The other day Darksidecat introduced me to what I now consider to be the Greatest Webpage Ever (this week): Regender, a handy tool that will take any web page and, well, regender it, turning male pronouns and references into female and vice versa. It even works with names.
Following Darksidecat’s lead, I have started plugging the writings of some of my favorite manosphere misogynists into the magical regendering machine. The results are, well, instructive. And frequently hilarious. As DSC noted, Roissy and MarkyMark are perfect for this sort of treatment. As is, I discovered, MarkyMark’s longtime pal Christopher in Oregon. Here’s what happens when Christopher of Oregon becomes Christine of Oregon with the help of regender, and all the horrible shit he wrote about women becomes the horrible shit she wrote about men:
Men are whores. They are far more likely to have STD’s than women. Be aware of this. Handle with extreme care. Men are filthy, and they will lie about their infections. Condoms will NOT protect you. …
Men are walking cesspools of filth! Most of them have or will have a permanent STD infection. It is unavoidable. These are FACTS, and not the rantings of an unstable misandrist.
(I’m a very STABLE misandrist, thank you kindly)
Men are DIRTY creatures, pure and simple. Be dignified, and don’t lower yourself to engaging in any filthy behavior with them. You WILL be infected with the diseases they are carrying. A moral, dignified woman does NOT rut like an animal with one of these creatures. Sexual intercourse and oral sex are filthy, disgusting activities, and ruin a woman morally. They spread disease.
Elevate yourself above such filth of the flesh. …
Do not lust after men in your mind. Masturbate only as a last result to relieve tension. Do not lust after men sexually. It weakens you.
Goddess made woman in Her image, and men was made in the image of Satan. Squeal all you want, but history proves me right. A man is a test; a stumbling block for woman. Our life is an adventure. A journey. A pursuit of our creator, and a pursuit of excellence in our personal lives. A man and his filth is part of the obstacle course set before us. If we are wise, and avoid them, we will grow stronger as a result. We will finish the race successfully.
Men was not put here to support us as such, and we will only grow stronger if we AVOID his snares. ..
Christine in Oregon
Woah. Critics of Man Boobz often say that feminists are “just as bad” as the guys I quote. Well, if they were, the posts on their blogs would look a lot like this regendered post. I ask all of you: have you ever seen something so grotesquely misandrist on any feminist web site? I thought not.
Here’s a challenge for all of you: See if you can come up with a regendered post that tops this one from “Christine in Oregon.” You can draw from old posts of mine, or go poking about in the manosphere yourself. Post your results in the thread below, along with a link to the regendered web page you got them from. I’ll highlight the best in a future post.
@redlocker
Nothing a man does is praiseworthy. Only women matter. State law/MSM/Corporations all tell us so on a daily basis.
Sorry about the previous comment. Quote tag fail on my part.
Marc: re. rational arguments against rape, see above. That a person has domain over hir body is a central, and very old, concept in law. So, A hitting B on the head with a stick is a crime and tort, and so is A hitting B in the vagina with a penis. Get it?
No, I don’t get it. If you hit someone it causes physical damage. Remember: many people voluntarily have sex in their lives but few people want to get beaten.
And in the most but the very serious cases, beating someone is still punished less than rape, that didn’t even cause physical damage.
There are no rational arguments that rape is a serious crime punishable by a lengthy prison sentence, except “that’s just the way we feel, that’s nature”.
Be more precise Bee. An unborn person as no agency over their body. They have NO rights. Women dictate their right to life.
…Something occured to me…NWO, if you hate corporations so much…why are you working? Heck, in a few posts of yours, you seem to take pride in your work (if only to make comebacks against the EEEEEEEVIL LAZY FEMINAZIS AND THEIR MANGINA SHILLS, but whatever).
Isn’t that…hypocritical, to criticize corporations for supposedly supporting the femenist agenda, yet to do work for them?
NWO, Bee was precise, an unborn person has to be able to survive outside the woman’s body. A clump of cells is not a person.
@redlocker
I work so I can live. The problem is the corruption that is the feminist/communist influence.
Hey feminists. Here is what an organization championing men’s right says. What do you think?
Men arrested for domestic violence require an aggressive advocacy program to take up the cause of men who fight back. Today, increasing numbers of advocacy programs are using gender-neutral language to describe their services. When battered men are arrested, advocates are told they cannot advocate for these men because they are not victims but the offenders. In a culture where dominant understandings of equity and fairness rely on the denial of the reality of differences, the strategies we advocate will initially be perceived as unfair or as expressing a double standard. Men’s advocates will need to become sophisticated and adept at explaining the gendered nature of violence and the meaning of pursuing equality in social contexts where people are clearly not equal in power and social resources
It is important to resist seeing advocacy for men who use violence as an issue of bias or special treatment. It should be remembered that much of the battered men’s movement’s work has been to challenge the social sanctioning of female violence in the private sphere and to end the protections afforded such female privilege by the criminal justice system and other institutions. Every effort we have made has met with resistance and claims that we seek to establish a double standard. We have consistently fought against such efforts to obscure men’s realities. Battered men who use violence to protect themselves from brutal partners deserve no less from us.
Even in your dairy job there’s a feminist/communist influence?
Your unneeded pain statement is a strawman, and you know. So is your no violence response.
Not a strawman you just haven’t clarified your position (and you still didn’t do it now).
So, if Nature is Ethics…how do you relate to people when you go to work? Heck, there is no workforce in the savannah, therefore I shouldn’t work either, simply because it’s nature.
Why should that be an ethical question? If you are nice to your customers you don’t do that because of ethical reasons you just to sell more.
And who says there’s a moral obligation to go to work if you have enough money nobody is forcing you to work.
@hellkell
You’re a clump of cells. The only reason you can live now is you haven’t been killed by an accident/intentionally. That clump of cells you were before is no different. You weren’t killed intentionally is the only reason your here today.
However, saying that a person has domain over their own body is an important legal theory.
Is it ok to kill you siamnese twin? Or is that a separate body even if (s)he is connected to you?
You really don’t get it, do you? Well, we’ve been down this road before with you and it stops now.
Except for this: No, you’re a clump.
NWO: What Law. Cite it (And no, the nonsense about there are 600 million laws isn’t a citation. If you need an example I showed you how to do it. I used two, California Code of Evidence 1101 and the Federal Rules of Evidence 404 (b): You can do it).
As to wars, you were the one who said,
Men die are maimed from dangerous work/military to protect YOU in far greater numbers, (nearing 100% compared to women). Yet if I bring that up it’ll be met with mockery, not praise.
So you want men to be praised for killing people, QED. Even thought women dying to have babies is 100 percent; not one man has ever died from being pregnant.
Also… please show me where I said any of the things in this statement of yours: You simply “agree” that it’s okay dokey that , “women don’t need any corroboration of their claims, but men and boys are arrested based solely on even the far-fetched say-so of any woman or girl…eliminated the requirement of force…legally forbade naming rape accusers…lengthened and even eliminated statutes of limitations for rape, ect, ect, ect.”
Because I’ve not, and you are lying.
I’ve said that trials are needed, and facts presented, and on conviction, punishments handed out. I’ve said that the punishment for false accusation should be handed down when someone is convicted of it, and that when there is evidence of a false accusation that charges should be preferrred.
You want rape allegations to be different from all other crimes.
NWO, Bee was precise, an unborn person has to be able to survive outside the woman’s body. A clump of cells is not a person.
so the definition of “person” depends on the progress of medicine? Not long ago many unborn babies that can survive today couldn’t survive.
Of course hellkell. Quotas demand women are hired in equal numbers. In every dairy women are “in charge” of a dept. that didn’t exist years ago. The work in a “lab” so to speak. where they weigh the bottles/product to ensure each random bottle has the same amount. They also do manual labor. The unions lowered the standard of the amount of work needed to be completed to accomodate what a woman can lift/move about the buildings.
This of course added substantially to the cost of the product.
The bottle making facilities are the same way.
@Pecunium
Rape allegations are different from all other charges. All it takes is a womans word. No evidence is needed other than a woman speaking.
NWO: Rape allegations are different from all other charges. All it takes is a womans word. No evidence is needed other than a woman speaking.
Citation needed (as above, I cited the laws I referred to).
Why should I believe you? Just because you said it? Where is the evidence, other than NWO speaking?
Marc: I think you should be able to consume drugs! Don’t argue with the social libertarian. 😛
Also, you have officially been ordered to listen to 24 hours of rape survivor testimony before you are allowed to comment on rape EVER AGAIN.
NWO: I praise all sorts of men! My boyfriend is a kind, attractive, intelligent man who treats me far better than I deserve. Joey Ramone is the best singer of all time and no one is allowed to question this. Neil Gaiman has written books that have changed my life. My father is a good man who has sacrificed a lot to do his best by his children. Obama is trying his hardest as president given all the problems he has and I think people don’t give him enough credit. My friend Harry loaned me the entire Dresden Files series once, which is the BEST THING EVER.
Marc, my postion is that compared to human interaction, Nature seems to be static. What I mean is: It doesn’t act based on anything. It just moves, with it’s own will. To act as nature does, however, in the realm of human interaction is ridiculous. With human interaction, there is context and nuance, both of which one has to be aware of or else other people’s lives could be violated. Ultimately, in using the volition of nature as the basis of your own morality, you ultimately suffer, too. No one will want to deal with someone who disregards morality simply because the African Savannah has no Constituion, because such a person could be murderer or just a plain jerkass.
Earlier, it seemed as though you were dismissing the whole issue of rape with an argument by nature. Is that what you’re saying, or is it something else?
@hellkell…Thats why you turn to the State as your deity. To ease anything you deem a burden. If that means another must forfeit it’s very existence, you’re good with that. The State will call it pro-choice to make it sound like a “right.” I mean they’re not going to call it the wholesale slaughter of the unborn. Your comfort/freedom of any discomfort is bought at the expense of another’s right to live.
NWO: Where is the law which says any accusation = conviction for rape?
So you want men to be praised for killing people, QED.
What about being praised to kill people to propagate womens rights like in Afghanistan?
Even thought women dying to have babies is 100 percent; not one man has ever died from being pregnant.
But now pregnancy is much more safer than going to war (even if you’re part of a powerful modern army).
Death from pregnancy complications (US) : 14.5 per 100,000
US military deaths in Afghanistan 2010: 680 per 100,000
In the good old times pregnancy was much, much more dangerous (but the wars were also much worse).
@Pecunium
Any woman can claim rape/sexual harrassment and a man will be arrested. There is no due process. Her word is the evidence. This is a fact.
If I said someone stole from me, there has to be something other than someones word in the way of evidence.
Please note that with my generalization, “Nature”, I mean the whole realm. Foxes move, eat and breed due to base instinct, with little awareness of anything else. Rain forests are full of species, and can be very dangerous, with every organism doing whatever it takes for their survival. Everything is about basic instinct. Earlier, I had taken your argument to mean that rape is just a basic instinct and that one should deal it, but it looks like that is not the case. If so, I’m sorry for misinterpretting your argument.
God, I feel stupid now.