At first glance, Alcuin’s blog would seem to be some sort of parody. The blog’s slogan – “Promoting the Intellectual Renaissance of Western Patriarchy” – seems so over-the-top pretentious that even the smuggest of would-be intellectuals wouldn’t be able to post it with a straight face.
But if Alcuin is a troll, he’s a dedicated one, and one (at least based on my less-than-exhaustive survey of his blog) who never seems to break character. So I’m assuming he’s real. Which makes him a pompous ass with a lot of irritating ideas he’s somehow convinced himself are new and interesting. Take (please!) his recent post “Back Where They Belong.” And yes, “they” mean who you think, and “where they belong” means where you think.
Men should run the government, business, education, and religion. Women should stay at home. Young unmarried women can briefly work as kindergarten and elementary teachers, but there are no reasons why men can’t usually do this as well.
I’m not sure if Alcuin understands that women actually hold most of the jobs that currently exist, and that removing virtually all of them from the workplace would cause the economy to implode like, well, Alcuin, if you suddenly removed all of his idiocy. Also, how many kindergarten teachers do we really need?
As long as women run things, men will continue to be sidelined and slandered because feminism is a zero-sum movement.
Women … run things?
There can be no peace between the sexes until women are back where they belong. The sexes are meant to complement each other rather than compete and put one another down.
Yes, and the best way to show how the sexes “are meant to complement each other rather than … put one another down” is for one of the sexes to, er, put the other down by sending them back into the home.
Women have no business being lawyers, judges, educators, doctors, bureaucrats, writers, or religious leaders. Their attempted leadership in these areas, an illegitimate coup d’etat, is destroying our society.
I agree. Lady Pope is doing a terrible job of dealing with all those abuse cases!
Sadly, they prefer to enjoy their present situation, and let society rot, than go back where they belong and participate in building things again. Much like enjoying the concert on the sinking Titanic – though in this case, don’t expect chivalrous men to jump into the cold water so the ladies can have space on the lifeboats.
A little Titanic humor always enlivens a dull rant, eh?
Knock knock!
Who’s there!
An iceberg!
Damn, I guess we shouldn’t have kept going in zero visibility in a part of the ocean where icebergs had been recently sighted, in our ship that doesn’t have enough lifeboats for everyone!
I crack myself up sometimes. Back to Alcuin:
Feminism is a hate movement that brings out the worst in women.
Unlike the Men’s Rights movement, a hate movement that brings out the best in men!
It hates women because it hates femininity and motherhood, the chief characteristics of what it means to be a genuine woman. It brings out the worst in women by turning them into men, or trying to masculate them.
Damn you, feminism! Don’t go masculating those ladies! First they want to wear pants, and the next thing you know they’re growing ironic mustaches and using Axe Detailers instead of loofahs and subscribing to Bass Fishing Monthly.
It hates men because it blames everything on men, and regards masculinity in men to be evil. It emasculates men at the same time. Gays and, much more secondarily, manginas, are somewhat acceptable to the gynocracy, especially when the furniture needs moving or some bitch can’t pay her own bills.
Because when you need furniture moved, or some money, you call … the gays? Is this some new gay stereotype I’m not aware of? I mean, manginas, sure, manginas are furniture-movers and money-to-bitches conduits extraordinaire. That’s how they get access to pussy, after all.
But what’s the incentive for the gays? They don’t need pussy; they’d, presumably, prefer to spend their money on tiny dogs and gym memberships than on some bitch’s bills; and while gays may have strong opinions about where the furniture should go, are they really interested in carrying it there themselves?
Women generally use men, and feminism continues this grand tradition. A man’s value is defined according to his use to women. Deeper than that, feminism regards men in the same way that the Nazis regarded Jews – men are Untermensch and cannot be granted the same rights and privileges that women are.
And … now we’ve got Nazis.
Feminism aims to bring men down, as it is a zero-sum movement. It doesn’t simply aim to improve the lot of women through, for instance, education, but seeks to exclude men from education.
It does? Last I heard, colleges were actually lowering their standards in order to enroll more guys.
Thus the current propaganda about campus rape, and the attempt to make it easier to accuse a university male of rape in the USA. Thanks, government. You are, once again, the handmaiden of misandry.
And handmaidens are bad. Not like Shieldmaidens.
Feminist hate will never be satisfied, so men can’t keep avoiding the issue. We must avoid feminism as much as we can, and educate each other about it and about alternatives.
Generally it is advisable to actually know something about something before trying to “educating” other people about it.
This intellectual Renaissance of Western Patriarchy business is a lot trickier than you might think.
Wow… just wow.
Fractal Wrongness. It’s wrong assumptions which lead to conclusions that are also inaccurate and don’t even logically flow from those assumptions, all of it in conflict with reality. I guess white men really need to step up their wrongness game to maintain socioeconomic dominance in this day and age.
The title of his blog wins Oxymoron of the Year.
All the wrong there is so wrong it broke my brain.
“Women should not be allowed to participate in society in any meaningful way whatsoever.”
…
“Hey, why won’t any of these bitches date me? I’m a nice guy!”
Not to be pedantic, but he’s Alcuin, not Alucin. The name is probably a reference to Alcuin of York, a medieval theologian. themoreyouknow.jpg
““Women should not be allowed to participate in society in any meaningful way whatsoever.”
…
“Hey, why won’t any of these bitches date me? I’m a nice guy!””
And the cycle continues…
Uh oh. I wear pants, go to college, work outside the home, AND I use an Axe Detailer! (They hold up so much longer than normal bath poufs). I’d better tell FiletofSwedishBoyfriend to hush up a bit longer till DADT is repealed. He’s clearly dating an Almost-Man!
filetofswedishfish, you are such a rebel. I mean it’s one thing to go to college and have a job, but wearing pants? Wow, you really are bold. You better be careful or you might start reading books and having opinions.
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92MHA9nhYo0&w=420&h=345%5D
Holy…they just keep getting crazier and crazier. This is unreal. It’s like that time I studied Creationists (yes, Creationists, not Creationism) only–brace yourselves–way crazier.
I would say something more articulate, but I just finished my current novel, and after 9,300 words today I’m feeling pretty braindead.
Ahhh. He seems to be a catholic fundie. He also asserts that rape is a property crime. Charming charming man.
“Deeper than that, feminism regards men in the same way that the Nazis regarded Jews – men are Untermensch and cannot be granted the same rights and privileges that women are.”
“Women have no business being lawyers, judges, educators, doctors, bureaucrats, writers, or religious leaders.”
Does not compute. Brain imploding. Error.
Kendra, Gaston is so right. Look what kind of shit educating women leads to:
Ray, that’s because these are people who view sex solely as a transaction of goods; something that women “sell” to men in one way or another, whether it be through material or social gain. This of course presumes that women do not enjoy sex for the sake of having it, and also that women are not people but bodies to be bought and sold. As you say, it’s all very charming.
>>The name is probably a reference to Alcuin of York, a medieval theologian.
As opposed to this Alcuin, who is a medieval blogger.
“cannot be granted the same rights and privileges that women are.” Ah, the rampant hypocrisy, so obvious.
Maybe Alcuin needs a cuddle…
Holy crap, every time I think the stupid has peaked… They invent better (?) stupid.
JOanna: I’m sure as fuck not volunteering!
@darksidecat:
It is worse than you think.
“As long as women run things, men will continue to be sidelined and slandered”
“Women should stay at home.”
“Women have no business being lawyers, judges, educators, doctors, bureaucrats, writers, or religious leaders. Their attempted leadership in these areas, an illegitimate coup d’etat, is destroying our society.”
Sounds like sidelining and slander to me… Oh wait, is this a man talking about woman? Lessee.. I guess that’s just stating facts.
And all that stuff about women being the downfall of society? Yeesh, what a drama queen.
My mom’s working and my dad isn’t. The happy monogamous marriage that raised two functional well-adjusted kids IS SINGLE-HANDEDLY DESTROYING SOCIETY!
Of course, if it were the other way, my dad would be a mangina paying my mom’s bills.
Gays like to help women so they can say “uh uh, girlfriend” and other charming if stereotypical remarks.
Oh, wait, that’s just TV and movies. Never mind.
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGnjrTkv1gs&w=420&h=345%5D
Captain: Don’t forget ‘oh SNAP!’ and jazzhands! Oh, oh, and feather boas. And a blaster – wait, never mind, that’s Jack Harkness.
And everyone knows that Captain Jack’s not so much gay or straight as ‘yes, please’ when it comes to sex…