Categories
antifeminism crackpottery evil women I'm totally being sarcastic idiocy men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny MRA oppressed men reactionary bullshit the spearhead

Spearheadonomics: How the ladies caused our economic malaise

These are the awkwardly posed businessladies who wrecked our economy
These are the awkwardly posed businessladies who wrecked our economy

Like a lot of people, when I’m looking for insights on the current economic mess, I turn first to random dudes posting on The Spearhead. Here’s some guy called Poiuyt explaining how ladies and the men who don’t hate them are the source of all our troubles:

Because this god damned genderist society has become so amoral, so degenerate and so bankrupted on account of its genderist pervervions and femaleist subversions, it is going to be exceedingly difficult to grow itself out of the mess it finds itself in. The proverbial golden geese and their precious eggs in male produktivity have been either been killed, eaten, over-exploited, over worked, abused, dis-incentivised, harrased and are now increasingly extinct.

Well, I can’t argue with that, though the whole goose metaphor isn’t working 100% for me, given that I’m pretty sure it’s not the man goose that lays the eggs, but the lady goose. But that’s nitpicking. Poiuyt is on a roll:

You simply cannot get any further male inspired ekonomic growth out of hugely indebted and morally bankrupted societies as ours following genderist statism today, … … because the primary sources of growth potential in male inspired productivity and male entrepreneurship has been cannibalised to the bone. Cannibalised to the point where there is nothing left to base any further ekonomic growth on, consequent of the vicious sexist state ideology of womanism at all costs.

49 upvotes for this bit of wisdom.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

294 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
KathleenB
KathleenB
9 years ago

And NWO’s reality substitution powers remain undiminished by rain, time, facts or logic. I’d be impressed if I weren’t dry heaving.

Bagelsan
Bagelsan
9 years ago

All we do is rote memorization.

Maybe you didn’t do well in school because you thought this? And hint: Sally’s perfect scores on homework probably mean she’s acing her tests, too. Double hint: one of those kids is gonna do way better in any field of academia/employment than the other; fucking around acting like an ass and not doing your work isn’t “meritorious.” :p

Holly Pervocracy
9 years ago

Title IX

Big Daddy State

wiki knowledge

da crew

men=bad women=good

Rothchilds

cyrillic

Oh, well I guess women are perfect and never do anything wrong and men are responsible for all the bad in the universe, huh, that’s what you think isn’t it

elephants

Unshakable belief that “patriarchy” means “the fact that men exist”

my job is really hard you guys

Frenzied attack on one word in someone’s comment, totally ignoring the sentence it was in

I don’t really need to read NWO posts individually any more. They’re all made of the same ingredients.

Unimaginative
Unimaginative
9 years ago

Merit has a meaning. “something that deserves or justifies a reward or commendation; a commendable quality” etc. Like handing assignments in a timely fashion, or not disrupting class with unruly behaviour.

I also aced my tests in school, but failed to hand in assignments on time (because tests were easy, and doing assignments was boring). Guess what. Assignments count toward the total mark. I failed a few classes because, by NOT turning my assignments in on time, I did NOT merit a passing grade. Just like poor wee Billy.

Shora
9 years ago

NWO:

I see. If that’s the case why did shaenon make sure to point out that single women only bought 20% of the houses.

To illustrate that it is quite impossible for the economic crisis to be all the woman’s fault

Did she give us a number on how many houses were bought by single men exclusively?

No, because nobody is blaming economic crises on those silly men.

Quite clearly she was shifting the blame to men.

Quite clearly she was explaining how its ridiculous to shift the blame on women. There is a really, really important difference there.

Who defauled more? Single men or single women? Who suggested buying a bigger house for married couples?

I dunno. And also, I dunno, it was different for everyone I guess.

All the sudden gender is irrelevant? Any other time the finger of blame IS gendered. Funny how that works?

Your firm grasp of the concept of context never ceases to astound me. And also I’d like to hear what you think are other times when the finger of blame is gendered. Schrodinger’s rapist doesn’t count.

red_locker
9 years ago

“I don’t really need to read NWO posts individually any more. They’re all made of the same ingredients.”

That makes two of us.

NWOslave
NWOslave
9 years ago

@Pam
“Ah yes, the ever-praised Phyllis Schlafly, who remains ever-blameless for the lack of gender neutrality in child custody cases and child/spousal support cases, etc.”

Feminists on the left and feminists on the right. Communist feminists, liberal feminists, radical feminists, moderate feminists. They all sit in the same tent, arguing on how men can best conform to benefit women.

Phyllis Schlafly…How men should work to support women in the domesic arena.
Hanna Rosin…How men should work to support women in education and employment.
Ozy….How men should support women so they can wear dresses and not be shamed.
The Daly’s and radfems…How men should support reducing male population to save the planet.
The slutwalkers….How men should support women acting like animals in heat.

So the cry of feminism isn’t a monolithic block is nothing more than the degree to which women demand how to best divvy up mens actions and resources.

Slap an innocent looking girl on TV and have cry about the wage gap and lets all run to help.
Slap another one on TV about education and we run to help.
Slap another one to talk about only Womens DV and we run to help.
Slap another one on TV to talk about what war to fight because a woman isn’t fully educated in feminist theory in a foreign land and we run to kill and die.
Slap them on TV to scream about STEM.
Slap them on TV to talk about the end of men and we applaud.
Slap them on TV to laugh at men being mutilated and we cheer.
Slap them on TV to close womens prisons to save money and we pour out forgiveness and love and help.
Slap the on TV to increases sentences for men for the same crime and we applaud.
Slap them on TV to talk about their feelings on any issue and we run to hush the delicate snowflakes and soothe their every discomfort.
Laws, laws, laws! We must have more laws and more money and more of everything so no woman, reguardless of her individual preference ever suffers even a slight to her precious feelings.

Feminism is a monolithic block.

Bagelsan
Bagelsan
9 years ago

Owly, you need to stop slapping innocent girls on TV! 😀

Holly Pervocracy
9 years ago

Phyllis Schlafly is my favorite feminist ever, right after the women from “The View” and the United States Congress.

KathleenB
KathleenB
9 years ago

Wow, that logic shield is really great. Everything bounces off of it!

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
9 years ago

Are we absolutely sure that NWO isn’t TimeCube guy? The similarities in rhetorical style are quite striking.

NWOslave
NWOslave
9 years ago

@Shora
“Your firm grasp of the concept of context never ceases to astound me. And also I’d like to hear what you think are other times when the finger of blame is gendered. Schrodinger’s rapist doesn’t count.”

Patriarchy!
Men in power, even though all privilege is afforded to only women!
White, male privilege!
Men are oppressors!
Women are victims!
Women have always been oppressed!
DV is violence against women!
VAWA, men commit violence against women!
Title IX, men oppress women in education!

The list is endless.

Feminism is victimology. Point to a “man” at the top, therefore all women should be up there with him, even though there may only be a few hundred men at the top of education, employment, wealth, ect. All women demand to be at the top as well. Women demand more laws so all women can reside at the top of every aspect of society with those scant few men.

Holly Pervocracy
9 years ago

Why did I bother writing out that list above?

NWO just did it for me.

KathleenB
KathleenB
9 years ago

Okay, the lightshow from the LogicShield is getting boring. Next!

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
9 years ago

Um, NWO, you’re aware that victimology is an actual academic field that has nothing to do with feminism, right? It often looks at questions such as, who gets mugged most often, and why?

Pam
Pam
9 years ago

Communist feminists, liberal feminists, radical feminists, moderate feminists.

You forgot a category, Slavey, as, according to you, there are now ANTI-feminism feminists. I guess that would make perfect sense when using MRA logic.

Bagelsan
Bagelsan
9 years ago

“Spam feminists, feminist spams, feminist feminists, spam spams…”

Alternatively:

“Fried feminists, feminist gumbo, feminist stew, feminist cocktails…”

NWOslave
NWOslave
9 years ago

@Holly Pervocracy

Your brand of feminism, “I’d rather live in a world where a hundred false accusers are told* “I believe you, I care about you, and I’ll stand up for you,” than where one rape survivor is told “gosh, this story has two sides and I really need to consider him innocent until proven guilty.”

And your little disclaimer, because I wouldn’t want to misquote you in anyway…”not in court, but by their friends, families, and people who figure they have a right to comment because they read about it on the Internet and everything ”

How nice of you to be so willing to ostracize any man on any womans word. Unconditional support of any woman. You are a gem.

KathleenB
KathleenB
9 years ago

/me bursts into song

Spam, spam, spam, spam spam, spam spam, lovely spam, wonderful spam…

Yes, I am a geek.

Holly Pervocracy
9 years ago

How nice of you to be so willing to ostracize any man on any womans word. Unconditional support of any woman. You are a gem.

I’ll unconditionally support any person.

Why are you bigoted against male rape survivors, NWO? Why do you think all rapists are men?

You goddamn misandrist.

Shaenon
9 years ago

I see. If that’s the case why did shaenon make sure to point out that single women only bought 20% of the houses.

Because a previous poster was claiming that the housing bubble was caused entirely by women buying houses, and I wanted to point out that this was mathematically impossible. It was a futile effort on my part, as he immediately shifted the goalposts and started claiming that the houses bought by men were also women’s fault. Disappointing.

I do, however, want to get away from the notion that the housing crisis was the fault of home buyers. It wasn’t. It was the fault of government deregulation allowing lenders to take advantage of buyers with sleazy mortgage deals. All the buyers were guilty of was trusting that the people they went to for home loans knew what they were talking about and could be trusted, which turned out to be untrue.

Holly Pervocracy
9 years ago

Not that NWO would listen (he’s too busy being misandrist), but supporting a survivor isn’t the same thing as attacking their assailant, anyway.

“I’m here for you” doesn’t mean “I’ll kill that guy!”, and that’s why it doesn’t need to be held to a standard of proof.

Shaenon
9 years ago

Have you wondered why there are so many women in chemistry and biology? I mean, those are kind of random fields for women to be good at, aren’t they? Women especially dominate in genetics and biochemistry, which rank at the “hard science” end of biology research.

Back in the 1970s, a biochemist named Joseph Gall made a point of encouraging his female students and assistants, mentoring them in the same way male science students were typically mentored. Gall’s lone efforts produced a generation of gifted female microbiologists, a group sometimes jokingly referred to as “Gall’s Girls.” The 2009 Nobel Prize in Medicine, the first science Nobel awarded to a woman-headed team, went to Elizabeth Blackburn, Carol Greider, and Jack Szostak. Blackburn was one of “Gall’s Girls,” and Greider was one of her students. (The work that won them the Nobel: “immortalizing” cells through manipulation of the telomeres on the ends of DNA strands.)

And that’s why there are so many female biochemists.

Shaenon
9 years ago

I read a nifty article recently on the history of UNIVAC. In the early ’50s, the team that developed UNIVAC hooked up with the Remington Typewriter Company to promote their computer to the public. Remington delivered on the advertising, most memorably using UNIVAC to predict the outcome of the 1952 presidential election in a televised stunt. But Remington also brought in a lot of entrenched corporate sexism, and the female programmers were so badly treated by Remington that they jumped ship for rival IBM. This group included Grace Hopper, developer of the first compiler and the first programmer to realize that computers would become advanced enough to require languages rather than simple numeric punchcodes.

And that’s why you’re probably reading this on an IBM computer rather than a Remington.

NWOslave
NWOslave
9 years ago

@Holly Pervocracy
“Why are you bigoted against male rape survivors, NWO? Why do you think all rapists are men?
You goddamn misandrist.”

Holy reverse psycology batman! You must be joking. Try that little speech on someone else. Why not go the entire nine yards and say, “see how the patriarchy hurts men too!”
—————–
“Not that NWO would listen (he’s too busy being misandrist), but supporting a survivor isn’t the same thing as attacking their assailant, anyway.”

“I’m here for you” doesn’t mean “I’ll kill that guy!”, and that’s why it doesn’t need to be held to a standard of proof.”

What it says quite clearly is you’ll take any womans word as gospel. That would be “alleged” attacker, by the way.

“I’m here for you,” means you don’t care if “that guy” loses his job, ends up a bum, and dies of starvation on a steaming grate due to a womans lie. Passive violence can be far more detrimental than active violence.
————–
@Shaenon
“Have you wondered why there are so many women in chemistry and biology? I mean, those are kind of random fields for women to be good at, aren’t they? Women especially dominate in genetics and biochemistry, which rank at the “hard science” end of biology research.”

Well wonder no longer ladies. Big Daddy to the rescue. This is just one of so very many State agencies for women, although this one tosses in the token minority word as a gesture of good will. As you can tell, women are the prime target. I wonder where that 75k to 300k comes from? Could it be Big Daddy borrows the money from the bank at interest and passes the bill to the general population? There’s an economy stimulant. Plus of course we have to pay to employ the The National Institute of Agriculture and whatever other agencies that work hand in hand. All billed to the general population at interest.

You can go to any field of eduaction and there will be a womans only club like this one billed to the general population. There will also be the old equality quota system in place, which will be overseen by another agency, and another, and another. Mandatory she fears you classes. So when theres more women in any particular field due to outright discrimination, monitarily, educationally, socially and every possible way. Women will say, “see, women are ‘better’ than men when given, (haha) equal opportunity.”

Passive hatred. Giving every benefit and loads of extras to women, while taxing men to do it. Women are taxed as well, but since the money goes back to women as a collective, they still benefit.

“The National Institute of Agriculture offers a grant to research projects and organizations devoted to increasing the number of women and minorities from rural areas engaged in science, technology, engineering and mathematics fields deemed relevant to USDA priorities. These grants may be highly beneficial to furthering biology education for women and underrepresented minority students. Awards may be as much as $300,000, but will not be less than $75,000 each.”

Bagelsan
Bagelsan
9 years ago

Well wonder no longer ladies. Big Daddy to the rescue. This is just one of so very many State agencies for women, although this one tosses in the token minority word as a gesture of good will.

She…she wasn’t wondering. She was explaining. Did you read the post?

Bagelsan
Bagelsan
9 years ago

Also: do you know what a grant is? Because I think not.

Holly Pervocracy
9 years ago

Holy reverse psycology batman! You must be joking. Try that little speech on someone else. Why not go the entire nine yards and say, “see how the patriarchy hurts men too!”

NWO, you know the old myth about the Inuit having 300 words for snow?

Because it is so key to your lifestyle, you have just as many ways to say “la la la I’m not listening.”

Molly Ren
9 years ago

Delta wrote, “People are getting useless gender studies majors and liberal arts degrees faster than McDonald’s and Starbucks can hire them.”

Delta hasn’t been all that original so far, but “liberal arts majors ruined the economy” is my new favorite crackpot theory as to what caused the recession. Forget the banks and lack of regulatory laws! 😛

Holly Pervocracy
9 years ago

Out of curiosity, NWO, would you assume that a man telling you he’d been raped was a liar, and tell him you weren’t going to fall for his evil ploy to ruin a woman’s life?

(Acceptable answers: “Yes, I’m consistently horrible” and “No, I’m only a misogynist.” Unacceptable answer: “That’s what feminists do!”)

Moewicus
Moewicus
9 years ago

[This comment got eaten by the Internet Tube Elves earlier today, but by constantly going to new levels of both obtuseness and assholery, NWOwlyslave has inspired me to try to get it through one more time just for the satisfaction. I’m not even sure if this is in the right thread anymore.]

NWOwlyslave accuses people of ignoring his citations when he apparently has no idea how to interpret them. To wit:

“Battering in same-sex intimate relationships has many of the same characteristics of battering in heterosexual relationships, but happens within the context of the larger societal oppression of same-sex couples. Resources that describe same-sex domestic violence have been developed by specialists in that field such as The Northwest Network of Bi, Trans, Lesbian and Gay Survivors of Abuse, http://www.nwnetwork.org

[Owly’s interpretation:] Well, well, well. It would appear same-sex violence is also the fault of straight men’s societal oppression. As gomer pyle would say, “shazaam.” And as a source for this completely unbiased report which blames men we’re directed to The Northwest Network of Bi, Trans, Lesbian and Gay Survivors of Abuse as proof.

Right, except “in the context of” does not mean “but it’s still because of, so na-ne-na-ne-boo-boo,” “larger societal oppression” is not the same as “straight men’s oppression,” and the reference to “Resources that describe same-sex domestic violence” is clearly not a citation attempting to prove your drastic misrepresentation of the paragraph. The point of the paragraph is that other people’s attitudes towards homosexual couples affects how domestic violence in those relationships is seen and the resources available to those people may differ from those available to people in heterosexual abusive relationships.

It would be difficult to create such a drastic misinterpretation of these words unless you were deliberately trying.

Hmm. Are NWOslave and Toysoldier secretly the same person? The (capacity for) Force(d misinterpretation) is strong with these two, and I’ve definitely never seem them both in a room at the same time!

Protip: saving a document on your computer is not the same thing as reading it, let alone comprehending it.

[Every day in every way, NWOslave astounds with his failure to comprehend what he reads. Hey Owly, you never told me if you lieks my poem for you or not.]

cynickal
cynickal
9 years ago

Honesly, NWO’s consistant hated toward women make me wonder how anyone would let him near female bovines…

They must oppress him so, what with their needing to be milked and fed and cleaned up after. Waving their slutty, slutty utters all over the place, forcing men to cater to their every whim.

Tragic, I say.

Shaenon
9 years ago

If the real-estate market is driven by women wanting Barbie Dream Houses, why the hell can’t I find a house with an elevator in it?

cynickal
cynickal
9 years ago

Because men invented elevators.
Don’t you remember the Skepchick thread? 😉

hellkell
hellkell
9 years ago

Take my wealth

NWO, what wealth? You’re a failed inventor/milk machine tech who works 28 hour days. Not exactly a get-rich-quick scheme.

NWOslave
NWOslave
9 years ago

@Holly Pervocracy
“Out of curiosity, NWO, would you assume that a man telling you he’d been raped was a liar, and tell him you weren’t going to fall for his evil ploy to ruin a woman’s life?”

“(Acceptable answers: “Yes, I’m consistently horrible” and “No, I’m only a misogynist.” Unacceptable answer: “That’s what feminists do!”)”

Decisions, decisions. Why don’t you tell me? My choices, since you’ve deemed yourself correct and innocent, are; consistently horrible, or only a misogynist. Why these are the same choices the various non-monolithic brands of feminism offers now.

But, since I’m on a roll, I’m gonna have to say the LGBT, and whatever other letters have been added to the great rainbow coalition is your problem since they have the unconditional support of feminism. So if a man is raped, it’ll be by the GB portion of your blessed coalition.

I know, I know. According to feminism it’s always straight men raping other men. The fly in that ointment of thought is, being a straight man myself, and hanging out with straight men. We would be vomiting, dry heaving, coughing, hacking and wheezing if we tried to commit such a crime. Even feminists have to admit, this seizure-like state wouldn’t be very condusive to getting a woody. At best, a straight man could only make an extremely feeble try at attempted rape of another man. So you’d have to be G or B or have tendencies toward G to commit the rape of a man/boy.

Of course, since the numbers of male on male rape both in and out of prison are kept a well guarded secret, we don’t know how high that number really is. So if it were to come out that there are as many men raped as women, and gays make up at most 2% of the population. We’d know that gay men on average are 50 times more likely to rape than straight men. We wouldn’t want that type of info getting out, only straight men are bad. Feminism has decreed that to be truth.
———————
@cynickal
“Because men invented elevators.
Don’t you remember the Skepchick thread?”

I remember it well. We had feminists deeming any man talking to a woman creepy and skeevy at her discretion. It ranged from evevators to outside doughnut shops. And if it’s dark, forget about it. You came dangerously close to breaking the law.
———————-

Oh and Dave, if I’m off topic, keep in mind I’m either responding to a question or commenting on a comment. Which means my comment is off topic because their comment or question is off topic.

KathleenB
KathleenB
9 years ago

Ummm… the person who’s getting attention gets to decide their boundaries. The person giving the attention should, if a decent human being or trying to pretend to be one, abide by the boundaries of others. It’s not misandrist to tell a man that you don’t like the way he’s talking to you or looking at you or touching you or whatever. If a man asked a woman not to violate his boundaries, he would be lauded for showing the bitches who’s boss. And (assuming he was polite and no-violent) I think most feminists would respond with a resounding ‘meh.’

NWOslave
NWOslave
9 years ago

@hellkell
“NWO, what wealth? You’re a failed inventor/milk machine tech who works 28 hour days. Not exactly a get-rich-quick scheme.”

Even though failed inventor/milk machine tech isn’t quite it. You are right in one sense. What little wealth I have is being stripped away. Does it bring joy to your heart that even some bottom feeding failure like myself has his meager possessions stripped? That’ll teach me!

KathleenB
KathleenB
9 years ago

Who the fuck is taking your stuff away, NWO? Are feminists sneaking into your house at night and taking you shit to redistribute to the more deserving? Give me a fucking break.

NWOslave
NWOslave
9 years ago

@KathleenB
“Ummm… the person who’s getting attention gets to decide their boundaries.”

But how can any person know what another persons “boundaries” are unless they appproach them. The only way to know a persons boundaries is to approach them. Yet depending on the individual woman/feminist and where she was approached, any womans individual feelings may describe the mans behavior as creepy. The only way to never cross a womans boundaries is to never approach.

hellkell
hellkell
9 years ago

“Even though failed inventor/milk machine tech isn’t quite it. You are right in one sense. What little wealth I have is being stripped away. Does it bring joy to your heart that even some bottom feeding failure like myself has his meager possessions stripped? That’ll teach me!”

It’s not feminists stripping your wealth, nor are they to blame for you being a bottom feeding failure. That’s on you and you alone.

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
9 years ago

You know, I meet a lot of guys through work who are strangers to me, and the vast majority of them have managed to walk up and start talking to me without crossing my boundaries. There have also been many men who have managed to approach me in a specifically interested in dating way while I’m out and about without crossing my boundaries.

It’s almost like it’s entirely possible for men to talk to women without crossing their boundaries, as long as the men involved are decent human beings without massive lady issues.

KathleenB
KathleenB
9 years ago

NWO: I’m not saying don’t approach (seriously, are you really that dense?). I’m saying that if you’re told to stop, STOP! It is not my fucking responsibility to keep creepers away from me once I’ve said no, it’s theirs to leave me the fuck alone once I’ve set the boundary.

Bagelsan
Bagelsan
9 years ago

I know, I know. According to feminism it’s always straight men raping other men. The fly in that ointment of thought is, being a straight man myself, and hanging out with straight men. We would be vomiting, dry heaving, coughing, hacking and wheezing if we tried to commit such a crime.

Whoo, someone really, really hates his own body. That’s honestly kind of sad — male bodies give you a literal feeling of nausea? Do you ever use locker rooms? Do you own mirrors? Do you even masturbate? 🙁

NWOslave
NWOslave
9 years ago

@KathleenB
“Who the fuck is taking your stuff away, NWO? Are feminists sneaking into your house at night and taking you shit to redistribute to the more deserving? Give me a fucking break.”

Well dear, I’ve been working a long time. I figure over the last 30 years I’ve paid a good $500,000 in taxes. Ya got federal, state, city, medical, unemployment, social security (which I’ll never see), sales, property, on and on it goes.

Tell me? What did I get for my money?
Am I supposed to be overjoyed at putting a woman thru college?
Am I supposed to be thrilled that the job I applied for and deserved was given to a woman with no experience, (This was told to me by the recruiter at pepsico), to fill a quota so pepsico can continue to sell the Big Daddy’s 22 million?
Am I supposed to be extatic to pay for womens health care costing 2 to 1 excluding any reproductive care so women can live 7 years longer?
Am I supposed to go ga-ga that my health insurance is very expensive to defer the cost women spend on themselves?

If I refuse to pay this money I go to jail.

Virtually all my tax money and a good portion of my earned money goes exclusively towards, womens, education, employment, health, everything. In return, schools tell me I’m an oppressive misogynist. Employment tells me women need jobs. Health tells me we can’t afford you. (10 federal health centers for women, none for men). Charities and everything else tells me, fuck you, you’re a man.

No thanks but no thanks to your system of equality. I’ll take the 500k.

Holly Pervocracy
9 years ago

So, NWO, it’s lovely to know what you think of gay people, but if a man said he’d been raped, would you believe him?

NWOslave
NWOslave
9 years ago

@Bagelsan
“Whoo, someone really, really hates his own body. That’s honestly kind of sad — male bodies give you a literal feeling of nausea? Do you ever use locker rooms? Do you own mirrors? Do you even masturbate”

Again with the pathetic attempt at psycology? It didn’t work for Holly and it doesn’t work for you. When I masturbate I think of young naked girls. That’s how ya know I’m straight.

Does this type of psyco-nonsense actually work on anyone? Is this what they teach in the ivory tower these days?

KathleenB
KathleenB
9 years ago

Bullshit, NWO, bullshit. Tax money also pays for streets, police and fire protection, the military, food and drug safety, making sure cars are safe, etc. No matter how many times you try to replace common reality with your own, the fact is that a good chunk of tax money goes to things the benefit EVERYONE (for differing values of benefit, I’ll admit). You’re going to tell me you never drive on roads? You have a problem with a regulatory body ensuring that people who drive are doing so properly? Do you never eat food? Take medicine? Drink municipal water? If you’re really serious about not dealing with the results of taxation, you’ll kinda need to stop doing all of those things.

KathleenB
KathleenB
9 years ago

NWO: You still have to interact with a male body in order to masturbate, NWO – assuming you’re actually cis. According to your thesis, you should be too overcome by nausea to get it up, much less finish.

Bagelsan
Bagelsan
9 years ago

When I masturbate I think of young naked girls. That’s how ya know I’m straight.

But you’re touching a dick! Isn’t that all gross and gay and dry-heave-y? :p