Hey, fellas! Do you hate feminists but also hate doing things? Our good friend over at the Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Technology blog has an idea for you: strike at the heart of the feminazi matriarchy by “denying marriage and denying children to women.” This, PMAFT (for short) argues, will effectively transfer “the costs of misandry … back on to women.” And all you have to do is: nothing!
Apparently, feminist ladies have an insatiable need to marry and make babies with men who hate them. All you need to do to thwart this evil plan is to not have sex with them. But wait a minute, you say, don’t ladies make the babies themselves, in their bellies? Well, yes they do. But unfortunately for them they also need a little something from you as well. No, not your money – that comes later. You know that white stuff that comes out of your penis when you masturbate? Ladies actually need that in order to make babies. And you control the supply! Cut them off! Embargo that shit.
Also, if you ever find yourself in a chapel with one of these ladies, and some religious looking dude starts asking you all sorts of questions, do not – I repeat, do not – answer any of them with the phrase “I do.” That’s how they get you.
The great thing about denying ladies your babies is that it also helps you to strike back at your parents – by denying them grandchildren! Ha HA! As PMAFT helpfully explains:
Our parents’ generation had one foot in the old system and one foot in the feminist system. This meant that many of them have completely avoided the consequences of supporting feminism. I see this with my own parents who don’t particularly think of themselves as “feminists” but have effectively supported feminism all the same. They have experienced absolutely no consequences from their support of feminism. This goes for both my mom and my dad. …
Most of our parents want grandchildren so denying them grandchildren really forces the cost of misandry back on to them. This is particularly effective when done by only children or by men who have only brothers. Even for men who have sisters, this can still be effective if it prevents the “family name” from being passed on.
In your face! No babies for you!
AAAHHHH THE GIANT BABY. As if I weren’t already apprehensive enough about having an enormous baby – my sister and I were both over 9 pounds.
What is PMAFT going to call his new movement? Sperm Going Their Own Way?
“But sadly, I don’t love their furry sperm.”
Furry? What?
Valerie, have you been getting hit on by misogynistic furries?
All I can think of is that scene from American dad. The one where they see the furry group sex thing and the one dressed up like a car is driving/squatting over the squirrel one saying… “vroom vroom”.
Giant demanding baby lording over mom. I never knew a single image could sum up my feelings on motherhood so well XD
All I know is that feminists women are always all about having the babies. Honestly, if I meet another feminist woman who wants me to marry and impregnate her as soon as humanly possible, I think I will scream. This is why this plan will be so effective. It will drive a spike of visceral fear into their overactive uterii, bringing down the Gynocracy as they bow to the overwhelming pressure of the Manbargo (Spermbargo?) and finally allow a world where men can just have a relationship with a woman who doesn’t feel bound to immediately settle down and crochet bibs.
Or something.
[/channeling the ghost of MRA Future]
I think it should definitely be called “Spermbargo”.
The furry i refer to is the moss growing on their balls from no special lady friends coming around to visit. It’s akin to vagina cobwebs.
Sperm going their own way and Spermbargo- nice. Maybe they can collect it and fertilize their gardens or something. I’ve heard that men make up to 1 or 2 gallons of it a year, but maybe I heard wrong.
Really, all this does is prevent misogynistic, feminism-blaming assholes from procreating and spreading their hate-filled dogma onto the next generation. Sounds like a plan to me!
So, in protest to women not wanting to have babies with them, they’re going to stop having babies with women. Isn’t this kind of like telling your boss that you’ll protest your firing by not showing up to work?
Why are we making fun of this plan? It sounds like a win win to me…
Because MRAs have no follow-through (coincidentally, this is why they’re all bad at golf) and they won’t carry out any plan, especially one that leads to them whining less often.
Seriously – anything that removes these dudes from the gene pool gets my blessing.
Um, guys, minor point – saying “what this misogynist dude says is totally contradictory to what that other misogynist dude said, haha, stupid illogical fools” is kinda like them throwing Twisty Faster (or choose your favorite internet not-actually-a-feminist) in a commenter’s face.
I often have to tell people that feminism is a large, varied movement, and just because someone who claims to be a feminist said something doesn’t mean I agree with it automatically. I think we ought to pay those mocked on the blog that minimal respect, too – unless the poster SAID he minded “women only sleeping with alphas” or the declining marriage rate or whatever, it’s a bit unfair to assume those are his opinions.
I know they rarely extend to us the same courtesy, but I rely on feminism and equalism to be my safe place where the rational people are. So please let’s not tar all the assholes with the same brush. They may have custom-fitted tarring brushes!
Someone apparently read Lysistrata and thought “hey! men can play that game” and missed the point where that tactic required the women refusing sex to the men they were married to. It’s not as effective when you aren’t already married and also not living someplace like Ancient Greece.
You believe a 11% attrition rate is insignificant?
So, in protest to women not wanting to have babies with them, they’re going to stop having babies with women.
All women secretly want babies, not to mention that MRAs believe that the numbers of MGTOW are significant enough to have effects on the national level.
Women especially love having babies with men who other women have rejected so often that said men are now bitter enough to want to GTOW.
Additional fun question, what is the generation of “our parents”, are these dudes all roughly the same age?
Oh, I know. Those uber misogynist, bitter, MGTOW’s who think I should either be in the kitchen on in bed with him are just catnip! My goodness, if I can’t straddle one of those omega men and shit out his crotchsapwn, well… it will be the end of my potential happiness. I may have to get another cat or two to mask my anguish at not having a manly MRA man parked at the TV playing Final Fantasy!
[/sarcasm]
And, yes, I feel spectacularly sick for even joking aboout that kind of thing. Ugh!
@Rain:
Seriously – anything that removes these dudes from the gene pool gets my blessing.
So they are beyond redemption? Why are you still making fun of them if they can’t help it anyway?
Simon
For the lulz
I thought, beyond all reason, that there might be a debate going on here. Instead I see a bunch of hypocrites who lay claim to the word Equality, masturbating each other via keyboard. Count me out.
tonysprout, what is there to debate about “People who hate women should not get married to women”? Do you disagree?
Yeah, well, I still jerk off manually.
Tonysprout, allow me to introduce you to the site header. Mocking misogyny, that’s what we do. Debating for Dummies is thataway —–>
… But let’s face it; people as hateful as these guys should not be breeding anyway.
Ain’t nothing “hateful” about it. These are guys who are just acting in their interest. It is not in their interest to create a baby that they will not see much if at all, they will have little influence over raising, and will pay several decades for the privilege.
The mantra of accusing everybody who disagrees with your philosophy as “hateful” is old.
No, it will never work 100% but it is working. Marriage rates are way down. Legitimate births are way down. Women are having to do an “oops” in many instances to get pregnant.
Women it is my observation don’t understand “the art of the deal.” Women have driven harder and harder deals with men over the last several decades (with the assistance of government) and at some point the deal is no longer “doable.” Both sides lose.
Calling men hateful, etc. is not constructive. Women think they don’t have to “give” anything anymore. Men will just screw them and then pay them child support for two decades. It is coming to a stop to a large extent. You don’t want to provide reliable committed companionship, cleaning, cooking, or really anything. You are just obligations not assets.
Most of you cheat. The vast majority of you divorce. Many of you don’t even “put out” after the first few years of marriage. You offer a “product” that is not marketable anymore.
I can already hear some of you saying things like “not all women are like that.” Well, there are exceptions, but a guy cannot know in advance. It is like buying Tylenol knowing that 50% or more of the bottles or poisoned. You aren’t going to buy it even though it is true that “not all bottles are like that” — no matter how bad a headache you have.
The world is moving in the direction of men refusing to marry and reproduce and it will continue until women become better and more loyal companions. This is true no matter how much you ridicule the MGTOW movement. Men ultimately will look after their best interests. You have a valuable asset with your sexuality but you drive too hard a bargain.