My favorite incoherent MRA blogger at the moment is our dear friend Christian J from the blog What Men Are Saying About Women. In recent days, Dr. J – famed inventor of the MRA two-dot ellipsis – has delivered up some truly inspired prose. I’d like to share some of the highlights (by which I mean lowlights) from a few of his recent posts.
Here he is, attempting to explain the “hookup culture” of the youth of today:
Women dish it up on a platter in line with their feminist education (free love/free sex mentality) to the alphas as they turn them on, the most, in the hope of either pretending to be carefree and casual about it all or they just have a high sex drive that requires servicing on a regular basis. It’s not that difficult..
No, no, not difficult at all.
Here he is talking about, er, pussy power, and somehow stumbling on to the subject of international finance:
The girls ofcourse have been trained to think that they can get away with just about anything as they possess the magic “V” which has a very high trading component as well as a social exchange rate, not unlike the Euro or an open ocean oil exploration license, but the magic “V”is more mobile and comes with it’s own carrier and operator, batteries not included though. Perfect really, when you think about it.
Here’s the opening sentence of a post of his about chivalry, and how feminists all secretly love it:
As feminism gets messier and even more morose, one does have to wonder what efforts those masterminds of insanity will do to cover their obvious and blatant erroneous experiments on human biology.
I don’t know if it’s even possible for me to get messier or more morose.
Here he is waxing poetic about the dreaded mangina:
[N]o one really considers them to be anything but a waste product, whose relevance is yet to be determined. A pretend girlie-man if you like, who wavers between reality and the dream state of their female masters. A neutered sycophant living on a different plain where reality and fantasy mix to form their delusional, ethereal world..
And let’s finish up with this muddled attempt to call feminists a bunch of lying liars:
We have on numerous occasions, demonstrated the continual lying and misinformation that the feminist hegemony consistently wallows in without what they believe is, in any fear of contradiction.
I have no idea if the second half of that sentence is the result of some sort of grievous editing error, or if he actually thought it made some sort of sense. With Christian J, it’s impossible to tell.
I’m still curious about what your disclaimer looked like before xD
@Snowy shhhh don’t give away the twist ending xD
I think we should all have disclaimers at the end of our comments now 😀
Along w/ some PEACE and FREEDOM!!! ending xD
LIVE LONG AND PROSPER!!!!!!
Angelized Disclaimer: Meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow CATS! 😀
And making fun of my screen name? Especially in such an unoriginal manner? Chuckee, I’m disappointed in you.
Here’s a protip: if you feel compelled to constantly assert–baselessly–that your argument is “compelling” and “well presented” it’s probably neither.
What argument do you have, other than “women are skanks who will fuck anyone in proximity?” Even if that’s true, so what? I mean, I know we mere peons can’t grok your superior intellect, but throw us a bone here. Why should it matter that people are promiscuous? All you’ve really said is that it disgusts you. Again, if I’m getting your brilliant argument wrong, please clarify.
I love how she assumes that I read her post with the smiley (I didn’t). 🙂 sorry 🙂
(STANDARDIZED DISCLAIMER – Apologies to the less gifted among us, for my use of big words. I find it more economical to write this way
🙂
FURTHER DISCLAIMER – Just because I use a smiley does not mean that I did it because someone else used it).
🙂 🙂
oh , and XD XD
I’m sure Chuckie has a really high IQ, too.
DAMMIT CB xD
You ruined my streak xD Apparently the sidebar was being filled w/ Amis 😀
xD
See I’m infectious! 😀
Now he’s using my patented XD 😀
Also he’s in denial, but that’s ok XD
Also your disclaimer doesn’t seem that standardized nemore XDDD
Is that what it looked like before? O:
I’m sorry Ami; that’s as it should be. 🙂
I assume nothing! 😀 I know you did 😀 b/c the post you responded to HAD A SMILEY IN IT XDDD
He did it because he wants to, not because you told him to.
@Katz He sure showed me O:
At this rate, his future posts will be nothing but smileys 😀
It’s much more fun to have happier trolls than dour ones :3
*bops*
I missed this place XD
I also miss you CB 🙁 *hugs*
Do you have IM or nething? 😀
You should come join the chatbox sometime! 😀 We’d love to have you there! 😀
There are a lot of high-intelligence* people who have casual sex, dude. For one thing, look at much of the entire poly/kinky/queer cluster.
Also, people who are not of high intelligence are not retchworthy. For fuck’s sake.
*I assume that’s what you mean by “bell curve,” given that that’s what idiot trolls usually mean by bell curve. If you actually mean something else, my apologies.
Ozyized Disclaimer: Content may not be fully understandable by anti-feminists, douchebags and people who do not recognize the divinity of Our Lord Neil Gaiman, Blessed Be His Pen.
http://i610.photobucket.com/albums/tt185/artysean/789290-xmen.jpg
Also here’s a picture of Wolviecow! 😀
(i was looking for pics for Escher Girls and I found that and it’s SOOO cute I have to share it XDD )
sweetie, I have used smileys before in previous posts. nothin’ new under the sun. AND I have a limited repertoire with respect to their use (you probably won’t remember my post sarcastically commenting on your expertise with smileys, but it is on record).
(STANDARDIZED DISCLAIMER – Apologies to the less gifted among us, for my use of big words. I find it more economical to write this way
🙂
FURTHER DISCLAIMER – Just because I use a smiley does not mean that I did it because someone else used it).
🙂 🙂
oh , and XD XD
Seriously, Chuckee, why do you favor proximity theory over other theories of attraction derived from social psychology? What are the theory’s strengths and weaknesses? I never took Social Psych when I was in college, so I’d appreciate a quick primer, if you would be so kind. If you haven’t sufficient mastery of the subject, then appropriate links will suffice. Wikipedia’s a bit thin on the subject. You do have links, don’t you?
There’s an interesting implication to Chuckie’s disclaimer (unintentional, which is the only context in which “interesting” is likely to apply to him): If he were actually using words that other people didn’t understand, he would keep doing it. In other words, he doesn’t care if people understand him or not. Ergo not only is he failing to communicate, but he isn’t even trying–he doesn’t want to make an argument, he just wants to post words in our presence and feel smart about it.
XD
I like that my smileys are now PERMANENTLY ENTRENCHED in his disclaimer 😀
Yay! 😀 Amiortality! 😀
Annnnnddd he’s still in denial XD
AND lying! 😀 Since we’ve tussled before XD
Sorry Ozy and CB, I think he’s too wrapped up in trying to prove to me that he’s not being influenced by my awesomeness than arguing the actual point here xD
It’s the Rodeo Cat thing xD It is my gift… it is my curse…
*walks off w/ a cat shadow behind her*
Aw, fuck it. I’ll just play Diablo II before bed. Let me know if he actually says anything interesting, OK guys? I’ll not wait up.
Hmm I merged 2 sentences xD That should be “to argue the actual point” 😀
Ami-ized Disclaimer: Arguing with Ami may result in Ami-ization of the way you talk 😀