Categories
idiocy men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny MRA rape rapey statutory rape apologists

MRA blog suggests a cooling-off period would make statutory rape ok

From Human Stupidity, an MRA blog rather obsessed with underage girls and the alleged evil of age of consent laws:

[I]f a 15 year old … can decide to have sex with a 16 year old … [h]ow come she cannot have sex with a 35 year old? Age discrimination by law?

Are you worried about manipulation of the tender 15 year old? I have a solution:

what about legalizing sex with underage adolescents, if they first undergo an hour of mandatory counselling and a 2 day cool off period? That should take care of this issue. This would guarantee safety for the 15 year old against being conned or manipulated. More safety that is offered to 21 year old tipsy Friday night party girls who may feel sorry for what they did yesterday

I think he might actually be serious here. Though  it’s pretty clear he’d be happy with any excuse to make it legal for 35 year-old men to have sex with 15 year-old girls.

522 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JoJo
JoJo
13 years ago

How about adding a parental notification proviso to the ‘cooling off period’? After all, we are talking about minors still living under their (her) parents’ roof. Shouldn’t they know that a 40 year old wants to screw their daughter? Would the parents have the option of calling the police?

Societal Contract
Societal Contract
13 years ago

“Would the parents have the option of calling the police?”

If a 40 year old so much as looked sideways at any of my kids I’d be calling the police AFTER I put him in the hospital.

Pecunium
13 years ago

Brandon: My only insight is that you have debated me through out the last post; So you either value marriage or you are playing the devil’s advocate.

False dichotomy.

You have said untrue things about marriage (e.g. it makes one partner unequal, and the benefits can be replicated). I have replied to those claims of fact.

That’s a value neutral,relative to marriage. The value I see as good is having/using correct facts.

Pecunium
13 years ago

Brandon: So the crux of the matter is I don’t view the benefits of marriage as actual benefits.

That’s not the crux of the matter. If that’s all it were pretty much everyone here would say fine, enjoy.

But you didn’t do that. You made claims of fact about how marriage works. You said that people who get married are being foolish. You said that being married makes one person dependent on the other, and entails burdens that smart people should avoid.

That’s the crux of the matter.

darksidecat
13 years ago

Marriage comes with over 1100 federal legal benefits. That is a consequence of the legal system and social traditions moreso than the actual value of marriage, but these are substantive legal rights.

Brandon
Brandon
13 years ago

@pecunium: I never said people that get married are foolish. Commenters here inferred that. I made countless attempts to clarify my position that marriage as an institution and people within that institution are two different concepts. I repeated that position at least 5 times but it fell on deaf ears. I can try and clarify…I can’t actually make people listen.

Marriage CAN make one dependent. If both people work and maintain some semblance of individualism (their own car, their own bank account, etc…) then both parties can be equal. Once you have either party being financially dependent on the other, then independence can fall apart very quickly.

Personally I think the burdens outweigh the benefits (that I have check marked). So from my perspective marriage does seem like a risk that isn’t worth the reward. I also think that my perspective is becoming more popular.

Hershele Ostropoler
13 years ago

Brandon:

I have had women spend a lot of time thanking me and women snap at me for holding a door open. One woman even screamed at me and said “I can open the door myself asshole”.

It’s nice to find a rich, untapped vein of urban legendry. Tell us about bra burning, Uncle Brandon!

Pecunium
13 years ago

Brandon: @pecunium: I never said people that get married are foolish. Commenters here inferred that. I made countless attempts to clarify my position that marriage as an institution and people within that institution are two different concepts.

Good Lord… here we go again. You say things you don’t seem to realise you are saying. Subtext exists (e.g. the way you took my bit of snark as a dick joke. It wasn’t, it was a play on words).

Katz summed up pretty well, Is it a reasonable statement to say “I respect you, but I think this thing you do/think is total crap?”

It’s clearly unreasonable to say “I respect you, but this thing you think/do is obviously total crap,” because that’s saying that can’t tell that something is obviously total crap, which is not respectful.

Which is what you did in all the below.

Personally, I am anti-marriage for anyone (straight, bi, gay, trans, etc…). I see it as a pointless institution that binds people together thus limiting their freedom.

Pointless. Are you saying that people who engage in a pointless exercise aren’t being foolish?

@Molly Ren: I think we just have two different world views. I just can’t see any long term benefits to being married that ONLY exist in the marriage framework. I don’t like the idea of me being dependent on my girlfriend to take care of my needs nor do I like the idea of me taking care of her financially.

The juxtaposition there is that getting married leads to one, or the other, being dependent. Not a conditional status on things which happen outside the marriage (it also implies that should one’s SO fall on hard times, then dumping them is reasonable.

Marriage is also the most limiting relationship around. What about swingers, polygamy, polyandry, polyamory, etc… .

Which insults people who don’t have that sort of relationship. Which is inane. As with any relationship, marriage is what the people who get married choose to make it. Any number of people here have pointed out the non-normative nature of their relationships. Moreover, when you later discuss, “committed” relationship, you extend the “limiting” idea to them.

. Marriage is nothing more than the government seeing you, your partner and children (if any) as a business. And to make love, emotions and intimacy into a business is asinine and absurd. Business is business and love is love…the two should not mingle. Just like church and state.

You just said that love and marriage are difficult to reconcile, because the state makes it a business.

@redlocker: I believe marriage, just like The Fed is rotten to the core. No amount of window dressings will change the fact that the foundation is crumbling as more and more time passes.

Marriage is rotten at the core, and getting worse as time passes.

Second, my viewpoint of marriage is not the same as everyone else’s (as we can clearly tell from this thread alone). I see it as a way to “break a horse in” while other men do not. It is fairly normal and socially acceptable to get married…is it not? My viewpoint is the different and a non-mainstream one. So I think it is perfectly ok to say that marriage is something that most people do…yet I think it is a bad move because of my whole domesticating piece.

I think it is a tool to reign in men,

Nothing insulting there, to either men, nor women. Marriage is just about the rotten business of breaking men’s spirit, like a wild horse being tamed to saddle or pack.

I guess now I see why so many of the commenters where defending it…you girls get a lot of perks.

Nothing insulting there, esp. not in relation to the comment about marriage being about breaking men’s wills.

Those are comments you made which were directly insulting to people who choose to get married. It doesn’t include the stereotyping insults about women not being interested in sex after the get married, or men who have to say, “yes, anything you say honey… Men who have broken spirits and are nothing but a paycheck to his family and an empty shell of a man.’

The thing is, you can’t say things like that and the handwave away the content with, “but I respect your choice.”

Because you have characterised the choice as stupid, foolish and self-destructive. It’s like saying, “No offense, but…”

At that point, one can be pretty sure that offense is about be given.

Societal Contract
Societal Contract
13 years ago

Brandon:

I have had women spend a lot of time thanking me and women snap at me for holding a door open. One woman even screamed at me and said “I can open the door myself asshole”.

Hereshele:

It’s nice to find a rich, untapped vein of urban legendry. Tell us about bra burning, Uncle Brandon!

Me:

Well it must be true because tehse women are apologizing for that very thing:

Dracula
Dracula
13 years ago

How many times are you gonna post that same thing, Societal Contract?

Societal Contract
Societal Contract
13 years ago

Until the contract has been signed, Dracula.

😉

Societal Contract
Societal Contract
13 years ago

And signed in blood……

hellkell
hellkell
13 years ago

Has anyone been able to watch that whole thing? I just couldn’t.

Quit spamming the threads with that.

Dracula
Dracula
13 years ago

Yeah, the “Dear Woman” thing was bad enough in the first place.

Societal Contract
Societal Contract
13 years ago

Have you seen the parodies? I could post those too if you want.

😉

hellkell
hellkell
13 years ago

Nah, I think we’re good. Thanks anyway.

Bee
Bee
13 years ago

AND SIGNED IN CAPITAL LETTERS

Actually, though, this blog is an Admiralty Court, so prolly in order to be valid a contract needs to be signed with a fish or something. Too bad the slaveman’s not around to explain admiralty contract law.

Brandon
Brandon
13 years ago

@Hershele: No your right…I am just lying to you. It never really happened and I am just making shit up. Or thanks for shitting on my experiences. I have an experience that you don’t like or don’t agree with and you use any defense mechanism you can to stay in denial…in this case calling me liar and that my experience is “the stuff of legends”. Pfft!

@Pecunium:Ok…one more time. This time with an analogy. Do you have kids? Do you love your kids? If your kids make bad decisions do you still love them?

I am going to assume your answers are yes, yes and yes.

I love my father. Sometimes my father makes decisions that I don’t agree with. That does not mean my father loses my respect. My father is by far the one person in this world that I respect the most…and we disagree all the time. We also have opposing views…like he is pro-marriage and I am not. We disagree with that issue…but I still respect him. I trust him with my life.

Do you get it? Respecting people is not bound by ONE decision or disagreement. Also, I am ALWAYS in favor of people doing things (legally) that will make them happy. If someone thinks that getting married will make them happy…I WILL SUPPORT THEM. My dislike of the institution of marriage is not as important as someone’s happiness.

I might see marriage as rotten, confining and domestic…that doesn’t mean others will see it that way. And even if they did see marriage similar to me, they might still decide to get married because they want that kind of life…and if it makes them happy I SUPPORT THEM.

There are lots of foolish and pointless behaviors. I think bungee jumping is dangerous and foolish. But if someone wants to do it…so be it. I am not going to think any less of them for doing it. I might think “Man, that looks dangerous and I am not going to do that”. You make is sound like I am saying “You complete and utter moron…why would you do something so damn stupid”

At the moment, marriage can not be just removed from society. But I do support undermining it. Things like allowing singles and other non-married people to receive the benefits married couples have now. And when everyone has the rights, benefits and privileges of married people…marriage will be an empty gesture, completely ineffective and counterproductive.

Magpie
13 years ago

Brandon, your philisophy is “fuck you jack, i’m alright!” What happens when the wheel of fortune turns and you’re not alright anymore?

Brandon
Brandon
13 years ago

@Magpie: And what exactly makes you draw such an incorrect conclusion?

Magpie
13 years ago

Ummm … everything you’ve said here so far?

Seriously, what will you do when things change and you find you can’t do everything for yourself anymore?

Brandon
Brandon
13 years ago

@Magpie: I go to my friends and family for support when needed. You act as if I am saying everyone has their shit together all the time. No one does. We all trip in life.

So saying “everything you’ve said here so far” is a pretty vague.

Magpie
13 years ago

No, I’m seeing you say YOU have your shit together all the time. I’ve never come across anyone quite like you in real life. It’s like you don’t know you’re alive. Upper class twit of the year.

Actually, that came out a bit savage. I don’t think you are a bad person, I just can’t understand you.

Brandon
Brandon
13 years ago

@Magpie: Maybe it might help you to know that I was living homeless on the street a little over a year ago. I am also not upper class. In fact I am squarely in the working class.

I have never made more than 40K and I have worked with mostly non-profits.

Pecunium
13 years ago

Brandon: Your analogy is inaccurate.

It’s more a case of, “if you love your kids why do you keep telling them they are stupid?”.

1 11 12 13 14 15 21