The other day we took a look at a Redditor who calls himself AntiFeministMedia. He does not seem to like the ladies very much. Indeed, in some of the posts of his I quoted, he went so far as to say that women are animals, not humans, and suggested that men should pretty much have the final say in anything involving reproduction (as clearly the women have been doing a terrible job of it).
So one might wonder: why have ladies at all? This is a thought that has crossed the mind of AntiFeministMedia more than a few times. And he’s got some ideas about how it could be done.
As he points out in this comment, men have known all along that ladies is trouble. But now, thanks to superior male brains, we finally have the technology to do something about it. Today, fleshlights! Tomorrow, the womb!
Men have known women are the problem right throughout history, and to deny it just goes to show how ignorant and stupid you are.
Religion’s, culture’s, all have there warnings about women.
And all these things will be known again. The dots will be joined, and its my hope that after this current fuck up of allowing feminism to take root, men will never allow it again.
I actually think its time men went foreward alone. We have the hi-technology now to clone little boys into the future, soon we will have female androids with artificial wombs. Identical to women in almost every way, except for the animal nature…
Women should be replaced by better technology.
Consider the many fine benefits of this plan:
If men didnt have to live in this human-female environment, but instead was guaranteed in having his sexual needs met, and his genes live on into the future, there would be a lot less conflict of all kinds.
This two-party system of male and female has served its purpose (in the most brutal way), we are rapidly approaching a time where things could be radically different.
Tell me more about this brave new world of which you speak, in which men can live their lives free of bitches:
Cloning science and female androids may just solve that woman problem for us.
I wouldnt advocate killing women, certainly not, but a gradual fade-out, allow women to live out their natural lives, while we transition to the new technology.
No need for anything as unpleasant as killing, no. Just the elimination of one gender by the other through a little “fade-out,” like they have in the movies. Nothing objectionable about this, not at all.
If you’ve followed any of these links back to the original comments, you’ll see that AntiFeministMedia, like most truly original thinkers, has gotten some resistance to his ideas — even from the normally forward-looking thinkers of the Men’s Rights subreddit. And a few downvotes!
But some of his comments are so clearly and obviously correct, so pithy and wise, that they get upvotes. Like this one, suggesting that female demand for iPads and mobile phones is one of the central driving forces behind war:
Well its nice to hear her comment that western women themselves have been complicit in foreign wars and the rape of native women by soldiers, so that companies can obtain gold and other precious metals for Ipads and moble phones which women seem to like so much.
Oh you evil women with your iPads and mobile phones! We men are of course immune to the devilish allure of computer technology. Indeed, I’m typing this blog post on an old Smith-Corona Galaxie Portable Typewriter.
…
He never denied he was a KKK member.
If I get randy but don’t have sex, will I get a masculine glow in my eyes, too? Should I wear sunnies?
Samuel wrote, “I just think the woman on man boobz are not saying how they really feel in order not to offend the feminist men here”
Samuel, I’m (sometimes) afraid of *men I don’t know*. Especially if they keep insisting we’re lying by omission.
Afraid of all men, all the time? That’s a bit of a stretch, yo.
“Yes I do Fucking animalistic non celibate men putting pills in girls drinks to get them to pass out how sick!!!!!!!!!!!!!”
Well, know we know Samuel’s feelings about men who have sex.
And they say feminists hate it when men have sex.
Samuel: “I just think the woman on man boobz are not saying how they really feel in order not to offend the feminist men here”
Please see: Threads relating to Rebecca Watson.
Having casually been following this thread, Samuel, I would like to point out a couple things (some of which will be redundant with the comments of others).
1. Lots of women like sex. I would go as far as to say MOST women like sex of some kind.
2. Some women like casual sex. Some women do not.
3. Some men like casual sex. Some men do not.
4. It is possible for many–even MOST–people to want to have casual sex with someone without objectifying them.
Do you disagree on any particular point?
Also, while we’re at it–
You said that you see lots of articles about women wanting men to be more sensitive and emotional. While this may be true for some people, or even common in certain subcultures, it is not a universal feeling among women (and really probably stems from a lot of problematic social narratives, but let’s not get into that now).
“I just think the woman on man boobz are not saying how they really feel in order not to offend the feminist men here”
We have another mind reader, here.
Oh, he flounced? Huh. I’ll give him…4 hours, maximum. If he doesn’t come back, I’ll give myself a purple nurple.
…
SAMUEL, DON’T YOU CARE ABOUT THE PAIN OF A FELLOW MAN?! PLEASE COME BACK, I NEED TO HEAR MORE ABOUT WHAT YOU THINK WOMEN THINK AND THE POWERS OF STORING SEMEN IN YOUR BALLS LIKE YOU’RE A MINI FRIDGE!
The Laplacedemon asked
1. Lots of women like sex. I would go as far as to say MOST women like sex of some kind.
2. Some women like casual sex. Some women do not.
3. Some men like casual sex. Some men do not.
4. It is possible for many–even MOST–people to want to have casual sex with someone without objectifying them.
Do you disagree on any particular point?
I still think that men have a stronger sex drive than women. How many woman have raped men throughout history violently?
Men have a stronger sex drive. Men are more visual, Laplacedemon I mean I always hear men will say they love a womens nipples or pussy as objects but never heard a woman say how she loves a mans penis veins. It may sound like a weird example and I am not here to offend but It just does not happen
On a good note you said also, while we’re at it–
You said that you see lots of articles about women wanting men to be more sensitive and emotional. While this may be true for some people, or even common in certain subcultures, it is not a universal feeling among women (and really probably stems from a lot of problematic social narratives, but let’s not get into that now)
That is an awesome point that would be a great topic for a thread. Thats heavy duty intellectual academic stuff. Laplacedemon I think you a guy, and thank you for this last academic poiint. Thats deep
Dude, violent rape and sex are vastly different things
Seriously, how long do I have to wait until we can just assume it’s true?
‘Yaz I hear what your saying. I do not believe the women.’ Samuel
‘I remember a women who lived on the opposite end of our dormitory. We wer talking and she said that she thinks men think of one thing-sex.’ Samuel
So…You believe her, of course (since her beliefs back up what you already wanted to believe). This one woman’s experiences invalidate the experiences of all these women on this very forum who are directly contradicting her?
You’ve ranted and raved about how men should be celibate because they cannot be trusted around women. You won’t carpool with a woman because you may have to experience desire by being in close proximity, which you apparently think is sinful. You aren’t capable of seeing women as people, only as sex objects. You keep saying men are the problem…and then you flip out and go into all caps mode, screaming to men that feminists think the worst of men and trying to rally the troops. Are you mad? I mean, seriously. Your thought processes are all over the place, and extremely incoherent. Especially for someone who’s proclaimed themselves an erudite leader of a social movement.
what is this i don’t even. Samuel, I never accused that you have a crush on Holly. Where are you getting that?
Anyone else just looove how the dudes get to be ‘deep”? Me too.
Right now, I am strongly leaning to ‘yes.” Literally. Like I said earlier, Samuel, it sounds like you’re in pain here and you don’t have to be. Get therapy.
I don’t know who said it earlier in this thread, but Samuel is failing the Turing test.
At this point, I’m not even sure he’s human. His language skills and the thread of his thoughts are so random and chaotic. Maybe an advanced bot designed to confuse and frustrate feminists. And if that’s the case…Brilliant!
I have to wonder…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhat_syndrome
I’ve been following along on this thread for a while now, and at this point I’m convinced that what this whole thing is just a baiting tactic.
Samuel wants to be told that men who want sex are disgusting pigs. He wants to be told that being celibate/sensitive/whatever makes you a wimp. He wants other people to confirm that everything he fears and despises about himself are objectively true, or at least perceived to be so by the world around him, because that would mean he’s not responsible for the way he views women, nor is he obliged to challenge his own perceptions.
He’s setting himself up so that his only option is to run away from the problem, rather than facing up to it.
“Samuel wants to be told that men who want sex are disgusting pigs. He wants to be told that being celibate/sensitive/whatever makes you a wimp. He wants other people to confirm that everything he fears and despises about himself are objectively true, or at least perceived to be so by the world around him, because that would mean he’s not responsible for the way he views women, nor is he obliged to challenge his own perceptions.
He’s setting himself up so that his only option is to run away from the problem, rather than facing up to it.”
This is probably the best analysis of this whole thing. Samuel’s behavior definitely sounds like he’s just setting an elaborate trap for himself so that he can be as condescending as he wants. Heck, in various threads, there was a man named Marc who did nearly the exact same thing, only he had better grammar and talked like a high school kid who just read Nietzsche for the first time.
Samuel: As I said before… retention of semen is bad for the prostate, and leads to an increased risk of cancer.
Ejaculation at least twice a week is a great way to reduce the risk of prostate problems.
I must say the flip side of the, “men are only feminists to get laid” argument isn’t all that common. Really… women are only pretending to like sex so the men who are pretending to like women to get sex will be nice to them?
That’s fucked up.
but never heard a woman say how she loves a mans penis veins.
At the risk of TMI… I have. I’ll bet you can find a flickr group for just that topic.
Also… his veins? That’s sort of reductionist. It’s not like there are large groups of men raving about the glories of a really well shaped set of labia minora (and most people, when they say nipples, mean areolae).
So the better analogy would be saying you don’t know of women who say they like to look at cock.
Which is patently absurd, because it’s easy to find.
Twisting the hope for advances in medicine and technology (it is not that far out, that some day, there gonna be artificial wombs) into some insane misogynist bullshit… How disgusting.