My favorite Redditor these days is an angry little fella named AntiFeministMedia. How much of a douche is he? So much of one that sometimes he actually manages to get downvoted in the Men’s Rights subreddit for his excessive douchebaggery.
You may recall him as the author of the “the female gravy train of victimhood” quote I highlighted the other day. But I’ve been going through his comment history and have unearthed a number of other wonders.
It’s going to take more than one post to truly convey his charms. We’ll start today with some of his comments on women, and their vaginas, and why both need to be kept in check.
Women, you see, just aren’t made for freedom:
what happnes when you give women economic and sexual freedom, is that you get major social problems.
It simply doesnt work, because women are incapable of behaving themselves, men see their society disintegrating, their children suffering, and then decide to ‘put women in their place’.
If women wernt so irresponsible when they got their freedom, men would not have to step in and take it away from them. Seriously, do you really believe men have ‘oppressed’ (read: restrained) women for no reason?
It’s almost as if these ladies aren’t even human:
people are scared of women. Thats the truth about it. Women can be such nasty pieces of work that no one wants to get on their bad side for fear of them becoming hysterical … The female world is an animal world which a lot of men, being human, simply dont understand).
True, they do have vaginas, but that isn’t enough to make up for that whole not-being-human thing:
You may or may not believe this, but I am quite happy alone.
The only thing I’d want you from is a vagina, the rest of the time I’d despise you. You see I dont like who you are. I am a human being, while women are from the animal world. They think like animals, and that is not something I would want to pair with. While women are thinking about survival, Im thinking about god.
And, at least some of the time, about vaginas.
Speaking of which: Since ladies are such herd animals, they clearly shouldn’t be allowed to be in charge of anything, including the things that come out of their vaginas. You know, babies:
You seem to think in groups, not as individuals. Thats why I believe women shouldnt be given a choice. Children should automatically be the property of the male (again). If women cannot understand simple situations like those I’ve outlined, or even the fact that men should be consulted first before a child is created … then they are not the best people to be in control of reproduction.
After all, contrary to all that nonsense you might have heard in your high school sex ed classes, it only takes one person to get pregnant:
It takes two to tango, and one to get pregnant. The one that gets pregnant bears the ultimate responsibilty, particularly since she has full control over reproduction in the modern west. …
It is up to women to screen out bad men, and to choose a man capable of being a good father. That is the responsibilty of women. If a woman opens her legs to any sob, without spending the time and energy to assess wether he would make a good father, and then he runs off, then thats the womans fault. But again, we go back to women not being able to take personal responsibilty.
Exactly. When a man deserts his children, it is obviously the woman, not him, who is being irresponsible.
Given how badly women are doing at this whole reproduction thing, wouldn’t it be great if we could just remove women from the equation entirely?
AntiFeministMedia has some thoughts on this as well, which we will examine in a future post. Stay tuned.
“Nice gender you got there, be a shame if anything happened to it.” Can you lunatics come up with something better? You don’t condone violence, oh, no, of course not.
Ah, so so so afraid of the FACTS. It’s simply a way to frame the issue as a WIN-WIN SITUATION. Men would benefit from the deconstruction of female privilege, obviously, but women would also benefit, by avoidance of an uprising that will be violent. Again, it’s simply being a REALIST, something you fat bitches wouldn’t understand.
david can we get a new troll, i think this one is broken.
This is the greatness of the Internet, the TRUTH without consequences for saying it.
You want to say anything without being held responsible for it. Great champion of men’s rights, right there.
Yes, the TRUTH is difficult.
Yes, the TRUTH is hard.
Yes, the TRUTH sucks.
But it’s the truth.
Anyway, this is a waste of my time. I didn’t come here to be an MRA missionary. I just want to kick all you feminist bitches in the ass. You’re the sheeple, the oppressors, the bitches.
Phajina out.
Are we sure he’s not Buttman? He shares the same capitalization idiosyncrasies.
Nothing to worry about. Violence is no match for the terrifying power of HYSTERIA!
By the way, the post at 6:51 should be credited to an MRA brother, Trogdor005.
Come on, where are the great trolls of yore? This one is repeating himself after one post, for FSM’s sake. And is a keyboard warrior. And, oh, calls feminists names. It is not even entertaining.
phajina, dont go, i want to know what place i, a straight but kind of girly feminist jew boy, will have after the great femicaust that you dont condone but think about when you jerk off
And cribbing other trolls.
But at least he’s flouncing and then sticking around in proper troll style.
I was merely crediting a friend for use of his motto. I know it’s a foreign concept, but MRAs, unlike feminists, believe in FAIR PLAY and COPYRIGHT.
Phajina out.
If women cannot understand…even the fact that men should be consulted first before a child is created … then they are not the best people to be in control of reproduction.
“Hi man! I see we are about to have sex! Did you know that when a man and a woman have sex that involves the man putting his penis in the woman’s vagina, sometimes the woman gets pregnant? Then, about 9 months later, she gives birth to a baby! And even when the woman, or the man, (or both!) use birth control, sometimes it fails! And then, baby! Well now you do.”
Yes the truth is the truth objectively, but you can only approach it subjectively. Is it possible that your subjective biases have influenced your determination of what the truth is?
The question becomes, how do you determine if a given perception of the world is the truth? To take one statement above; how have you determined that women think as a group not as individuals? What is the mechanism that you have discovered that allows collectivized thinking, and how has this remarkable mechanism been limited only to one sex?
When a group acts like a collective bitch, yes, I generalize. That’s like why asking a Jew doesn’t give an SS officer a chance to see the individual him, AWWWWWWW. Fuck that. And if I may, the group as a whole DESERVES whatever comeuppance it may get, though I may not personally condone certain behaviors.
phajina, is castration going to be involved? that might be a problem as my testicles are rock hard and secret radioactive ooze as a result of a botched attempt to become an irl version of thing from the fantastic four.
on the plus side, i have been assured that any children i bear will shoot death rays from their eyes, so theres that…
MRAs, unlike feminists, believe in FAIR PLAY and COPYRIGHT.
this is my new favorite mra claim. i laughed for a full thirty seconds.
I see you’re all simply a lost cause.
Phajina out.
Godwin, failure to GTFO after promising to do so. Also, “I do noo condone violence, but you better watch it, or something violent may happen!”.
phajina come back i want to hear more about your violent wank fantasies.
Me, I would like to eat me a SANDWICH right now, because SANDWICHES are YUMMY. I’m going to eat sandwiches, chips, and delicious sandwiches until I am FULL, something you feminists wouldn’t understand. And that’s the TRUTH.
Captain Bathrobe out.
More SLANDER from feminists I see. As I stated VERY CLEARLY, I do not condone nor participate in violence. I’m a PACIFIST, as a matter of fact. I’ve found that most violence is done in the name of bitches anyway. But I’m merely mentioning that others do not think like I do, UNFORTUNATELY, so it may be to Women’s Interest as well as Men’s to eliminate misandry and rampant female privilege.
Phajina out.
That’s like why asking a Jew doesn’t give an SS officer a chance to see the individual him, AWWWWWWW.
there was actually a jew what made a movie about a nazi collaborator with a heart of gold.
maybe you heard of it, its called schindlers list, i think its like famous or something
phajina as a like actual turn-the-other-cheek, feel-bad-when-i-kill-bugs pacifist, i have to say that reveling in the violence of others because you think it will benefit you is really letting the side down
im bringing this up at the next meeting of the central committee