Ladies! Better move fast if you want to sink your talons into some hard-working, high-earning beta man-wallet! Men’s Rights Redditor ShinShinGogetsuko is on to you ladies and your devious ways, and he’s taking his video games and going home. By which I mean: he’s GOING GALT!
Men are choosing to reject the culture that is being forced upon them which tells them to be anything but MEN. What they want us to be is slaves, to throw away our souls and toil away while women get to do whatever they want in the name of “female empowerment” and with a court system that will side with them. Equality is the ideal, but it’s not about equality–it’s about control. Men are going Galt.
When society takes a stand against the destruction of men’s character, then men will return to being men. Until then, Xbox 720.
See, I wasn’t kidding about the video games bit.
LINK and SCREENSHOT.
Thanks to tim-buckles on ShitRedditSays for the link (and the screenshot).
My first car was a $2000 clunker, so while you might not be able to save $50,000 to buy a BMW, you can easily buy a cheap used car.
There’s a reason they’re called “clunkers”, and it’s not because that’s a German word meaning “will cost you far less in maintenance than the car is worth”.
@KathleenB: No I didn’t. For one, the USPS charges money for their services. Hence they get most of their revenue from that. The amount of money the government contributes is pretty small.
The FY2010 lists revenue, expenses and contributions from the govt as (in millions):
$67,052, $75,426, $3,132
With an operating loss as (in millions):
$(8,374)
So the amount isn’t large, but making the claim that the USPS isn’t funded in anyway by the government is wrong.
@ Rutee – When you say none of this shit happens to you with a credit union, what do you mean? I’m not thrilled with the way my bank keeps jacking up fees (and now I don’t even feel like I can say which bank that is, with our friend Hengist hanging around being all creepy). The major disadvantage of credit unions is how few locations there are, right? But you can use the ATMs of some of the major banks if you’re willing to pay a fee?
As to Brandon’s point, I don’t expect the USPS to make a profit any more than I expect the Royal Mail to make a profit. Their responsibility is to make sure that citizens get their mail in a timely manner, not to make money for shareholders. I can understand why a libertarian doesn’t like the idea of public services that aren’t designed to be profit-making entities, but it’s a bit silly to act as if the fact that they don’t make a profit is a sign that they’re failing at their mission, because that’s not actually their mission at all.
Brandon you’re still fucking stupider than pudding,
The US Postal Service is constitutionally MANDATED.
What does the USPS handing mail to lawfully established mail carriers of other countries have fuck all to do with anything?
@mythago: My first car worked pretty well…by clunker I meant it was cosmetically unappealing. It was an old car but I bought it with proof that it just went through a tune up. It got shitty gas mileage, but gas was $1.50 a gallon at the time so it didn’t really break the bank.
It ran well and had a lot of miles, but it looked like crap and would not have impressed anyone.
Also, on the idea that people don’t need credit cards or even bank accounts – sometimes I have to travel for work. In order to get good rates on flights, hotels, etc, I need to book well in advance, take advantage of special offers, etc. Have you ever tried to use Expedia or book a hotel room without a credit card? I guess in theory the no credit card or bank account thing is possible, but only if you’re willing to limit your life in a lot of ways that are very inconvenient.
@Cynickal: Again, not saying the USPS should be abolished, I just want them to not be a bigger tax drain than necessary.
Someone made the comment about UPS/FedEx handing mail to the USPS. The USPS does exactly the same thing with other mail carriers (Royal Mail, Japan Post, etc…)
Also you’re still a complete dipshit who doesn’t bother to read the articles you quote.
*THIS* is where the fundamental profit loss is. Regardless of the fact the the USPS is a NON-PROFIT entity!
So to review for people who read for comprehension;
1) the post office is constitutionally mandated to deliver all letters, flyers, packages and post cards to all residence in the US or US held territories.
2) Commercial carriers push the most expensive aspect of their business (i.e. the delivery part) on to the USPS
3) The USPS is Congressionally Mandated to pay a full 75 years worth of pension and benefits in just ten years.
@Cynickal: Problem solved:
http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-08-11/politics/30042108_1_federal-worker-union-contracts-pension-plan
Mass unemployment and poverty is a very strange definition of “solved.”
@Katz: No. The USPS isn’t getting the same amount of business as it formerly did. With the creation of things like IM services, social networks, email and practically every other form of communication, the USPS is getting less mail. The majority of the mail getting delivered is physical products bought online.
So with a drop in mail being delivered, why should we continue to keep people on when their is less work to do. Should we just start paying people to do nothing?
I can’t speak to overdraft fees, but I don’t pay a red cent to use my money in general. My bank isn’t actually in my state anymore, and although that has caused a couple problems, it’s generally worked out fine between direct deposit and the like. I don’t handle cash, and use debit or credit for everything, and they gave me a card that functions as both. If you need a lot of cash, this is probably not an ideal solution. There are other disadvantages as well; the amount earned in savings is smaller, because credit unions predominantly deal with low risk and low return income. There are some services that they simply do not offer, such as international wire transfers (I don’t think that’s a problem for most people). I’m sure there are others, but they haven’t come up for me.
Note that having a debit card (Which I am, again, not charged a single red cent to use) does allow some handling of cash without an ATM, from cashback. I suspect that some of this is just mine, but I really am treated much better at my credit union than I ever was at a bank. It’s really nice to not pay money to use money. (I was charged for checks. Like, the printing of the checkbook, not the usage of the checks inside. That’s about it).
Agreed about credit unions. I dropped the BofA when I was offered an in to my local credit union (a downside, there are many you can’t get into if you don’t work someplace associated with them) and it took me very little time and effort to get stuff out of BofA and over to them, and the fee payments dropped dramatically. I do have a $5/mo charge for online billpay, but that’s it. And I could not pay that and just write paper checks instead. Many credit unions also refund you the money you’re charged for out-of-network ATMs, so the cost to you ends up being nothing. The customer service was an enormous step up also, for me. I can’t speak for all credit unions, but I’d recommend mine to anyone.
Hmm. I didn’t know that much about credit unions. Now I’m intrigued. May have to look into it.
I too heart my credit union! No monthly minimum balance, no debit card fees, etc etc. The trick is to get cash back at the grocery store instead of going to an ATM.
re credit unions: Many belong to a Co-op, and co-op ATMS are free. Some belong in such a way that co-op member branches can be used as if they were a branch of your CU for everyday banking.
Brandon: So the amount isn’t large, but making the claim that the USPS isn’t funded in anyway by the government is wrong.
Compared to: If you want to compare apples to apples, then you need to compare a government service to a private service that does roughly the same thing. USPS = UPS,
So, which is is, a government service, as you had been stating in your previous condemnations, or something for which there is a contribution, the amount of which isn’t large.
If the latter, why hold it up as a poster child of gov’t inefficiency?
Because it’s a convenient whipping boy. Never mind that it’s not been the thing people accuse it of being sice 1982… 30 years.
And, as Rutee says, it’s not supposed to run at a profit. As cynickal points out, if it ran at a straight loss (like the Army) it would 1: be mandated, and 2: worth every cent.
Did you actually have a point to make about making government services like SSI solvent or do you think that hurling insults is a valid retort?
Do have any actual figures, or is is it going to be more of the same, “It’s going broke”, without any actual explanation/demonstration of real understanding of the solvency of the SSA.
@Pecunium: Your comparison is comparing two different things: a companies service record and it’s finances. Again, apples and oranges. Which is also two different arguments.
Again, the USPS and the ARMY are two different things which serve two completely different functions. It’s like comparing UPS to Blackwater…it makes no sense.
1) The Army doesn’t provide any chargeable services. They are completely supported by tax dollars.
2) The USPS makes most of it’s money via paid postage and other fees charged per person. It only takes a miniscule amount of tax dollars.
As I have stated above, I am fine with government services that charge for their services to not make a profit. But they should at least break even for multiple reasons:
1) They can budget their money efficiently and appropriately
2) They don’t have to keep going to congress to get more tax dollars
3) They don’t take tax dollars that can be used elsewhere.
The better government services manage money, the more services we can have without raising taxes.
Uh, as far as I can tell their basic functions are “serving the interests of the American people (by mailing stuff),” “serving the interests of the American people (by shooting people),” “making money (by mailing stuff),” and “making money (by shooting people)” respectively.
@Bagelsan: Ya, if you want to make a sweeping broad generalization. What next? Are you going to say apples and oranges are the same thing…fruit.
From that standpoint, all we can do is talk about govt services in the abstract because one could argue every single government services “serves the interests of the American people (by doing X)”
So do you actually have something specific or do you just want to argue in the abstract?
I’m saying that the purpose of the USPS is not to make money; comparing it to things that are primarily intended to make money is silly.
Unconstitutional.
Actual solution: http://baucus.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=702
*Which addresses the actual problems within the Postal Service, not some shitty anarchist idea of closing down government so they can pretend to be Mel Gibson In Beyond Thunderdome*
Why are we arguing about the post office again?
Holy crap, you even have to pay service charges at credit unions? People complain that there’s too much government in Canada, but jeez. I use a for-profit bank, and I pay NO FEES at all, unless I go into overdraft. They make their money by using my money. I get free cheques, no limit on transactions, no charge for transactions. They pay me pretty good interest on my savings. I was looking into using a credit union, but they charge fees and have transaction limits. How do United Statesers do anything anymore? It’s like you’re being bled to death by a kijillion blood-sucking insects.
I’d really like to see these “regulation of industry is ruining the economy” people trot out some citations, because the opposite is true. Actually, I’d like to see them locked into padded rooms or put into retirement colonies without access to the media, so that they could inflict less damage on the US (and thus the global) economy.
Libertarian fuckwads keep complaining that only Galtian Captains of industry can successfully run anything and that government agencies that produce more services for fewer dollars are more inefficient than corporate, for-profit organizations.
Of course these are the same fuckwits that thing unemployment is at 9.3% because unemployed people are lazy and living large on their government cheese.