From Human Stupidity, an MRA blog rather obsessed with underage girls and the alleged evil of age of consent laws:
[I]f a 15 year old … can decide to have sex with a 16 year old … [h]ow come she cannot have sex with a 35 year old? Age discrimination by law?
Are you worried about manipulation of the tender 15 year old? I have a solution:
what about legalizing sex with underage adolescents, if they first undergo an hour of mandatory counselling and a 2 day cool off period? That should take care of this issue. This would guarantee safety for the 15 year old against being conned or manipulated. More safety that is offered to 21 year old tipsy Friday night party girls who may feel sorry for what they did yesterday
I think he might actually be serious here. Though it’s pretty clear he’d be happy with any excuse to make it legal for 35 year-old men to have sex with 15 year-old girls.
You don’t need a degree to be interested in something; just look at almost everyone who posts here. Pecunium has no graduate education, but he’s well-read and, from what I can gather, extremely intelligent. I brought up my degree to mention that I probably know enough to talk to you about Thailand, assuming the culture is what you’re into.
But seriously, what do you know about Thailand? You said you find the culture interesting, is there anything in particular that you can cite as an example of the products of that culture? The religion, the movies, the archaeological sites, Muay Thai, the fact that it’s the only place in the region that’s never been colonized, the cat poetry, (no, seriously, there’s cat poetry), anything? Pecunium asked you this too, because it’s pretty fucking telling that for a country you’re so “interested” in you’d like to move there, you are unwilling to cite a single book, poem, sporting event, archaeological site, or whatever, that would be a catalyst for such consuming interest.
What about “progressive feminism” makes it sound to you like it’s synonymous with “likes sex trafficking”?
Jeez, where to even begin? Brandon, while it’s certainly heartening to know that you think Massachusetts has adequate resources and progressive attitudes about women’s reproductive health it is but one state. And Planned Parenthood’s funding, for services that are not abortion, has been under attack at the national level for some time now. When feminists advocate for continued access to reproductive choice and health care it isn’t, necessarily because our own access is at risk. I realize you’re kind of a “I’ve got mine…” type but there’s so much more to activism than immediate and personal considerations. And, in general, caring about an issue means more than caring about how it affects you.
And the whole silly sit-com dad trope is just so fucking stupid. Seriously, how can you bring that shit up as a legitimate grievance? There aren’t plenty of awesome male characters in film and television to balance out the silly dads? Really? Not enough super heroes? Brilliant detectives? Super spies? Cool stoners? Seriously?
There’s more but it’ll keep. I want to snuggle with my baby and see if the Saints are gonna show up for this game.
PP in Boston is hard up for funds and has had to cut sliding-scale services, actually. On the scale of “at least we HAVE services,” our state isn’t the worst off, but we’re no women’s-health utopia.
But I get the impression that Brandon’s only measure of these things is Brandon’s healthcare, so for him our national health status is something along he lines of “just great, except our nation gets the sniffles occasionally and last year our nation broke its ankle.”
These guys can’t even get dates from women their own age, there’s no chance in hell that teenagers are going to “come on to them”.
Its a moot point.
“However, it’s interesting that in this scenario, the underage person must be the one to undergo the cooling off period, not the adult who’s preying upon them (really, her). This reminds me of NWO’s detailed thought-experiments in which 14 year olds come on to him. The girl wants sex like a fact of nature; the agency of the predator has vanished.”
One of them wrote on his blog that while riding a bus through a lower income hood, a Latino teenaged girl got on, sat next to him and asked, “whats that?” pointing to his iPad. He got all excited and wrote a blog about how he got “hit on” by a teen that day.
“One of them wrote on his blog that while riding a bus through a lower income hood, a Latino teenaged girl got on, sat next to him and asked, “whats that?” pointing to his iPad. He got all excited and wrote a blog about how he got “hit on” by a teen that day.”
so many things make more sense now….
Congratulations, Brandon. My point was to show that as long as your state has reproductive access, you couldn’t give a shit about the rest of the country/world. And as I expected, you came through.
Yep, we’re the narcissists.
Problem is over because Brandon’s State is fine, people!
Good christ, and you unironically called other people narcissists.
VoIP at least has demonstrated clear knowledge of thailand as much more; thinking you’re that stupid isn’t the same as actually thinking Thailand is only for sex tourism. You’ve been pretty stone cold stupid in the past, and it’d be a pleasant surprise for you to actually consider a place broadly.
Also, you did see the opening post, yes? Why this might be a sensitive issue can’t be that difficult a set of dots to connect.
Reading comprehension, you don’t has it.
You’re too honest and straightforward, but you’re not going to tell her about your long term goals? You wouldn’t know honest and straightforward if it asked you by name!
No. It is categorically not that easy, you just never had it anywhere near as bad as you think it is. I know the kind of pressure men have to have kids; it’s nothing compared to the bullshit women face. Shit, you could get a vasectomy now and you wouldn’t have a wise-ass tell you it’s not what you want. Constant barriers, constant irritation, constant EVERYTHING is not comparable to your dad saying every so often “Hey you should get settled down, have kids…”
Words, you don’t understand them. That’s not what narcissist means.
No, the wives aren’t. Don’t you idiots usually quote Everyone Loves Raymond? Take the episode where we find out that the mom hasn’t had an orgasm ever. The focus isn’t on how much that sucks for her, to have had to lie back and think of England; the episode’s focus is on Raymond’s pain at her telling him. It was more important for her to let him think he was a stud than it was for him to take the effort help her enjoy sex as much as he does. And it’s not like anyone else pointed out how big a jackass this makes Raymond, as in the Boondocks, when Riley had his amazingly sexist plan to have Condy get laid to end the war (Wherein Jasmine immediately points out that he is relying on a sexist, idiotic trope to work at all), the episode’s sympathy is on Raymond as well.
The media is rife with this shit; yes, men take the buffoon role, but the buffoon has paradoxically become a better place to be. It plays in part with more powerful narratives that downplay intelligence, critical thinking, problem-solving ability, etc.
You wanna quote sitcoms, 2 and a Half Men is hailed as so fantastic and awesome, but it’s amazingly misogynist. People claim this is a misanthropic narrative, but they miss a subtle point; the men are terrible because they individually have flaws. The women are terrible because they are women. Men may be terrible, but at least they’re differentiable humans, not like those women. Plus, the premise of the show is centered on a completely dead narrative, one that was dead when it launched. Of course, you think it reflects the reality of divorce, going by what you’ve said about alimony, but your beliefs, they don’t sync up well with the facts.
Sauce, that sounds… extremely dodgy as more than a potential hypothetical that isn’t born out in actual sports teams.
You have no idea what marriage has looked like throughout most of human history, so I’m not really surprised you’re saying this.
Based on? Considering they have ways out for the indigent, and that too many slip through the cracks as is, this seems a stupid objection. I mean, there’s smart ones, but you don’t seem likely to advocate a general tax to replace child support so that everyone actually gets covered.
I’m pretty sure I know better than you where there’s gender bias in the law. Currently, male judges are more likely to apply roughly 10% harsher sentencing in most criminal laws (I believe female judges are still slightly harsher on men, but the gap was much smaller, 4% if I recall correctly). Hint, higher sentences relate to a perception of a greater share of responsibility for the crime…
Once again, the MRM tries to parody a civil rights movement in aping their form.
The claim is not that it is utterly impossible to understand any part of the experience of the marginalized, so much as to understand it more than academically. Even if it were, however, you aren’t marginalized. The claim doesn’t just come from the fact that we’re humans and can generally only understand each other imperfectly. There’s also the concrete fact that the marginalized are removed from the discourse almost entirely, and the majority simply doesn’t hear about it. Guess what: The experiences of men are the default! I can’t understand you perfectly, but society frames things primarily in terms of you. It’s easier to understand where you have come from, by a wide margin, than where I have been. It’s also in part there to combat the omnipresent Mighty Whitey stereotype seen in media where a White Man becomes a better version of whatever group he’s entering (The Last Samurai and James Cameron’s Avatar are two recent entries in this ever so long tradition).
Most of the shit men take in feminine-dominated areas, absent children at *least*, is from misogynists.
Agreed, but how much does it actually affect men in the age of blood tests? I can actually see this being an issue for the poor, potentially, I’ll give you that.
massachusetts isnt even actually that great on reproductive rights:
http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/government-and-you/state-governments/state-profiles/massachusetts.html
And BTW, I don’t have six years in college… quite. I sure as fuck don’t have a degree, unless it’s in ‘the myriad ways you and your life can fuck up college.’
‘Hey baby, want to come over to my rooming house, get hot and heavy, apply for a sexual license, wait the mandatory cooling off period then have your first sexual experience be with a man so terrified of women his own age he hopes he’ll attract young girls based on, and only on, the fact that he’s been on the earth longer than they have and can buy liquor? Hmmmmm?’
You forgot “has a car”, TK.
@Brandon,
I was a pre-school teacher for 7 years. The only ones who questioned my choice of job were other men.
Also, it seems to me that what Brandon is talking about with the ‘all men are rapists’ and men aren’t allowed to teach young children…are social constructions of gender which pressure men to be and act certain ways.* Why not just ignore them?
*Note: these are patriarchal pressures. Most feminists I know laugh at the argument that rape happens because men’s sexual impulses are FULL ON and cannot be controlled. Yes, feminists have argued that rape is bad, but the whole ‘men can’t control themselves’ and ‘women should just dress so they don’t set men off’ thing is the world according to patriarchy. Not feminists.
Brandon:
That’s not because of Title IX; it’s because sexist administrators were given responsibility to enforce Title IX.
Not to mention that it’s pretty obvious that sex tourism is more about the dominance of the First World over the Third than anything to do with Thailand itself. I mean, unless the observer is consumed with a pathological disregard for the weak…oh wait…
I’m starting to lose track of what Brandon believes and what his point is, he seems all over the place xD (also is he off the “social norms don’t have any effect?” thing now? xD )
I need a Cole/Cliff’s Notes of Brandon… >_>
Nebody? 😀
I need a Cole/Cliff’s Notes of Brandon… >_>
Born on third base; thinks he hit a triple.
@KathleenB: Good for your husband. But god forbid another man has a different experience.
@HellKell: Then I am sure you will also agree with other stereotypes of other countries. Like Americans are stupid. Thailand has more things to offer than dudes going there to engage in sex tourism.
@Voip: I particularly am interested in Muay Thai, Thai food, how Buddhism shapes a lot of their culture and just the idea of exploring a country that is so different from the USA. I spent some time in Tokyo and found it fascinating on how parts of their culture are the complete opposite of ours. Their whole take on sex and money is completely flipped around (sex: Japanese don’t feel shame while Americans treat sex as something that should be hidden away and money is rarely flaunted in japan while Americans flaunt their wealth all over the place)
I also like to do things in a whimsical way. I basically decided to go to Tokyo a week before I went. I would much rather just go exploring and learn that way as opposed to reading a bunch of history to acclimate myself. Although a Thai phrasebook and etiquette guide would be required reading prior to going.
@Lauralot: And how could I possibly help residents of say Nebraska fight for reproductive rights? I can’t vote in their elections nor am I even remotely near them to actually do any meaningful for them. All I can do is support them in spirit. So it’s not a question of “refusing to help” it is more like “I hope they enact that law”.
@Rutee: I called Voip a narcissist…not everyone. For someone who accuses me of selective reading…you seem to do it as well. Hi pot…this is kettle.
In response to being honest…I think I am with Ashley. The goal of moving is far far far away. That’s like telling her “one day I am going to retire”. There is no set date or year for that matter. All it is right now is a desire and some basic planning. I have no definite concrete facts to tell her when I do…I will bring it up. This obviously assumes we are still together when that day happens.
And while white people might not be marginalized…that doesn’t mean we don’t face pressures to conform to society. I am not saying whites have it bad. Just that being white doesn’t magically make all your problems go away. Or that those problems should be minimized because “other people have it worse than you”.
whoah dude, you are the Richard Burton of Internet libertarians. (no not that one the other one.) Next you’ll be telling me about these awesome cartoons you found. Did you know they aren’t just for children over there? Truly, the mysterious east is a land of wonder.
@Voip: Seriously WTF does observing a piece of Japanese culture have to do with Internet libertarians and cartoons.
Well, Brandon, America does have you. I know you’re not all Americans, but…
We know that, and Thailand knows that; we’re just not sure the dudes going there know that.
“Japanese don’t feel shame while Americans treat sex as something that should be hidden away”
Explain what you mean by this? From my perspective Americans don’t hide sex away at all. They are very open about discussing it and advertising it and so on. So what are the Japanese doing – having it in public?
@Societal: The Japanese seem more tolerate and accepting of having sex and they don’t try and shame it away like a lot of Christians do. Since Christianity and Judaism didn’t make much progress in Japan, they don’t have a lot of the baggage that comes with it. The difference about money is slightly more pronounced. Certain businesses would place your change in manilla envelopes as to hide it from on lookers.
No, Brandon. You could send donations, start a letter campaign, or a website or Facebook group to try and help fight for reproductive rights in states that are not as lucky as yours. Just because it’s out of sight doesn’t mean it has to be out of mind.