The other day we took a look at a Redditor who calls himself AntiFeministMedia. He does not seem to like the ladies very much. Indeed, in some of the posts of his I quoted, he went so far as to say that women are animals, not humans, and suggested that men should pretty much have the final say in anything involving reproduction (as clearly the women have been doing a terrible job of it).
So one might wonder: why have ladies at all? This is a thought that has crossed the mind of AntiFeministMedia more than a few times. And he’s got some ideas about how it could be done.
As he points out in this comment, men have known all along that ladies is trouble. But now, thanks to superior male brains, we finally have the technology to do something about it. Today, fleshlights! Tomorrow, the womb!
Men have known women are the problem right throughout history, and to deny it just goes to show how ignorant and stupid you are.
Religion’s, culture’s, all have there warnings about women.
And all these things will be known again. The dots will be joined, and its my hope that after this current fuck up of allowing feminism to take root, men will never allow it again.
I actually think its time men went foreward alone. We have the hi-technology now to clone little boys into the future, soon we will have female androids with artificial wombs. Identical to women in almost every way, except for the animal nature…
Women should be replaced by better technology.
Consider the many fine benefits of this plan:
If men didnt have to live in this human-female environment, but instead was guaranteed in having his sexual needs met, and his genes live on into the future, there would be a lot less conflict of all kinds.
This two-party system of male and female has served its purpose (in the most brutal way), we are rapidly approaching a time where things could be radically different.
Tell me more about this brave new world of which you speak, in which men can live their lives free of bitches:
Cloning science and female androids may just solve that woman problem for us.
I wouldnt advocate killing women, certainly not, but a gradual fade-out, allow women to live out their natural lives, while we transition to the new technology.
No need for anything as unpleasant as killing, no. Just the elimination of one gender by the other through a little “fade-out,” like they have in the movies. Nothing objectionable about this, not at all.
If you’ve followed any of these links back to the original comments, you’ll see that AntiFeministMedia, like most truly original thinkers, has gotten some resistance to his ideas — even from the normally forward-looking thinkers of the Men’s Rights subreddit. And a few downvotes!
But some of his comments are so clearly and obviously correct, so pithy and wise, that they get upvotes. Like this one, suggesting that female demand for iPads and mobile phones is one of the central driving forces behind war:
Well its nice to hear her comment that western women themselves have been complicit in foreign wars and the rape of native women by soldiers, so that companies can obtain gold and other precious metals for Ipads and moble phones which women seem to like so much.
Oh you evil women with your iPads and mobile phones! We men are of course immune to the devilish allure of computer technology. Indeed, I’m typing this blog post on an old Smith-Corona Galaxie Portable Typewriter.
@ozymandias42
“If you look at a gay couple holding hands and immediately think of anal sex, the perversion is not in them, but in you.”
That’s so deep Ozzy, I’m convinced. Why dontcha try pawning that indoctrination off on three year olds. Oh wait, you do.
Hey NWO unscreamed and came back! 😀
Nobody is making you have to participate in nething you find disgusting NWO, or even think about it :3
Do we have to go back to the birds and the bees and mommies and daddys, or are feminists still in denial of biology?
Plz, go into it? 😀
Let’s have sex ed, NWO style! 😀
*sits attentively*
Explain NWO :3 After that we’ll have a Q&A session for Prof slave :3
Samuel, what we’re talking about is your bizarre stream-of-thought, non-paragraphed, weirdly punctuated, occasionally nonsensical posts. They do not read like someone who has ever been taught basic English writing. Your hostility towards “big words” does not help your presenting yourself as some sort of scholar. You’ve been very hostile about the fact that no one has expressed interest in blogging with you (about what? you cannot say) or even wanting to spend any time not in the comments with you, but you’ve not given any reason for anyone to want to. You claim that you’ve been threatened and abused, however, when asked for examples, you cannot (or will not) answer. You parrot things like Cosmo and claim this is feminist thinking. You don’t listen when other people talk and then praise our resident crankpot as a logical thinker. Put up or shut up, but we’re not here to do the work for you.
Why dontcha try pawning that indoctrination off on three year olds. Oh wait, you do.
She does? :O What indoctrination has she done on three year olds? o: What do you believe she is teaching/forcing them to do? 😀
I’m not afraid of homosexuals I find what they do revolting so the word homophobe carries no meaning.
Actually that just means that “homophobe” means “you.”
This is the very last time on this thread .Here is that link I think someone requested http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11493157
That’s so deep Ozzy, I’m convinced.
He didn’t deny it.
“I’m not afraid of homosexuals I find what they do revolting so the word homophobe carries no meaning.”
So you have an irrational hatred for homosexuals? Homophobe is apt, but I can call you a heterosexist too. But no, you *ARE* irrationally afraid of homosexuals. “OMG IF BERT AND ERNIE ARE GAY THEY WILL ENGAGE IN GAY SEX IN FRONT OF THE CHILDREN” is irrational, fear, and inaccurate. There is no evidence of this. I specifically asked why you thought Bert and Ernie would, but not Hercules or Megara, or any other couple in children’s media in the USA. And you didn’t substantiate that.
“Do we have to go back to the birds and the bees and mommies and daddys, or are feminists still in denial of biology?”
You wanna play the biology card? You realize htat homosexuality is amazingly common in the animal kingdom, yes?
@Ami Angelwings
“Nobody is making you have to participate in nething you find disgusting NWO, or even think about it”
The Government does. Mandatory classes for pre-adolescents. I’d say my tax dollars are being used for indoctrination. Kinda sticks in my craw.
NWO, you do know that Bert & Ernie aren’t being married on Sesame Street right? xD That was just some fans wanting them to be xD
Even if they were.. so what? Do you scream “dangling sex!” in front of kids b/c Superman and Lois are married? Or that Disney movies have male and female chars marrying and kissing? o: Did Snow White dangle sex in front of children? xD
You do know that your “heterosexual agenda” is EVERYWHERE alrdy right? xD But if not, then fine
Tell me what the heterosexual version of the “gay agenda” would look like? :3 What would be the offensive indoctrinating heterosexual parallel to 2 male muppets being married? 😀
The Government does. Mandatory classes for pre-adolescents. I’d say my tax dollars are being used for indoctrination. Kinda sticks in my craw.
Oh? You were indoctrinated into homosexuality and homosexual acts as a kid? o_O
Ami this is a great link on the old thread of the alleged “man shortage” of available men for women to date. Look what happens to one country. Interesting stuff- whats your feedback?anyone?I hate to rethread(sic) but you wanted proof.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11493157
Samuel | August 13, 2011 at 8:17 pm
This is the very last time on this thread
Okay, who’s betting what? 😀
I’ll bet he’ll be back.
Samuel, that’s Latvia. We don’t live there. Its social structure and pressures are vastly different, and far, far less influenced by feminism.
You’re just giving us examples of other things that happen under other circumstances.
It would have been better if he used Latveria as an example xD
(Off topic) Hi Ami! I was at a conference about women superhero types this last few days – and the keynote speaker mentioned your blog as an awesome space for discussing all the stuff we were talking about. I’m already aware that you rule and run feminism, but didn’t know you were making inroads into the Australian academic scene. Thought you might like to keep track of your takeover 😉
Samuel, you could always mover over here. Anybody asks anybody out, if they think they’ve got a chance. There is no ‘dating culture’, like what you describe.
@Rutee
“So you have an irrational hatred for homosexuals? Homophobe is apt, but I can call you a heterosexist too. But no, you *ARE* irrationally afraid of homosexuals.”
No, I have a very rational revulsion towards LGBTQ actions. Just because feminists try to make me out as the bad guy means nothing. Feminists saying I’m right and your wrong because I say so is your only arguement.
Just because you’ve been so thoroughly indoctrinated where you can’t think for yourself doesn’t mean I can’t. To be honest I don’t even know what heterosexist means and I really don’t want to. It’ll be some theoretical feminist nonsense that’s the exact opposite of reality.
Ami rules the whole world! xD
Why do transphobes (transogynists? ) always think that they’ve discovered fire when they’re like “well WHAT IF I IDENTIFIED AS A HOBBIT!?” or “well what if I said I was Napoleon!” xD
You can do w/e you want NWO. xD
Wanna ID as a Hobbit, go ahead. 😀
Lyn | August 13, 2011 at 8:25 pm
(Off topic) Hi Ami! I was at a conference about women superhero types this last few days – and the keynote speaker mentioned your blog as an awesome space for discussing all the stuff we were talking about. I’m already aware that you rule and run feminism, but didn’t know you were making inroads into the Australian academic scene. Thought you might like to keep track of your takeover
Rly? O:
wow…. 😀
The speaker’s name wasn’t “Karen Healey” by any chance was it? o:
No, I have a very rational revulsion towards LGBTQ actions.
Then you’d have no trouble explaining it to us? :3 What are the “rational” reasons you hate queer and trans ppl? :]
And what would you like ppl to do about it? :3
@Magpie I DO! 😀 MUHAHAHAHA Or at least Australia…