Like a lot of people, when I’m looking for insights on the current economic mess, I turn first to random dudes posting on The Spearhead. Here’s some guy called Poiuyt explaining how ladies and the men who don’t hate them are the source of all our troubles:
Because this god damned genderist society has become so amoral, so degenerate and so bankrupted on account of its genderist pervervions and femaleist subversions, it is going to be exceedingly difficult to grow itself out of the mess it finds itself in. The proverbial golden geese and their precious eggs in male produktivity have been either been killed, eaten, over-exploited, over worked, abused, dis-incentivised, harrased and are now increasingly extinct.
Well, I can’t argue with that, though the whole goose metaphor isn’t working 100% for me, given that I’m pretty sure it’s not the man goose that lays the eggs, but the lady goose. But that’s nitpicking. Poiuyt is on a roll:
You simply cannot get any further male inspired ekonomic growth out of hugely indebted and morally bankrupted societies as ours following genderist statism today, … … because the primary sources of growth potential in male inspired productivity and male entrepreneurship has been cannibalised to the bone. Cannibalised to the point where there is nothing left to base any further ekonomic growth on, consequent of the vicious sexist state ideology of womanism at all costs.
49 upvotes for this bit of wisdom.
They just wish their minds ran as fast as a hamster.
Maybe the reference is to egg-onomics?
Come to think of it, I’ve never seen a goose egg (except on a scoreboard). He might be on to something.
“And who’s dreamed of having Barbie’s Toy Mansion ever since they were little girls?”
Whose dreams fueled the rise of the exurbs and the supremacy of the SUV? Whose view of the world is more appreciably to be seen in the cheap developments which blanket this country from coast to coast?
You guys are wasting your breath when you try to make me believe that walls-and-a-roof are paltry things forced by venal females on your unwilling and all-too-mighty spirits. You yourselves have a taste for shoddily built big houses, buyable on easy terms. You’re not stupid enough not to know that the woman who sold you the cheap, big house (in cases in which it was a woman who sold you the big cheap house) wasn’t simply the last person in the pipeline. She was working for somebody who was working for somebody who was working for somebody (and so are you, most of the time).
If you don’t want to take the matter up with those who possess real decision-making power, don’t blame your neighborhood brokers: look at yourselves, because, though it’s always the seller’s job to sell, a buyer retains the option not to buy.
“OK, I’ll bite.”
You sure will.
Ozymandias42: Long may you “profit”
It’s almost as if you live in a society wherein men are privileged and have an easier time rising to the top.
But when women do it, it doesn’t count? Jobs and Gates would be nowhere without Hopper, who would herself be nowhere without Lovelace and Babbage.
Citation needed.
The horror.
This is true. And a number of the oil salesfolks? Men. I don’t know what the gender split of alt med is, but there’s a lot of substantial men in it (as well as women, I’m aware).
I like how you say this after Steve Jobs. Tell me again how much you need your iPhone and iPad, please.
This is a completely idiotic view of economics, likely cribbed from Ayn Rand. Economic value isn’t only created by innovation, because new ideas aren’t the only things people need, and it’s certainly not the only thing they want. Industry and service are probably even bigger components.
The percentage of women in STEM is low, but it’s by no means zero, dimwit.
Uh, yes it was. There are always poor people who want to buy houses they can’t afford (Protip, it’s not just women). There used to be regulations that forced you to disclose who you were selling to, etc.
Are all jobs uniform in the sex of who’s in them, in the parallel universe you inhabit? This is like, the third or fourth time you’ve done this.
Also, ‘hundreds of thousands of branch level bankers’? 1 in 100, at most? You sure, bro? I guess it’s possible, but it don’t seem likely…
Nice job finding some tiiiny lil’ she-goats to sacrifice, Peter! Just blame the little guys, it still works for the GOP!
“And who’s dreamed of having Barbie’s Toy Mansion ever since they were little girls?”
Not me, and not the women I know, but who dreams about fucking Barbie in a Ferrari? Oh right, you guys.
(Bekabot’s post was awesome)
“Get bent. The economic crisis in 2008 wasn’t some 1980′s junk bond market crash created exclusively by male traders. It was and is primarily a housing bubble crisis and a consumer credit bubble crisis. And who’s dreamed of having Barbie’s Toy Mansion ever since they were little girls? The crisis coincided with an explosion of female home ownership and female consumer debt.”
And who started the deadly stereotypes of Barbie’s Toy Mansions for girls, again? Granted, Barbies were made a woman who based them off of their family, but the entire line of Barbies is, in fact, based on patriarchial notions.
But that’s besides the point. The House Bubble came and went. The banks are in trouble and are being protested to boot. Really, it’s funny how you can blame half the world for the economy without even thinking that maybe, just maybe, the way things were run were a little fucked up.
But what do I know? I’m just a mangina looking for facts, not scapegoats. 🙂
Barbies were made by a woman*
I must type slower next time.
…Barbies were made a woman…
Wasn’t that the plot of Weird Science?
“Wasn’t that the plot of Weird Science?”
I dunno, I’ve yet to see that. Though, it’s on Netflix now, so…
*moviebuff away*
It’s not one of John Hughes’ better films.
@Eneya
“Rambling: check”
Have you ever actually read the comments here???
“Accusations how women ruined the world: check”
This is the standard troupe of women in power, (politicians, MSM darlings, Corporate gals) blaming only men for every problem, everywhere all the time.
“Ignoring reality and history: check”
Reality ignoring from the men and women are interchangable group. History from the group that rewrites history as womens oppression.
“Logic: missing.”
Here’s women/feminist logic.
http://www.theduluthmodel.org/training/wheels.html
Here’s a few exerpts…
“The Power and Control Wheel represents the lived experience of women who live with a man who beats them. It does not attempt to give a broad understanding of all violence in the home or community but instead offers a more precise explanation of the tactics men use to batter women.”
Men use tactics to beat women!
———————
“When women use violence in an intimate relationship, the context of that violence tends to differ from men. First, men’s use of violence against women is learned and reinforced through many social, cultural and institutional avenues, while women’s use of violence does not have the same kind of societal support. Secondly, many women who do use violence against their male partners are being battered. Their violence is primarily used to respond to and resist the controlling violence being used against them. On the societal level, women’s violence against men has a trivial effect on men compared to the devastating effect of men’s violence against women.”
And here I thought men and women were interchangable. It would appear mens violence against women is learned and reinforced on all levels. I still fondly remember my first father son talk with dad, and how he explained the tactics for beating mom. Oh how we laughed! Women on the other hand, are so saintly, they primarily use violence to resist mens evil controlling violence against them. Further, women’s violence against men has a trivial effect as oppossed to the devestating effects of men’s violence against women.
———————–
Battering in same-sex intimate relationships has many of the same characteristics of battering in heterosexual relationships, but happens within the context of the larger societal oppression of same-sex couples. Resources that describe same-sex domestic violence have been developed by specialists in that field such as The Northwest Network of Bi, Trans, Lesbian and Gay Survivors of Abuse, http://www.nwnetwork.org
Well, well, well. It would appear same-sex violence is also the fault of straight men’s societal oppression. As gomer pyle would say, “shazaam.” And as a source for this completely unbiased report which blames men we’re directed to The Northwest Network of Bi, Trans, Lesbian and Gay Survivors of Abuse as proof.
————————
That link I’ve given isn’t some tiny little source either. That is DAIP. That is some fucking money rolling thru that shit. Now I see why Title IX judge, jury and special police task forces need to read why men are manipulative. Nothing manipulative about womens language in DAIP.
———————–
@Rutee Katreya
“Citation needed.”
Why bother asking for citations? I gave you the Governments pdf file clearly stating Title IX has it’s own police force which doesn’t need facts. They have a trained judge and jury. Why Does He Do That?: Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men; Exerpts from this book is what the trained jury reads. Men are guilty, innocense must be proven. Accusers can’t be cross-examined. Third party accusers.
Women, led by feminists have choosen this as the standard for judging men. Why bother with a citation when the response is denial?
Women were some of the first people to brew beer millennia ago.
A woman first brought the concept of vaccination to Europe.
A woman grew eBay into the business it is today.
A woman helped develop bacterial agar, which is still in use today in nearly every facet of medical research.
A woman wrote the first novel in the world, and another woman wrote what is (arguably) the first science fiction novel.
A woman was one of those behind-the-scenes geniuses of IBM.
A woman invented the first treatment for leukemia and the first immuno-suppressive drug, as well as treatments for gout, malaria, and herpes.
A woman recently invented lenses used to prevent age-related macular degeneration, the major cause of blindness in developed countries.
NWO, are you so frothy tonight that you keep getting your threads mixed up? Not every one of them needs your Title IX rants-n-raves, which would be even more entertaining if you read, much less comprehended, your source materials.
Speaking of spinning wheels: NWO, do you spin some sort of wheel-of-fortune type wheel that tells you which off-topic rant to paste into the comments at any given moment? Because I’m pretty sure we weren’t talking about Title IX.
As far as the financial meltdown.
10 fed health centers.
Title IX
Quota’s
Guv education agencies just for women.
Guv employment agencies just for women.
AA
welfare
Just way too many Guv agencies to list that gotta top a trillion a year.
And that’s just the public sector, the private sector equals that, pretty much with Big Daddy guns as incentive.
——————-
Women’s entrepreneurial endevours seem to be based around hatred of men. I mean if you wanna start a charity, just exclude men. If you wanna start a business, exclude men. Education for women just rings angelic. Help women. Help women. Help women. It’s like a mantra continually pumped over the airwaves, every magazine, The State, every corporation, our schools, billboards, every advert. It’s inescapable.
When everything everywhere demands help for women while at the same time blames men for all of lifes problems, ya got some pretty strong hatred goin on. Somehow, the solution will be to blame patriarchy, which of course means blame men for men being hated.
——————–
@Shora
“Okay, so I sort of get why MRAs spell things funny… Like “Women” is “womyn, wimminz, wymyn”
The term “womyn” was first coined by feminists; their deep hatred of men was such that they refused to have their gender, in any way associated with men.
@David Futrelle
“Speaking of spinning wheels: NWO, do you spin some sort of wheel-of-fortune type wheel that tells you which off-topic rant to paste into the comments at any given moment? Because I’m pretty sure we weren’t talking about Title IX.”
In the post above I used Title IX as a costly State agency which has an economic impact. Hows that? Better? And the point is…..What’s the point of providing citations if the citations are denied and/or ignored? By the by, did you read the link I provided, and if so, whaddya think of Big Daddy’s justice?
I love it–the subprime collapse was apparently the result of women suddenly catching up with half a century of socialization by Barbie and buying houses they couldn’t afford because Malibu Dream House (which was introduced when, 1980s at the earliest?). Because it’s not like men also valorize vain purchases like fancy parts on cheap cars and expensive dream houses. And Peter conveniently leaves out the “hundreds of thousands of genius-level [women] working under them.” Apparently it’s okay to appeal to anonymous masses of genius men, but to disconfirm his hypothesis we have to point to a 1:1 Steve Jobs/Oprah ratio.
BTW, for every Oprah and Jenny McCarthy there is a Chopra and an Andrew Wakefield and a Mike Adams, etcetera, etcetera.
NWO, I want to know if you read the link you provided.
@hellkell
“NWO, I want to know if you read the link you provided.”
I have Big Daddys pdf file saved in my documents.
In other words, no, he did not actually read any of the link.
@Moewicus
“I love it–the subprime collapse was apparently the result of women suddenly catching up with half a century of socialization by Barbie and buying houses they couldn’t afford because Malibu Dream House”
Are you saying women had no part in the economic collapse?
————–
@Bagelsan
If I recall, the manboobz crew usually responds with something along the lines of, “those people invented stuff, not you, you ain’t shit.” Also, the behind the scenes IBMer was a man. Cutting off your willy, pumping yourself full of hormones and changing your name doesn’t change anything.
Let’s see…
Nope, he just names all of them. And he no longer even bothers saying anything about them–just mentions their name and that’s that.
“Also, the behind the scenes IBMer was a man. Cutting off your willy, pumping yourself full of hormones and changing your name doesn’t change anything.”
….
Wow.
No wonder you’re not taken seriously (well, that and your general paranoic conspiracy theory mongering).
Pop that one in the big book for the next time he talks about who is a ‘real man’ 😉