The dude at What Men Are Saying About Women – you may recall him as the inventor of the MRA two-dot period – remains my favorite illiterate MRA blogger. To be fair, the illiteracy is really just the icing on the cake of his ridiculous opinions. In a recent post he wrote about a new study that purports to show that there is more sex in countries with greater gender equality. (Probably true; the study itself, probably bullshit.)
Here’s the two-dot blogger trying to make some sort of point about it all:
Feminists have always promoted shagging as some type of recommended behaviour that should be allowed at random without limitation or indeed have any limits attached to it. Probably explains why most of the feminist mangina sites have little tags like “I support Porn” or “I support BDSM” as they would heartily agree that the promotion of free sex on demand would allow them unlimited access especially if there is a feminist female involved. Brainwashing does apparently have it positive side..
What surprises me the most is the lack of information concerning sexually transmitted diseases of all types. Those nasty disease like HIV or those others that munch your body at random. Not really something you want to be told after a night of debauchery with some slut feminist ( they promote themselves to be sluts now) willingly spreads her legs for some horizontal tango..
So apparently having more sex is bad because feminists..
And then you get AIDS..
And sentences should always be ended with not one but two periods..
@hellkell
“NWO, you are full of it. You just read selectively and get nasty with people.”
Aww, boohoo. Don’t the mockers like being mocked for having their lying ideology exposed?
“First off, it’s pointless due to feminists notorious ability to discount anything that goes against their failed destructive ideology. Secondly, do your own research ya lazy slob.”
I just wanted to highlight that this was being said by a creationist antivaxxer who seriously believes in various bircher conspiracy theories.
Someone here has a lying ideology, and it’s you.
“First off, it’s pointless due to feminists notorious ability to discount anything that goes against their failed destructive ideology. Secondly, do your own research ya lazy slob.”
I’ll second Rutee on highlighting this. One can cut the irony with a hot butter knife.
You made the claim, you justify it. Sounds like bullshit to me, but surely if you’re all resourced up you surely can easily link to where you found the data to state this as a fact that we all should accept.
No? Pulled it out of your ass? Thought so.
I’d also, while we’re asking, like to know how feminism has failed or destructed anything. Last I checked, I knew I’d be able to vote when I came of age, the same wasn’t true for my grandmother, hmmm, that is a huge fail.
NWO: I have never been pumped and dumped actually! I’ve had sex with a guy and dumped him the day after cuz he sucked donkey balls in bed, though. I honestly don’t understand why someone would pump and dump someone else. So you have someone whom you’re attracted to, who’s attracted to you, and who’s good in bed and capable of having a casual-sex relationship. Why the hell wouldn’t you fuck them again instead of having to go find someone else who’s attracted to you? That’s incredibly inefficient.
And also I have loyalty, fidelity and honor in spite of my promiscuity. It is as if my morals have almost nothing to do with what i do with my own personal vagina. Funny, that.
Thank you, NWO. You just proved something with this response (hint: it was the fact that you are full of shit).
“So you have someone whom you’re attracted to, who’s attracted to you, and who’s good in bed and capable of having a casual-sex relationship. Why the hell wouldn’t you fuck them again instead of having to go find someone else who’s attracted to you? That’s incredibly inefficient.”
Are you implying that the PUA community is extremely inefficient at sex?
Yes.
I mean, unless you view seduction as a pleasure in and of itself, and the sex as a cherry on the top of the process of making someone be attracted to you, which seems like a valid position. But most of the PUA rhetoric seems to suggest that they want to get laid a lot and are just very, very bad at it.
There’s so much wrong in this, I scarcely know where to begin (there were no STD’s in the olden days? ORLY?). But I will give you this–they were the good old days…when Blacks, other minorities and women were oppressed. Yes, those were fine days indeed. Now, it’s like you can’t call someone a “nigger” without some do-gooding liberal or feminist screaming bloody murder.
Also, what is “appaulling,” aside from your spelling and reasoning?
Valid position. Heh.
OK, I am one of these people. I confess I get a deal of pleasure out of the chase. It’s heady, heady, addicting stuff…that dance that people do.
In the good old days STD’s were unheard of?
Syphilis anyone?
Can we name the famous people in the good old days that went mad and then died from it?
NWO has pushed the used up oxytocin myth here before. He’s an excellent reverse bullshit detector: if he believes it, it’s probably bullshit. Saves a lot of time, really.
Nope. Nothing to see here.
“In the good old days STD’s were unheard of?
Syphilis anyone?
Can we name the famous people in the good old days that went mad and then died from it?”
That’s Feminist propaganda you’re spouting. Those people didn’t die from Syphilis, they died from ALIENS WITH IONIZED RADIATION LAZER GUNS. The lizard-brained cyborg lizard femists have brainwashed the masses with their history about famous so that they could continue getting away with hitting on boys and then accusing them of rape.
WAKE UP, SHEEPLE!
Props to vacuumslayer for mentioning the Syphilis experiment, BTW.
@captainbathrobe
“NWO has pushed the used up oxytocin myth here before.”
Before right now I have never once typed the word oxytocin on this site. Do feminists ever do anything other than lie?
I seem to recall that you did, NWO.
So you have someone whom you’re attracted to, who’s attracted to you, and who’s good in bed and capable of having a casual-sex relationship. Why the hell wouldn’t you fuck them again instead of having to go find someone else who’s attracted to you?
Most of these PUAs are closeted gay. They don’t want to have sex several time with the same woman and they have sex with women (only once) to prove to themselves they are not gay.
I could have mistaken you for someone else, I suppose. My apologies if you were not, in fact, full of shit in this particular manner previously. Better luck next time.
@NWOslave
“I’m guessing the emperical evidence that STDs are much more rampant in countries with loose sexual mores and high indexes of gender equality would be the emperical evidence.”
Betch, honestly. You cannot be serious.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:HIV_Epidem.png
Ah, Africa. Bastion of liberalism and feminism.
Also, empirical! empirical!
“Well except for the emperical evidence that shows for every time a woman fucks a different man her ability to form a lasting relationship with a man drop percentagewise.”
I would also like to point out that this is going to be hard to prove empirically, as you have huge correlation / causation problems. I doubt very much that is has been done.
Seriously, guys, am I wasting my time? Is this guy a joke?
“@ozymandias42
“I dunno, I’ve been throwing away my value and honor quite avidly”
No shit sherlock, you’re what’s called a pump and dump. You just wanna be praised for it, good luck with that.”
And if you’re the sort of person who encounters and uses that term, that makes you a…what? When you can get it, of course.
I like pump and dump for men too, actually.
Ew, that spacing didn’t work out the way I thought it would.
No, you don’t understand. “Emperical” is a different word. It means “agreeing with NWO.”
Seriously, guys, am I wasting my time? Is this guy a joke?
Yes. He just doesn’t realize it yet.