David K. Meller, take it away:
There are still certain things that a suitably trained woman can do that a dog, no matter how smart and well trained, cannot do. That is why I am interested in female companionship.
Here’s the comment that came from. Enjoy!
And just remember: this guy regularly gets upvotes on The Spearhead, often for stuff much worse than this, as I’ve pointed out before.
Kristinmh–24 September 2011@9:51pm
“…the only thing that makes a woman better than one [a dog] is that you can have sex with a woman. Dude, that you even went there is beyond creepy…”
No, Kristenmh,
I am NOT going to say here or ANYWHERE, that having sex with a dog is preferable to having sex with a woman! THAT would be CREEPY!! I prefer a human woman for sex over an animal anytime and under any conditions, Pets are nice for other things.
Excuse the caps, but I had to emphasise the point. Bestiality, even as a joke, is beyond the pale!
PEACE AND FREEDOM!!
David K. Meller
To answer my own question, I would imagine that DKM’s search for The Perfect Woman is not going that well, and that this is somehow the fault of feminism.
Considering the set-up you’ve given us, DKM, (i.e., comparing dogs to women) I’d say that jokes about bestiality are well within the pale.
Paniorpa is just some random troll.
Haec Dixit Spatio Papa
And can anyone enlighten me as to what feminist author said “the sexes are equal, so let’s go out and bone some stanky homeless dudes”?
Was it Dworkin?
In any case, into the Book it goes!
copies and pastes paniorpa’s comments into the Big Book O’ Larnin’
Noted. David K Meller will not fuck dogs. Heck, he can barely bring himself to fuck women.
He will, however, refuse to spell ‘shit’ with all the letters.
I find it moderately amusing that someone can write appalingly repulsive things about owning other human beings, but finds writing ‘naughty words’ in full is unpossible.
He probably also writes it ‘G*d”
PEEANCE AND FREEANCE.
Zee R. Emm.
I thought the G*d thing was about respect. Something about not not just tossing any scrap of paper with gods name written out. I had a teacher write it that way on the blackboard, which he said he did so he could erase without having to say a prayer or something each time. Not my cup of tea but different from acting like ‘fuck you’ and ‘f*ck you’ are different things.
I ask myself that every day; Who are these folks? How can they even exist in society? How have such sad examples of humanity even mastered the basics of navigating a job interview to pay for their internets?
And how can they not read their blogs and not cry themselves to sleep? Is that why they wear pink wigs and sunglasses? To disguise the tears?
Noble. Right. Well, in the sense that they believe their ability to perpetrate violence means their worldview is correct, maybe.
Really, MRAL, let me share with you a protip from Jennifer Kessler: There is no need for feminists to go out and pretend to be misogynists to create something misogynist to write about. There is an surfeit of misogynist jackasses. If we ever feel as though our nets are somehow empty (Which is never really the case, it just gets boring to get the same particular types over and over), you just need to scoot over about 10 internet feet and you’ll find different varieties entirely.
Cynickal- I hear ya. I don’t know how these poor things get dressed in the morning without tripping over their own egos, let alone hold down a job. What do they put on their applications? I don’t do dogs or windows.
If you think women are subhuman, wouldn’t having sex with one be bestiality? I mean, sure, they might make nice pets if suitably trained, but they’re not people or anything.
MRAL, I invite you to read the quote from Meller in the original post, then come back down here and say with a straight face that MRAs need any help making themselves look like goofballs.
Perhaps he means “noble” like inert? Non-reactive?
Filling balloons with hot air and giving you a squeaky voice?Can you just admit that you’re only bitter because you can’t get laid? That’s all this is right? If you happen to find a woman that can tolerate you, you’ll probably forget what MRA even stands for.
Men are frustrated because they can’t get laid. Women are frustrated because they are too dumb to make money.
This sums up adequately the feminist vs MRAs debate.
Tonight I’m getting laid with a 19yo romanian whore. Not too expensive, and a nice ass. Good bargain.
So paniorpa is frustrated because he can’t get laid unless he pays for it, and is too dumb to make enough money to pay for a non-budget prostitute?
Good to know.
kysokisaen-
I see that it is a strict Jewish observation. Apparently some Talmud scholars decided a while back that Deutoronomy forbade erasing the name of God, and that throwing away a paper with ‘God’ written on it amounted to the same thing.
I dunno how writing God on the internet applies, but can see how someone might just do it out of habit.
So I retract my snarky comment about it.
But it makes me wonder if God is really fooled if you write G-d instead.
Oh, and….
PEEANCE AND FREEANCE!
Zee R. Emm
@panorpia: Good for you. I think that sex workers are probably a good option for MRAs, who seem to want sex with women without too much conversation. Remember, though, that sex workers share information about bad dates. Be polite and friendly, treat the young woman with at least as much courtesy as you would any other professional, and I hope you have a nice time.
DKM could probably learn something from panorpia here. After, all, DKM says that he is interested in ‘companionship’, but is only really looking for a specific set of services. Try just paying someone to do the things that trained dogs can’t do.
Classism. It isn’t cool just because it’s an MRA.
It’s supposed to be read “Adonai” or “Our Lord”, so it seems an overly literal interpretation of the 2nd commandmentrather than an attempt to trick him, per se. But still really weird to look at.
Ah, but that might prove to be too costly, in that he may not be able to contract only one “someone” to provide all the services (the ones that trained dogs can’t do) that he wants rendered. No, better that women willingly and quite gladly deny themselves personhood and any/all human rights (as women should naturally do, by virtue of their possessing internal reproductive organs, but laws will still have to be made to enforce this, just in case some uppity women out there rail against their “true nature”) in order to become the domestic slaves that he believes men, by virtue of their possessing external reproductive organs, are entitled to own.
[i]But it’s still really weird to look at.[/i]
Not if you grow up with it! >_>
My failed html tags however are objectively weird to look at. >_<
Classism. It isn’t cool just because it’s an MRA.
you’re right. I was just trying to turn his comment around on him. Probably inartfully.
@Pam: I get it now. Thanks.
@DKM: You want to create a category of people who do housework and stay at home to serve you and other men. Why only the one servant caste? I think we should also randomly choose a portion of society to be the warrior caste, and I will order them off to war at my whim. I am entitled to an army! Why do modern egalitarian societies rob me of my natural rights?
Also, I lament the fact that no one is painting my portrait right now. I tried to train a dog to do it, but he’s TERRIBLE.
Don’t forget that despite wanting punishment for all women who don’t ‘choose’ to be slaves, it’s still freedom, so it’s not ‘really slavery at all’.