The other day we took a look at a Redditor who calls himself AntiFeministMedia. He does not seem to like the ladies very much. Indeed, in some of the posts of his I quoted, he went so far as to say that women are animals, not humans, and suggested that men should pretty much have the final say in anything involving reproduction (as clearly the women have been doing a terrible job of it).
So one might wonder: why have ladies at all? This is a thought that has crossed the mind of AntiFeministMedia more than a few times. And he’s got some ideas about how it could be done.
As he points out in this comment, men have known all along that ladies is trouble. But now, thanks to superior male brains, we finally have the technology to do something about it. Today, fleshlights! Tomorrow, the womb!
Men have known women are the problem right throughout history, and to deny it just goes to show how ignorant and stupid you are.
Religion’s, culture’s, all have there warnings about women.
And all these things will be known again. The dots will be joined, and its my hope that after this current fuck up of allowing feminism to take root, men will never allow it again.
I actually think its time men went foreward alone. We have the hi-technology now to clone little boys into the future, soon we will have female androids with artificial wombs. Identical to women in almost every way, except for the animal nature…
Women should be replaced by better technology.
Consider the many fine benefits of this plan:
If men didnt have to live in this human-female environment, but instead was guaranteed in having his sexual needs met, and his genes live on into the future, there would be a lot less conflict of all kinds.
This two-party system of male and female has served its purpose (in the most brutal way), we are rapidly approaching a time where things could be radically different.
Tell me more about this brave new world of which you speak, in which men can live their lives free of bitches:
Cloning science and female androids may just solve that woman problem for us.
I wouldnt advocate killing women, certainly not, but a gradual fade-out, allow women to live out their natural lives, while we transition to the new technology.
No need for anything as unpleasant as killing, no. Just the elimination of one gender by the other through a little “fade-out,” like they have in the movies. Nothing objectionable about this, not at all.
If you’ve followed any of these links back to the original comments, you’ll see that AntiFeministMedia, like most truly original thinkers, has gotten some resistance to his ideas — even from the normally forward-looking thinkers of the Men’s Rights subreddit. And a few downvotes!
But some of his comments are so clearly and obviously correct, so pithy and wise, that they get upvotes. Like this one, suggesting that female demand for iPads and mobile phones is one of the central driving forces behind war:
Well its nice to hear her comment that western women themselves have been complicit in foreign wars and the rape of native women by soldiers, so that companies can obtain gold and other precious metals for Ipads and moble phones which women seem to like so much.
Oh you evil women with your iPads and mobile phones! We men are of course immune to the devilish allure of computer technology. Indeed, I’m typing this blog post on an old Smith-Corona Galaxie Portable Typewriter.
Also, it may be pointed out, that mocking a person who happens to be celibate or gay is not the same as mocking them for or with being celibate or gay. There is quite a large difference there.
N4ever said “Since when is a skewed gender ratio on campuses a “man shortage”? I went to a school with a 60/40 female-male split, and I didn’t have any trouble dating guys… I rather enjoyed myself, in fact.
But as long as we’re linking to Op-Ed and Lifestyle pieces in newsmags…Here’s one with some data: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2046035,00.html
It seems that men want to get married as much, if not more, than women do. And their incentives are greater for doing so.
You also said N4ever that marriage is a patriarchal institution and you as a woman would never get married
This statement you made is why some mgtow guys call for gender separatism as the only solution to the gender war. It is crazy in a way but these guts envision a separate region for both men and women and since marriage is a patriarchal institution like you said you implied men do not need women and women do not need men. Your statement implies that even some feminists believe in some sort of separate countries for men and women.
My future wife asked me out for our first date…and paid for dinner and a movie.
Feminism, FTW!
@Katz
“You may feel mocked, but I feel that your error-riddled posts show a slapdash attitude. If you were serious about this conversation–and if you wanted to be taken seriously–you would put the effort into presenting yourself like a smart, educated person: by writing correctly.”
Grammar is paramount to a feminist, it’s proof positive of how smart and educated in higher acedemia they are.
—————————-
@hellkell
“You feel mocked by that? Oh, honey, people here have been extremely patient and good-natured with you.”
You can tell a feminists good-natured patience by the condecending, “Oh, honey.”
—————————-
@Feyline
“Check out the sidebar over there to the right. There’s a link to the Manboobz Forum where you can create topics about whatever you want to discuss.”
And if it contains mocking men while retaining the sanctitiy of women never being wrong it’s a winner.
—————————-
@katz
“Actually, I probably wouldn’t date a guy who was constantly talking about prostate cancer. Not much of a turn-on.”
But a woman yammering incesantly about all women being eternally oppressed and if you don’t agree you’re a misogynist is a major league turn on. Helloooo kitty!
—————————
@ozymandias42
“Also, Ami is a WOMAN, you douchenozzle.”
And I’m a hobbit that lives on middle-earth cause I feel like a hobbit.
Why are all the idiot trolls raging transphobes? Oh right, because the Men’s Right’s movements is a hate movement, not a civil rights movement, so the trolls don’t actually give a shit about anyone but straight white able-bodied cis men.
@NWOSlave: “You’re a boy pretending to be a girl. No amount of hormone shots or gender-bending will change that.
I guess there wasn’t a big need for a transperson movement a 100 years ago due to the fact science wasn’t able to artificially reconstruct people. Yet feminist ideology tells me gender is a construct. Laughable. Go write another self-help blog for us throwbacks on Ozzys wonderful what about teh menz blog.”
One would think that a strong, smart manly man like yourself would be too strong or too intelligtent to even be bothered by the existence of anyone that’s different than them.
Also, I can’t wait to see you answer your own paradox about male brains, since you state that Ami is “pretending to be a girl”.
BTW, pretending is about acting with knowledge that you’re not REALLY what you’re emulating. Actors and Politicians often take that to several levels. 😉
However, Ami isn’t “pretending” to be a girl anymore than I’m “pretending” to be Black simply because I don’t meet some stereotypical expectations about people with said biological traits, or because I piss off some internet race/sex police. Ami is what she is because she has decided on what her identity is (sorry if that sounds redundant). She made her own decision, choosing what is front of her and moving towards it, and best of all, SHE ISN’T HURTING ANYONE WHILE DOING IT. The day that one finds out that trans folk cause earthquakes every time they break an arbitrary line set by society, MAYBE I’ll start reconsidering my position…
Eh, what am I kidding, Ami starts Earthquakes everywhere…at least on the net, and I see that she has caused another one, judging by your screed. Oh Ami, why do you have to be so dangerous! 😉
You don’t have the temperament of a Hobbit. You seem like you would fit well in Orc society, though.
Aw, what’s the matter, NWO? Jealous because no one’s calling you “honey?”
Talk some more about pedicures and silky drawers, and I’ll think about it.
I interrupt your fun with Samuel and NOWslave to reply to Ozy: yers, it is. Apparently, they have to admit they are MRAs as well. One thing is sure: if we can’t find anyone who meets the Challenge criteria, the fault will be ours.
Awww, ballgame left without saying hello. I’m beginning to think he chickened out. Imagine that! ballgame weaselling out! Not even so much as a “I’m sorry, I don’t know who you are, you insignificant person” or a slur on my character! I am very disappointed.
He’s back at FC accepting the congratulations of the boyz and Schala at his magnificent work demolishing all our arguments. He doesn’t need reality to correlate with his perceptions. As we have noted, it’s a gift MRAs have. Even the ones who say they aren’t.
Samuel is NOWslave’s sock puppet, right? Or have all my deepest fears about what constitutes MRA scholarship just been confirmed?
NWO, if you want to be a hobbit I don’t care. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my bone. Go live in a hole and eat second breakfast, it’s really none of my business.
“Samuel is NOWslave’s sock puppet, right?”
No, he’s a real person, all right. One would have to be demented to even THINK of emulating pronunciation/grammar errors, not to mention that Samuel’s “Hey I’m celibate but I want some pussy but I don’t know how to do it HELP” act would probably be criticized as “mangina” behavior by some MRAs.
In short: you get to define your own identity, and whatever you say it is, as long as you are not causing harm to anyone else, is what it is.
Also: my umm, you know, husband cooked dinner for me on our first date.
Feminism. It’s so confusering.
Go live in a hole and eat second breakfast, it’s really none of my business.
I did a spit-take when I read this.
@redlocker
“One would think that a strong, smart manly man like yourself would be too strong or too intelligtent to even be bothered by the existence of anyone that’s different than them.”
It’s because I’m a big strong man that I say those things with conviction. I do not have to accept anything feminists tell me is acceptable. I think for myself, not like feminist sheep who follow.
—————————-
“BTW, pretending is about acting with knowledge that you’re not REALLY what you’re emulating. Actors and Politicians often take that to several levels.”
And pretending feminism has anything to do with equality befor the law.
—————————-
Perhaps the vilest aspect of feminism, which virtually all women are to a certain degree due to constant indoctrination, is the indoctrination itself. Here is a classic example.
http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2011/08/10/Petition_Seeks_to_Out_Bert_and_Ernie/
Feminists leading the way to Bert and Ernie getting married of sesame street. Leave the fucking children alone. What the fuck is with feminists and their LGBTQ cohorts that they have to dangle social issues in front of pre-schoolers? I mean WTF! Feminists scream to high heaven if a man looks at a a girl under 18 whose prancing about clad in a postage stamp all the while wanting Bert and Ernie to do a humpty dance for 3 year olds.
Sesame Street; ABCs/123s, that’s it. No social conditioning at all. No acceptance or rejecting of anything. Leave the fucking pre-schoolers alone!
Spearhafoc wrotence again, Samuel, is English a second language for you? Your writing is very forced and awkward. You don’t seem to have the cadence of a native speaker
Again someone here is mocking me..
I’m actually a native speaker. I am actually pretty erudite once you get to know me. I actually can debate on this site with Feminists. You actually have to have some type of faculties to be able to stay here.
I realize now Feminism can be philosophical as well as sociological and political. I mean people use some “big words here” like “intersectional”, “kyriarchy” and “heteronormative”
I do not know much about Feminist Theory, those words are words that some previous commentator wrote. It sparked my interest because I am a logophile
Really? Because feminists are not the first to say Bert and Ernie were gay, by a long shot.
“Feminists scream to high heaven if a man looks at a a girl under 18 whose prancing about clad in a postage stamp all the while wanting Bert and Ernie to do a humpty dance for 3 year olds. ”
What the fuck is wrong with you? This is America, and those feminists are still Meriken; it’s fairly unlikely they want Bert and Ernie to engage in sex on camera. What the fuck is with this shit, I never hear you homophobes bitch about how the fact that oh let’s pick an easy one, Mulan and the Captain dude are in love OBVIOUSLY means that disney will now show them fucking on screen. Or Hercules or Megara. Or really any other heterosexual relationship.
I hadn’t heard about that. That’s so cool!
I am actually pretty erudite once you get to know me.
If people have to know you before you stop seeming incoherent, you’re not erudite.
Ok, a point by point of NWOSlave:
“It’s because I’m a big strong man that I say those things with conviction. I do not have to accept anything feminists tell me is acceptable. I think for myself, not like feminist sheep who follow.”
Says the guy who links to conspiracy theorist websites, never questioning said sources or even thinking about whether their methods for their info are correct.
“Feminists leading the way to Bert and Ernie getting married of sesame street. Leave the fucking children alone. What the fuck is with feminists and their LGBTQ cohorts that they have to dangle social issues in front of pre-schoolers? I mean WTF! Feminists scream to high heaven if a man looks at a a girl under 18 whose prancing about clad in a postage stamp all the while wanting Bert and Ernie to do a humpty dance for 3 year olds. ”
…
Have you even WATCHED Sesame Street before? There is no explicit violence/sex on that show, and there won’t be anytime soon. That you think gays = debachery on TV that 3 year olds will see says a lot about you.
Also, you’re upset about people “dangling social issues in front of children”. That sounds like the same rhetoric used back when the Civil Right movement was occuring and people on TV and Movies made material that addressed racism.
Didn’t take long to get back to the scantily-clad teenagers, I see.
If you look at a gay couple holding hands and immediately think of anal sex, the perversion is not in them, but in you.
@Rutee
“I never hear you homophobes bitch about how the fact that oh let’s pick an easy one, Mulan and the Captain dude are in love OBVIOUSLY means that disney will now show them fucking on screen.”
I’m not afraid of homosexuals I find what they do revolting so the word homophobe carries no meaning. Do we have to go back to the birds and the bees and mommies and daddys, or are feminists still in denial of biology?
redlocker, your point is a good one. I guess I can’t get my head around the idea that anyone would read one of NOWslave’s posts and say “Wow! Clever guy!”
NOWslave is obviously tired out after his burst of genius identifying China as feminist, and now is scraping the bottom of the barrel for worn out insults. Gee, I bet Ami hasn’t heard that one before.
Newsflash, NOWslave: we are all “pretending” to be boys and girls. Sex is determined by biology, but gender performance is something we are taught to do. You too could be a woman tomorrow. Go on and try it. After one day you’d be curled up in a foetal position unable to leave the house.
Ami could have chosen to stealth, and avoid the shit I’m sure she experiences all the frigging time, but she didn’t. I know it’s too hard for you to respect another person’s integrity, so just STFU on the subject.