The other day we took a look at a Redditor who calls himself AntiFeministMedia. He does not seem to like the ladies very much. Indeed, in some of the posts of his I quoted, he went so far as to say that women are animals, not humans, and suggested that men should pretty much have the final say in anything involving reproduction (as clearly the women have been doing a terrible job of it).
So one might wonder: why have ladies at all? This is a thought that has crossed the mind of AntiFeministMedia more than a few times. And he’s got some ideas about how it could be done.
As he points out in this comment, men have known all along that ladies is trouble. But now, thanks to superior male brains, we finally have the technology to do something about it. Today, fleshlights! Tomorrow, the womb!
Men have known women are the problem right throughout history, and to deny it just goes to show how ignorant and stupid you are.
Religion’s, culture’s, all have there warnings about women.
And all these things will be known again. The dots will be joined, and its my hope that after this current fuck up of allowing feminism to take root, men will never allow it again.
I actually think its time men went foreward alone. We have the hi-technology now to clone little boys into the future, soon we will have female androids with artificial wombs. Identical to women in almost every way, except for the animal nature…
Women should be replaced by better technology.
Consider the many fine benefits of this plan:
If men didnt have to live in this human-female environment, but instead was guaranteed in having his sexual needs met, and his genes live on into the future, there would be a lot less conflict of all kinds.
This two-party system of male and female has served its purpose (in the most brutal way), we are rapidly approaching a time where things could be radically different.
Tell me more about this brave new world of which you speak, in which men can live their lives free of bitches:
Cloning science and female androids may just solve that woman problem for us.
I wouldnt advocate killing women, certainly not, but a gradual fade-out, allow women to live out their natural lives, while we transition to the new technology.
No need for anything as unpleasant as killing, no. Just the elimination of one gender by the other through a little “fade-out,” like they have in the movies. Nothing objectionable about this, not at all.
If you’ve followed any of these links back to the original comments, you’ll see that AntiFeministMedia, like most truly original thinkers, has gotten some resistance to his ideas — even from the normally forward-looking thinkers of the Men’s Rights subreddit. And a few downvotes!
But some of his comments are so clearly and obviously correct, so pithy and wise, that they get upvotes. Like this one, suggesting that female demand for iPads and mobile phones is one of the central driving forces behind war:
Well its nice to hear her comment that western women themselves have been complicit in foreign wars and the rape of native women by soldiers, so that companies can obtain gold and other precious metals for Ipads and moble phones which women seem to like so much.
Oh you evil women with your iPads and mobile phones! We men are of course immune to the devilish allure of computer technology. Indeed, I’m typing this blog post on an old Smith-Corona Galaxie Portable Typewriter.
It was Karen! She was epically awesome as our keynote 🙂
Yay! I knew it xD
She wrote an essay that’s in a book, and I was a major part of her essay xD
Awww now I need to give Karen a huge hug (again) 😀
And yus, she is v epically awesome 😀
Oooh, I need to look that up! Both you and Karen are, like, made of win. Together you both would be more win than my tiny mortal mind can handle 😉
@eilish
“Newsflash, NOWslave: we are all “pretending” to be boys and girls. Sex is determined by biology, but gender performance is something we are taught to do. You too could be a woman tomorrow. Go on and try it. After one day you’d be curled up in a foetal position unable to leave the house.
Ami could have chosen to stealth, and avoid the shit I’m sure she experiences all the frigging time, but she didn’t. I know it’s too hard for you to respect another person’s integrity, so just STFU on the subject.”
Sex, gender and performance are all determined at birth. A woman can’t be a man and a man can’t be a woman. They not only look different, they think and act differently because they are different. The only gender constructs of the modern world are LGBTQ.
Is it some kind of wierd paralysis of feminist ideology where they look at reality and do the opposite. I mean when feminists decided to destroy the family did they look around at society and at history and say to themselves, “man, that really works well for a thriving stable society. Lets do the opposite.”
Sex, gender and performance are all determined at birth. A woman can’t be a man and a man can’t be a woman. They not only look different, they think and act differently because they are different.
Okay, so before we get to me :3 Let’s have you answer a simple question I asked you last time this came up, and you ran away from the thread right after xD
Tell me about my cat. She’s female.
Is she a loud cat? Or a quiet cat? Is she very active, and jumpy, or is she more laid back, and stalkery? Does she hide a lot, or is she out in the open most of the time? Does she like to be around people or not? What’s her favourite game to play? Is she a cat that will eat all her food in one go? Or one where I can just fill the bowl up and let her nibble throughout the day? There’s one vegetable she seems to really love… what is it? Does she like sleeping with me at night, or does she sleep alone? Is she friendly with other cats, or aggressive, or aloof?
You have all the information you need. She’s female. :3
So Ami, next time you’re having tea with Julia Gillard ….
NWO:
When we make a well reasoned claim to you acting some way, you can’t argue your way out of it by saying “Well, just saying that doesn’t make it true!”
And saying you have a rational hatred of LGBTQ peeps does not make it so, unless you’ve actually presented a rational argument for your hatred. So. what are your ‘rational’ reasons?
(Note: keep in mind that learning that LGBTQ people exist =/= brainwashing you into becoming part of LGBTQ. So no posting videos of children being taught that gay people exist, it has bugger-all to do with any sort of claim of indoctrination.)
Does it ever occur to NWO that he was indoctrinated at school, too? And probably taught different things to what his parents were taught?
“No, I have a very rational revulsion towards LGBTQ actions.”
Your big argument was the birds and the bees. This is laughable at best, seeing as it isn’t actually an argument against homosexual sex, it’s an explanation of how heterosexual sex works. You said “BIOLOGY!”, but, well, that’s only substantiated by things ‘fitting’, unless you think everyone has to have kids. And I already pointed out that ecology is a constraining factor there at this point.
“No, I have a very rational revulsion towards LGBTQ actions. Just because feminists try to make me out as the bad guy means nothing. Feminists saying I’m right and your wrong because I say so is your only arguement. ”
I pointed out that your fears were irrational because look at the rest of the similar situations. Are couples fucking in front of the camera a common thing in children’s media, yes or no?
“Just because you’ve been so thoroughly indoctrinated where you can’t think for yourself doesn’t mean I can’t. To be honest I don’t even know what heterosexist means and I really don’t want to. It’ll be some theoretical feminist nonsense that’s the exact opposite of reality.”
Seriously? It’s just a word that better describes actions that discriminate against homosexuals, because you asshats keep claiming you’re not scared (Of course, they rarely launch into a fear-based screed in the same page), so in homophobia isn’t always apt. I mean, it is for you, but you’re not actually that common in this.
Anyway, weighing my options, I’m going back to DFO. Enjoy your paranoia and stupidity.
NWOslave: If your dislike of homosexuals is rational, perhaps you’ll be able to explain, in rational terms, why you dislike them.
What exactly are two 30 year old women who have sex together doing to harm you, me, or anybody else?
@Ami Angelwings
“Then you’d have no trouble explaining it to us? :3 What are the “rational” reasons you hate queer and trans ppl?”
First off I said I hate their actions not them. Nice try though.
Well, I love my dad more than an other man I know, yet I’ve never once wanted to mount him. Knowing feminists they’ll probably say if it’s enthusiastically consensual it’s okily dokily. Makes me shudder but thats feminist ideology for ya. Feminists of course can seperate love and sex when it’s convenient to prop up their destructive ideology, but for the LBGTQ it works for them.
Transpeople are nothing but totally artificial constructs. Talk about living in a fantasy world. Normally I consider psycology to be total quakery, but in this case, it couldn’t hurt.
The truely funny part is all you armchair psycologists would probably recommend I see a professional shrink. Big Daddy might soon make that mandatory, that’ll make all the feminists happy.
NWO, your ability to twist words around is unsurpassed. Where on earth do you get the idea that feminists condone incest?
@NWOSlave:
………
“Transpeople are nothing but totally artificial constructs. Talk about living in a fantasy world. Normally I consider psycology to be total quakery, but in this case, it couldn’t hurt.”
So, you dismiss most of pyschology, but when it agrees with your pre-convictions then its just peachy. That alone is enough evidence to say that you don’t know or care what is actually true. You’re like a man living in a dark cave for most of his life, theorizing about what the outside world is like. When you finally do go outside and see the world as it is, you tell reality to go screw itself.
The truly funny part is that you keep telling us we think we are perfect beings, never wrong and never doubtable. But you, in thinking what is happening in your own mind is more accurate than what actually happens in the real world? It’s the height of narcissism and delusional thoughts of self-perfection. Carry on ranting about gay people, NWO, it’ll be fun watching you struggle. XD
Yeah, I’m against a father having sex with his son. There’s an inherent power imbalance that would make the relationship non-consentual by its very nature.
Why would you even go there? What the frell does that have to do with anything?
@hellkell
“NWO, your ability to twist words around is unsurpassed. Where on earth do you get the idea that feminists condone incest?”
Anyone wanna place wagers as to wether or not feminists will embrace incest as long as it’s consensual in the next few years?
xD
Okay NWO, what about me being trans do you hate, since you dont’ hate trans ppl, just my actions :3 So what actions? 😀 (by your logic you can’t call nebody here a man hater again btw xD )
Well, I love my dad more than an other man I know, yet I’ve never once wanted to mount him. Knowing feminists they’ll probably say if it’s enthusiastically consensual it’s okily dokily. Makes me shudder but thats feminist ideology for ya. Feminists of course can seperate love and sex when it’s convenient to prop up their destructive ideology, but for the LBGTQ it works for them.
Transpeople are nothing but totally artificial constructs. Talk about living in a fantasy world. Normally I consider psycology to be total quakery, but in this case, it couldn’t hurt.
The truely funny part is all you armchair psycologists would probably recommend I see a professional shrink. Big Daddy might soon make that mandatory, that’ll make all the feminists happy.
I presume you love your mom too, and you’ve never wanted to have sex w/ her. But you’ve wanted to have sex w/ other women right? xD
As for transppl, before we get to us, plz answer the question about my cat 😀
THEN we’ll get to us 😀 We can have our 3rd 1 on 1 match :3
You do realize, NWO sir, that the modern nuclear family is less than two hundred years old and is a product of the needs of the Industrial Revolution? Throughout most of human history people lived in extended families (which some people, most of whom have feminist tendencies, have been more-or-less trying to simulate through extended families of choice).
Father-son incest can’t be consensual. It just can’t.
No, you jackass, see Spearhafoc’s comment about the inherent power imbalance inherent in that relationship. Which, and I’ll speak slowly, means that consent can never be truly freely given.
I think he’s suggesting that we don’t need no education.
…OK, I feel dirty mentioning that song in association with him, but we need something as a palate cleanser to all the hate and craziness.
I misspelled “consensual” in an earlier post. Sorry about that, everyone. There’s no spellcheck on this ancient laptop I’m using.
Expect many other such errors over the weekend. Having spellcheck all those years has left me a bit complacent.
Waiting for NWO to answer the question about my cat…. should be easy… after all, he’s the great gender essentialist… should be no problem figuring out the personality of an animal. We’re not even talking a human here xD
@ozymandias42
“You do realize, NWO sir, that the modern nuclear family is less than two hundred years old and is a product of the needs of the Industrial Revolution? Throughout most of human history people lived in extended families”
200 years old, thats it? Is this some feminist joke? Rewrite the history books boys. Ozzy says the family of man/woman/children is a paultry 200 years old and feminists have yet to be wrong.
On thats note, good day.
Surprise surprise xD
He ran AGAIN XD