like it’s entirely possible for men to talk to women without crossing their boundaries, as long as the men involved are decent human beings without massive lady issues.
NWO: I’m not saying don’t approach (seriously, are you really that dense?). I’m saying that if you’re told to stop, STOP! It is not my fucking responsibility to keep creepers away from me once I’ve said no, it’s theirs to leave me the fuck alone once I’ve set the boundary.
Whoo, someone really, really hates his own body. That’s honestly kind of sad — male bodies give you a literal feeling of nausea? Do you ever use locker rooms? Do you own mirrors? Do you even masturbate?
@KathleenB
“Who the fuck is taking your stuff away, NWO? Are feminists sneaking into your house at night and taking you shit to redistribute to the more deserving? Give me a fucking break.”
Well dear, I’ve been working a long time. I figure over the last 30 years I’ve paid a good $500,000 in taxes. Ya got federal, state, city, medical, unemployment, social security (which I’ll never see), sales, property, on and on it goes.
Tell me? What did I get for my money?
Am I supposed to be overjoyed at putting a woman thru college?
Am I supposed to be thrilled that the job I applied for and deserved was given to a woman with no experience, (This was told to me by the recruiter at pepsico), to fill a quota so pepsico can continue to sell the Big Daddy’s 22 million?
Am I supposed to be extatic to pay for womens health care costing 2 to 1 excluding any reproductive care so women can live 7 years longer?
Am I supposed to go ga-ga that my health insurance is very expensive to defer the cost women spend on themselves?
If I refuse to pay this money I go to jail.
Virtually all my tax money and a good portion of my earned money goes exclusively towards, womens, education, employment, health, everything. In return, schools tell me I’m an oppressive misogynist. Employment tells me women need jobs. Health tells me we can’t afford you. (10 federal health centers for women, none for men). Charities and everything else tells me, fuck you, you’re a man.
No thanks but no thanks to your system of equality. I’ll take the 500k.
So, NWO, it’s lovely to know what you think of gay people, but if a man said he’d been raped, would you believe him?
@Bagelsan
“Whoo, someone really, really hates his own body. That’s honestly kind of sad — male bodies give you a literal feeling of nausea? Do you ever use locker rooms? Do you own mirrors? Do you even masturbate”
Again with the pathetic attempt at psycology? It didn’t work for Holly and it doesn’t work for you. When I masturbate I think of young naked girls. That’s how ya know I’m straight.
Does this type of psyco-nonsense actually work on anyone? Is this what they teach in the ivory tower these days?
Bullshit, NWO, bullshit. Tax money also pays for streets, police and fire protection, the military, food and drug safety, making sure cars are safe, etc. No matter how many times you try to replace common reality with your own, the fact is that a good chunk of tax money goes to things the benefit EVERYONE (for differing values of benefit, I’ll admit). You’re going to tell me you never drive on roads? You have a problem with a regulatory body ensuring that people who drive are doing so properly? Do you never eat food? Take medicine? Drink municipal water? If you’re really serious about not dealing with the results of taxation, you’ll kinda need to stop doing all of those things.
NWO: You still have to interact with a male body in order to masturbate, NWO – assuming you’re actually cis. According to your thesis, you should be too overcome by nausea to get it up, much less finish.
But you’re touching a dick! Isn’t that all gross and gay and dry-heave-y? :p