The other day we took a look at a Redditor who calls himself AntiFeministMedia. He does not seem to like the ladies very much. Indeed, in some of the posts of his I quoted, he went so far as to say that women are animals, not humans, and suggested that men should pretty much have the final say in anything involving reproduction (as clearly the women have been doing a terrible job of it).
So one might wonder: why have ladies at all? This is a thought that has crossed the mind of AntiFeministMedia more than a few times. And he’s got some ideas about how it could be done.
As he points out in this comment, men have known all along that ladies is trouble. But now, thanks to superior male brains, we finally have the technology to do something about it. Today, fleshlights! Tomorrow, the womb!
Men have known women are the problem right throughout history, and to deny it just goes to show how ignorant and stupid you are.
Religion’s, culture’s, all have there warnings about women.
And all these things will be known again. The dots will be joined, and its my hope that after this current fuck up of allowing feminism to take root, men will never allow it again.
I actually think its time men went foreward alone. We have the hi-technology now to clone little boys into the future, soon we will have female androids with artificial wombs. Identical to women in almost every way, except for the animal nature…
Women should be replaced by better technology.
Consider the many fine benefits of this plan:
If men didnt have to live in this human-female environment, but instead was guaranteed in having his sexual needs met, and his genes live on into the future, there would be a lot less conflict of all kinds.
This two-party system of male and female has served its purpose (in the most brutal way), we are rapidly approaching a time where things could be radically different.
Tell me more about this brave new world of which you speak, in which men can live their lives free of bitches:
Cloning science and female androids may just solve that woman problem for us.
I wouldnt advocate killing women, certainly not, but a gradual fade-out, allow women to live out their natural lives, while we transition to the new technology.
No need for anything as unpleasant as killing, no. Just the elimination of one gender by the other through a little “fade-out,” like they have in the movies. Nothing objectionable about this, not at all.
If you’ve followed any of these links back to the original comments, you’ll see that AntiFeministMedia, like most truly original thinkers, has gotten some resistance to his ideas — even from the normally forward-looking thinkers of the Men’s Rights subreddit. And a few downvotes!
But some of his comments are so clearly and obviously correct, so pithy and wise, that they get upvotes. Like this one, suggesting that female demand for iPads and mobile phones is one of the central driving forces behind war:
Well its nice to hear her comment that western women themselves have been complicit in foreign wars and the rape of native women by soldiers, so that companies can obtain gold and other precious metals for Ipads and moble phones which women seem to like so much.
Oh you evil women with your iPads and mobile phones! We men are of course immune to the devilish allure of computer technology. Indeed, I’m typing this blog post on an old Smith-Corona Galaxie Portable Typewriter.
@NWO YUS! NWO has finally said it! 😀
So NWO, you believe I have a larger male brain correct? 😀
(let us begin! :3 )
Also what do you have against my Safe Space Project? :3
@katz-
Yeah, if scientific research shows you’re wrong, that just goes to show how much feminism has weaseled its way into scientific research.
you say is sarcastically but i’m pretty sure owlslave has literally argued this before.
Woah there, Mr Slave. Ami isn’t pretending to be anything, she’s a girl. You on the other hand, are a douchebag pretending to be a human being.
And yes, Ami, we women should ask out men who are concerned about prostate cancer, not men who are attractive and interesting to us subjectively. Because we’re c-r-a-z-y women, we can’t rely on our subjective instincts to decide which men to like / ask out / etc.
Once again Samuel, who is mocking you here? I really don’t think Kristin recommending you look for an asexual partner if you yourself identify as asexual counts as mocking.
mediumdave was pretty harsh with him but he was clear about why he was doing it. also his name makes it pretty clear hes not a woman or a “female” or however samuel wants it
Also, Ami is a WOMAN, you douchenozzle. I realize you may not have much familiarity with women, being as they scream and flee at the sight of them, but you can tell based on the “she.”
I look forward to seeing how NWOSlave deals with the logic of Ami (a woman!) also having this biologically superior “male” brain. Rodeocat indeed! XD
Samuel im also a shy dude who has probably missed opportunities because of it but i have the presence of mind not to blame other people for it because id prefer not to be both shy and a pathetic whiny sadsack.
also, if you go around blaming other people for your problems no fucking wonder other people choose not to be around you.
Artificial wombs can be used to gestate embryos that have been made in vitro. But they can’t just “replace” women, because without having a lot of X chromosomes floating around in the gene pool, humans would continuously lose genetic variability and end up ‘inbred’ and riddled with genetic disease. The Y has fewer genes on it than the X, and much less variability. Men are more susceptible to sex-linked disease because they lack a second X chromosome. If you’re interested in understanding why, google “random X inactivation” and “Barr bodies”… Embryonic stem cells don’t bypass this little problem. Google “random X inactivation” and “Barr bodies”… Embryonic stem cells don’t bypass this little problem.
Ah, I understand what you were saying now. Thanks for clarifying. I’ll look up the terms you mentioned for some of my own research. Thanks again.
VoIP — It’s prostrate cancer Samuel thinks men (and feminists!) should be concerned about. He has been very consistent on that point.
Don’t laugh MizDarwin! This debilitating cancer that causes people to have to lie down a lot is no laughing matter!
Actually, I probably wouldn’t date a guy who was constantly talking about prostate cancer. Not much of a turn-on.
mandolin & ozy: Thanks for the character references.
All: There have been some questions raised that could potentially expand into some pretty involved discussions. I’m not trying to dodge those; I’m just not sure the tail end of this thread is the best venue to address them in. I’ve emailed David about some possible alternatives.
It’s prostrate cancer Samuel thinks men (and feminists!) should be concerned about. He has been very consistent on that point.
I can see his point. Once it gets bad one does tend to lie down a lot.
Ballgame: Check out the sidebar over there to the right. There’s a link to the Manboobz Forum where you can create topics about whatever you want to discuss.
Did NWO run away screaming or something? o_O
I DO have to admit I’ve never seen a feminist lobby for prostrate cancer :
Also, NWO is an asshole pretending to be an entire person.
MizDarwin, I am in the process of figuring out some different animation software. There will be more movies!
This made me laugh so hard I may have peed a little.
Sorry I spelled Prostrate cancer wrong. I am sure some feminists here have spelled words wrong pr typing errors. I feel mocked.
Snowy and other made fun of men with Prostrate cancer something about men lying dow. See I as a man am offended as an MRA especially. Prostrate cancer kills men, I’m outa here how can feminists mock a man with prostrate cancer here are recent stats
Other than skin cancer, prostate cancer is the most common cancer in American men. The latest American Cancer Society estimates for prostate cancer in the United States are for 2011:
* About 240,890 new cases of prostate cancer will be diagnosed
* About 33,720 men will die of prostate cancer
About 1 man in 6 will be diagnosed with prostate cancer during his lifetime. More than 2 million men in the United States who have been diagnosed with prostate cancer at some point are still alive today.
Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in American men, behind only lung cancer. About 1 man in 36 will die of prostate cancer.
Last Medical Review: 11/22/2010
Last Revised: 06/17/2011
I am sure some feminists here have spelled words wrong pr typing errors.
Yes, but most of us would take the time to look for spelling errors in a sentence about spelling errors.
You may feel mocked, but I feel that your error-riddled posts show a slapdash attitude. If you were serious about this conversation–and if you wanted to be taken seriously–you would put the effort into presenting yourself like a smart, educated person: by writing correctly. If you can’t take the time to do that, you shouldn’t be surprised when we treat you like an ignorant, uneducated person.
(If you’re dyslexic or similar, you get a pass.)
You feel mocked by that? Oh, honey, people here have been extremely patient and good-natured with you.
“Sorry I spelled Prostrate cancer wrong.”
Can’t speak for anyone else, but if you feel mocked, my work here is done. Your complete disregard for spelling, punctuation, and syntax are disrespectful to anyone whom you expect to engage with you.
Samuel, no one mocked prostate cancer. Prostate cancer, much like uterine or breast cancer, is a horrible and debilitating disease. One that is being worked on, and great progress made. For instance, a new drug has been developed that turns your own body’s immune system against the cancer, a first for any type of cancer and a huge breakthrough for the field as a whole. See here: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36853649/ns/health-cancer/t/fda-approves-new-drug-prostate-cancer/
What we are having a problem with is your inability to spell the word correctly, even, it seems, after it has been pointed out to you. We are not mocking you for being a man, or being celibate. We are mocking you for being incapable of seeing and fixing mistakes. Especially when they are a major spelling error of a condition you claim to be very educated on. Tell me, Samuel, how do you know so much about the condition, but don’t know how to spell it?
Once again, Samuel, is English a second language for you? Your writing is very forced and awkward. You don’t seem to have the cadence of a native speaker.