The other day we took a look at a Redditor who calls himself AntiFeministMedia. He does not seem to like the ladies very much. Indeed, in some of the posts of his I quoted, he went so far as to say that women are animals, not humans, and suggested that men should pretty much have the final say in anything involving reproduction (as clearly the women have been doing a terrible job of it).
So one might wonder: why have ladies at all? This is a thought that has crossed the mind of AntiFeministMedia more than a few times. And he’s got some ideas about how it could be done.
As he points out in this comment, men have known all along that ladies is trouble. But now, thanks to superior male brains, we finally have the technology to do something about it. Today, fleshlights! Tomorrow, the womb!
Men have known women are the problem right throughout history, and to deny it just goes to show how ignorant and stupid you are.
Religion’s, culture’s, all have there warnings about women.
And all these things will be known again. The dots will be joined, and its my hope that after this current fuck up of allowing feminism to take root, men will never allow it again.
I actually think its time men went foreward alone. We have the hi-technology now to clone little boys into the future, soon we will have female androids with artificial wombs. Identical to women in almost every way, except for the animal nature…
Women should be replaced by better technology.
Consider the many fine benefits of this plan:
If men didnt have to live in this human-female environment, but instead was guaranteed in having his sexual needs met, and his genes live on into the future, there would be a lot less conflict of all kinds.
This two-party system of male and female has served its purpose (in the most brutal way), we are rapidly approaching a time where things could be radically different.
Tell me more about this brave new world of which you speak, in which men can live their lives free of bitches:
Cloning science and female androids may just solve that woman problem for us.
I wouldnt advocate killing women, certainly not, but a gradual fade-out, allow women to live out their natural lives, while we transition to the new technology.
No need for anything as unpleasant as killing, no. Just the elimination of one gender by the other through a little “fade-out,” like they have in the movies. Nothing objectionable about this, not at all.
If you’ve followed any of these links back to the original comments, you’ll see that AntiFeministMedia, like most truly original thinkers, has gotten some resistance to his ideas — even from the normally forward-looking thinkers of the Men’s Rights subreddit. And a few downvotes!
But some of his comments are so clearly and obviously correct, so pithy and wise, that they get upvotes. Like this one, suggesting that female demand for iPads and mobile phones is one of the central driving forces behind war:
Well its nice to hear her comment that western women themselves have been complicit in foreign wars and the rape of native women by soldiers, so that companies can obtain gold and other precious metals for Ipads and moble phones which women seem to like so much.
Oh you evil women with your iPads and mobile phones! We men are of course immune to the devilish allure of computer technology. Indeed, I’m typing this blog post on an old Smith-Corona Galaxie Portable Typewriter.
The concept of Human rights really go right over these guys noggins.
Speaking of which: http://consumerist.com/2011/08/taco-bell-worker-handcuffs-self-to-coworker-he-likes-gets-arrested.html
Oh AntiFeministMedia….
Gah! Stop telling us you are superior when making the obvious mistake of there for their.
Also, someone disguise Lois McMasters Bujold’s name and give him Ethan of Athos. One key factor in this little fantasy? Raising children finally gets the recognition it deserves.
AntiFeministMedia’s last paragraph I would actually agree with if he replaced “women” with “people.” :/ Stop being a misogynist who’s actually right about something, dude, that’s not funny at all.
That picture reminds me of the chicken-wire-wrapped-in-fur “moms” they use to nurse orphan Rhesus monkeys.
Maybe that’s all the technology we need to keep MGTOW emotionally secure. It needs more padding on the lemon juicer breasts though. Ouch!
Joanna, how could we women have human rights? We’re actually animals, a totally different species than men. You see, in his world, all humans are not animals, only women. Magic is the only reason men and women can reproduce, since we are such vastly different species.
I also can’t tell if he likes new technology or not. On the one hand, he fantasizes about fembots with functional uteri. That sounds pretty advanced to me. On the other hand, Android phones are the cause of global conflict. It would be much easier to make a rebuttal to his arguments if he would stop contradicting himself.
I know there’s no approaching this rationally, but it makes me wonder just how much evil he thinks is on that second X chromosome.
I can sort of understand (in the same way I can “sort of understand” a lot of wrong things) the argument that women are socialized to be evil. But he seems to be an Evil Essentialist. How the fuck does that work?
Say that there’s an error in cloning one of these robo-sons, and it ends up with two X chromosomes. Is it now doomed to evil? Even if you raise it as a good upstanding citizen with every expectation you’d have of a male child? Still evil? Dang.
Also, he’s not accounting for the fact that unless you do commit some sort of atrocity, women are still going to have access to reproductive technology (and plain old-fashioned reproduction), and that might put a bit of a monkey wrench in your “the next generation will only be men” plan.
A typewriter? Bah! Real men use hammers, chisels and stone tablets. Or they would, if they weren’t so busy HUNTING THE MAMMOTH TO FEED US!
I don’t actually know how to embed Youtube videos, but I copied Steph’s code from above. Let’s see if this works….
I don’t think the ‘cybernetic women’ idea will work out so well for AntiFeministMedia:
Nope didn’t work. Oh well.
Actual calls for female genocide. Lovely. But these guys don’t hate women, oh no!
Gold in their semi-conductors? Is AFM living in the 50’s? Hasn’t his superior male brain absorbed the fact that semiconductors barely use copper, let alone gold?
Or does he not understand the actual meaning of the work “precious”?
Poopie. I signed up with wordpress & gravitar and still get an orange box. 🙁
Yeah, it’s not gold, it’s tantalum: http://techgenie.com/latest/iphone-4-and-the-congo-connection/
I’m pretty sure that “even feminists” (or is it FYMYNYSTS) can agree the exploitation of the African contenent by developed nations is an ongoing blemish on humanity.
The DeBiers consortium is bad enough without adding tantalum exploitation to the list.
I actually have no idea how to embed videos either; I just copy-pasted the URL into the reply and that’s how it came out. I was expecting it to be a link, but the embed works just as well.
(I also wanted to post the whole filmstrip leading up to that, but couldn’t find it on Youtube.)
Ha! That’s hilarious!
I mean, it’s misandry! This blog software embedded a video because the person posting it has a [unisex, that tends to skew] female name! That’s why it happened!
How can he expect to end global war when his fembots and artificial wombs are going to use even more conflict materials? Among all the other things that are wrongheaded about his statements.
I’ve said before and I’ll say again, I would be totally on board with an artificial womb. Fear of pregnancy is the only thing standing between me and a family. I want daughters, though, so I guess our Future MGTOW Masters probably wouldn’t let me use the womb, huh?
Nothing like the smell of genocide in the morning…
Andrea Vaughn… No, we had one explain how letting one sex die out isn’t gendercide… no blood you see.
Yeah, I want an artificial womb! 🙁 Adoption is often extremely unethical, I probably won’t be able to afford a surrogate and the idea of pregnancy terrifies me. When I am in a committed relationship and want children, an artificial womb would be right up my alley.
That’s stupid. If you had all women strangled, there wouldn’t be any blood either.
spearhafoc: It was Marc, he was trying to fool us into showing our true colors and agree to wiping out men.
He was disappointed, even angry, that we called it a horrible idea, morally wrong, and plainly repugnant.
This seemed to confuse him. It certainly seemed to be the primary catalyst for his meltdown.
What will they do when their AI robot sex slaves refuse to have sex with them, too?
Yeah… it was as if Marc intended to play devil’s advocate, and ended up playing the devil instead. 😀