Hey, everybody, here’s another massive list of ridiculous comments from the Reddit’s Men’s Rights subreddit on the subjects of women, feminists and feminism. Some, er, highlights:
Never trust a woman. When you are out and they are around, go the other way. Your life may actually depend on you crossing the street or not taking that elevator or not working late in a office with another lonely woman.
Women are keen to assert all of the benefits that modern society affords them, but at the same time quick to twist their hair into pigtails and play the “I’m just a girl” defense when the traditional benefits of being a woman would suit them better.
Misandrist feminists want gender based apartheid, and the male population culled to lest than 10%
Feminism does NOT create strong women – it creates dependency and a stunted intellect.
In the feminist community, bigotry is met with a groundswell of support, and is very rarely called out.
That last one is just a teensy bit ironic, given that most of the comments above were heavily upvoted – in other words, “met with a groundswell of support.” Further evidence of this irony: oh, just the hundreds of misogynistic statements from MRAs I’ve linked to on this blog.
For links to the original comments in context, see the full list on Reddit. Props to the Redditor known as Squibbling for having the patience to assemble all of this.
@Magpie NWO isn’t interested in how the real world works xD But maybe you should share it? It wouldn’t matter to him XD
And you wouldn’t be encouraging him… he doesn’t need help being angry and frustrated XD
Seems more like aggressively stupid whiney bullshit to my, but YMMV
To be honest I’m a bit worried about NWOs blood pressure. Having your internal thermostat constantly set to RAGE must put a lot of stress on the body.
Cassandra has the right idea btw 😀
Hitler was a vegetarian*, that’s why he funded the Rothchilds…wait, no, how is that supposed to work? XD
*this bit is actually true XD
@CassandraSays maybe he has a condition where he needs to always be angry or he’ll die… like… Crank… except that it has to be only anger… so we’re actually helping him live! 😀
I wish we could teach him to spell if only because every time I see “Rothchilds” I think “wait, Tim Roth has kids? what do they have to do with the Illuminati?”.
Simon:
I don’t know about “must”; personally, I’m just bored.
@DSC
http://ami-rants.blogspot.com/2007/05/why-im-anti-vegetarian.html
And that’s why I hate vegetarians! 😀
Now NWO has to become a vegetarian or his world will become lopsided xD
Bear in mind this is my memory of what I read in the paper, so lacking detail, and possibly inaccurate in parts.
A teenager came home after her curfew, when her foster-parents roused on her she said some men in the park had attacked her. Every cop in town was called in to search for the men, warnings were broadcast on the radio, etc. She recanted after a couple of hours – she hadn’t realised that the police take rape seriously, and was embarrassed to have caused all the fuss.
She wasn’t charged, but given a stern talking-to about lying to the police.
So: no arrests, and a girl who (probably for the first time) was shown that police and the community really are against rape.
@Cassandra spelling is part of state indoctrination. It’s taken him this long to break free from the State mandated spelling he was brainwashed w/ as a child as much as he has… don’t mock his hard work. xD
@Magpie and then some straight cis white men were rounded up and shot right?
Teh Ami stands alone >:3
Of course Ami, by the Illuminati using guns paid for by the Rothchildren 😉
Wait, is NWO for or against Hitler? Given the MRA fondness for the idea of genocide I’m not quite sure.
I’m going to guess he’s against dolphins because they seem too happy.
“Teh Ami stands alone >:3”
Until she is joined by her gallant hippo sidekick! 😀
I’ve added NWO’s nuttery to the Big Book ‘O Learnin’ in the Forum. Go check it out, peeps!
And bullets provided by Miss Magazine.
This goes deeper than even NWOslave imagines.
Much deeper – why else would CassandraSays bring up dolphins …
@Quackers
“and forcing yourself on someone without consent and wearing sexy clothes are 2 different things. The first is actively taking away someone’s choice and causing physical and mental harm. The second doesn’t.”
Sexual frustration doesn’t harm anyone? It makes violent rapists, doesn’t it? Nobody becomes a violent rapist out of boredom. Unless feminists say they do.
“I HATE that I had to compare things to actual human women.”
Oh I’m sure you hate compare inanimate objects to women. The difference is inanimate oblect don’t have a choice, women do it on purpose. And you praise other women for it.
“Sluts” just go out and enjoy consensual sex without coercion. Or in your definition, are simply women who wear mini skirts and show cleavage. You can’t compare the two. The equivalent of a PUA would be a woman who employs these same tactics on men. I praise neither.
Yes sluts coerce, drunk man a little cleavage, short skirt=coercion. She couldn’t control herself. She lacked sexual control. PUA get girl drunk, talks her up=coercion. Ya see men and women are different, if they didn’t think differently we wouldn’t be having this discussion.
So heres the deal, if men can’t tell women what they consider sexual harrassment is, than women can’t tell men what sexual teasing and frustration is.
Womens total lack of sexual self control will always lead to mens total lack of sexual control. One is just as damaging as the other.
————————–
@Shora
“Also, I’m a woman; Do I deserve to be sexually frustrated by men who tease me? Every day at work I see some cute guy with a delicious body wearing nothing but a tank top that shows off all those lovely muscles. Obviously, he’s only dressing like that to tease me personally.”
PUAs are able to bed women because they are able to take advantage of a womans nature with their actions. A tank top won’t get a woman in the sack. Men and women are sexually different, most people can tell the difference.
—————————-
@CassandraSays
“Assuming that NWO actually meant “flip side”, wouldn’t the flip side of sluts be those no sex until marriage Christian folks?”
That would be flip side of the same coin, you would’ve had to be able to think independently to figure that one out. Try it sometime.
—————————–
@ozymandias42
“Dude, my source is Betty Friedan’s damn memoir.”
Had I known you were quoting a feminist I would’ve never doubted you. Feminists are well known for their unbiased, accurate reporting.
Sexual frustration doesn’t harm anyone? It makes violent rapists, doesn’t it?
No, no it doesn’t.
Yes sluts coerce, drunk man a little cleavage, short skirt=coercion.
No, it’s not.
PUA get girl drunk, talks her up=coercion.
No, that’s not either.
So heres the deal, if men can’t tell women what they consider sexual harrassment is, than women can’t tell men what sexual teasing and frustration is.
They’re not even close to being the same thing.
Womens total lack of sexual self control will always lead to mens total lack of sexual control. One is just as damaging as the other.
Except that dressing sexy is in no way equivalent to rape or harassment. Repeatedly saying that they are does not make them so.
Perhaps you don’t understand. I’m talking about me, personally. I, personally, want to sex this guy up six ways from Sunday. If this guy donned a sexy tank top and walked up to me tomorrow and said “You’re cute, wanna fuck?” I would. Seriously.
Alas, he has not done that, but continues to wear sexy tank tops. The tease. If I raped him he’d totally have it coming, right?
Also, do you really find nothing misandric about saying that men’s natural sexuality is rapey?
@Magpie
“A teenager came home after her curfew, when her foster-parents roused on her she said some men in the park had attacked her. Every cop in town was called in to search for the men, warnings were broadcast on the radio, etc. She recanted after a couple of hours – she hadn’t realised that the police take rape seriously, and was embarrassed to have caused all the fuss.”
Holy crap she was embarrassed and everything? The poor dear, she’s a victim of the patriarchy. Maybe a trip to the mall for some sexy clothes will make her feel better. I’ll bet that put quite a scare into the locals and further reinforced the bad/man, good/woman feminist ideology. Good for you. Maybe a slutwalk is in order to teach them bad men a lesson!
Keep on keepin on folks. Ya know 99% of the comments are nonsensical, “why do you hate elephant” comments. Do you fine folks have that shit as hot keys or something?
Besides, NWO, allow me to ask you again: Dallas Cowboy cheerleaders? Are they sluts who engage in sexual teasing, or are they harmless entertainment for men at sporting events? What about Hooter’s waitresses? Playboy models? Are they engaging in “harmful” teasing? Do they cause sexual frustration and therefore must be condemned? What’s the difference between them and a woman who dresses in an attractive manner on the street? Please show your work.
@DSC
http://ami-rants.blogspot.com/2007/05/why-im-anti-vegetarian.html
And that’s why I hate vegetarians! 😀
Now NWO has to become a vegetarian or his world will become lopsided xD
I’m vegetarian and I could hate you for that because it’s a serious issue and your satirical attempts just failed massively!
I don’t like Peta-esque “Doing X to humans” = “Doing X to animals” comparisons but here, with you all, I just succumb to the temptation to make one of those… here it is:
If you’re so sensitive that you even have compassion for a girl because she has (oh the horror!) to hear the words “nice netbook” uttered from a guy on the train, maybe, just maybe you can also muster some compassion for the animals that suffer and die for your palate everyday!*
*hint: search for “piglet castration” on YouTube.