Categories
creepy men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny MRA rapey reddit statutory rape apologists

Again with the 14-year-old girls

Was Aqualung a Men's Rights Redditor?

So a bunch of the regulars on Reddit’s Men’s Rights subreddit have their collective knickers in a twist about dudes getting called “pedophiles” just for saying they think 14-year old girls are hot. Because that’s “ephebephilia,” dontchaknow, not pedophilia! And besides, thingsarebad argues

Normal heterosexual males will generally have sexual attraction for pubescent females of child-bearing age, from puberty till they start to get old and gross (late 20s, early 30s usually haha).

That’s pretty much “eww.” But so is the rest of the discussion, really, from this “joke” about all women being as immature as children to this heavily upvoted claim that feminists have created a “pedo-scare … to criminalize healthy and normal male sexuality,” to  this Evo-Psych-flavored argument for lowering the age of consent.

Is it just me or are dudes who get indignant when people don’t carefully distinguish between ephebephilia and pedophilia just really really creepy?

Is “the right to lust after underage girls without having to feel icky about it” really a Men’s Rights issue? Why this preoccupation with 14-year-old girls, on r/mensrights and Reddit generally?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

374 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nobinayamu
Nobinayamu
9 years ago

Pecunium, I’d say they’re about neck and neck, actually.

NWO fantasizes about 14 year old girls because he’s an ephebephile, yes, but mostly because he’s deeply insecure and believes that a 14 year old girl would, by virtue of her inexperience and lack of education, never leave him. He routinely conflates loyalty with an absence of any previous relationship, we know how he feels about anyone who knows more than him (nearly everyone), and he believes that caring about a woman’s sexual pleasure is distinctly unmanly.

Of course, according to him, he’s out working 28 hour days, 9 days a week so I imagine that he fantasizes about keeping her chained up like some Black Snake Moan re-dux.

And JUANDELACRUZ… well his shit kind of speaks for itself.

Both skeeve me right the fuck out and I have a pretty high tolerance level for creepiness. But between NWOs constant conflation of male sexual arousal and sexual assault, and JUAN’s certainty that a great illustration of chivalry and knightly courtliness is screwing middle schoolers…

I was a 14 year old girl once.

This thread just bothers me.

Rutee Katreya
9 years ago

I don’t think moe is inherently bad! Sexual fantasies often come from a really dark and disturbing place in someone’s id, and “I want to protect and cuddle (and also sleep with) a cute, innocent girl” is not quite as dark and disturbing as, say, gay incest noncon fantasies. If roleplayed with a consenting and ADULT partner, it’s cool.

Sigh.

It isn’t inherently bad, but not for the reasons you listed here.

It’s not inherently bad because *It’s not inherently sexual*. I mean, yes, the desires themselves, if you didn’t say they were a thing you should be able to act on unfettered, would be fine, like non-consensual fantasies, but more tot he point, *It doesn’t have to be sexual*

Isn’t it a deliberate double-edge sword? If she doesn’t talk about the men in her life she cares for, then that’s “proof” no man can stand her and she’s just bitter.

No, no it isn’t. I mean, yes, they’ll claim that, of course. But someone that manipulative isn’t necessarily worth saving, so to speak. To win the debate, you first have to point out that there’s no grounds for their stupid stereotype. Whatever your response is, it must treat the stereotype as groundless and as a thing that has to be substantiated with evidence. Because the stereotype isn’t *true*, there’s little danger of losing, debate-wise; even if they do find a link to a self identified feminist who is in fact in favor of institutional bias against men, it’s trivial to find 5 or 10 self identified feminists who aren’t.

What do you suggest to deal with such cowardly dodges from chickenshit MRAs?

IMO, your target isn’t always the asshole in front of you. It’s the rest of the world.

To be honest I’m rather enjoying this feminist vs MRA spectacle, because it’s like watching two camps of extremist fanatics, each fully convinced that they are 100% right, going at it with all they’ve got.

Narcissistic little idiots, aren’t you? This is by no means ‘going at it with all I’ve got’. This is a lazy day on call, with quick looks between branches in a Dungeon Crawl Stone Soup run. I know who the actual target is, and it was never your pathetic little movement. You’re capering monkeys.

Nobinayamu
Nobinayamu
9 years ago

Johnny_B, quote a dick joke from these threads. Pull one up and quote it.

Bruce McGlory
9 years ago

“Which are, of course, perfectly fine and laudable (who cares that so many men are insecure about their penis size? They’re just men, fuck’em and their worthless feelings) ”

There’s your problem right there, Johnnypoo. NO ONE said anything remotely like that. If you actually read what Ginmar wrote, as opposed to desperately searching for a reason to whine about it, you could have avoided making yourself look like a total moron. Better luck next time, cuddlebum.

**
“IMO, your target isn’t always the asshole in front of you. It’s the rest of the world.”

that is an excellent point. The asshole making the claims has already made up his teeny, atrophied mind about it. But the audience . . …. .

Pecunium
9 years ago

Nobinayamu; I don’t think, actually, that NWO is interested in 14 year olds. I think he is using that to yank our chains. What he wants is someone who isn’t all that autonomous, but has been reared to think serving a man is the apotheosis of female virtue (like Meller, but without the eliminationsist violence, which he blames on women).

Because such women are rare (fundie mormons and quiverfull types aside, which seem to be communities he doesn’t really cotton to), he has to turn to children, and then say they are actually sexual creatures, so he can justify the idea of being able to establish a relationship where one could indoctrinate them to be a Mellerian slave.

But his unease at the idea of women with rights, and agency, means he is unable to attack the root cause of his problem (that women really are people, and it would take a Nehamiah Scudder, bringing about a Gilead to keep them from being able to discover it; see Warren Jeffs and Colorado City, Ariz.), and so he has to move to more extreme examples of how, “women have been perverted, and men are marginalised”.

Add in his conspiracy theories (illuminati, international feminism, the Rothchilds [sic], the secret ownership of the US by the Fed, etc.) and one has someone who is almost completely unable to separate fact from fiction.

junadelacruz… just wants to enslave 10 year olds and rape them to get his rocks off.

Nobinayamu
Nobinayamu
9 years ago

“But the audience…”

Truer words and all that sort of thing, Bruce.

Papr1ka
Papr1ka
9 years ago

Urgh. When I was fourteen, I was creeped out enough when I got hit on by 18-19 year-olds. I mean at first, I thought they just genuinely wanted to be friends with me because gee, I dunno, they might have thought I was a cool person. The creep-factor didn’t come in until they started copping this “why haven’t you fucked me yet?” attitude. I can’t imagine being approached by a man in his mid-twenties, thirties, or forties when I was a teenager.

To make matters worse, at my high school we had a problem with this guy who had graduated, but even after he was 19 and in college, he would attend football games and other school events so that he could try to seduce the high school freshmans and eighth graders (anyone who was a sophomore or older at that time had spent at least a year going to school with him and knew better than to give him the time of day). Apparently he wasn’t having a great deal of luck with relationships among women his own age.

The teachers/administration didn’t feel it was their place to tell him he couldn’t come to sporting events, so the then-seniors and juniors took it upon themselves to have a meeting with the younger girls to warn them to stay away from this guy. It just goes to show, some of these men who get so huffy about simple age-of-consent laws are really upset that they can’t just go after someone who is much more naive and impressionable than an adult woman. Many of the girls who this guy was approaching felt uncomfortable due to his advances, but were not assertive enough to just tell him to leave them alone.

ozymandias42
9 years ago

Rutee: You’re right, of course. Which is why Juandelacruz is so fucking annoying, because he’s taking a bunch of perfectly acceptable things that people are into and turning them into THE CREEPIEST SHIT EVER. Seriously. So creepy. I am going to have to wash my brain out with soap.

Papr1ka: I hate people who take advantage of vulnerable people who don’t know how to say no… Even beyond the “oh shit rapey” aspects, there’s the fact that in an actual romantic relationship, both partners want to be in the relationship. That is, like, Romance 101.

Johnny_B
Johnny_B
9 years ago

There’s your problem right there, Johnnypoo. NO ONE said anything remotely like that. If you actually read what Ginmar wrote, as opposed to desperately searching for a reason to whine about it, you could have avoided making yourself look like a total moron. Better luck next time, cuddlebum.

Let’s see… Ginmar said: “MRAs whine like stuck pigs when WE make dick jokes”.

Now according to your special wisdom, what is the grand meaning here which escapes me? Unless, of course, you were just desperately searching for a reason to take a jab at me… although I’ll admit your responses are quite funny when read out loud in a lispy femme voice, so feel free to continue.

Pecunium
9 years ago

Johnny B: when read out loud in a lispy femme voice, I can see where this might, at times, be troublesome. Have you considered seeing a speech therapist?

Ginmar said: “MRAs whine like stuck pigs when WE make dick jokes”.

Yes, but… show us, if you would be so kind, where anyone here has actually made one?

Because that’s known as “rhetorical excess”, and is a device meant to focus on the titty-baby behavior of misogynists (like yourself) who abuse women, and then get all huffy and offended if anyone dares to engage in the same sort of behavior toward them, it’s practically lèse majesté ; as evidenced by you getting your skivvies in a twist at the very idea someone might do it.

darksidecat
9 years ago

Actually, MRA historical ignoramuses, the notion of the women as the thing to be rescued and the protected woman as asexual is a much more modern notion. You could consider actually reading things like Chretien de Troyes “A Knight of the Cart” (Also known as “Lancelot”). We have a woman that Lancelot rescues more than once asking for him to have sex with her as payment for staying at her house. We have Lancelot giving a distressed monologue hoping his friends will come rescue him. And Guinevere is anything but a reluctant sexually innocent child in the description of the sex scene:

“Now Lancelot had his every wish: the queen willingly sought his company
and affection, as he held her in his arms and she held him in hers. Her
love-play seemed.so gentle and-good to him, both her kisses and caresses, that
in truth the two of them felt a joy and wonder the equal of which has never
been heard or known. But I shall let it remain a secret forever, since it
should not be written of: the most delightful and choicest pleasure is that which is hinted at, but never told.”

Women in medieval discourse are often seen as oversexed, not unsexual. You are actually projecting a Victorian discourse on the medievalists (who certainly were not angels by any measure either, I definitely do not want to live in a medieval modeled society, though I don’t like a Victorian modeled one either).

Nobinayamu
Nobinayamu
9 years ago

Pecunium, I think you’re right about certain aspects NWO’s reasoning, but wrong about the chain yanking. I really think he wants a 14 year old because he thinks he’d have a lover he could parent. I find that fucked up.

Juandelacruz… makes me uncomfortable. He’s like reading the forums of self-identified pedophiles who believe that 10 year olds’ rights are being infringed upon by age of consent laws.

Spearhafoc
9 years ago

To be fair, NWOslave outright said that 14 was too young for him. He seems interested in 15 year olds though, so it’s he’s still creepy as fuck.

Oh, some of my favourite twilight riffs (other than Growing Up Cullen and Sparkledammerung) are Mark Reads Twilight (chapter by chapter essays by a gay Hispanic man), Alex Reads Twilight (irreverent Youtube videos by a British guy), Reasoning With Vampires (which hilariously corrects all the grammar mistakes and points out other issues – This one is by far my favourite).

Spearhafoc
9 years ago

*it’s still?

I’m tired today. Can’t believe I got all the HTML working.

Spearhafoc
9 years ago

Oh, and there’s also Rifftrax commentaries on the movies. No idea how I forgot those.

Johnny_B
Johnny_B
9 years ago

Yes, but… show us, if you would be so kind, where anyone here has actually made one? Because that’s known as “rhetorical excess”, and is a device meant to focus on the titty-baby behavior of misogynists (like yourself) who abuse women, and then get all huffy and offended if anyone dares to engage in the same sort of behavior toward them, it’s practically lèse majesté ; as evidenced by you getting your skivvies in a twist at the very idea someone might do it.

Where did I say you did? Methinks somebody is protesting too much. If you’re so innocent, why feel the need to correct me? Given what she said, it was natural to assume that people here were, in fact, making dick jokes. Or are you saying that it was my responsibility to go back and check whether it’s true instead of taking her at her word?

Oh, and apparently I’m now a woman-abusing misogynist. Good to know.

“and then get all huffy and offended if anyone dares to engage in the same sort of behavior toward them” – what’s that term where you accuse the opposition of the very thing that you are in fact doing?

qwert666
qwert666
9 years ago

Paul Elam

Nobinayamu
Nobinayamu
9 years ago

“To be fair, NWOslave outright said that 14 was too young for him. He seems interested in 15 year olds though, so it’s he’s still creepy as fuck.”

Spear, I know that’s what he said, but when push comes to shove he sexualizes 14 year old girls constantly, and abandoned his whole “I’d like a 16 or 17 year old”-schtick just as soon as it was pointed out that 16 and 17 year olds are perfectly legal in the vast majority of the U.S.

Walking like a duck and quacking like a duck are going to make me think you’d taste good in an orange sauce.

Amused
Amused
9 years ago

Johnny B: You don’t accuse people of being just as bad as misogynists on the basis of “assumptions”. You can only do so on the basis of facts. Claiming, first, that feminists on this blog are awash in hatred, then sanctimoniously proclaiming that there wasn’t actually any factual basis to your accusation, and how dare anyone insinuate that had one! — not only is it intellectually dishonest, it’s insane. If you want to accuse people of being hateful, you have a moral obligation to ascertain that a factual basis actually exists to make the accusation — even if that means that yeah, you have to go back and read all those comments. Anything short of that, you are reduced to admitting that you didn’t have a basis in the first place. Huff and puff though you might, needless to say your argument was exposed. Again.

KathleenB
KathleenB
9 years ago

darksidecat: You mean the Castle Anthrax scene was actually kinda historically accurate?

Ginmar Rienne
9 years ago

Fuck fuck ffuck fuck fuck This thing just ate my goddamned comment. No time to copy and paste; it was one of those Hey, why’d everything turn blue and SNAP OMG . Hey, if men invented everything and get credit for everything, then this means I can blame this on some dude, right? With credit comes responsibility, after all. You want all the credit, you get all the blame, too. I blame Dick Cheney.

I’m not dividing and conquering, Holly, the MRAs are, and anybody who feels compelled to respond to an accusation of man-hating with burbling about the boytoy instead of with the contempt such an accusation deserves is not helping other women. The social conditioning goes a lot deeper than people want to admit—-that and the denial, I think. If you respond to an accusation of wholesale man hating with, “But I love men! I love my boyfriend!” you’re basically apologizing to MRAs. They don’t believe you, but I bet they get off on once again making a woman feel nervous about being regarded as….what, exactly? Any of the types of women I delineated? You might as well say you hate cats. They’re setting a “When did you stop beating your wife question?” and the proper response is to tell them to fuck off, not assure them that you adore your wife, blah blah blah. You see this sort of thing all the time at Jezebel, where they’re so eager to appeal to men and prove to them that they don’t hate men (and probably assure themselves that it’s really not as bad out there as the big nasty feminazis say) that they buy into all kinds of appeasement.

Bruce, what do I suggest? Well, the MRAs are offering two shitty choices in the hope that women will accept one without thinking, “Fuck this shit.” They’re offering, “Suck up to us and make up to us, or else we’ll call you bitter, a bitch, whatever. ” To which I say, “Bring it, assholes.” Of course, I think there’s appeasement and then there’s deflection. Of course, some of the shit the MRAs say is out of line, and I’ve noticed that too many women—even feminists—-will pile on the victim rather than the MRA, for fighting back and making everybody uncomfortable.

There’s all kinds of choices. Tell ’em you castrate sheep for work and it was so fun you branched out. Whatever sarcasm you can’ think of. They’re going to think badly of you? Guess what? They already hate you and think you’re shit. Having the bad opinion of MRAs is kind of an honor, because as you might have noticed they live on magnifying slights and microscopic shit into injustices. (They never seem to want to trade their terrible circumstances for that of any woman, however many bonbons they think we eat.) Being though well of by awful people—-yeah, is that really something to be sought after? Why is it suddenly okay to say, “Here, I have a boyfriend,” when in other cases, it’s just, “Some of my best friends are black.” We’re not in the wrong here. Womens’ rights are under assault every where in the world, and that includes the US, where hundreds of bills have been introduced to make abortion effectively impossible for most women. That’s injustice, and it’s completely okay to get angry about it. When a bunch of woman-hating mal-adjusted losers try and make you ashamed of that anger, the last thing you want to do is fall for it. I mean, these guys are going on and on and on about how great and cool and wonderful it is to fuck fourteen-year-olds. They’ve got more excuses for it than Carter has pills. Couple that with the rage some of them seethe with and their total refusal to admit that anybody on their side has ever said or done anything the slightest bit wrong and…..yeah, ugh, I wouldn’t want to mention my SO anywhere around them. It’d feel dirty.

Amy
Amy
9 years ago

“ ‘As to the draft = vote thing – do men have to risk their lives in childbirth to create more citizens? Not so much.’

That is such a ridiculous comparison that I might have to label you a complete misandric idiot.”

Just have to point out that until the past century/century and a half – so for almost all of human history – women often died in childbirth because medicine was still fairly primitive.

http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/historyonline/childbirth.cfm

In fact, women had a lower life expectancy than men until the beginning of the 20th century, for this reason.

http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/08/08/is-america-ready-for-more-old-men/the-convergence-of-life-expectancy

Of course, we are talking about First World women here. In 2011, there are still plenty of places in the world where women get inadequate or downright damaging care during pregnancy and childbirth, and die in high numbers as a result.

So, yes, women dying to create more citizens was a very real thing throughout almost the entire period of time during which they could not own land or assets, could not vote, could not object to being raped by their husbands, and were generally treated like non-people (coverture!) under the law as well as in practice.

As for the draft thing, many feminists (myself included) have agitated for women to be included. I agree that it is not fair that the die-for-your-country-in-battle thing is compulsory only for men. Traditionally, though, women have not been drafted because of sexism, not because of feminism.

As for the original post about age of consent, I would say that even though it has been legal to have sex with a 14-year-old girl for much of human history, times are different now. Nowadays, people are not forced into hyper-accelerated adulthood because they live about 3-4 times as long as they used to. Because of the way our society is set up, 14-year-old people in 2011 are barely out of childhood and have nowhere near enough mental maturity to engage in intimate relationships with 30-year-olds. Societies for most of history had no concept of childhood and treated 14-year-olds far differently, with the result that they matured far differently. I would add that there’s the possibility that was quite damaging to them, and we don’t know.

Anecdotal experience: I was once a 14-year-old girl, and when I was I also knew many other 14-year-old girls. None of us, but none, were anywhere near ready to date someone who was 20, much less a much older guy. We were incredibly inexperienced in everything, and we were scared of standing up for ourselves, even the boldest of us. We had no idea what dating or sex were supposed to be about. A relationship or sexual encounter between one of us and an older man would have involved a major power imbalance.

When I was 17 years old, I dated a 24-year-old man for several months. I spent most of it being miserable because I could never seem to give him what he wanted, sexually or emotionally, and he would get pretty angry about that. Now that I’m 25, I am amazed and slightly creeped out by that guy for wanting to date me, and I think it’s ridiculous that he expected a 17-year-old virgin to satisfy him sexually and emotionally. I can also see the power imbalance that we had. And that wasn’t even a huge age gap, and I was only a year below the age of consent.

As for there being healthy relationships with a power imbalance – sure. But the Taken In Hand stuff is supposed to take place between two consenting adults, and I’ve never seen any TIH-ers advocating significant age gaps. If you read their website, most of the people involved are actually a little bit older and both parties already have relationship experience and seem to be of similar ages. The woman involved has power to begin with and understands what she is giving up. Not that I’m a fan of TIH, but it’s not right to compare that power imbalance to the one that occurs in a relationship between a teenage girl and an older guy.

KathleenB
KathleenB
9 years ago

Ginmar: While I kinda agree with the whole ‘playing into misogyny” thing, I can also understand the impulse – I adore my husband, I’ve spent over ten years with him, and being told that I hate him by some asshole stings. I know it shouldn’t (it’s some random douchenozzle on the internet, for fuck’s sake!), but it does.

cynickal
cynickal
9 years ago

Is JohnnyB squeeling like a stuck pig again?

Lyn
Lyn
9 years ago

Ginmar – I get what you’re saying. It’s kindof like the question: ‘you aren’t one of those hairy-legged feminists, are you?’ which has the coda: ‘if you are you should be totally ignored because, somehow, hairy legs on women makes it impossible for them to use reason.’ That is, of course, freaking ridiculous.

The difference is that if I were man-hating then I think that would be a problem. Hating an entire gender is wrong, imo. I like them in a I’m attracted to them kindof way which is why I responded the way I did – and I take your point that using that as a measure of non-man-hatred quietly implies that lesbians do hate men. In future, I’ll respond (to a direct accusation!) with a simple ‘I don’t hate men, I hate people for who they are’ or something like that.

However, I still think that describing my response as ‘burbling’ or ‘sucking up’ and saying that the ONLY way to respond to accusations of man-hatred is with anger (I may be wrong about this, but it seems to be what you’re implying) is divisive in its own way. I think that there’s room for different ways to engage with douches – I don’t like doing the angry thing which is, yes, totally part of my conditioning – but I don’t think anyone gets to insist that I do something that doesn’t suit me, or that if I don’t I’m doing feminism wrong. I think having a measured response to someone else’s anger has its place as a rhetorical device. I would argue too, that while righteous anger is certainly warranted in many circumstances, it isn’t always the best way to respond, and can alienate people who might have otherwise become allies (and I’m talking here about the audience rather than the misogynist who wants to fuck 14yos). It’s not our job to teach those who believe the crap about feminism being evil and man-hating, no-one has to, but if I want to then that’s no problem for anyone else. Just like I’m not going to argue that people shouldn’t respond in an angry way.

ohiken
ohiken
9 years ago

I do actually castrate goats, but it’s purely a hobby.

Rutee Katreya
9 years ago

Lyn: I think Ginmar is just saying “Don’t behave as though they’re shit has been substantiated”, but I may be wrong.Don’t try to put yourself in exceptional terms for having a boyfriend. Let me think, how would I do it in a non sarcastic or caustic way… that’s not in my general repertoire, but hey, I’m thinking.

Let’s say “No no, that isn’t what feminism about, and aside from a rare few individuals, has never been anything but a false narrative sold by people who don’t like treating women as people. Oh, and by the way, my boyfriend is always amused when people tell him about what I must be like” or whatever.

I don’t think you have to be mean, but I do think you have to treat the untrue BS as laughable, however you choose to.

Of course, I don’t know if Ginmar agrees, but that’s my take on the matter at least.

Magpie
9 years ago

Ginmar doesn’t let anyone define the discussion except Ginmar. She is 100% herself wherever she posts. and this is a good thing. It’s like when Ami first posted, easy to be put off by a different style, but hang in there, it’s worth it.

Nobinayamu
Nobinayamu
9 years ago

Everyone should present their arguments in whatever way they see fit. There’s more than enough room.

Magpie
9 years ago

Exactly, Nobinayamu. For example, I present mine like an ignorant bushie 🙂

Pecunium
9 years ago

Johhny B: I said you got a big-ol wedgie because (as you admit) no one here was making dick jokes.

So you just made that shit up, and blamed us for something we didn’t do, pretending that justifies (in the idea that two wrongs make a right, when everyone knows it’s actually three lefts that make a right), the abuse you heap on women.

But hey, if you want dick jokes, I know lots, 16 years in the Army (one of the most broad-minded groups I know for offensive jokes) has given me ammunition.

But really, it’s hard to tops MRAs for being both dicks, and jokes.

captainbathrobe
9 years ago

Nobody tell Johnny B. about our annual Make Fun of Guys with Small Penises Convention in Des Moines this year.

hellkell
hellkell
9 years ago

Shhhh, CB. I’ve got my flight and room booked, how about you?

Bagelsan
Bagelsan
9 years ago

Well, considering that neither the MRAs nor Ginmar will be convinced by anything they read online regarding “the right way to do feminism”, why not just say exactly what you like to? I sure do. Share fetus-smoothie recipes while babbling about how delicious cock is, then rasp your stubbly legs together like a grasshopper as you compose an ode to that cute smart guy at work. Knock y’all selves out.

On a site named “manboobz” I can’t take this discussion terribly seriously; save it for Feministe or somewhere like that, where we can joyfully and finely police the minutiae of our every written sentence.

Magpie
9 years ago

“rasp your stubbly legs together like a grasshopper” I so wish this was a real thing 🙂

cynickal
cynickal
9 years ago

I like to think of it as an old time defense.
Some shield holders refuting the basic idiotic advances, some pikers jabbing at them and the occasional rock thrower lobbing comments over peoples’ heads.

Also cat videos because

Societal Contract
Societal Contract
9 years ago

All of these dudes who are crying for the age of consent to be lowered are not even dating girls at or above the current age of consent. If they cannot pull a 16 year old, what makes them think 14 year olds are going to get the hots for them?

Magpie
9 years ago

That’s why the spearhead is filled with such miserable sods. Not enough cat videos.

Johnny_B
Johnny_B
9 years ago

Is JohnnyB squeeling like a stuck pig again?

Nobody tell Johnny B. about our annual Make Fun of Guys with Small Penises Convention in Des Moines this year.

Shhhh, CB. I’ve got my flight and room booked, how about you?

What’s funny is that you actually think you’re clever when you basically sound like a gang of schoolyard bull.. wait, haven’t we gone over this already? ffs.

Johhny B: I said you got a big-ol wedgie because (as you admit) no one here was making dick jokes. So you just made that shit up, and blamed us for something we didn’t do, pretending that justifies (in the idea that two wrongs make a right, when everyone knows it’s actually three lefts that make a right), the abuse you heap on women.

Now you’re just being glib and dishonest. I expected better from you. Once again, when Ginmar said “WE make dick jokes”, I responded to that. If YOU in particular did not, in fact, make dick jokes, then you shouldn’t have felt targeted or felt the need to respond. So what exactly did I make up? The fact that I took Ginmar at her word? Oh, and since we’re talking about lies and dishonesty, where do I “heap abuse” on women? Do you have a quote on that, or are you just full of shit as well as a hypocrite?

Things Are Bad
9 years ago

The day I see a meaningful argument from a misandrist will surely be my last.

Anyway, remember guys n gals.

MRA: http://en.gravatar.com/jeremiahmra

Things Are Bad
9 years ago
Magical Laura (@_magical_laura)

TAB no one gives a fuck how hot you are or are not. That’s not the way WE judge people.

And being a creep has nothing to do with how you look, it’s to do with your views and behaviour. You are creepy because of the things you say about women.

Also, your ridiculous self-inflated ego shows, and does not do wonders for your attractiveness.

Magical Laura (@_magical_laura)

*cue OMY YOU ARE UGLY AND FAT* 😉

Bagelsan
Bagelsan
9 years ago

And yeah, this was already covered on the other thread, but seriously TAB you look super creepy there. Your closed-mouth smile and eyes that don’t show a speck of good humor send off all my “sketchy” instincts like whoa — that is the face of someone who I avoid being alone in a room with, no joke. I’m not being mean, I’m being honest; your photo is unsettling even without knowing what little I do of your personality, and god knows that isn’t doing you any favors in getting the ladies either.

mediumdave
9 years ago

TAB, congratulations on being younger than David Futrelle! I know that’s a tough thing to pull off.

Bruce McGlory
9 years ago

“The day I see a meaningful argument from a misandrist will surely be my last.”

Do you often talk about arguing with imaginary people?

Bruce McGlory
9 years ago

“Let’s see… Ginmar said: “MRAs whine like stuck pigs when WE make dick jokes”.

Now according to your special wisdom, what is the grand meaning here which escapes me? Unless, of course, you were just desperately searching for a reason to take a jab at me… although I’ll admit your responses are quite funny when read out loud in a lispy femme voice, so feel free to continue”

Christ, how do little boys as dumb as you and Tab manage to get dressed in the morning? Does mommy still do it for you?

The “grand meaning” was that you douchey cowardly bigots say shit that is a lot worse about women, then pretend it was just a joke, or pretend that straight up (and well debunked lies) – like Tab’s 100% of rape accusations are false thing (which, seriously dude, thanks for showing us what a complete moron you are) – and then WHINE LIKE FUCKING STUCK PIGS when you THINK someone said something “misandrist”.

Thanks for amping up your totally worthlessness as a human being by adding in some homophobia with your festering misogyny. Cuz all gay dudes have lispy femme voices, right cuddlebum? I’d LOVE for you to have the opportunity to say it to my face, so I can watch you piss your pants instead, babycakes.

Jump off a bridge already.

Hershele Ostropoler
9 years ago

David’s, um, not exactly hiding that picture of himself. It’s not like you uncovered some big secret.

Pecunium
9 years ago

Johnny B: Let’s look at the difference between Ginmar’s comment, and yours.

She was making a comment on the meta level. That anti-feminists say feminists make all sorts of wild claims about feminists; “That they complain when “we” (i.e. feminists, as a class), “make dick jokes”. She then says she pre-empts that by making mock of it with comments about castrating men and serving up boiled baby for supper (not that there is anything wrong with boiled babies.

You then pretended this was an admission that manboobz engages in dick jokes. You took the meta, to the local.