Sometimes the fellows on MGTOWforums.com get all philosophical on us. At the moment they are discussing a question of great import: Are women incapable of love to the degree men love?
I suspect you can guess their unanimous answer – women are incapable of love — which is pretty much what you’d expect men who hate women to say about women and love. Some highlights:
Fairi5fair thinks women are monsters; he just can’t figure out which kind:
Women are just incapable of love period. The thrill of being able to use her pussy to get free shit is what women mistake for “love”. …
They are cold, grasping, selfish, and heartless parasites. They have no souls. They are all vampires. Undead zombies lurching from meal to meal.
Wait, so are they vampires or are they zombies? I think I can handle either one by itself, but if they are both at the same time we’re doomed!
Goldenfetus seems to be smoking something powerful:
Yes, they are less capable of love than men, or totally incapable.
One possibility I’ve considered is that in a natural … environment male ‘love’ (platonic) would be reserved only for other men, while women would be viewed as property or objects of reproduction whose value was derived from fertility and subservience without any basis in ‘love’ reciprocation. If so, I would identify feminism as the factor that misled men into extending this love, disastrously, to females – tricking them into believing that females have souls and are like males.
Loving a woman is like trying to pet a toilet, water a sandwich, or plow a parking lot and then wondering why you aren’t getting results. The defect (of understanding) lies with the man loving an object incompatible with love, rather than in the female whose nature precludes reciprocity.
Arctic thinks it’s all about the Benjamins:
Love to a woman is a man who is their servant 24/7 365 a day. …
The idea of love involving sacrifice to a female is as foreign as periods are to men. Why should she care about a relationship involving sacrifice on her part, when she is taught all her life to exploit men for her own uses? Sacrifice herself for a mere man? WHY? Why, when beta males are selling their souls to sniff her crotch? …
[I]ts safe to say the idea of women being in love begins and ends at the ATM of her committed male asset.
The Accomplice agrees:
Women do not seek love or companionship. Their main objective is to find a man of the highest status possible (Richest men, the toughest guys, most popular guy etc) who will protect them, provide for them and satisfy their selfish desires. … [T]he majority of women are too weak physically and mentally to do these things on their own, hence why they always chase after men …
A women’s idea of love is all hypergamy, nothing more.
Superion goes all Evo-Psych on us:
Women are incapapble of love is the great, horrible secret that society has tried to hide from men since the dawn of time.
Women are physically and mentally weaker than men.
In order to survive and pass on their genes they need the resources of the strongest and best providing male available.
To do this, women rely on beauty and guile to trick a male into being her slave.
Women do not love.
For men, love is a self-delusion.
We trick ourselves into wasting our resources on one particular female.
This makes no sense so we tell ourselves we’re in love to justify it.
Such an unromantic bunch! Maybe this will cheer them up.
Actually, screw them. Maybe it will cheer me up:
And if that didn’t do the trick, how about this?
Also, I’d like to point out to everyone how qwert666’s pompous, painstaking, condescending, butter-wouldn’t-melt-in-his-mouth routine really frays at the edges when he’s mad. Poor sweetie, looks like we got to him.
Oh yeah? Well I say that it is YOU who failed to understand MY statement about your being an MGTOW, and therefore YOU who are the utter, utter, UTTER dolt!
Did you know that?
And what a complete waste of my time.
Then why bother? I’m on vacation, and it’s fun to hang out here for a while. Of course I noticed that you haven’t actually replied to my query as to where all these mythical men actually GO once they decide to up and leave?
Galt Gulch, obviously.
A real actual “going their own way” example (and don’t assume it’s just adult men who left Georgia):
http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2011/06/17/gas-farm-labor-crisis-playing-out-as-planned/
Seriously, the more I hear about MGTOW the more I approve. Once we lose the douchey half of our population can we replace them with all those non-asshole immigrants who want to come into the country? Yo quiero mas hombres quienes no me odian.
My parting shot to you muppets
I want to make a hand-up-ass joke, but he left already and I know he wouldn’t appreciate it.
I can’t believe that no one has made a mgtow rapture joke yet! Half the male population just disappearing.
Qbert. If you were actually going your own way you would have gone. Instead you’re here defending your position to a group that are largely feminists. Get off the pot dude and start living that great life you envision.
My best friend is a life long bachelor, 54 and his last long term relationship was in his 20’s. He’s never married or lived with a woman, this is just how he’s decided to live his life. Does he go to mgtow websites? No.
As a side note his sister is the same way. No reason for it, their parents are wonderful people who have been married for 55+ years and love each other to death, they just both decided that they didn’t want marriage.
So please stop making yourself look like an idiot.
No, no marriage is safe!! Their mom could totally divorce their dad at any moment — women being, well, heartless and irrational — and then what would he do? Starve on the street, is what. On the street. While the mom laughed. Bitch. >:(
Y’know, it’s fun playing with him, but I’d hate for anything to happen to qwert’s pyloric valve.
Didn’t this guy swear he was leaving -MGTOW!- three days ago? With his “integrity”, no less?
Just go.
Seriously. Go. Go your own way.
MGTOWs are always coming here to protest the links to their sites when they’re called out for misogyny. “We aren’t misogynists! We just have been hurt by and don’t want to deal with women! And we’re GOING OUR OWN WAY! SO THERE!” If you don’t like being accused of misogyny, make your forum private. You aren’t the only people calling women soulless whores on the internet. David will, I am certain, find other misogyny to mock.
Jesus man. Get a grip. Nobody cares. We aren’t threatened by your decision, we aren’t going to beg you to stay, and nobody misses you. All of this “I’m leaving and I’m never coming back!” – stomping around like somebody stole your bike. There have always been people, men and women, who have led their own lives and never married. You aren’t special because you choose to remain single just as people who actively seek relationships aren’t flawed.
You’re like six year olds pretending to run away from home with one ear to the door of their hiding place, waiting for their mothers to call them for dinner.
Stop telling us you’re leaving and leave.
Just fucking go already.
I just noticed all the typos. The end of my penultimate post should read,
The difference between an organized group and “a group of individuals who are GTOW, a way that is unique to them,” “living their lives on their own terms” on what is “essentially a personal mission” and the rest of that super-deep stuff that blew our minds back in undergrad is…whether or not you joined an internet forum.
that’s precious.
qwert666: I am not your friend. I’m not your enemy. I am merely pointing out what I see.
What I don’t see is someone being humble. I see someone who is saying that what… half the men in the uS (we’ll limit your fantasy to the US) have been so aggrieved by women they have a justifiable reason to try and torpedo society.
And you think such a society (with half the men gone… unless what you were saying was all them men, i.e. half the total population) would fail.
Why?
I mean seriously, why?
Becuase women can’t do things for themselves is the implicit explanation I can see.
And that, my dear boy, is misogyny.
I don’t think women love men. A woman may love a son, a brother, a father, but not the guy she has sex with. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhkeV-IHb7c I had this opinion before I seen this video, but this link says everything perfectly.
Sadly, is see nothing in this comment section
(Especially from the feminist side)
That does anything to disprove these assumptions.
—-
MGTOW: We’re going to leave.
Feminists: Fine! We don’t give a f**k about you, and would be better off without you anyway.
—-
If anything..
This comment section demonstrates there is truth to the MGTOW’s hypothesis.
And that is very, very depressing.
—-
Also, both of those videos are of a man singing love songs to a woman.
The existence of that was never called into question.
So you chose to resurrect a 6 year old thread to drop that nugget of wisdom, Z?
Thanks for stopping by.