Hey, fellas! Do you hate feminists but also hate doing things? Our good friend over at the Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Technology blog has an idea for you: strike at the heart of the feminazi matriarchy by “denying marriage and denying children to women.” This, PMAFT (for short) argues, will effectively transfer “the costs of misandry … back on to women.” And all you have to do is: nothing!
Apparently, feminist ladies have an insatiable need to marry and make babies with men who hate them. All you need to do to thwart this evil plan is to not have sex with them. But wait a minute, you say, don’t ladies make the babies themselves, in their bellies? Well, yes they do. But unfortunately for them they also need a little something from you as well. No, not your money – that comes later. You know that white stuff that comes out of your penis when you masturbate? Ladies actually need that in order to make babies. And you control the supply! Cut them off! Embargo that shit.
Also, if you ever find yourself in a chapel with one of these ladies, and some religious looking dude starts asking you all sorts of questions, do not – I repeat, do not – answer any of them with the phrase “I do.” That’s how they get you.
The great thing about denying ladies your babies is that it also helps you to strike back at your parents – by denying them grandchildren! Ha HA! As PMAFT helpfully explains:
Our parents’ generation had one foot in the old system and one foot in the feminist system. This meant that many of them have completely avoided the consequences of supporting feminism. I see this with my own parents who don’t particularly think of themselves as “feminists” but have effectively supported feminism all the same. They have experienced absolutely no consequences from their support of feminism. This goes for both my mom and my dad. …
Most of our parents want grandchildren so denying them grandchildren really forces the cost of misandry back on to them. This is particularly effective when done by only children or by men who have only brothers. Even for men who have sisters, this can still be effective if it prevents the “family name” from being passed on.
In your face! No babies for you!
Ooooookaaaaaay…. so declining marriage rates and declining birth rates (well, the “right” sorta babies) are the fault of feminism, and the best way to strike back at the heart of feminism is by denying marriage and children to women. Makes sense to me!!
OK, way to assume all women want is marriage and babies.
Well… that was an interesting window into the possible origins of PMAFT’s resentments, wasn’t it? 😀
Does this mean these guys are going to take responsibility for contraception?
If we’re talking about having Giant Babies of Doom, I’d definitely rather go childless.
I’ll just say “Good luck with that” to PMAFT’s grand plan. We’ll see which happens first: The “baby denial” plan or the eventual death of our sun.
Timer starts…now.
Why are we making fun of this plan? It sounds like a win win to me; these idiots think they’re accomplishing a useful goal against ‘misandry’ and this moron and his readers remove themselves from the dating pool so as to not inflict themselves on women.
Go, Go, PMAFT guy! You have my blessings!
*happy sqee sounds*
So… you mean… you and all of the rest of the MRA will stay the fuck away from me and my body and will not try to tell me what to do with it?
THANK YOU!!!!
P.S. No, seriously… thank you!
I’m with Rutee here.
I’ll even play along a little if it’ll help.
“Oh nooo, mister, please don’t refuse to marry me or get me pregnant! That would just devastate me! Please, I beg you, don’t go far far away and never talk to women again! We couldn’t bear it!”
No kidding. This is dumb even by their own logic. Only manginas will produce children, who will be indoctrinated by the feminist overlords, producing more manginas. But let’s face it; people as hateful as these guys should not be breeding anyway.
How is his plan so effective for men that have only brothers? Why can’t one of the brothers have children? What if he has a sister, she has a baby, and gives her own last name to the baby? What if the grandparents don’t care that their grandchildren have a different last name than them? He didn’t think his plan through very well.
I have to admit, I want to know what “consequences” he thinks his parents should have suffered for not actively hating women. Spanking machine?
I concur with the people on here who think it sounds like an awesome plan!
Godspeed, PMAFT!
You will show those pesky feminists and grandparents! I hope you can convince as many MRAs as possible to follow your example, so you can deal…uh, maximum damage on marriage- and baby-starved feminists!
And grandparents!
(seriously, what’s with the grandparents bit?)
I am firmly in support of as many misogynists as possible not getting married to women. Can this be arranged?
I too support the OP’s grand plan!
The grandparents thing is very weird, especially considering that, in my experience, grandparents tend to be more involved with their daughter’s children than the children of their sons (this perhaps varies between communites even in the US). Funny, I have never once heard my mother complain that her two grandkids don’t have the same last name as her (of course, she uses her ex-husband’s last name out of convience because all of the four kids were minors at the time of the divorce). My aunt has five kids, none of which share the last name she uses, and two grandkids, neither of which has her child’s last name as the kid’s last name. I have yet to hear her complain about the names issue (though her son who was a “junior” did have his name legally changed due to the fact that his mother’s husband who he was named after was not his father and did not raise him).
It seems to me that this “family name” issue is more important in certain specific extremely patriarchal or misogynist settings, not in general emotional and social connection terms.
@darksidecat
I’d agree that family name issues are usually coming from patriarchally linked situations, such as a boy being the default means by which a name is carried on, or the assumption that a woman will take her husband’s last name.
But I don’t think there’s misogyny per se being enacted. It may be a result of a patriarchal custom, but wanting a family name to live on isn’t misogynist. Maybe it’s misguided, in one view or another, to be attached to it. But that’s a large step from misogyny.
Then again, in my experience, family names have only been a big issue with people who’s names are very rare. A former (male) boss of mine took on his maternal grandmother’s maiden name, as it was so rare and he wanted that bit of family history to live on. Now…he was assuming that his future spouse would be okay with the kids having his (new) last name. A pretty big assumption, yes. But it definitely was about social and historical connection.
I think it is like any other issue, it depends on why it is important and has such emotional attachments.
I fully support this plan, especially if it means I’m not required to squirt out some misogynist idiot’s baby.
So, he’s going to deny us his essence?
That’s a relief.
So, in other words, “We cannot allow those FEMINISTS to capture, and tamper with, our Precious Bodily Fluids.”
Hey, at least the dating pool will be more open.
Seriously, though, reading this plan is like reading a fragment of Heraclitus, only even less intelligent and riddling only in that it contradicts nearly every argument about marriage decreases MRAs have made.
Is that a promise not to try to have sex with any more women, MGTOW dudes? Because if so I applaud your decision and will give it my full support. And I will also remind you that you made that decision next time one of you is whining about how evil bitches won’t sleep with him because they only like jerks.
@Antonov An-225
This is a bit random, but I just wanted to give you a high-five as a fellow aircraft-as-nickname user (:
I’ll give them one thing.
At least they’re not Quiverfulls.
Quiverfulls – because 6 billion people just isn’t enough.
Awesome plan!!! I completely support this. All right you MRA?MGTOWers, start keeping your sperm to yourself.
I do wonder though, if women are refusing to sleep with you because you are a misogynistic jerk, where does the denying women access to you come into play. Because I thought a big MRA complaint was women wouldn’t sleep with betas on down. This is a bit like saying you quit after you’ve been fired. Maybe I’m confusing different psychotic rants???
David- Nice one about the MRA’s hating to do things. That cracked me up. They sit around all day bitching on how feminists haven’t built them any DV centers but are too lazy themselves to build any. And if they really believed that all feminists are abusers, wouldn’t that be like complaining that drug dealers haven’t built any rehab centers? Makes no sense. But they wouldn’t be very funny if they were logical. I love them just the way they are! But sadly, I don’t love their furry sperm. None for me, thanks.