Say what you will about the dedicated PUAs (Pick-Up Artists) of the world: at least they sometimes actually talk to real human women. The guys in Reddit’s Seduction subreddit, I’m not so sure about.
It’s kind of sad, sometimes, to read the plaintive requests for advice on Seddit (as it’s known) from college guys who’ve fixated on some girl in some class of theirs, and want desperately to learn the secret formula to get into her pants. These aren’t guys who’ve mastered the art of “negging” women with clever little mini-insults (a favorite PUA technique); these are guys who haven’t quite grasped that you have to actually talk to a woman in order to ask her out.
Take this query, recently posted there:
My suggestion?
Write “coffee?” on your forehead, and stand in front of her. Point at your forehead if necessary.
So, yeah, I’ve been banned from Seddit.
Look, I feel for the guy. I’ve been that guy.
But just think of it from the point of view of the girl. Some guy you’ve never spoken to, some guy who doesn’t know a thing about you other than you make him feel funny in his pants, approaches you out of the blue and … slips you a note?
But really, the problem there isn’t the note. Well, part of the problem is the note, But the main problem is that college dude has never spoken to her before. As anyone who has watched Seinfeld knows well, “coffee” means “sex.” Going up to a woman you’ve never spoken to before and asking her out is a bit like saying “hi, you make me feel funny in my pants. I would like to put my penis in you. Perhaps we could chat a bit first. Though, clearly, I don’t care what’s in your actual brain, because here I am asking you out based on nothing more than the fact that you cause that aforementioned feeling in my pants.”
Pro-tip for lonely guys: remember that women are actual human beings also.
Now, this poor Sedditor got some good basic advice from the crowd there, basically boiling down to: figure out an excuse to talk to her before class, and see how it goes.
Now, Seddit may be mildly useful in giving this sort of basic advice to the truly hapless. But it doesn’t seem to be very good at getting across the notion that women are human.
Indeed, there was a strikingly similar question posted in Seddit a couple of days ago: a guy who wanted to ask out the only girl in his engineering class. His post, in stark contrast with the note guy, was bristling with PUA acronyms and lingo: the girl was an “HB8” (Hot Babe that he rated an 8 of 10 on the hotness scale); he was on the lookout for IOSs (Indications of Interest) from her, and so on and so on.
But his strategy was strikingly similar to that of the AFC (Average Frustrated Chump) with the note: he was going to walk up to her after class and ask her out for dinner. But he was planning to add one more “technique” to his approach: “kino.” In PUA-speak, kino means touch.
So, yeah, that’s what he learned from all his study of advanced PUA-oloogy: just start touching her! Women are eager to jump into bed with guys who come up to them out of the blue and start groping them. (The post itself was deleted after it got linked to in the ShitRedditSays subreddit, so no link.)
Trouble is, this guy is not the only one getting the message that Pick-up artistry is all about invading a woman’s personal space and “escalating” until she literally fights you off or given is. This is, in fact, the basic message of the PUA who calls himself Gunwich – a man who not that long ago (allegedly) shot a woman I the face after she refused his advances.
And, yes, pressuring a woman until she gives in, or up, is one way of getting in her pants. It’s also, you know, rape.
In recent days a number of Sedditers have posted advice that is little more than a how-to of date rape. A number of instances were pointed out in ShitRedditSays, and were deleted by the Seddit moderators. It’s clear this is damage control; a number of regulars on ShitRedditSays have been banned from posting in Seddit – many of whom had actually never posted there in the first place.
Here’s a discussion of one copy-and pasted date rape guide that got deleted before anyone made a screencap.
The Seddit mods say this is “fringe” stuff that doesn’t reflect how most Sedditors think. Then how is it that some of the creepiest comments get dozens of upvotes? Take this Sedditor’s advice on how to get inside a woman’s house (and then her pants) that I managed to screencap before it was deleted:
Now, there is plenty of PUA material that is not rapey. Manipulative, sure. Dopey, absolutely. But not rapey. A good Pick-Up Artist, in theory at least, should be able to tell when a woman is interested and when she isn’t, and move on when she isn’t.
But it’s clear that many Sedditors aren’t learning that whole “if she’s not interested, move on” thing. They’re learning: “if she’s not interested, pressure her and manipulate her, and wear her down. And be sure to touch her. Sorry, “kino escalate.”
They’re not learning empathy. They’re learning stupid human tricks. And, worse, they’re learning to ignore a woman’s “no,” to treat it as what PUAs call LMR – that is, Last Minute Resistance. And that’s pretty much a formula for date rape.
Oh, please let Samuel-the-condescending-prat stick the flounce!
Actually, slaveman, it’s an MRA’s incredibly boneheaded misunderstanding of a survey from the 1980s, which you’ve unsurprisingly adopted as your own.
http://kittywampus.wordpress.com/2010/01/17/dalys-misandry-idolatry-in-second-wave-feminism/ <– Mary Daly says in an interview that men should be reduced to ten percent of the human race. MRAs, please note how many feminists say she sucks donkey balls off a stick.
NWOslave has gotten so ugly and mean. What happened to the sweet, lovable troll who just went on about how Cyrillic and Spanish use the same characters and how Judaism is an aggressively evangelistic religion (and it IS only a religion)?
I dunno, but he’s doing wonders for my self-esteem. No, seriously. If that douchebag hates me, I have to be doing SOMETHING right.
Oz, you are unethical because you are an evil woman who enjoys sex and talks about it without shame, instead of being a fine, upstanding man who wants to fuck 15 year-olds and thinks rape is justified if the woman is being a tease.
Hope that helps. 🙂
Another addition to “Samuel’s life in movies”:
Well NWO if you’re not right, and feminists aren’t right…then who the hell is right????
My comment was delayed in mod for a while, so here it is again on benefits of celibacy
A man is expected to have lots of heterosexual sex and always to be on the chase for it. If he’s not, he’s not a “real man”, and considered less masculine. This pressure can make sex a lot less pleasurable.
That is why (temporary) celibacy can be so liberating for a man. Then you have the time to sort out inner desire from outside pressure, feel secure in your masculity without the need to be validated by sex and know that when you have sex, it is because you really want it, which surely is more pleasurably.
“A man is expected to have lots of heterosexual sex and always to be on the chase for it. If he’s not, he’s not a “real man”, and considered less masculine.”
I don’t know who got that into your head but you might want to consider switching social circles. Heck, I don’t get pressured into sewing and wearing dresses because it’s feminine. Dammit I’m gonna wear pants and play video games. In your face society!
Now now, Ithiliana, if it wasn’t for Samuel dropping by today and stamping his feet when we didn’t immediately respond to his requests, we might still be labouring under the mistaken notion that NOMAS is NOT “a solid MRA organization.Fucking solid. They are hardcore MRA with a feminist tilt.”, and that NWOslave is NOT the Yoda of the MRM.
Do what you have to od for your own enjoyment, so long as it doesn’t infringe on others. If you’d rather not have sex, for any reason whatsoever, don’t. If it’s temporary, fine. If it’s permanent, fine. I don’t care.
But Samuel was trying to claim actual health benefits because TCM (Or possibly TIM) says it’s good for you. Laughable bullshit, at best.
It always impresses me how, no matter how disparate their individual views and personalities, MRAs will always leap to each others’ defense. One believes that all sex is rape and one believes that there’s no such thing as rape? “Right on, brother!”
*showers everyone with rose petals*
You know, I used to think my Labrador begged shamelessly for cookies – and then I saw Samuel.
Bee said Ding ding ding ding ding! Holly wins a prize!
Oh, Samuel from the future, if you think that a Lazy Bear Weekend is without its many sexual dynamics and tensions, I don’t know what to say, sweetie. Good luck with your weird blog.
Nah I cannot let you win. I decided to come back. but I have a Feminist blogger partnering with me.It is not a weird blog. It will be real good.Trust me I am all about excellence. I encourage you all here to comment
Lets see who ha the guts to comment.Lets see how compassionte feminists are
You really needed reinforcements samuel?
Man, I put my money on at LEAST a week.
None of that means there’s a physical addictionf or sex; addiction isn’t a term used widely. It refers to observable physical effects that build a dependency on a substance. You don’t get addicted to cigarrettes because they just taste so good; you build a chemical dependency on them. There’s little to no evidence of such for sex.
Rutee stated the above quote
The problem is addiction is real.Sex addiction. There is a book by Patrick Carnes “Out of the shadows” very real. Check this out Rutee or Joanna or Ami Or Kristin or Holly or Ozy or Hellkell or Pam or Magpie check it out this link give me your feedback
http://www.slaafws.org/
Dammit, Samuel, you have to stick the landing or you don’t get full points! 2.43 from the Michigan judge.
1.75 from the Russians.
Man, I put my money on at LEAST a week.
Ozy stated this
The design of my blog is cool. I spent a few bucks(not a lot) it is just an “amateur blog”
It could expand.
I knew he wouldn’t stick the flounce.
If your blog is as coherent as the rest of your comments I’m not wasting my time. It’s a big enough nuisance sussing out your meaning here, and a big ole’ blog post is only going to be worse.
Kathleen said Dammit, Samuel, you have to stick the landing or you don’t get full points! 2.43 from the Michigan judge.
What do you mean?
Seriously I am asking just a few person here to please please give me your feedback on this site http://www.slaafws.org/
“Nah I cannot let you win. I decided to come back. but I have a Feminist blogger partnering with me.”
Oooh, is it magdelyn?