The other day we took a look at a Redditor who calls himself AntiFeministMedia. He does not seem to like the ladies very much. Indeed, in some of the posts of his I quoted, he went so far as to say that women are animals, not humans, and suggested that men should pretty much have the final say in anything involving reproduction (as clearly the women have been doing a terrible job of it).
So one might wonder: why have ladies at all? This is a thought that has crossed the mind of AntiFeministMedia more than a few times. And he’s got some ideas about how it could be done.
As he points out in this comment, men have known all along that ladies is trouble. But now, thanks to superior male brains, we finally have the technology to do something about it. Today, fleshlights! Tomorrow, the womb!
Men have known women are the problem right throughout history, and to deny it just goes to show how ignorant and stupid you are.
Religion’s, culture’s, all have there warnings about women.
And all these things will be known again. The dots will be joined, and its my hope that after this current fuck up of allowing feminism to take root, men will never allow it again.
I actually think its time men went foreward alone. We have the hi-technology now to clone little boys into the future, soon we will have female androids with artificial wombs. Identical to women in almost every way, except for the animal nature…
Women should be replaced by better technology.
Consider the many fine benefits of this plan:
If men didnt have to live in this human-female environment, but instead was guaranteed in having his sexual needs met, and his genes live on into the future, there would be a lot less conflict of all kinds.
This two-party system of male and female has served its purpose (in the most brutal way), we are rapidly approaching a time where things could be radically different.
Tell me more about this brave new world of which you speak, in which men can live their lives free of bitches:
Cloning science and female androids may just solve that woman problem for us.
I wouldnt advocate killing women, certainly not, but a gradual fade-out, allow women to live out their natural lives, while we transition to the new technology.
No need for anything as unpleasant as killing, no. Just the elimination of one gender by the other through a little “fade-out,” like they have in the movies. Nothing objectionable about this, not at all.
If you’ve followed any of these links back to the original comments, you’ll see that AntiFeministMedia, like most truly original thinkers, has gotten some resistance to his ideas — even from the normally forward-looking thinkers of the Men’s Rights subreddit. And a few downvotes!
But some of his comments are so clearly and obviously correct, so pithy and wise, that they get upvotes. Like this one, suggesting that female demand for iPads and mobile phones is one of the central driving forces behind war:
Well its nice to hear her comment that western women themselves have been complicit in foreign wars and the rape of native women by soldiers, so that companies can obtain gold and other precious metals for Ipads and moble phones which women seem to like so much.
Oh you evil women with your iPads and mobile phones! We men are of course immune to the devilish allure of computer technology. Indeed, I’m typing this blog post on an old Smith-Corona Galaxie Portable Typewriter.
Do you think that a woman could want a man WHILE respecting him and connecting with him emotionally? What happens if she wants your cock AS WELL AS YOUR PERSONALITY? Can you imagine a scenario in which you are wanted by a woman and it does not make you uncomfortable?
No, but I have Asperger’s, so it takes me a long time to be comfortable around another person to the point that I’m not afraid of physical contact with them; also, I’m a member of a religion that strongly discourages sleeping with multiple short-term partners. My responses probably aren’t representative of everyone.
But why are you asking me like you think I’ll turn against hellkell and Holly? Do you want a woman you can point to, so you can go “Here, she agrees with me, the rest of you must be wrong”? Not going to happen. Like hellkell said, no one of us can speak for every woman on earth.
Look at his “coworker” scenario: he seems to think that the vast majority of sexual encounters entail a lack of connection, which is why celibacy is the answer.
It is also possible to engage in the activity that we here on Earth call “DATING.” It’s like having a friend, but you also have sex with them.
But why are you asking me like you think I’ll turn against hellkell and Holly? Do you want a woman you can point to, so you can go “Here, she agrees with me, the rest of you must be wrong”?
Well he tried to do it w/ Ozy xD Except zie didn’t agree w/ him. But he was RLY TRYING xD
Well he tried to do it w/ Ozy xD Except zie didn’t agree w/ him. But he was RLY TRYING xD
Depending on what he’s saying (I’m really not sure) I don’t agree with him either.
OK, I think that’s a confirmation that Samuel thinks all lust is objectifying.
Believe I can be as critical to mRA’S as well as women.”
You just defended a raging heterosexist, cissexist bigot. ARe you sure you want to make that claim?
I said to you already I do not agree with NWO in a lot of issues. I am more concerned about the sociological aspects of the Mens Movement. I am very much a Tony Porter follower and absolutely am on a mission until I leave this Planet that TOXIC MASCULINITY IS HARMFUL TO MEN AND WOMAN
OK, I think that’s a confirmation that Samuel thinks all lust is objectifying.
Which is interesting, since there’s a tension between his uncomfortable reaction to his coworker’s advances and his recurrent insistence that MRAs and MGTOWs, when given a chance, are dying to make good partners for someone.
Samuel, what does marriage mean to you? Why is it a good thing? Do you believe married people can want to have sex with each other? Does the sex then become “holy,” or can sex happen between married people that isn’t at the level of “holiness” but still isn’t “objectifying”?
I believe NWO has a right as an MRA activist to express his views
I am…absolutely am on a mission until I leave this Planet that TOXIC MASCULINITY IS HARMFUL TO MEN AND WOMAN
OK, but that’s not the same thing as just wanting sex. Sex isn’t harmful if you respect your partner.
Hellkell, you win this thread so many times. I would consider it an honor to be insulted by you.
I am trying to get to all questions oh, and I have a question for you!
I have a friend who I fuck regularly. We’ve known each other for years (the sex only started recently) and we’re pretty close, but the sex is just fun and meaningless. What are your thoughts on this relationship? Is he objectifying me because he’s putting his penis in me despite the fact that he’s a wonderful and supportive friend?
To answer your question I believe it is fornication if 2 people are fucking emotions can get involved someone will fall in love and be hurt very very very very difficult to have sex and not have 1 or the other partner wanting a commited relationship
To answer your question I believe it is fornication if 2 people are fucking emotions can get involved someone will fall in love and be hurt very very very very difficult to have sex and not have 1 or the other partner wanting a commited relationship
Feyline seems to be fine with it: she said that the friend she sleeps with is ‘wonderful,” even. What if it makes her and her friend happy? How would that make you feel? Would it surprise you?
Samuel, what does marriage mean to you? Why is it a good thing? Do you believe married people can want to have sex with each other? Does the sex then become “holy,” or can sex happen between married people that isn’t at the level of “holiness” but still isn’t “objectifying”?
Marriage to me is Spiritual. I like a lot of Buddhist principles. In much eastern mysticism sex is holy sexual energy between 2 people is real deep. The Karma Sutra and Tantric are practiced in the East. Sex and marriage are spiritual. I have been to India and their divorce rate is much less than here. Sex is spiritual. Sex is an energy. That is why if man preserves his semen and is celibate, he becomes actually more of a man and stronger
Marriage is where a couple have conversations while one is on the toilet. Not all that spiritual 🙂
So you don’t believe that it’s possible to have a lot of partners and still be happy? Feyline, Holly, and Ozy seem happy. Is it possible that their life works for them, while your life works for you?
…does anyone want to explain to the Spiritual Explorer that Buddhism and Hinduism are different things?
Me, I’m just curious what “more of a man” means. Are there men walking around who are only like 75% man (25% silicon dioxide and other fillers) because they jizzed too much?
If “thought with his cock all the time” means that he views me (and possibly all women) as simply a life support system for a fleshlight, then no.
Voip said “Feyline seems to be fine with it: she said that the friend she sleeps with is ‘wonderful,” even. What if it makes her and her friend happy? How would that make you feel? Would it surprise you?
I still think it is very very very very difficult to seperate emotion in sex. Voip, if a man and a woman are fucking and reaching orgasm that is one thing
but if there is kissing and eye contact and kissing and eye contact and verbal “I love you’s” to each other -someone is going to fall in love. This is why I think a man and woman cannot be friend ,one person will fall in love and one may just want to be friends Is my answer good voip?
I think the very idea that lust is a dangerous and shameful emotion, that it somehow makes you less than human, is an integral part of our society’s toxic views on masculinity.
There is such a thing that we refer to as Tantric Buddhism (it’s not the devotees’ name for it), it’s not outside the realm of possibility that he heard about it at some point.
…maybe?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vajrayana
Is there a female version of hanging on to your semen?
If you have a vasectomy, so the sperm never leaves the testes, does that count?
“I am very much a Tony Porter follower and absolutely am on a mission until I leave this Planet that TOXIC MASCULINITY IS HARMFUL TO MEN AND WOMAN”
I hope we’re not at the same time declaring masculinity harmful. I am by my own admission comfortably masculine by choice, in the manner that I define as masculine.
“Marriage to me is Spiritual. I like a lot of Buddhist principles. In much eastern mysticism sex is holy sexual energy between 2 people is real deep. The Karma Sutra and Tantric are practiced in the East. Sex and marriage are spiritual. I have been to India and their divorce rate is much less than here. Sex is spiritual. Sex is an energy.”
Well, then you might eventually find someone who feels that way. Having your own beliefs is fine. At the same time, if the rest of the world isn’t the same way then just live with it. Seek out smaller circles, within which you’ll increase your chance of finding a similar human being.
“That is why if man preserves his semen and is celibate, he becomes actually more of a man and stronger”
Uh no. I can bench-press most of the people in Montreal and I tend to jack off pretty frequently. That’s BS.
@Katz: Thank you! *blushes*
Samuel, no, you don;t make any damn sense. Why on earth would there be “I love yous” during casual sex? If there are, you’re doin’ it wrong.
So now men and women can’t be friends? What planet are you on? Doesn’t look like Earth.
And semen makes you stronger. Huh. Do you also believe in eating the hearts of your enemies?
voip cool link ty
“but if there is kissing and eye contact and kissing and eye contact and verbal “I love you’s” to each other -someone is going to fall in love. This is why I think a man and woman cannot be friend ,one person will fall in love and one may just want to be friends Is my answer good voip?”
What if you’re friends with a woman and don’t say “i love you” or kiss them? I mean, i may be wrong here, but I don’t think that happens very often in platonic friendships.