The other day Darksidecat introduced me to what I now consider to be the Greatest Webpage Ever (this week): Regender, a handy tool that will take any web page and, well, regender it, turning male pronouns and references into female and vice versa. It even works with names.
Following Darksidecat’s lead, I have started plugging the writings of some of my favorite manosphere misogynists into the magical regendering machine. The results are, well, instructive. And frequently hilarious. As DSC noted, Roissy and MarkyMark are perfect for this sort of treatment. As is, I discovered, MarkyMark’s longtime pal Christopher in Oregon. Here’s what happens when Christopher of Oregon becomes Christine of Oregon with the help of regender, and all the horrible shit he wrote about women becomes the horrible shit she wrote about men:
Men are whores. They are far more likely to have STD’s than women. Be aware of this. Handle with extreme care. Men are filthy, and they will lie about their infections. Condoms will NOT protect you. …
Men are walking cesspools of filth! Most of them have or will have a permanent STD infection. It is unavoidable. These are FACTS, and not the rantings of an unstable misandrist.
(I’m a very STABLE misandrist, thank you kindly)
Men are DIRTY creatures, pure and simple. Be dignified, and don’t lower yourself to engaging in any filthy behavior with them. You WILL be infected with the diseases they are carrying. A moral, dignified woman does NOT rut like an animal with one of these creatures. Sexual intercourse and oral sex are filthy, disgusting activities, and ruin a woman morally. They spread disease.
Elevate yourself above such filth of the flesh. …
Do not lust after men in your mind. Masturbate only as a last result to relieve tension. Do not lust after men sexually. It weakens you.
Goddess made woman in Her image, and men was made in the image of Satan. Squeal all you want, but history proves me right. A man is a test; a stumbling block for woman. Our life is an adventure. A journey. A pursuit of our creator, and a pursuit of excellence in our personal lives. A man and his filth is part of the obstacle course set before us. If we are wise, and avoid them, we will grow stronger as a result. We will finish the race successfully.
Men was not put here to support us as such, and we will only grow stronger if we AVOID his snares. ..
Christine in Oregon
Woah. Critics of Man Boobz often say that feminists are “just as bad” as the guys I quote. Well, if they were, the posts on their blogs would look a lot like this regendered post. I ask all of you: have you ever seen something so grotesquely misandrist on any feminist web site? I thought not.
Here’s a challenge for all of you: See if you can come up with a regendered post that tops this one from “Christine in Oregon.” You can draw from old posts of mine, or go poking about in the manosphere yourself. Post your results in the thread below, along with a link to the regendered web page you got them from. I’ll highlight the best in a future post.
Marc, I suppose in your world child molestation shouldn’t be a serious crime, either?
Not to change the subject here or anything — wait, what is the subject? — but I wanted to repost something that I posted when NWO was away sleeping or working like a dog or giving birth to a poo or whatever it is that he was doing:
Last night I watched a vampire movie (Thirst, 2009), in which the lady vampire was a lot more evil than the man vampire. And the least sympathetic character in the movie was another woman. And yet I loved the movie!
At one point I actively found myself rooting for the man vampire to kill the lady vampire!
Does that make me a bad feminist? Or does it make me a feminist who thinks that female characters in films should be as complicated and flawed as male characters — just like in real life — and that female characters in movies should run the gamut from good to evil just like male characters? And that sometimes this means movies in which the female characters are worse people (or vampires) than the male characters, and that this is perfectly fine and good?
Gosh, it’s almost as if my kind of feminism is sort of premised on the notion that women are NOT perfect princesses, but, you know, are human beings with good points and bad points just like men?
Marc: So your examples support my position not yours.
No, because you are saying the “harm” of rape is minor. I am also saying the “Harm” of taking a fraction of one percent (and a really small fraction, at that) shouldn’t be punished the same as taking a car from someone who only has one car.
So it’s not a strawman, it’s an analogy.
That you then make the same sort of teleological argument about “gay rape” is why we say you aren’t being consistent. It’s not like it’s real harm to have a cock shoved up your ass, or be made to give a blowjob. It’s not like someone blinded you.
The point is: I would (until someone gives me a cogent argument why rape without bodily harm is more serious than bullying someone into suicide)
But you discounted mine: 1: I agreed with you, bullying someone to suicide is at least as criminal as rape. I also said that problems of causal proof are harder, and the means of testing it aren’t present.
But the real fact is… you are are rape apologist. You want to make anything which doesn’t have a woman beaten = “not rape”. No one is going to be able to make what you consider a, “cogent argument” because you are arguing in bad faith, equivocating, question begging and moving goalposts.
So, go play with whatever it is you play with when you aren’t campainging in favor of rape while pretending to argue about the best way to punish it.
(That last comment of mine was mostly directed at NWO.)
Mangina, David. It makes you a bad mangina.
NWO: Injury is not a legal requirement for assault. Is that clear enough?
If I point a pistol at you, or pull a knife on you, that’s all I have to do to be convicted of Assault with a Deadly Weapon.
Go on, read the statutes I quoted, they are right there. It’s very short. You can do it. I know you can.
@Alex
If you believe you can create life from nothing than do so. Otherwise nothing extra was contributed. A female contributes 1 egg, nothing else is needed.
If a woman concieves and the next day falls into a coma. She can be fed intrevenously and give birth. She wakes up a year later and someone says here you baby. A biological function has taken place. What extra did she put forth? Nothing. When a pregnant woman is sleeping is the extra still taking place? Women have actually given birth who didn’t even know they were pregnant. I know you’ve all heard the stories. I guaruntee if a pregnant woman goes about her business she’ll give birth. No extra effort is required.
luke123: Do you think that women should be allowed abuse back in retaliation, and advocate for special treatment in court to forgive them if they do ?
Can you put that into English, or provide a link (to Praxis) so I have some idea what you think you are saying here?
@Mr. Slave,
So what bodily function does a male do, besides a sperm, that ze can fall into a coma and be presented with a baby when ze wakes up?
Dave, Did the female vampire win? I’ll bet she did. And I’m sure it was sexy too.
It’s only for Mississippi, and you’ll note that kidnapping, armed robbery, capital murder, and rape all have punishments of up to life. Out of the results of those crimes, only one is permanent in the way that you’re talking about. In a sense, you appear to be arguing for a complete overhaul of the CJ system to fit your idiosyncratic wishes.
Look, attempted murder is also punishable very seriously though there is no objective damage.
It’s about the damage that can possibly occur by this crime. If you threaten someone with guns to give you their money it’s not a big step to actually kill someone. That’s why a robbery with fake guns will not be punished that severe.
Rape on the other hand is just unconsensual intercourse.
That’s also the reason why rape is such a problematic crime, so difficult to persecute and so prone to miscarriage of justice.
Good night.
Slaveman: How did the imaginary woman and/or her imaginary boyfriend know she was pregnant at one week, and what was this magical substance he gave her that caused an abortion without any risk of harmful effects to the person who had the abortion? If we’re going to be setting legal precedent here on manboobz, I wanna be sure to have all the facts.
You know, all this stuff that NWO is talking about is why I support more research into the male birth control pill, so we can debunk him by saying “why didn’t he take his pill then?”
That said: NWO, men have several options if they don’t want Teh Baybieez, of varying effectiveness; the more ineffective methods can be combined. They can engage in outercourse or other sexual activities that can’t lead to pregnancy. They can use condoms, which they should anyway unless they’re in committed relationships in which STD test results have been exchanged. They can attempt to screen for and only sleep with women who don’t want children. They can pull out. If certain that they don’t want children, they can get a vasectomy.
Alex, the only extra you did was terminate a seperate life, with Big Daddy’s blessing.
NWO: A female contributes 1 egg, nothing else is needed.
Ok… We can test this. We get an egg-donor, put the egg in your hand, and you can whack off onto it.
Nine months later you should have a baby.
” it’s almost as if my kind of feminism is sort of premised on the notion that women are NOT perfect princesses, but, you know, are human beings with good points and bad points just like men?”
That has nothing to do with feminism. There have been evil women in fiction since the old fairytales. The evil stephmother, the evil witch who eats children….
I think she should too, NWO. Buy sometimes nature provides accidents without any human’s consent. And sometimes people make dumb mistakes.
Either way, my view is that a woman has the right to control who lives in her uterus, and if the embryo can’t live anywhere else, that’s the embryo’s problem.
There should be a term for someone who insists on trying to have conversations they’re not intellectually capable of having.
What’s your real name, NWOslave? Because I think we should name that term after you.
@Pecunium,
I will rephrase. Do you think it is acceptable to advocate for laws that would decriminalize women if they beat men ?
How exactly is that advocating equality ?
The link is here:http://www.examiner.com/domestic-violence-in-national/praxis-international-encourages-domestic-violence-when-properly-applied
@Mr. Slave,
Yes, I did. But that’s not what I asked you. *ahem* A female human does two bodily functions for a baby to be born: ze releases an egg and then ze carries it for nine months (or little less if it’s premature). Does a male human do two bodily functions for a baby to be born? I know ze ejaculates, but what else does ze do?
Marc:
Woman charged in with bank robbery, used toy gun
And this one:
Alabama man gets 15 years for failed toy gun robbery
“There have been evil women in fiction since the old fairytales. The evil stephmother, the evil witch who eats children….”
Ah yes, but the way feminism views the world is different. We don’t have to see each woman as either a maiden, a matron, or a crone. A woman can be a little of each if she chooses, or none of them at all. She can be herself, and I don’t have to put labels on her to feel comfortable about it.
And a character in a story can be a character in a story, and not define how I view All Women.
Okay, new idea. Instead of having an abortion, I hand over custody of the fetus to the father. Since men and women contribute the same to reproduction, he should have no problem bringing it to term!
…God, this is like trying to explain why clouds aren’t made of cotton balls.
ozymandias42, but once the conception has taken place, women/feminists reserve all rights to a mans genetic material. Isn’t that right? At her command a man may or may not be granted a child.
If the relationship is “committed” as in loyalty/fidelity STDs are an impossibility. A little hint, STDs can be wiped out by loyalty, but of course that runs counter to responsibly owning your sexuality. A feminist no-no.
I see, men can screen and pull out and vasectomies. What else can men do? Is it OK for mommies to paint little boys up with make-up and nail polish and dress them up like little princesses to break all those bad gender barriers? You’re so all about the menz aren’t ya?
Gee, it all sounds too good to be true. Ozzy cares so damn much about da menz.
@Mr. Slave, Slave man,
A female human does two bodily functions for a baby to be born: ze releases an egg and then ze carries it for nine months (or little less if it’s premature). Does a male human do two bodily functions for a baby to be born? I know ze ejaculates, but what else does ze do?