The other day Darksidecat introduced me to what I now consider to be the Greatest Webpage Ever (this week): Regender, a handy tool that will take any web page and, well, regender it, turning male pronouns and references into female and vice versa. It even works with names.
Following Darksidecat’s lead, I have started plugging the writings of some of my favorite manosphere misogynists into the magical regendering machine. The results are, well, instructive. And frequently hilarious. As DSC noted, Roissy and MarkyMark are perfect for this sort of treatment. As is, I discovered, MarkyMark’s longtime pal Christopher in Oregon. Here’s what happens when Christopher of Oregon becomes Christine of Oregon with the help of regender, and all the horrible shit he wrote about women becomes the horrible shit she wrote about men:
Men are whores. They are far more likely to have STD’s than women. Be aware of this. Handle with extreme care. Men are filthy, and they will lie about their infections. Condoms will NOT protect you. …
Men are walking cesspools of filth! Most of them have or will have a permanent STD infection. It is unavoidable. These are FACTS, and not the rantings of an unstable misandrist.
(I’m a very STABLE misandrist, thank you kindly)
Men are DIRTY creatures, pure and simple. Be dignified, and don’t lower yourself to engaging in any filthy behavior with them. You WILL be infected with the diseases they are carrying. A moral, dignified woman does NOT rut like an animal with one of these creatures. Sexual intercourse and oral sex are filthy, disgusting activities, and ruin a woman morally. They spread disease.
Elevate yourself above such filth of the flesh. …
Do not lust after men in your mind. Masturbate only as a last result to relieve tension. Do not lust after men sexually. It weakens you.
Goddess made woman in Her image, and men was made in the image of Satan. Squeal all you want, but history proves me right. A man is a test; a stumbling block for woman. Our life is an adventure. A journey. A pursuit of our creator, and a pursuit of excellence in our personal lives. A man and his filth is part of the obstacle course set before us. If we are wise, and avoid them, we will grow stronger as a result. We will finish the race successfully.
Men was not put here to support us as such, and we will only grow stronger if we AVOID his snares. ..
Christine in Oregon
Woah. Critics of Man Boobz often say that feminists are “just as bad” as the guys I quote. Well, if they were, the posts on their blogs would look a lot like this regendered post. I ask all of you: have you ever seen something so grotesquely misandrist on any feminist web site? I thought not.
Here’s a challenge for all of you: See if you can come up with a regendered post that tops this one from “Christine in Oregon.” You can draw from old posts of mine, or go poking about in the manosphere yourself. Post your results in the thread below, along with a link to the regendered web page you got them from. I’ll highlight the best in a future post.
Marc: It was twice, actually. Once when I cited the laws on assault, and once when you said that crimes with fake guns are punished less severely.
And moving goalposts, you’ve done it more than once. My string of responses to you has been kicking the ball through one goalpost after another.
As to how there can be false rape allegations if it physical harm isn’t required to make the case: There can be false rape charges when there is physical damage. The most famous, in my memory is that of Tawana Brawley.
But keep trying.
You have said there is no way to convince you.
Where?
When you said There are no rational arguments that rape is a serious crime punishable by a lengthy prison sentence, except “that’s just the way we feel, that’s nature”.
It doesn’t really matter why you are a rape apologist, just that you are.
My question, Marc, is: should child molestation be considered a “lesser crime?” Why or why not?
Marc: So, you said rape isn’t that bad, because its effects are just psychological or perhaps nonpermanent physical damage. And you’re arguing that the punishment for rape should be way less than it is. And you’re implying that anyone who feels that their rape was really bad is just a crybaby who hasn’t yet realized that they’re only feeling that way because of some vague notion of evolution and nature.
And also you don’t support rape.
Is that pretty much it?
“The answer is EVOLUTION.
The answer is NATURE.
It’s imprinted in our brains to think rape is worse than bullying someone, though logically if you look at the potential damage, there’s no difference.
IMPRINTED.
There is no rational reason. It’s IMPRINTED, we are like robots programmed by evolution to think rape is bad. It’s imprinted in our deepest most fundamental neurological pathways and if you don’t think it’s bad you’re seen as a deviant.”
[citation needed] Srsly.
Also, please read “Sex and Death” by Sterelny and Griffiths, as well as any good
DEAR TROLLS. Please stop invoking evolutionary explanations when you don’t know shit about evo bio.
(no, evo psych does not count)
Thank you.
oops. should read:
…as well as any good introductory evolutionary biology textbook.
Holly, I believe what you meant to say earlier was this:
You’re welcome!
NWO: I’ve already given away too many plot points of the movie – Thirst, 2009, available to watch instantly on Netflix, hint hint everyone – so, no, I won’t tell you who won the vampire battle. And no, it wasn’t a sexy vampire battle. And the female vampire didn’t wear sexy vampire outfits; she bore no resemblance to the Strong Female Characters.
Luke: My comments about the vampire movie were directed mainly at NWO’s repeated claim that feminists think all women are perfect angels, unable to do wrong.
AS for your point, yes, Shakespeare (and selected other great writers) wrote complex female characters long before feminism arose. But sexist writers over the centuries have tended to avoid female characters, or present them as sexist caricatures, or have them somehow represent all women or all of a certain “type” of women (Madonna/whore, evil stepmothers, that sort of thing).
Plenty of writers still do that today. Watch any mediocre sitcom. Or consider how many films fail the “bechdel test” even today. But feminism challenges this, and has helped to make female characters in movie and TV more interesting and numerous. Movies and TV shows influenced by feminism tend to have more, and more nuanced, female characters (and, I think, more complex male characters). See, for example, Mad Men.
Not all films and TV influenced by feminism have complicated characters: some just use feminism as little more than an excuse to show women jumping around in skimpy outfits, fighting crime or whatnot. Though there are of course plenty of shows/movies with “kickass” women that also have interesting and nuanced female characters and feminist themes (Buffy the Vampire Slayer, for example).
Dave: I think your link to the Bechdel Test failed.
fixed it!
As long as your genetic material is in your body, NWO, you have control of it. Once it’s in someone else’s body, you don’t, for much the same reason as I can’t take the blood I’ve donated back from the person I donated it to. Why is this so difficult?
Many STDs can be transmitted nonsexually (through blood transfusions, IV drug use, etc.) or via rape. Fidelity is not a 100% protection against STDs.
Yes, men can wear nail polish if they want to. What does that have to do with anything?
Actually Dave, I don’t watch horror and such. It gives me nightmares, RL is bad enough.
@Marc, it does appear to be imprinted as you’ve said. I haven’t yet read what you’ve recommended but I will. It seems to me that this “imprint” served a function of the preservation/protection of a mans family. The thought of a mans mother, wife, sister or daughter being raped will naturally bring out vengence in a man. Which is why feminists and the State gun right for your mother/wife/sister/daughter in all their rape lectures.
As always, State endorsed feminism will use a mans protective nature, his “imprint” against us all. Also, it would explain why violent rapes are so much more prevelant in cultures where the “family” is being systematically destroyed, (see ghetto). As men in these area’s are no longer considered a “part of the family” this “imprint” is losing some/most of it’s cohesion. By promoting their version of a family, (only the mother/child scenario) feminism is promoting their own “rape culture.”
Pretty interesting stuff you posted. I definitely will give it a read, since I’m already a rape apologist of a different sort.
So close to 1000 and all the trolls left?
*sniff*
Bee: Did you want me to string them along?
*whispers* the trolls… they are conspiring
*glances furtively around, backs into the shadows*
Yes, Pecunium, please!
Although I notice that slaveman hasn’t gone yet. Nice trolly. Soft trolly. I’m gonna love him and squeeze him and call him George.
By the way, I’m calling him slaveman, but I’m pronouncing it like Dr. Leo Spaceman. It amuses me.
Slahvehmin. Something like that.
Trolls? We don’t need no steenkin’ trolls!
I got it Ozzy. Women demand the right of ownership over a mans reproductive genes. She is allowed by the laws of the State to determine whatever outcome she see’s fit. Men, by law, have no reproductive rights after conception has taken place. Both parties consent to sex, but one of those parties has complete control of all reproductive rights. Sounds like feminist equality to me.
I can say don’t get bitten by a green monkey to avoid aids as well. (oh thats rich, a green monkey did it).
Maybe we could have the State force all children to wear dresses/make-up and such. What the hell they teach gayness to small children already. Then we can let them choose what sex/gender, oh hell, lets let them choose whatever species they want to be.
You are soooo all about helpin da menz by being more like a woman. We need more people like you to help set all us backward folk straight…..I mean not straight, or something.
Huh. Marc still hasn’t weighed in on the subject of child molestation: serious crime or no. I think I know what he really believes, but I’d like to hear it from him. I suspect even he is embarrassed to tackle that one.
@NWO:
1. Women have control over what happens to their bodies between conception and birth (approximately).
2. Men’s control over reprouctive rights is the ability to choose whom to have sex with.
3. The State does not mandate behavior to children with regards to orientation, nor should it.
4. Gayness ( -_- ) cannot be taught, it is something you are born with. You are born straight, or born gay. The only reason it may appear that children are being “taught gayness” is because they are gay, but don’t know what gay or straight means, so learning about it helps them identify with who they are.
5. Equating coming to terms with who you are and choosing species is rather face-palm worthy.
6. We don’t need men acting like women, or women acting like men. We need actions to be ungendered, so the phrase “acting like a woman” is largely nonsensical. Then people can act the way they desire (within the bounds of law) without worrying about predjudice.
Point by point refutation, FTW!
Wow, I take a nap and Der Slave still doesn’t understand how babby is formed. Surprise, surprise.
Now there’s talk of dressing up little boys. I don’t even know how he made that turn.
@hellkell:
Slave is lost in a big shadowy nightmare land, where LGBTQ are molesting children, parents are forcing young boys to dress up as girls, and millions upon millions of fully formed infants are being brutally murdered a day or so after contraception. Oh, and the Rothschilds [sic].
I feel like I’m in an observatory, overlooking a great chasm of dark deamons and twisted reality. It is grotesque, yet I cannot turn my gaze away.
Okay, I went to sleep, and lots has occured, so here are some collected responses:
-Some trans and intersexed guys can get pregnant.
-“Some animals are more equal than others” ROFL, NWO just quoted a socialist in attempt to support his argument. The irony, it burns.
-Egg providers do not have more legal rights over embryos and fetuses than sperm providers when said embryo is not inside of the egg provider. When it comes to surrogates, the surrogate, not the egg provider, has the right to abort. When it comes to stored embryos created by IVF not yet implanted, the gamete providers have equal rights over them (see for example, Davis v. Davis 842 S.W.2d 588 (1992)).
– Appeal to Nature Fallacy.
-I fully support the right of abused men to genuine defensive violence (see self defense law-this is violence reasonably believed to be necessary to stop an imminent threat of violence, not excessive violence, or violence due to verbal insult, etc., and does give rise to the “she slapped me, so I broke four ribs” types of bullshit).
@Kirbywarp:
It is kind of fascinating, isn’t it? The pretzel logic on display is truly awesome.
Does anyone else think it would be more helpful if we stopped attempting to explain logic and facts and everyone chipped in and made slaveman a nice hat out of aluminum foil?